Correlation Between Mean Arterial Pressure and Capillary Refill Time in Patients with Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Predicting sepsis at emergency department triage: Implementing clinical and laboratory markers within the first nursing assessment to enhance diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND

Early identification of sepsis in the emergency department (ED) triage is both valuable and challenging. Numerous studies have endeavored to pinpoint clinical and biochemical criteria to assist clinicians in the prompt diagnosis of sepsis, but few studies have assessed the efficacy of these criteria in the ED triage setting. The aim of the study was to explore the accuracy of clinical and laboratory markers evaluated at the triage level in identifying patients with sepsis.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in a large academic urban hospital, implementing a triage protocol aimed at early identification of septic patients based on clinical and laboratory markers. A multidisciplinary panel of experts reviewed cases to ensure accurate identification of septic patients. Variables analyzed included: Charlson comorbidity index, mean arterial pressure (MAP), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PetCO2), white cell count, eosinophil count, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, procalcitonin, and lactate.

RESULTS

A total of 235 patients were included. Multivariable analysis identified procalcitonin ≥1 ng/mL (OR 5.2; p < 0.001); CRP-to-albumin ratio ≥32 (OR 6.6; p < 0.001); PetCO2 ≤ 28 mmHg (OR 2.7; p = 0.031), and MAP <85 mmHg (OR 7.5; p < 0.001) as independent predictors for sepsis. MAP ≥85 mmHg, CRP/albumin ratio <32, and procalcitonin <1 ng/mL demonstrated negative predictive values for sepsis of 90%, 89%, and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underscores the significance of procalcitonin and mean arterial pressure, while introducing CRP/albumin ratio and PetCO2 as important variables to consider in the very initial assessment of patients with suspected sepsis in the ED.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Early identification of sepsis since the emergency department (ED) triage is challenging Implementing the ED triage protocol with simple clinical and laboratory markers allows to recognize patients with sepsis with a very good discriminatory power (AUC 0.88).

Association between average mean arterial pressure and 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis and primary hypertension: a retrospective analysis

Sepsis and hypertension pose significant health risks, yet the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) target for resuscitation remains uncertain. This study investigates the association between average MAP (a-MAP) within the initial 24 h of intensive care unit admission and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and primary hypertension using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database. Multivariable Cox regression assessed the association between a-MAP and 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses constructed survival curves, while restricted cubic splines (RCS) illustrated the nonlinear relationship between a-MAP and 30-day mortality. Subgroup analyses ensured robustness. The study involved 8,810 patients. Adjusted hazard ratios for 30-day mortality in the T1 group (< 73 mmHg) and T3 group (≥ 80 mmHg) compared to the T2 group (73-80 mmHg) were 1.25 (95% CI 1.09-1.43, P = 0.001) and 1.44 (95% CI 1.25-1.66, P < 0.001), respectively. RCS revealed a U-shaped relationship (non-linearity: P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed no significant interactions. Maintaining an a-MAP of 73 to 80 mmHg may be associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality. Further validation through prospective randomized controlled trials is warranted.

Low Versus High Blood Pressure Targets in Critically Ill and Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

Hypotension is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill and perioperative patients. However, these assumptions are supported by observational studies. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aims to compare the impact of lower versus higher blood pressure targets on mortality.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Scholar from inception to February 10, 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized trials comparing lower versus higher blood pressure targets in the management of critically ill and perioperative settings.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up available. This review was registered in the Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42023452928.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 2940 studies identified by the search string, 28 (12 in critically ill and 16 in perioperative settings) were included totaling 15,672 patients. Patients in the low blood pressure target group had lower mortality (23 studies included: 1019/7679 [13.3%] vs. 1103/7649 [14.4%]; relative risk 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%). This corresponded to a 97.4% probability of any increase in mortality with a Bayesian approach. These findings were mainly driven by studies performed in the ICU setting and with treatment lasting more than 24 hours; however, the magnitude and direction of the results were similar in the majority of sensitivity analyses including the analysis restricted to low risk of bias studies. We also observed a lower rate of atrial fibrillation and fewer patients requiring transfusion in low-pressure target groups. No differences were found in the other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on pooled randomized trial evidence, a lower compared with a higher blood pressure target results in a reduction of mortality, atrial fibrillation, and transfusion requirements. Lower blood pressure targets may be beneficial but there is ongoing uncertainty. However, the present meta-analysis does not confirm previous findings and recommendations. These results might inform future guidelines and promote the study of the concept of protective hemodynamics.

Prolonged capillary refill time and short-term mortality of critically ill patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prolonged capillary refill time (CRT) is an indicator of poor peripheral perfusion. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association of prolonged CRT and mortality of critically ill patients.

METHODS

To achieve the objective of this meta-analysis, we conducted a thorough search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science to identify relevant observational studies with longitudinal follow-up. The Cochrane Q test was utilized to assess between-study heterogeneity, and the I2 statistic was calculated to estimate the degree of heterogeneity. We employed random-effects models to combine the outcomes, considering the potential influence of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Eleven studies, encompassing 11,659 critically ill patients were included. During follow-up durations within hospitalization to 3 months, 1247 (10.7%) patients died. The pooled results indicated that a prolonged CRT at early phase of admission was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39 to 2.16, p < 0.001; I2 = 60%). Subgroup analyses showed that the association was not significantly modified by study design (prospective or retrospective), etiology of diseases (infection, non-infection, or mixed), or cutoff of CRT (>3 s, 3.5 s, or 4 s). The association between CRT and mortality was weaker in studies with multivariate analysis (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.60, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) as compared to that derived from studies of univariate analysis (RR: 6.27, 95% CI: 3.29 to 11.97, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged CRT at admission may be a predictor of increased short-term mortality of critically ill patients.

Effect on capillary refill time of volume expansion and increase of the norepinephrine dose in patients with septic shock

BACKGROUND

Capillary refill time (CRT) has been suggested as a variable to follow during the course of septic shock. We systematically investigated the effects on CRT of volume expansion and norepinephrine.

METHODS

In 69 septic shock patients, we recorded mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), and 5 consecutive CRT measurements (video method, standardized pressure applied on the fingertip) before and after a 500-mL saline infusion in 33 patients and before and after an increase of the norepinephrine dose in 36 different patients. Fluid responders were defined by an increase in CI ≥ 15%, and norepinephrine responders by an increase in MAP ≥ 15%.

RESULTS

The least significant change of CRT was 23%, so that changes in CRT were considered significant if larger than 23%. With volume expansion, CRT remained unchanged on average in patients with baseline CRT < 3 s (n = 7) and in all but one patient with baseline CRT ≥ 3 s in whom fluid increased CI < 15% (n = 13 "fluid non-responders"). In fluid responders with baseline CRT ≥ 3 s (n = 13), CRT decreased in 8 patients and remained unchanged in the others, exhibiting a dissociation between CI and CRT responses. The proportion of patients included > 24 h after starting norepinephrine was higher in patients with such a dissociation than in the other ones (60% vs. 0%, respectively). Norepinephrine did not change CRT significantly (except in one patient) if baseline CRT was ≥ 3 s and the increase in MAP < 15% (n = 6). In norepinephrine responders with prolonged baseline CRT (n = 11), it increased in 4 patients and remained unchanged in the other ones, which exhibited a dissociation between MAP and CRT responses.

CONCLUSIONS

In septic shock patients with prolonged CRT, CRT very rarely improves with treatment when volume expansion increases cardiac output < 15% and increasing norepinephrine increases MAP < 15%. When the effects of fluid infusion on cardiac output and of norepinephrine on MAP are significant, the response of CRT is variable, as it decreases in some patients and remains stable in others which exhibit a dissociation between changes in macrohemodynamic variables and in CRT. In this regard, CRT behaves as a marker of microcirculation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT04870892). Registered January15, 2021. Ethics committee approval CE SRLF 21-25.

Successful Use of Methylene Blue in Catecholamine-Resistant Septic Shock: A Case Report and Short Literature Review

Despite efforts to improve treatment outcomes, mortality in septic shock remains high. In some patients, despite the use of several adrenergic drugs, features of refractory vasoplegic shock with progressive multiorgan failure are observed. We present a case report of the successful reversal of vasoplegic shock following the use of methylene blue, a selective inhibitor of the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase, which prevents vasodilation in response to inflammatory cytokines. We also briefly review the literature.

Insights into Hemodynamic Features of Survivors and the Deceased with Acute Brain Injury: A Step Forward Tailored Treatment

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary artery catheters are widely used for hemodynamical monitoring in critically ill patients. Acute brain injury is among the severe conditions treated in an intensive care unit. The advanced monitoring of hemodynamical parameters, fluid balance and adequate administered treatment based on those values are components of goal-directed therapy.

METHODS

A prospective observational study included adult patients who were hospitalized in the ICU due to acute bran injury, excluding brain oedema after cardiac arrest. Each patient had PAC inserted and hemodynamic data were collected during the first 3 days of the ICU stay every 6 h. Patients were divided into two groups based on the endpoint: the survivors and the deceased.

RESULTS

Length of stay in hospital differed between patiens. All patients, regardless of their outcome, had noradrenaline administered. The initial values of PAP differed between the groups (p = 0.05). There were positive correlations noticed between noradrenaline dose, CVP and fluid balance when compared to PCWP in a group of survivors and a positive correlation in the fluid balance when compared to PAP and PVRI. Lactate serum concentrations presented a correlation with the dose of noradrenaline in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Upon acute brain injury, values of PVRI and PAP increase. This is corelated with fluid load and worsened by an excessive fluid treatment in the case of an inconsiderate approach for stabilizing the patient hemodynamically. PAC may present limited advantages in terms of PAP and PVRI control during the treatment.