Toweill DL, Kovarik WD, Carr R, Kaplan D, Lai S, Bratton S, Goldstein B. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate variability during propofol anesthesia for short-duration procedures in children.
Pediatr Crit Care Med 2003;
4:308-14. [PMID:
12831412 DOI:
10.1097/01.pcc.0000074260.93430.6a]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether heart rate variability metrics provide an accurate method of monitoring depth of anesthesia, assessing the response to painful stimuli, and assessing neuroautonomic regulation of cardiac activity in children receiving propofol anesthesia for short-duration procedures.
DESIGN
Prospective, case series.
SETTING
Sixteen-bed pediatric intensive care unit, oncology unit, and endoscopy suite in a tertiary care children's hospital and ophthalmology examination rooms in an associated eye institute.
PATIENTS
Thirty-three pediatric patients undergoing propofol anesthesia for short procedures.
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Heart rate variability metrics studied included mean, SD, low- and high-frequency power, detrended fluctuation analysis (represented by correlation coefficient, alpha), and approximate entropy. Compared with the initial anesthetized state, we found increased heart rate SD (3.17 +/- 1.31 vs. 7.05 +/- 0.26 bpm, p <.0001), heart rate low-frequency power (3.69 +/- 0.36 vs. 4.48 +/- 0.41 bpm(2)/Hz, p <.0001), heart rate low-/high-frequency ratio (1.47 +/- 0.26 vs. 1.26 +/- 0.24, p =.001), and heart rate alpha (1.12 +/- 0.24 vs. 1.35 +/- 0.21, p <.0001) during painful procedure. Mean heart rate (105.8 +/- 13.4 vs. 101.5 +/- 12.4 bpm, p =.005) and heart rate approximate entropy decreased with painful procedure (0.75 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.53 + 0.16, p <.001), whereas there was no significant change in heart rate high-frequency power (3.04 +/- 0.63 vs. 3.16 +/- 0.71 bpm(2)/Hz, p =.26).
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that power spectral analysis of heart rate variability may be an accurate and clinically useful measure of depth of propofol anesthesia. We speculate that high-frequency heart rate power during propofol anesthesia correlates with depth of anesthesia, whereas low-frequency power allows for assessment of the patient's sympathetic response to pain.
Collapse