Evaluation of biochemical the two cyanoacrylates: an experimental study in rats

Use of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives for wound closure in the head and neck region: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Wound closure in the head and neck region is challenging, primarily due to aesthetic concerns. Tissue adhesives have been prized for their ease of use. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of tissue adhesives as a suitable alternative to other conventional wound closure techniques, in the head and neck region.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. Available English literature from 2009 to 2019 was reviewed from PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials with wounds in the head and neck region were included in this study.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were found to meet the inclusion criteria. Main outcomes assessed included the following: cosmesis, pain, swelling, bleeding, wound dehiscence, time and cost. There was significant heterogeneity in results for pain, swelling and bleeding. No significant difference was observed in wound dehiscence and long-term cosmetic outcome when tissue adhesives were compared with sutures and staples. The time taken for wound closure with tissue adhesives was faster than sutures but were conflicted when compared with staples. Cost was found to be similar.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there is a consensus that there is no long-term difference in cosmetic outcome and wound dehiscence between tissue adhesives and other wound closure techniques. Tissue adhesives have the benefit of being easy and quick to use with excellent patient satisfaction levels. We recommend tissue adhesives as a suitable alternative for wound closure in low tension areas in the head and neck region.

Oral Applications of Cyanoacrylate Adhesives: A Literature Review

Cyanoacrylate adhesives have been used in medicine and dentistry with some controversial opinions. The aim of this review was to summarize the relevant literature regarding the use of cyanoacrylate adhesives for oral wounds during dental and surgical procedures, with focus on the applications, indications, advantages, and disadvantages. In conclusion, in vivo and clinical studies have demonstrated in the last few years convincing results regarding the safety, efficacy, ease of application, and feasibility of all types of cyanoacrylate adhesives used in intra- and extraoral procedures.

Use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesive in rat liver induced lesion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the healing process of rat traumatic liver lesion corrected with the use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesive, compared to the use of biologically absorbable chromed catgut thread suture. METHODS: Thirty mail adult rats were divided into two groups (15 per group) according to the used method for liver lesion correction as follows: adhesive group (AG), and catgut group (CG); each group being divided into three subsets of five animals (7th, 14th, and 21st day), respectively, according to post-surgery evaluation. All animals were submitted to homogeneous lesion applying synthetic bonding to AG and using chromed catgut suture to CG for lesion correction. Macroscopic and microscopic parameters of healing processes were evaluated. RESULTS: Both groups of animals showed excellent abdominal wall healing, with no evidence of infection, and no abdominal cavity peritonitis or abscess. The presence of adherence was observed in both groups with no statistically significant difference. As to macroscopic evaluation, there was statistically significant difference with respect to specific factors of clinical inflammation (ischemic inflammation and giant celular inflammatory reaction) between animals evaluated on the 10th day (ischemic necrosis and giant celular inflammatory reaction) among animals evaluated on the 14th day (A14 versus C14). CONCLUSION: Applying 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate adhesive for correcting rat liver lesion does not change healing process when compared to the use of chromed catgut stitch.