Understanding the Impact of Intimate Partner Violence Type and Timing on Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Knowledge, Acceptability, Sexual Behavior, and Gender Roles Among Women of Color

Exploring community- and systemic-level gender-based violence in visible minority women across five countries from an intersectionality lens: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The intersection of sexism with racism and xenophobia disproportionately exposes visible minority women to gender-based violence (GBV) at the community and systemic levels. This study aims to understand the knowledge strengths and gaps on GBV against visible minority women with an intersectional lens, revealing systemic barriers to accessing support and how these barriers intensify GBV and its effects. It will also identify effective and ineffective policies and practices in the literature to develop strategies addressing the root causes of GBV and supporting survivors.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review using a convergent integrated approach to examine current literature on community- and systemic-level GBV against visible minority women. We will follow Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines to converge data from both qualitative and quantitative studies to obtain an integrated qualitative synthesis on GBV in five countries: Canada, the USA, the UK, Australia and New Zealand. This analysis will be conducted following Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis guidelines. Community members with lived experience of GBV will actively contribute to improving the relevance and interpretation of results, following a community-engaged research approach. Themes are expected to unveil various aspects of community- and systemic-level GBV due to the intersection of racism, xenophobia and sexism, alongside barriers in addressing GBV and research gaps.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Since this study does not involve primary data collection or the use of identifiable human data, no ethical approval will be needed. Results will be disseminated through integrated knowledge translation, involving collaboration with participants who have lived experience of GBV. The findings will be used to identify specific areas of policy intervention, including adopting culturally sensitive approaches, improving school and workplace policies and promoting rights of visible minority women.

The Moderating Effects of HIV Relevant Factors on the Relationship Between Intimate Partner Violence and Intention to Start HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Cisgender Women

Intimate partner violence (IPV) and HIV are serious and related public health problems that detrimentally impact women's health. Because women who experience IPV are more likely to acquire HIV, it is critical to promote HIV prevention strategies, such as HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), that increase autonomy. This study of cisgender women eligible for HIV PrEP took place between 2017 and 2019 in Philadelphia and New York City. This study aimed to examine the relationship between four types of IPV (control, psychological, physical, sexual) and intention to start PrEP among PrEP-eligible cisgender women and assess the extent to which HIV relevant factors moderated the association between IPV experience and intention to start PrEP. In this sample of PrEP-eligible women (n = 214), 68.7% indicated intention to start PrEP in the next 3 months. Ethnicity was strongly associated with intention to start PrEP, with Hispanic women having the highest odds of intending to start PrEP in the next 3 months. Having a controlling partner significantly predicted intention to start PrEP. Women with more than one sex partner and a controlling partner had higher odds of intending to start PrEP as compared with those who had one or no partners and had no IPV control. These findings point to a need for patient-centered interventions that address the need for safety and autonomy among cisgender, PrEP-eligible women.

Improving Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Counseling at a Military Women's Health Care Clinic to Champion CDC and Defense Health Agency Recommendations

INTRODUCTION

The CDC updated their guidelines in 2021 to recommend all doctors speak about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against human immunodeficiency virus infection with all sexually active patients. In addition, there is a demonstrated need for physicians to counsel patients on PrEP to achieve military readiness. Results from the 2018 Health Related Behaviors Survey indicate 21.8% of U.S. service members were at high risk for human immunodeficiency virus. This improvement project aimed to assess deficiencies in providers' knowledge before and after an educational intervention and describe policies clinics can adopt to adhere to CDC recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pre-intervention survey was distributed to providers at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics clinic. Based on results, an educational lecture and standardized intake form were developed. Following the intervention, a post-survey was distributed to providers. A chart review was performed to determine whether PrEP counseling increased following the intervention.

RESULTS

Forty-seven gynecologic providers were sent a pre- and post-intervention survey. Thirty-seven individuals completed the pre-intervention survey (response rate 78.72%), whereas 18 people completed the post-intervention survey (response rate 38.30%). Descriptive analysis suggested comfort counseling on PrEP, comfort with Defense Health Agency guidance on PrEP, and knowledge of PrEP all increased. In terms of the chart review, 81 charts were reviewed pre- and post-intervention. Although we failed to meet our target counseling rate of 70%, the number of patients who were counseled on or prescribed PrEP following our intervention was statistically significant (P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

This improvement project increased provider knowledge and comfort with PrEP, but only marginally affected behavior changes among providers. This failure may be related to the specific clinic in which the study was implemented. Further research is needed to facilitate routine counseling of PrEP among military women's health care providers.

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Initiation Among Black and Latina Cisgender Women Receiving HIV Prevention Care Coordination Services in New York City

Black and Latina cisgender women are disproportionately impacted by HIV in the US. Although PrEP is effective at preventing HIV infection, uptake in this population remains low. The aim of the study was to examine sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with PrEP initiation (defined as receiving a PrEP prescription) among 565 cisgender women enrolled in an HIV prevention services coordination program in NYC from January 2017 to December 2019 who met HIV risk criteria for PrEP. Of these, 26% initiated PrEP. Latina women were significantly more likely than white women to have initiated PrEP (Latina: 29.7%; Black: 26.1%; White: 16.3%; Other: 7.4%). PrEP initiation was significantly associated with PrEP awareness, an annual income < $20,000, being unstably housed, receiving benefits navigation services, and reporting non-injection drug use and/or a recent sexual relationship with an HIV-positive partner. The relatively low rate of PrEP initiation we observed suggests the need to increase PrEP access and uptake among women, particularly Black and Latina women who continue to be disproportionately at risk for HIV.