Compliance With WHO/UNICEF BFHI Standards in Croatia After Implementation of the BFHI

Journey toward Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative designation: Healthcare professional's view on successful implementation process and maintenance of accreditation

PROBLEM

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative has yet to achieve widespread global implementation.

BACKGROUND

The implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative has been recognised as complex. The challenge has been to maintain accreditation.

AIM

To explore and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare professionals' perceptions of the implementation process and the maintenance of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study with focus groups (n = 10) of the nurses, midwives and unit leaders (n = 43) perceptions of the implementation process were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

FINDINGS

Analysis of the data revealed five main themes: groundwork for the baby-focused breastfeeding context, management support throughout the process, promoting baby-friendly practices, effective communication ensuring the right track, and supporting the maintenance of BFHI designation. The main themes describe the implementation as a journey of climbing a hill and after reaching the top trying to maintain their position.

DISCUSSION

The starting point for implementation was an optimal environment supporting baby-friendly breastfeeding practices. The support of the management of the organisation was an important way of moving the implementation forward. Commitment to the common goal strengthened the baby-friendly approach and with concrete and immediate feedback the right pathway on a journey was ensured.

CONCLUSION

Practical ways to support the implementation journey include regular update education on breastfeeding and continuous monitoring, as well as providing statistics to health professionals. Global guidelines on how to sustain change are needed. This will ensure that the work done is not wasted.

'Breastfeeding exclusivity, difficulties, and support in the first days after hospital discharge: A correlational study'

OBJECTIVE

Global breastfeeding rates are not optimal, and the early postpartum period represents a critical time for breastfeeding initiation. The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative endeavours to provide mothers with evidence-based breastfeeding support in birth hospitals. This study examined factors associated with breastfeeding exclusivity and breastfeeding difficulties in the first days after being discharged from Baby-Friendly designated hospital. The adequacy of breastfeeding support and maternal preferences for optimal support were also reported.

STUDY DESIGN

A non-experimental correlational study was conducted between May 2021 and October 2022. A total of n = 80 breastfeeding mothers completed a semi-structured questionnaire within two weeks of discharge from Baby-Friendly hospital in Finland. The questionnaire included demographic and obstetric background information and six questions on breastfeeding exclusivity, breastfeeding difficulties, and breastfeeding support. Descriptive statistical analysis and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the mothers was 30.6 years (SD 5.4), and half of the mothers were primiparas (49 %). Most mothers gave birth vaginally (85 %) to a full-term infant (84 %). Most (85 %) had made some prenatal plans for breastfeeding, and the median planned duration of breastfeeding was 12 months. Half of the infants (53 %) received supplemental milk while in the hospital. Most mothers (81 %) were exclusively breastfeeding after hospital discharge. Mothers whose infants received supplemental milk in the hospital had an increased odds of non-exclusive breastfeeding (aOR 16.5 [CI 95 % 1.7-156.7], p 0.015). Approximately one-third of the mothers (39 %) experienced breastfeeding difficulties. Primiparous mothers had increased odds of experiencing breastfeeding difficulties (aOR 3.41 [CI 95 % 1.2-9.8], p 0.023). Mothers who received adequate postnatal breastfeeding support in birth hospital had decreased odds of experiencing breastfeeding difficulties (aOR 0.16 [CI 95 % 0.03-0.8], p 0.026). Mothers were mainly satisfied with breastfeeding support, although timelier access to support was preferred after hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

Adequate in-hospital postnatal breastfeeding support, including avoidance of non-medical supplementation, contributes to successful breastfeeding after hospital discharge in terms of more exclusive breastfeeding and fewer breastfeeding difficulties. Primiparous mothers need emphasized support to mitigate breastfeeding difficulties. Timelier access to breastfeeding support after discharge is needed.

Breastfeeding support and avoiding inappropriate breast milk substitute marketing in a neonatal ward in the Czech Republic: a best practice implementation project

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this implementation project was to improve breastfeeding support, and more specifically, to increase compliance with the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and the requirements of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (the Code).

INTRODUCTION

The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding of the BFHI have been shown to improve breastfeeding outcomes at target hospitals. The Code is a minimum standard for the regulation of marketing practices related to breastfeeding support.

METHODS

We used the JBI evidence implementation model to identify a group of stakeholders in a hospital in the Czech Republic and carried out a best practice implementation project from January 2021 to May 2022. After conducting a baseline audit, the clinical team and external breastfeeding experts discussed challenges and devised an implementation plan using the JBI Getting Research into Practice framework. Follow-up audits were undertaken from January to December 2021 and in May 2022.

RESULTS

Compliance improved across all audited criteria, namely, to fully comply with the Code (0% to 100%); to have a written infant feeding policy (0% to 100%); to ensure staff have skills to support breastfeeding (0% to 100%); to discuss breastfeeding with pregnant women (0% to 100%); to facilitate skin-to-skin contact (67.86% to 83.58%); to support and provide help with breastfeeding (67.86% to 82.09%); to not provide fluids other than breast milk (50% to 58.21%); to practice rooming-in (57.14% to 61.19%); to respond to infant cues (50% to 64.18%); to provide information about community support services (32.14% to 62.69%); and to coordinate discharge and ongoing care (0% to 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Breastfeeding support requires a sustained long-term effort before it can become fully established. The involvement of national-level policy makers is needed.

Factors that influence the implementation of (inter)nationally endorsed health and social care standards: a systematic review and meta-summary

BACKGROUND

Health and social care standards have been widely adopted as a quality improvement intervention. Standards are typically made up of evidence-based statements that describe safe, high-quality, person-centred care as an outcome or process of care delivery. They involve stakeholders at multiple levels and multiple activities across diverse services. As such, challenges exist with their implementation. Existing literature relating to standards has focused on accreditation and regulation programmes and there is limited evidence to inform implementation strategies specifically tailored to support the implementation of standards. This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the most frequently reported enablers and barriers to implementing (inter)nationally endorsed standards, in order to inform the selection of strategies that can optimise their implementation.

METHODS

Database searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), SocINDEX, Google Scholar, OpenGrey and GreyNet International, complemented by manual searches of standard-setting bodies' websites and hand searching references of included studies. Primary qualitative, quantitative descriptive and mixed methods studies that reported enablers and barriers to implementing nationally or internationally endorsed standards were included. Two researchers independently screened search outcomes and conducted data extraction, methodological appraisal and CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) assessments. An inductive analysis was conducted using Sandelowski's meta-summary and measured frequency effect sizes (FES) for enablers and barriers.

RESULTS

4072 papers were retrieved initially with 35 studies ultimately included. Twenty-two thematic statements describing enablers were created from 322 descriptive findings and grouped under six themes. Twenty-four thematic statements describing barriers were created from 376 descriptive findings and grouped under six themes. The most prevalent enablers with CERQual assessments graded as high included: available support tools at local level (FES 55%); training courses to increase awareness and knowledge of the standards (FES 52%) and knowledge sharing and interprofessional collaborations (FES 45%). The most prevalent barriers with CERQual assessments graded as high included: a lack of knowledge of what standards are (FES 63%), staffing constraints (FES 46%), insufficient funds (FES 43%).

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequently reported enablers related to available support tools, education and shared learning. The most frequently reported barriers related to a lack of knowledge of standards, staffing issues and insufficient funds. Incorporating these findings into the selection of implementation strategies will enhance the likelihood of effective implementation of standards and subsequently, improve safe, quality care for people using health and social care services.

'She was hungry'-Croatian mothers' reasons for supplementing their healthy, term babies with formula during the birth hospitalisation

AIM

To explore why Croatian mothers request formula for their healthy, term newborn infants during the postnatal hospital stay.

METHODS

Four focus groups discussions were conducted with a total of 25 women who gave birth to healthy newborn infants, between May and June 2021 in Split, Croatia. A homogenous, non-random purposive sampling technique was used. The semi-structured interview schedule contained 15 open-ended questions. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied.

RESULTS

Three themes were generated. The first theme fear of hunger referred to the mothers' fears arising from difficulties in interpreting newborn infant behaviour and finding solace in giving formula. The second theme too little support-too late reflected participants' unrealised expectations of hospital staff. The third theme non-supportive communication addressed mother's need for empathy during the postpartum hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Croatian mothers want to breastfeed, but often feel unsupported in doing so in the maternity hospital setting. Antenatal education of expectant mothers and training of maternity staff in breastfeeding counselling, with a strong emphasis on communication skills, as well as employment of International Board Certified Lactation Consultants and/or volunteer breastfeeding counsellors, were perceived by participants as a way to decrease mothers' requests for formula for their healthy, newborn infants.

Improving breastfeeding support through the implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital and Community Initiatives: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Improved breastfeeding practices have the potential to save the lives of over 823,000 children under 5 years old globally every year. The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is a global campaign by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children's Fund, which promotes best practice to support breastfeeding in maternity services. The Baby-Friendly Community Initiative (BFCI) grew out of step 10, with a focus on community-based implementation. The aim of this scoping review is to map and examine the evidence relating to the implementation of BFHI and BFCI globally.

METHODS

This scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Inclusion criteria followed the Population, Concepts, Contexts approach. All articles were screened by two reviewers, using Covidence software. Data were charted according to: country, study design, setting, study population, BFHI steps, study aim and objectives, description of intervention, summary of results, barriers and enablers to implementation, evidence gaps, and recommendations. Qualitative and quantitative descriptive analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

A total of 278 articles were included in the review. Patterns identified were: i) national policy and health systems: effective and visible national leadership is needed, demonstrated with legislation, funding and policy; ii) hospital policy is crucial, especially in becoming breastfeeding friendly and neonatal care settings iii) implementation of specific steps; iv) the BFCI is implemented in only a few countries and government resources are needed to scale it; v) health worker breastfeeding knowledge and training needs strengthening to ensure long term changes in practice; vi) educational programmes for pregnant and postpartum women are essential for sustained exclusive breastfeeding. Evidence gaps include study design issues and need to improve the quality of breastfeeding data and to perform prevalence and longitudinal studies.

CONCLUSION

At a national level, political support for BFHI implementation supports expansion of Baby-Friendly Hospitals. Ongoing quality assurance is essential, as is systematic (re)assessment of BFHI designated hospitals. Baby Friendly Hospitals should provide breastfeeding support that favours long-term healthcare relationships across the perinatal period. These results can help to support and further enable the effective implementation of BFHI and BFCI globally.

Exclusive breastfeeding, breastfeeding problems, and maternal breastfeeding attitudes before and after the baby-friendly hospital initiative: A quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Breastfeeding practices remain globally suboptimal despite many known maternal and neonatal health benefits and the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative as a global effort to support breastfeeding.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effects of the implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative for a proportion of mothers who exclusively breastfed during a 6-month period, including breastfeeding problems, and maternal breastfeeding attitudes.

METHODS

Using a quasi-experimental non-equivalent two-group design, we recruited two independent samples of postpartum mothers in a maternity hospital to compare the situation before (N = 162) and after (N = 163) the implementation. We measured breastfeeding status and possible breastfeeding problems via text-message questions at 2 weeks, 1, 4 and 6 months after birth. We measured Mothers' attitudes toward breastfeeding at the maternity hospital and 4 months after birth using the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale.

RESULTS

The implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative had no effect on the proportion of mothers who exclusively breastfed, and we found no significant differences in exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months (41.3 % vs 52.9 %, p =.435). The intervention did not influence the reported number of breastfeeding problems (p =.260) or maternal breastfeeding attitudes (p =.354). More favourable breastfeeding attitudes (p <.001) and less problematic breastfeeding (p <.001) were associated positively with exclusive breastfeeding.

CONCLUSION

Exclusive breastfeeding rates did not increase after the intervention; however, the rates at baseline were already high. Ensuring the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative practices through pre- and postnatal periods and preparing mothers to manage common breastfeeding problems might improve breastfeeding rates. This trial was registered (0307-0041) with ClinicalTrials.gov on 03/03/2017.

Maternal perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support in Baby-Friendly hospitals: An integrative review

Background

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative aims to improve breastfeeding by implementing the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (Ten Steps) into routine breastfeeding support in birth hospitals. Maternal perspective to breastfeeding support is important to consider as mothers and their infants are in the center of that support.

Objectives

To review and synthesize the existing literature on maternal perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support in Baby-Friendly hospitals. A sub-aim was to describe differences in breastfeeding support between Baby-Friendly hospitals and non-Baby-Friendly hospitals from maternal perspective.

Data sources and review methods

An integrative literature review. A systematic literature search was conducted in October 2021 in five databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science. Original peer-reviewed studies published in English exploring maternal viewpoints on breastfeeding support in Baby-Friendly hospitals were included. Two reviewers independently screened the titles (n=914), abstracts (n=226), and full texts (n=47). The review comprised of seventeen studies and includes both quantitative studies (n=14) and qualitative studies (n=3). Inductive content analysis and descriptive synthesis were conducted.

Results

Most studies (n=14) measured hospitals' compliance with the Ten Steps practices from maternal perspective. Mothers were provided with breastfeeding information and encouragement, however, a qualitative finding indicated that information focused on positive aspects of breastfeeding. Early skin-to-skin contact between the mother and infant was well facilitated although often not lasting more than 30 min. Breastfeeding was facilitated by practical support but according to findings of two qualitative studies, support was not always adequate to address mothers' problems with breastfeeding. Most mothers were exclusively breastfeeding during the hospital stay and no supplemental milk was offered to infant. Mothers were roomed-in together with their infant and were mostly encouraged to breastfeed on demand. Differences between Baby-Friendly hospitals and non-Baby-Friendly hospitals were observed particularly for steps 6 and 9: supplementary feeding and pacifier use were less common in Baby-Friendly hospitals.

Conclusions

From the maternal perspective, breastfeeding support in the Baby-Friendly hospitals was mainly but not completely in adherence with the Ten Steps practices. Low compliance with some of the Ten Steps indicates a need for a more frequent assessment of the breastfeeding support practices and consideration of strategies facilitating a more sustainable implementation of the initiative. Regardless of some shortcomings with the breastfeeding support, mothers were mainly satisfied with the support in the hospital. Mothers in the Baby-Friendly hospitals perceived that breastfeeding support was more adherent to the Ten Steps compared to mothers in non-Baby-Friendly hospitals.

Healthcare Professionals' Breastfeeding Attitudes and Hospital Practices During Delivery and in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Pre and Post Implementing the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative

BACKGROUND

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative represents a global effort to support breastfeeding. Commitment to this program has been associated with the longer duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding and improvements in hospital practices. Further, healthcare professionals' breastfeeding attitudes have been associated with the ability to provide professional support for breastfeeding.

RESEARCH AIMS

To determine healthcare professionals' breastfeeding attitudes and hospital practices before and after the implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative.

METHODS

Using a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study design, healthcare professionals (N = 131) from the single hospital labor and delivery, maternity care, and neonatal intensive care were recruited before and after the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative intervention during 2017 and 2019. Breastfeeding attitudes with the validated Breastfeeding Attitude Questionnaire, breastfeeding-related hospital practices, and background characteristics were collected.

RESULTS

The healthcare professionals' breastfeeding attitude scores increased significantly after the implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, difference = 0.16, (95% CI [0.13, 0.19]) and became breastfeeding favorable among all professional groups in each study unit. Positive changes in breastfeeding-supportive hospital practices were achieved. The infants had significantly more frequent immediate and uninterrupted skin-to-skin contact with their mothers. The rate of early breastfeeding, as well as the number of exclusively breastfed infants, increased.

CONCLUSIONS

After the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative and Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative for neonatal wards (Neo-BFHI) interventions were concluded, we found significant improvements in the breastfeeding attitudes of healthcare professionals and in breastfeeding-related care practices.This RCT was registered (0307-0041) with ClinicalTrials.gov on 03/03/2017.

Robust estimation of infant feeding indicators by data quality assessment of longitudinal electronic health records from birth up to 18 months of life

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is an international strategy aimed at improving breastfeeding practices in health care services. Regular monitoring of indicators is key for BFHI implementation and maintenance. Currently, routine data collected from electronic health records (EHR) is an excellent source for infant feeding monitoring, however data quality (DQ) assessment should be undertaken. The aim of this research is to enable robust estimations of infant feeding indicators through DQ assessment of routine EHR data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We use the longitudinal series of healthcare contacts belonging to 6427 children born from 2009 to 2018 in the Health Area V of Murcia (Spain). Longitudinal data came from EHR at hospital discharge and community infant health reviews up to 18 months. The data of each healthcare contact contained a 24-h recall of infant feeding. We perform a DQ process in three phases: (1) an assessment of each-single-contact and the definition of their infant feeding status; (2) a longitudinal DQ assessment of completeness and consistency of the series of contacts to obtain meta-information that guides the duration calculus, for each case, of the different types of breastfeeding: exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), full breastfeeding (FBF) and any breastfeeding (ABF); and finally (3) a robust estimation of indicators and description of DQ of each indicator.

RESULTS

We found deficiencies of DQ in 30.42% of single contacts for EBF, 19.02% for FBF and 22.50% for ABF that were used to establish the infant feeding status. However, after longitudinal DQ assessment, we obtained valid and reliable data rates for most indicators such as "median duration of breastfeeding" nearly 90%, both for FBF and ABF, not so for EBF.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the DQ deficiencies found in raw data, the DQ assurance approach by indicators proposed in this work, allowed us to obtain a robust estimation of indicators with a significant percentage of subjects with valid information for ABF and FBF monitoring. The estimations were consistent with results previously published. The methodology provided with this study allows a continuous and reliable population monitoring of infant feeding indicators of BFHI from routine EHR data.

Compliance of a Baby-Friendly Designated Hospital in Ghana With the WHO/UNICEF Baby and Mother-Friendly Care Practices

BACKGROUND

Although the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative has improved breastfeeding rates globally, weak monitoring still affects hospital-level implementation.

RESEARCH AIM

To reassess compliance of a Baby-Friendly Hospital with the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding, International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes, HIV and Infant Feeding, and Mother-Friendly Care following the WHO/UNICEF global criteria.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, prospective, mixed-methods study (N = 180), clinical staff (n = 60), pregnant women (n = 40), postpartum mothers (n = 60), and mothers of babies in intensive care (n = 20) were randomly selected from one urban secondary-level public hospital in Ghana designated as Baby-Friendly in 2004 but never reassessed. Data were collected through interviews, document reviews, and observations using the revised WHO/UNICEF external reassessment tool and analyzed quantitatively using the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative computer tool. Scores higher than 80% signified a pass (high compliance). Scores rated as low (< 50%) and moderate (50-80%) signified noncompliance.

RESULTS

The facility passed the criteria for full compliance with the International Code (86%) but failed other components. Compliance with the Ten Steps was moderate (55%). Step 7 about rooming-in (84%) and Step 9 about human milk substitutes (100%) were passed, whereas Step 1 about written breastfeeding policies (0%), Step 2 about staff training (7%), and Step 4 about early breastfeeding initiation (31%) were met the least. Compliance with Mother-Friendly Care (34%) and HIV and Infant Feeding (47%) were low. Main implementation gaps were unavailability of policies and staff's inadequate knowledge about Baby-Friendly practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving staff training and maternal counseling, routinely reassessing designated facilities, and providing technical support in problematic areas might sustain implementation.

The effect of a combined intervention on exclusive breastfeeding in primiparas: A randomised controlled trial

An antenatal/postnatal intervention involving proactive telephone support and written materials was conducted among primiparas. Four hundred women, from the Split-Dalmatia County, Croatia, were randomized between November 2013 and December 2016 into three groups: intervention (IG), active control (ACG) and standard care (SCG). Primary outcome was exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included breastfeeding difficulties, attitudes towards infant feeding, breastfeeding self-efficacy and social support. Practice staff were blinded to group allocation. Of 400 women, 45 (11%) were lost to follow-up, and final analyses were conducted on 129 (IG), 103 (ACG) and 123 (SCG) participants. EBF rates at 3 months were significantly higher for the IG (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7 to 8.1; EBF 81%) as well as at 6 months (OR 15.7, 95% CI, 9.1 to 27.1; EBF 64%) compared with SCG (EBF 47% at 3 months and 3% at 6 months). Higher rates were also observed for the ACG at 3 months (OR 2.2, 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.8, EBF 68%) and 6 months (OR 2.3, 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.9, EBF 16%). Participants in the IG had the highest increase in positive attitudes towards infant feeding, in comparison to baseline, and significantly higher breastfeeding self-efficacy. Participants in SCG experienced significantly more breastfeeding difficulties, both at 3 and 6 months, in comparison to AC and IGs. Written breastfeeding materials and proactive telephone support among primiparas are an effective means of increasing breastfeeding rates, decreasing breastfeeding difficulties and improving self-efficacy and attitudes towards infant feeding.

The revitalization and scale-up of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative in Malawi

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) has shown to strengthen health providers' skills in the provision of breastfeeding counselling and support, which have led to improvements in breastfeeding outcomes. In Malawi, where BFHI was introduced in 1993 but later languished due to losses in funding, the Maternal and Child Survival Program supported the Malawi Ministry of Health (MOH) in the revitalization and scale-up of BFHI in 54 health facilities across all 28 districts of the country. This paper describes the revitalization and scale-up process within the context of an integrated health project; successes, challenges, and lessons learned with BFHI implementation; and the future of BFHI in Malawi. More than 80,000 mothers received counselling on exclusive breastfeeding following childbirth prior to discharge from the health facility. Early initiation of breastfeeding was tracked quarterly from baseline through endline via routine MOH health facility data. Increases in early initiation of breastfeeding were seen in two of the three regions of Malawi: by 2% in the Central region and 6% in the Southern region. Greater integration of BFHI into Malawi's health system is recommended, including improved preservice and in-service trainings for health providers to include expanded BFHI content, increased country financial investments in BFHI, and integration of BFHI into national clinical guidelines, protocols, and nutrition and health policies.

Worldwide prevalence of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact after vaginal birth: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation for immediate skin-to-skin contact (SSC) after birth, separation of mothers and infants seems to be common practice in many hospitals. It is unknown how common the practice of SSC is worldwide. Therefore, we aimed to determine the reported prevalence of SSC for healthy mothers and infants immediately after normal birth.

METHODS

We systematically searched CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest Central, PubMed and the Cochrane Library for articles published between January 2007 and October 2017 using the keywords "kangaroo care" or "skin to skin contact" or "breastfeeding initiation" or "breast crawl" or "maternal infant contact" or "maternal newborn contact" or "baby friendly hospital initiative" or "ten steps for successful breastfeeding".

RESULTS

After an initial screening of 5266 records, 84 full text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 35 of these met the inclusion criteria. The studies were from 28 countries representing all six WHO world regions. There was a wide range in the practice of SSC for mother-infant dyads around the world: from 1% to 98%. Only 15 studies clearly defined SSC. Most of the studies were from high-income countries, and these reported higher rates of SSC than studies from low and middle-income countries.

CONCLUSION

There was a great heterogeneity in the definition of SSC as well as study designs, which makes cross-county comparison difficult. National studies reporting SSC rates are lacking. Future studies and guidelines to enhance SSC practice should include a standardised set of indicators and measurement tools that document SSC starting time and duration of SSC.