Strategies to Prevent Peritonitis after Procedures: Our Opinions

Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) patients are at increased risk of peritonitis following elective colonoscopy and other potentially invasive dental or gynecological procedures. The increased risk of iatrogenic peritonitis is attributed to procedure-related factors such as instrumentation, biopsies, tissue injury, and peri-procedural bacterial contamination. Also contributory are patient-related factors such as the effect of the immunocompromised status of end-stage renal disease and the presence of intraperitoneal dialysate on the disruption of natural host defense mechanisms. We propose the use of standard peri-procedure protocols, including procedure-specific prophylactic antibiotics, and discuss the enhanced defense rationale for a dry abdomen during and sometimes after procedures. Depending on the procedure and its inherent risk of causing peritonitis, as well as the patient's ability to withhold PD for up to 3 days, we sometimes increase the intensity of PD before the procedure. We conclude that it is imperative that proceduralists and nephrologists be aware of and proactive about how to mitigate postprocedure PD complications.

Colonoscopy in automated peritoneal dialysis patients: value of prophylactic antibiotics: a prospective study on a single antibiotic

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the need for prophylactic antibiotics in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients undergoing flexible colonoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 93 patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. Patients were randomized into 2 age- and sex-matched groups; group A (46 patients) with intraperitoneal (IP) ceftazidime prior to colonoscopy and group B (47 patients) without prophylactic antibiotics. The relations between peritonitis and different parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of all colonoscopies, 60.2% showed normal findings, 17.2% with colonic polyps at different sites, 12.9% with angiodysplastic-like lesions, 5.4% with colonic ulcer(s), 3.2% with diverticulae without diverticulitis and 1.1% had transverse colon stricture. Post-colonoscopy peritonitis was documented in 3 (6.5%) and 4 (8.5%) patients in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.2742); the causative organisms were mainly gram negative bacteria. Polypectomy was not associated with increased peritonitis episodes. By multiple logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus was the only independent variable that entered into the best predictive equation over the development of post-colonoscopy peritonitis but not antibiotic use.

CONCLUSIONS

The relation between prophylactic antibiotic use prior to colonoscopy in APD patients and the risk of peritonitis was lacking. Only diabetes mellitus appears to be of significance. Polypectomy did not increase peritonitis episodes.

Prevention of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis

Reducing the frequency of peritonitis for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) continues to be a challenge. This review focuses on recent updates in catheter care and other patient factors that influence infection rates. An experienced nursing staff plays an important role in teaching proper PD technique to new patients, but nursing staff must be cognizant of each patient's unique educational needs. Over time, many patients become less adherent to proper dialysis technique, such as washing hands or wearing a mask. This behavior is associated with higher risk of peritonitis and is modifiable with re-training. Prophylactic antibiotics before PD catheter placement can decrease the infection risk immediately after catheter placement. In addition, some studies suggest that prophylaxis against fungal superinfection after antibiotic exposure is effective in reducing fungal peritonitis, although larger randomized studies are needed before this practice can be recommended for all patients. Over time, exit site and nasal colonization with pathogenic organisms can lead to exit-site infections and peritonitis. For patients with Staphylococcus aureus colonization, exit-site prophylaxis with either mupirocin or gentamicin cream reduces clinical infection with this organism. Although there are limited data for support, antibiotic prophylaxis before gastrointestinal, gynecologic, or dental procedures may also help reduce the risk of peritonitis.

Prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related infections

Despite substantial advances in peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a renal replacement modality, PD-related infection remains an important cause of morbidity, technique failure, and mortality. This review describes the microbiology and outcomes of PD peritonitis and catheter infection, followed by a discussion of several strategies that may reduce the risk of PD-related infections. Strategies that are reviewed include use of antibiotics at the time of PD catheter insertion, selection of PD catheter design and insertion technique, patient training, PD connectology, exit site prophylaxis, periprocedural prophylaxis, fungal prophylaxis, and choice of PD solutions.

The evidence base for the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in dental practice

INTRODUCTION

People with various medical conditions and devices are suggested candidates for receiving antibiotic prophylaxis before undergoing dental procedures. This practice is controversial, however, owing to the lack of proof of efficacy. The authors conducted a qualitative, systematic review to determine the level of evidence for this practice and whether antibiotic prophylaxis prevents distant site infections in these patients.

METHODS

The authors selected eight groups of patients with specific medical conditions and devices who often are given antibiotic prophylaxis before undergoing invasive dental procedures. The conditions and devices were cardiac-native heart valve disease, prosthetic heart valves and pacemakers; hip, knee and shoulder prosthetic joints; renal dialysis shunts; cerebrospinal fluid shunts; vascular grafts; immunosuppression secondary to cancer and cancer chemotherapy; systemic lupus erythematosus; and insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus. The authors thoroughly searched the literature for the years 1966 through 2005 for references indicating some level of support for this practice and graded each publication on the basis of level of evidence.

RESULTS

The authors found formal recommendations in favor of antibiotic prophylaxis for only three of the eight medical conditions: native heart disease, prosthetic heart valves and prosthetic joints. They found no prospective randomized clinical trials and only one clinical study of antibiotic prophylaxis. Only one systematic review and two case series provided weak, if any, support for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cardiac conditions. The authors found little or no evidence to support this practice or to demonstrate that it prevents distant site infections for any of these eight groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

No definitive, scientific basis exists for the use of prophylactic antibiotics before dental procedures for these eight groups of patients.

Prevention of infectious complications in peritoneal dialysis: best demonstrated practices

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) related infections continue to be a serious complication for PD patients. Peritonitis can be associated with pain, hospitalization and catheter loss as well as a risk of death. Peritonitis risk is not evenly spread across the PD population or programs. Very low rates of peritonitis in a program are possible if close attention is paid to the causes of peritonitis and protocols implemented to reduce the risk of infection. Protocols to decrease infection risk in PD patients include proper catheter placement, exit-site care that includes Staphylococcus aureus prophylaxis, careful training of patients with periodic retraining, treatment of contamination, and prevention of procedure-related and fungal peritonitis. Extensive data have been published on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent exit site infections. There are fewer data on training methods of patients to prevent infection risk. Quality improvement programs with continuous monitoring of infections, both of the catheter exit site and peritonitis, are important to decrease the PD related infections in PD programs. Continuous review of every episode of infection to determine the root cause of the event should be routine in PD programs. Further research is needed examining approaches to decrease infection risk.

Mannose binding lectin level and polymorphism in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Infection is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with end-stage renal disease. The increased susceptibility to infection is probably secondary to the impaired immune defence in uraemia and other co-morbid factors such as diabetes mellitus. Peritonitis remains the most common and major complication in the treatment modality of peritoneal dialysis (PD) for uraemic patients. Mannose binding lectin (MBL) is a calcium dependent C-type lectin that acts as an important first line defence mechanism against infection by its capability to activate the complement system and enhance phagocytosis.

METHODS

We examined whether serum concentration of MBL and the point mutation of MBL may act as a risk factor in PD-related peritonitis. We studied four groups of dialysis patients: PD patients with two or more episodes of peritonitis, peritonitis-free PD patients, haemodialysis (HD) patients not previously on PD, and HD patients who were converted from PD due to technique failure following peritonitis-related abdominal adhesion. Results. Both homozygous and heterozygous patients had profoundly reduced serum level of MBL. The codon 54 point mutation rate amongst our dialysis patients was comparable with that of healthy subjects. Dialysis patients had a significantly lower serum level of MBL than healthy controls independent of the MBL gene mutation or the mode of dialysis treatment. Patients on PD with codon 54 point mutation were found to have a lower serum MBL level compared with HD patients with similar MBL gene mutation. However, we found no difference in the serum MBL level or frequency of codon 54 point mutation between four groups of dialysis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis patients have lower MBL levels that may increase the susceptibility of infection. However, the existence of other risk factors such as connection technique, nasal bacterial carriers, bowel pathology and personal hygiene precludes the MBL level as the sole primary factor for peritonitis in patients on maintenance PD treatment.

Management of peritonitis in children receiving chronic peritoneal dialysis

Bacterial peritonitis is a major threat to long-term peritoneal membrane function in pediatric patients receiving chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD). This review summarizes the demographics, risk factors, and current recommendations regarding diagnostic procedures, management, and prevention of peritonitis in children. Albeit decreasing in incidence, bacterial peritonitis remains a major cause of technique failure in children with endstage renal disease receiving CPD. The use of standardized diagnostic procedures, efficacious antibacterial treatment, and objective response criteria are crucial in improving the outcome of this complication. Current guidelines recommend combining a first- and third-generation cephalosporin for empiric therapy in uncomplicated cases. The initial use of a glycopeptide/third-generation cephalosporin combination should be restricted to patients with risk factors for severe disease, as defined by clinical presentation, young age (<2 years), and recent infection with a methicillin resistant micro-organism. Several risk factors for primary or relapsing peritonitis have been identified, some of which are amenable to preventive measures. These relate to catheter design and implantation technique, connection methodology, early catheter removal in refractory or relapsing peritonitis, and eradication of Staphylococcus aureus from the catheter exit site and/or nasal reservoirs in patients and their caregivers.

Peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis

Peritonitis, an infectious complication of peritoneal dialysis, continues to account for much of the morbidity associated with this techniques. The clinical presentation and laboratory data used in diagnosis the peritonitis, as well as its differential diagnosis will be reviewed in this article. The distribution of pathogens is an important outcome determinant, Gram-negative infections being associated with greater rates of catheter loss and higher death rates. Among the five routes of peritoneal contamination, intraluminal and periluminal contamination account for most of the infections. Due to the two prevention methods implemented in the care of the PD population, the incidence of peritonitis has decreased over the last two decades. The recommendations for empiric treatment of peritonitis have changed over the years, as more was learnt about antibiotic resistance and drug toxicity. Future research to address enteric peritonitis, as well as biocompatible dialysis solution or biocompatible catheter materials is needed to further reduce the incidence of PD peritonitis.

Peritoneal dialysis. Prevention and control of infection

In spite of the reduction in peritonitis and catheter-related infection rates in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, these infections remain major sources of morbidity and transfer to haemodialysis. Touch contamination at the time of doing the exchanges is still a major cause of peritonitis and leads to Gram-positive organisms (coagulation-negative staphylococcus) being the most common pathogens. Newer exchange techniques have reduced this incidence but the more serious pathogens (Staphylococcal aureus, pseudomonas and fungi) remain a major problem. Treatment has to be immediate, and hence empirical, giving adequate cover for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. The use of vancomycin as an initial antibacterial has been discontinued because of the problem of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus. Recent guidelines advocate the use of a first generation cephalosporin combined with ceftazidime (if the urine output is >100 ml/day) or an aminoglycoside in anuric patients. Subsequent therapy changes are made upon bacterial isolation and sensitivities. Vancomycin is reserved for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus. Peritoneal catheter-related infections (exit site and tunnel) are predominantly caused by S. aureus and pseudomonal organisms and can be difficult to eradicate. Tunnel infections invariably involve the catheter dacron cuffs and therefore are more likely to lead to peritonitis; in this situation catheter removal is the treatment of choice. Treatment of exit-site infections is with oral antibacterials (penicillinase-resistant penicillins, cefalexin). Vancomycin is avoided if possible. The identification that nasal carriage of S. aureus predisposes to exit-site and tunnel infections has led to prophylactic regimens to combat this problem. Mupirocin applied at the exit site leads to a reduction in catheter-related infections and peritonitis.

Peritoneal infections

Peritoneal dialysis related infections include infection of the catheter exit site, subcutaneous pathway, or effluent. Exit-site infections, predominately owing to Staphylococcus aureus, are defined as purulent drainage at the exit site, although erythema may be a less serious type of exit-site infection. Tunnel infections are underdiagnosed clinically, and sonography of the tunnel is useful to delineate the extent of the infection and to evaluate response to antibiotic therapy. S aureus infections occur more frequently in S aureus carriers and immunosuppressed patients and can be reduced by mupirocin prophylaxis either intranasally or at the exit site. Patients with peritonitis present with cloudy effluent and usually pain, although 6% of patients may initially have pain without cloudy effluent. A white blood cell count of 100 or greater per microL, 50% of which are polymorphonuclear cells, has long been the hallmark of peritonitis. Empiric therapy is controversial, with some recommending cefazolin and others vancomycin (with cefatazidime for Gram-negative coverage). The choice should depend on the center's antibiotic sensitivity profile; those centers with a high rate of Enterococcus- or methicillin resistant organisms should use vancomcycin. Peritonitis episodes occurring in association with a tunnel infection with the same organism seldom resolve with antibiotics and require catheter removal. Other indications for catheter removal are refractory peritonitis, relapsing peritonitis, tunnel infection with inner-cuff involvement that does not respond to antibiotic therapy (based on ultrasound criteria), fungal peritonitis, and enteric peritonitis owing to intra abdominal pathology. Centers can reduce dialysis related infections to very low levels by proper catheter selection and insertion, careful selection and training of patients, avoidance of spiking techniques, and use of antibiotic prophylaxis against S. aureus. Further research is required to identify methods to reduce the risk of enteric peritonitis.