Comparison between DOQI and Canadian Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis

The recently published Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy differ in a number of ways from the United States National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines on the same topic. The three main differences are ( 1 ) the CSN targets are the same for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), whereas the DOQI targets are higher for APD; ( 2 ) the CSN guidelines have a lower creatinine clearance (CCr) target of 50 L/wk for low and low-average transporters compared to 60 L/wk for high and high-average transporters, but no such distinction is made by DOQI; and ( 3 ) the CSN has set lower limit targets as well as preferred targets for Kt/V and CCr.

Other differences are that the CSN recommendations do not give Kt/V the same primacy over CCr that DOQI does. Also, the CSN recommendations give greater emphasis to the risks associated with high transport status.

This review looks at the reasons for these differences and demonstrates that some are due to information that has become available since the publication of the DOQI guidelines. However, it is emphasized that, when recommendations are predominantly opinion- rather than evidence-based, geographic and economic factors may also account for differences.

Ultrafiltration and dialysis adequacy with various daily schedules of dialysis fluids

Dialysis regimens for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients vary with the need for fluid removal, but also because of concerns about the local and systemic consequences of high glucose exposure. The implications of various regimens for dialysis adequacy--that is, fluid and small-solute removal--are not always clear. We therefore analyzed ultrafiltration (UF) and adequacy indices for 4 different combinations of dialysis fluid. Collections of 24-hour dialysate and urine were carried out in 99 patients on CAPD. On 4 separate occasions, each patient performed 4 exchanges in 24 hours, including 3 daily exchanges with 1.36% glucose and 1 night exchange with either 1.36% glucose (G1 schedule), 2.27% glucose (G2 schedule), 3.86% glucose (G3 schedule), or icodextrin (Ico schedule). Weekly, total, and dialysis Kt/V and KT were calculated for both urea and creatinine. The mean values of urea Kt/V and KT were significantly lower for the G1 schedule than for the G3 and Ico schedules. The adequacy indices for overnight application of 3.86% glucose and icodextrin were similar. Using dialysis fluids with 1.36% and 2.27% glucose overnight reduces glucose exposure, but those schedules may provide inadequate UF and small-solute removal in some patients (UF < 1 L daily, Kt/V < 1.7).