Resuming peritoneal dialysis after catheter removal due to complicated peritonitis

BACKGROUND

Causes of non-resuming peritoneal dialysis (PD) after complicated peritonitis requiring peritoneal catheter (PC) removal remain poorly studied.

METHODS

We reviewed all peritonitis episodes in our center between 1997 and 2017. Patients who restarted PD after PC removal (Group 1) were compared to those who did not (Group 2), identifying the causes.

RESULTS

Of 284 peritonitis episodes, PC was removed in 48 patients (16.9%). In 18 (37.5%) patients PC was reinserted, and PD successfully resumed in all, with a median duration of PD afterwards of 14.1 months. In other 30 (62.5%) reinsertion of PC was not attempted. Causes of non-reinsertion were: transfer to hemodialysis 76.6% (n = 23), death 16.7% (n = 5) and transplantation 6.7% (n = 2). Hemodialysis switch was due to non-medical reasons in 47.8% (n = 11) including fear of peritonitis, family decision and social dependence. Group 1 was younger (p = 0.041), with lower Charlson index (p = 0.045) and higher men proportion (p = 0.049). Group 1 had a better patient survival than group 2 (survival at 24 months: 67% and 53%, respectively; log-rank test p: 0.01). There were no differences in survival between groups when adjusted for significant basal characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Resuming PD after severe peritonitis requiring PC removal is feasible but a high proportion of patients do not restart PD for non-medical reasons, usually older patients with higher Charlson index. A properly structured interview would be a useful tool that could improve return to technique in these patients.

Outcomes following peritoneal dialysis catheter removal with reinsertion or permanent transfer to haemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Long-term use of peritoneal dialysis catheter is associated with complications such as infection and malfunction, necessitating removal of catheter with subsequent reinsertion or permanent transfer to haemodialysis. This study aims to investigate the outcome in patients who underwent reinsertion.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A single-centre retrospective study was performed in Singapore General Hospital for all adult incident peritoneal dialysis patients between January 2011 and January 2016. Study data were retrieved from patient electronic medical records up till 1 January 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 470 patients had peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion with median follow-up period of 29.2 (interquartile range = 16.7-49.7) months. A total of 92 patients required catheter removal. Thirty-six (39%) patients underwent catheter reinsertion. The overall technique survival at 3 and 12 months were 83% and 67%. Median time to technique failure of the second catheter was 6.74 (interquartile range = 0-50.2) months. The mean survival for patients who converted to haemodialysis and re-attempted peritoneal dialysis was comparable (54.9 ± 5.5 vs 57.3 ± 3.6 months; p = 0.75). Twelve (13%) patients had contraindication for peritoneal dialysis and were excluded from analysis. Of 11 patients who required catheter removal due to malfunction, 7 (64%) underwent catheter reinsertion and 6 (86%) patients ultimately converted to haemodialysis during study period. Of the 69 patients who had catheter removal due to infection, 29 (42%) underwent catheter reinsertion and 8 (28%) patients eventually converted to haemodialysis during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Patient survival was comparable between patients who re-attempted peritoneal dialysis and patients who transferred to haemodialysis. Patients who had previous catheter removal due to infections had favourable technique survival than those due to catheter malfunction.

Pelvic drainage during removal of dialysis catheter decreases the risk of subsequent intra-abdominal complications in refractory peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis

AIM

Some patients with refractory peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis continue to develop intra-abdominal complications despite removal of the peritoneal catheter. Repeated percutaneous drainage or open laparotomy is often required, and mortality is not uncommon. The benefits of pelvic drainage placement during catheter removal in decreasing these complications and interventions remain unproven.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with refractory peritonitis who underwent removal of a Tenckhoff catheter between 1991 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Twelve patients had pelvic drainage using closed active suction devices during catheter removal (drainage group). The remaining 34 patients underwent catheter removal without drainage (non-drainage group). The outcomes measured were the development of intra-abdominal complications and the requirement for repeated percutaneous drainage or open laparotomy within 90 days after the catheter removal.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar with the exception of a higher median number of previous peritonitis episodes in the drainage group compared with the non-drainage group (2 vs 0, P = 0.02). During the follow-up period, intra-abdominal complications occurred in 15 (44%) of 34 patients in the non-drainage group, compared with one (8%) of 12 patients in the drainage group (P = 0.03). Twelve (35%) patients in the non-drainage group required repeated percutaneous drainage or open laparotomy for management, compared with zero (0%) patients in the drainage group (P = 0.02). Drain tubes were removed at a median of 6 days (inter-quartile range: 5-10) without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In the management of refractory peritonitis, pelvic drainage during removal of dialysis catheter decreases the risk of subsequent intra-abdominal complications and invasive interventions.

Reinitiation of peritoneal dialysis after catheter removal for refractory peritonitis

AIM

A high proportion of patients whose catheters are removed are unable to successfully reinitiate peritoneal dialysis (PD) due to irreversible peritoneal injury or to decisions made by the patient or the nephrologist for different and often empiric reasons. The present study examined the outcomes of patients reinitiated on PD after peritonitis.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients with end-stage renal disease who were initiated on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis at our Institute in south India between 1998 and 2012, identifying those in whom the catheter was removed and the cases where PD was reinitiated, analysing the reasons and outcome. We compared data of patients who could be reinitiated on PD with those who could not be reinitiated and also data of patients who successfully continued PD after reinitiation with those who suffered technique failure.

RESULTS

Peritoneal dialysis was reinitiated in 31 (19.4%) of 159 patients whose catheter was removed owing to refractory peritonitis, including after an episode of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fungal peritonitis. Some patients had the catheter placed for a third time. No significant difference was found between patients who reinitiated PD vs. did not, or between those who were successful in reinitiating PD vs. unsuccessful.

CONCLUSION

Notwithstanding the small cohort size, the present study demonstrates that reinitiating PD is feasible in a developing country, and also that reinitiation of PD is possible after an episode of P. aeruginosa and fungal peritonitis. However, future studies in a larger patient cohort and assessing dialysis adequacy are required to confirm and extend our findings.

Risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis catheter survival: a 9-year single-center study in 315 patients

PURPOSE

To review the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter outcomes at our center and assess factors affecting catheter survival.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study on 315 patients who had their first PD catheter placed between January 2001 and September 2009 at the UT Southwestern/DaVita Peritoneal Dialysis Clinic at Dallas, Texas. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and clinical information of the patients. The primary end point of the study was PD catheter failure, defined as removal of a dysfunctional PD catheter due to catheter-related complications. Catheter survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify factors that are independently associated with catheter survival.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 49.7 ± 29 yrs. The study population included 54.6% females, 42.5% African American, 27.9% Caucasian and 22.9% Hispanic patients. Diabetes was the primary etiology of end-stage renal disease in 43.2% of patients. More than 90% of patients had one or more co-morbidities, and 57.5% had previous abdominal surgery. The mean BMI for the group was 28.6 ± 13.8 kg/m2. Less than a quarter of the patients (24.1%) had non-infectious/mechanical catheter problems. Overall PD catheter survival rates over 12, 24 and 36 months were 92.9%, 91.9% and 91.1%, respectively. PD catheter-related non-infectious problem was the only independent variable that was significantly associated with catheter survival (hazard ratio 22.467; 95% CI 6.665-75.732). No significant association was observed between the PD catheter survival and other risk factors including age, body mass index (BMI), diabetic status, co-morbidities, previous abdominal surgeries or infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows an excellent 3-yr PD catheter survival (91.1%). Only PD catheter-related non-infectious problems are significantly associated with catheter failure. Other factors such as age, gender, race, BMI, diabetic status, co-morbidities, previous abdominal surgeries, peritoneal infections or exit site/tunnel infections were not found to affect the PD catheter survival and should not be considered barriers to PD initiation.