The Needs of Older Patients for Peritoneal Dialysis: Training and Support at Home

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in all its stages has become an important problem for older patients, stage 3 - 5 is expected to happen in 25 to 30% of the population, and a higher prevalence can be found in residential care and nursing homes, affecting the demand for patient education. Although older patients are able and keen to learn, there are specific needs that must be addressed. The focus of this paper is to review the demands to train and maintain older patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) at home.

Optimizing outcomes in the elderly with end-stage renal disease--live long and prosper

BACKGROUND

The elderly form an expanding proportion of patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease worldwide. The increased physiological frailty and functional morbidity associated with the aging process pose unique challenges when planning optimal management of an older patient needing renal replacement therapy (RRT).

AIMS

This position paper discusses current evidence regarding the optimal management of end-stage renal disease in the elderly with an emphasis on hemodialysis since it is the most common modality used in older patients. Further research is needed to define relevant patient-reported outcome measures for end-stage renal disease including functional assessments and psychological impacts of various forms of RRT. For those older patients who have opted for dialysis treatment, it is important to study the strategies that encourage greater uptake of home-based dialysis therapies and optimal vascular access.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of advanced chronic kidney disease in the elderly can be challenging but also extremely rewarding. The key issue is adopting a patient-focused and individualized approach that seeks to achieve the best outcomes based on a comprehensive holistic assessment of what is important to the patient.

Clinical outcome of elderly peritoneal dialysis patients with assisted care in a single medical centre: a 25 year experience

AIM

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative treatment for elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In Taiwan, non-professional personnel are employed to provide assisted care for elderly patients. Whether assisted care is appropriate for elderly patients is unknown. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the outcomes of assisted care in a single centre.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study in a single medical centre. The outcomes were derived from the assessment of patient survival, technique survival and peritonitis incidence between self-care patients and assisted-care patients.

RESULTS

From 1984 to 2010, there were 138 elderly PD patients at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, of which 70% were assisted-care patients and 30% self-care patients. The mean duration of PD survival was 49.2 months in self-care patients, which was significantly longer than the 17.0 months of assisted-care patients (P < 0.05). Using the multivariate Cox proportion regression model to adjust for risk factors, it was found that self-care patients had a lower risk in both patient survival (Hazard Ratio 0.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.94, P < 0.05) and technique survival (Hazard ratio; 0.11, 95% CI 0.1-0.9, P < 0.05). Fluid overloading was the major cause of technique failure in assisted-care patients. Type of assistance was not a risk factor for PD-related peritonitis.

CONCLUSION

Our elderly assisted care had patients had a poorer survival and technique survival rates than those of the self-care patients. We argue that this is because early recognition of medical deterioration and early medical intervention are necessary for a better outcome for elderly PD patients.

Renal replacement therapy in the elderly population

ESRD has become an important problem for elderly patients. The segment of the ESRD population age 65 years or older has grown considerably, and this growth is expected to accelerate in coming years. Nephrologists caring for the elderly with advanced kidney disease will encounter patients with comorbid conditions common in younger patients, as well as physical, psychological, and social challenges that occur with increased frequency in the aging population. These challenging factors must be addressed to help inform decisions regarding the option to initiate dialysis, the choice of dialysis modality, whether to pursue kidney transplantation, and end-of-life care. This article will highlight some common problems encountered by elderly patients with ESRD and review data on the clinical outcomes of elderly patients treated with different modalities of dialysis, outcomes of kidney transplantation in the elderly, and nondialytic management of CKD stage 5.

Compared with younger peritoneal dialysis patients, elderly patients have similar peritonitis-free survival and lower risk of technique failure, but higher risk of peritonitis-related mortality

BACKGROUND

The number of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is increasing worldwide, but the proportion of elderly patients commencing peritoneal dialysis (PD) is falling. The reluctance of elderly ESKD patients to consider PD may be related to a perception that PD is associated with greater rates of complications. In the present study, we compared outcomes between younger and older PD patients.

METHODS

Using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis Registry data, all adult ESKD patients commencing PD between 1991 and 2007 were categorized into under 50, 50 - 64.9, and 65 years of age or older groups. Time to first peritonitis, death-censored technique failure, and peritonitis-associated and all-cause mortality were evaluated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 12 932 PD patients included in the study, 3370 (26%) were under 50 years of age, 4386 (34%) were 50 - 64.9 years of age, and 5176 (40%) were 65 years of age or older. Compared with younger patients (<50 years), elderly patients (≥ 65 years) had a similar peritonitis-free survival and a lower risk of death-censored technique failure [hazard ratio (HR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79 to 0.93], but they had higher peritonitis-related (HR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.68 to 3.18) and all-cause mortality (HR: 2.90; 95% CI: 2.60 to 3.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Not unexpectedly, elderly patients have higher peritonitis-related and all-cause mortality, which is likely a consequence of a greater prevalence of comorbid disease. However, compared with younger patients, elderly patients have superior technique survival and similar peritonitis-free survival, suggesting that PD is a viable renal replacement therapy in this group of patients.

Peritoneal dialysis in the elderly--is its underutilization justified?

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is underused as a dialysis modality in the elderly population. This is partly due to insufficient information about whether PD confers similar outcomes and quality of life as other modalities. In the BOLDE cross-sectional study, the authors compared different aspects of quality of life (cognitive function, index of deprivation and illness intrusiveness) in matched patients older than 65 years of age treated by PD or haemodialysis. Quality of life was similar (and possibly somewhat better) in patients on PD. These data justify efforts to increase the utilization of PD in older subjects.

Broadening Options for Long-term Dialysis in the Elderly (BOLDE): differences in quality of life on peritoneal dialysis compared to haemodialysis for older patients

Background. Health-related quality of life (QOL) is an important outcome for older people who are often on dialysis for life. Little is, however, known about differences in QOL on haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in older age groups. Randomising patients to either modality to assess outcomes is not feasible.

Methods. In this cross-sectional, multi-centred study we conducted QOL assessments (Short Form-12 Mental and Physical Component Summary scales, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale) in 140 people (aged 65 years or older) on PD and HD.

Results. The groups were similar in age, gender, time on dialysis, ethnicity, Index of Deprivation (based on postcode), dialysis adequacy, cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Exam and Trail-Making Test B), nutritional status (Subjective Global Assessment) and social networks. There was a higher comorbidity score in the HD group. Regression analyses were undertaken to ascertain which variables significantly influence each QOL assessment. All were influenced by symptom count highlighting that the patient’s perception of their symptoms is a critical determinant of their mental and physical well being. Modality was found to be an independent predictor of illness intrusion with greater intrusion felt in those on HD.

Conclusions. Overall, in two closely matched demographic groups of older dialysis patients, QOL was similar, if not better, in those on PD. This study strongly supports offering PD to all suitable older people.