Intraperitoneal thrombolytic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature pertaining to the use of adjunctive thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was conducted (January 1966-December 1997) to find articles using the terms peritonitis, peritoneal dialysis, and each thrombolytic drug. References from these articles were then reviewed to identify further sources.

DATA EXTRACTION

Representative case reports and clinical trials are summarized in this report. Information regarding thrombolytic dosing, administration techniques, and reported efficacy rates are included from both case reports and clinical trials.

DISCUSSION

Thrombolytic agents administered intraperitoneally appear to facilitate antibiotic penetration into the biofilm formed by certain bacteria. Numerous case reports of intraperitoneal thrombolytic adjunctive therapy for recurrent or persistent PDAP have indicated that these agents may have a role in the treatment of selected patients. Urokinase and streptokinase are the only thrombolytics that have been studied. They appear to have similar efficacy, but the adverse drug event rate with streptokinase is unacceptably high. The efficacy of therapy with urokinase is probably inferior to removal of the peritoneal dialysis catheter, but, if successful, allows for the continuation of peritoneal dialysis therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In conjunction with appropriate antibiotic therapy, intraperitoneal instillation of urokinase should be reserved for patients who develop two or more episodes of recurrent or persistent PDAP in the absence of poor compliance and in whom dialysis catheter removal should be avoided (i.e., they cannot tolerate hemodialysis).

Infectious consequences of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

The peritoneal cavity of patients undergoing CAPD is critically immunocompromised and infectious peritonitis is the most important complication of the technique. Nevertheless, recent research into the epidemiology and pathogenesis of infections caused by the most important microorganisms has enabled significant reductions in peritonitis rates to be made. Peritonitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be prevented by eliminating their principal source, an infected Tenckhoff catheter wound. The source of infection for coagulase-negative staphylococci and other pseudomonads cannot be eliminated, but peritonitis caused by these organisms may be prevented by interrupting their routes of entry into the peritoneal cavity. The identification of host factors predictive of enhanced susceptibility to infectious peritonitis offers the further possibility of prevention by immunological approaches. Although the main difficulties surrounding the diagnosis of infective peritonitis have been clarified, approximately 20% of episodes remain culture-negative, with multifactorial aetiology. Initial (empirical) combination antibiotic therapy can be both appropriate and effective in approximately 85% of cases. Intraperitoneal monotherapy with fluoroquinolones has been equally successful, and these agents may prove effective by the oral route, offering considerable advantages in cost and convenience. Approximately 5% of episodes of bacterial peritonitis are unresponsive to antibiotic therapy. These cases may be conveniently managed by the technique of Tenckhoff catheter removal and replacement at a single operation.