What Can We Do to Preserve the Peritoneum?

Background

Long-term peritoneal dialysis may lead to peritoneal membrane failure. Loss of ultrafiltration is the most important clinical abnormality. Loss of ultrafiltration is associated with an increased number of peritoneal blood vessels, with fibrotic alterations, and with loss of mesothelium. Continuous exposure to bioincompatible dialysis solutions is likely to be important in the pathogenesis of these alterations.

Methods

This article reviews the toxicity of various constituents of dialysate, current assessments of interventions, and the results of interventions aimed at preserving the peritoneum.

Results

Glucose, possibly in combination with lactate, and glucose degradation products (GDPs) are likely to be the most toxic constituents of dialysate. Diabetiform peritoneal neoangiogenesis is likely to be mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Release of VEGF might be influenced by glucose-induced cellular pseudohypoxia, which is likely to be increased by exposure to lactate. Glucose and GDPs are both toxic to peritoneal cells. Glucose degradation products induce the formation of advanced glycosylation end-products at a much faster rate than does glucose itself, but the relative importance of GDPs and glucose in clinical PD has not been clarified. The effects of interventions should first be assessed in long-term animal models, followed by clinical studies on peritoneal transport and on effluent markers that may reflect the status of the peritoneum. Possible interventions aim at reducing peritoneal exposure to glucose, GDPs, and lactate. Techniques include peritoneal resting, replacing some glucose-based exchanges with amino acid–based and icodextrin-based dialysate, using bicarbonate as a buffer, and administering solutions that have a low GDP content. Exposure to various dialysis solutions with a reduced GDP content has resulted in an increase in the effluent concentration of the mesothelial cell marker CA125, irrespective of the buffer used. Experimental studies in a long-term peritoneal exposure model in rats showed that the combination of a reduction in the concentration of lactate and replacement of lactate with pyruvate resulted in a reduction of the number of peritoneal blood vessels. Results of drug therapy have been studied in various animal models. Their use in patients is still experimental.

Conclusions

Strategies to preserve the peritoneum aim at reducing membrane exposure to bioincompatible solutions. Currently available dialysis fluids that are more biocompatible are likely to have some beneficial effects. Further research on the development of dialysis solutions that use combinations of osmotic agents and alternative buffers is necessary.

A Case Report of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Under Peritoneal Dialysis With Cyst Infection and Culture-Positive Peritoneal Fluid

Background:

Cyst infection is a complication sometimes seen in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and often shows through a positive blood culture. However, there have been no reports of ADPKD patients whose cyst infection propagate to peritoneal fluid leading to positive peritoneal fluid culture.

Case presentation:

A 74-year-old Japanese man with ADPKD under peritoneal dialysis (PD) was presented with left flank pain, fever, and chills at our hospital. He did not show any symptoms or signs suggestive of peritonitis. There were no elevated cell counts or polymorphonuclear leucocytes in his PD fluid. There were some complicated cysts found in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations. We clinically diagnosed him as having a renal cyst infection rather than PD-related peritonitis. We initiated treatment by administering ceftriaxone with an immediate favorable response. As the possibility of accompanying prostatitis still remained, we switched to intravenous levofloxacin on the second day. On the 10th day, Helicobacter cinaedi was detected in 2 sets of blood culture as well as in PD fluid. We switched back to ceftriaxone and this treatment was entirely successful.

Conclusions:

This is the first report of H cinaedi cyst infection which propagates to peritoneal fluid in a patient with ADPKD.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis with different trends of change in effluent white cell count: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Effluent white cell count (WCC) is among the important prognostic factors for peritonitis outcome, but its trend has never been studied. We aimed to explore the clinical characteristics and outcomes of peritonitis episodes having different trends in effluent WCC change in the first 5 days.

METHODS

For each peritonitis episode, we examined the patient's demographic and biochemical data, serial effluent WCC, and organisms cultured. Peritonitis-associated death and transfer to hemodialysis were defined as treatment failure.

RESULTS

Based on the trend of effluent WCC in the first 5 days, we divided 190 peritonitis episodes into group A (WCC persistently declined), group B (WCC declined after a transient increase), group C (WCC increased after a transient decline), and group D (WCC persistently increased). In group A, peritonitis was caused mostly by gram-positive organisms, and effluent WCC declined the most quickly, leading to a good prognosis. Although the elevation of effluent WCC was prolonged in group B, and the infections were, compared with those in group A, more often caused by gram-negative organisms, outcomes were not worse. In group C, the effluent WCC was more likely to be higher than 100/μL on day 5, and the infection was, compared with those in groups A and B, less likely to be caused by gram-positive organisms. Accordingly, membership in group C independently predicted the worst outcome of peritonitis even adjusted for age, sex, and causative organism.

CONCLUSIONS

Different trends of change in effluent WCC during the early stage of peritonitis represent different clinical patterns and outcomes. Further investigation for optimizing outcomes is required.

Unusual presentation of peritonitis with persistent clear aspirate: a case report

Introduction

Peritonitis is the most frequent complication of peritoneal dialysis. Diagnosis of peritonitis includes symptoms and signs of peritonitis with a cloudy aspirate of more than 100 WBC/ml, as well as positive cultures. Although sterile peritonitis has been reported in the literature, to the best of our knowledge this is the first report of an unusual presentation of peritonitis without any white blood cells in the peritoneal aspirate despite multiple positive peritoneal cultures.

Case presentation

An 82-year-old Caucasian man who had been on continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis for 12 years was admitted to our hospital with general malaise, loss of appetite, weight loss and somnolence. He did not describe abdominal pain or fever. Even though his peritoneal fluid was consistently negative for leukocytes and clear, he had peritonitis with different organisms consecutively.

Conclusions

Our case report shows that any patient on peritoneal dialysis presenting with evidence of infection (fever, peripheral leukocytosis) without an obvious cause should have aspirate cultures done even if the aspirate is clear and abdominal pain is absent. Our case report may change the initial work-up and management of these patients. We believe this report is of interest to general medicine and emergency room physicians as well as nephrologists.

Peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis

Peritonitis, an infectious complication of peritoneal dialysis, continues to account for much of the morbidity associated with this techniques. The clinical presentation and laboratory data used in diagnosis the peritonitis, as well as its differential diagnosis will be reviewed in this article. The distribution of pathogens is an important outcome determinant, Gram-negative infections being associated with greater rates of catheter loss and higher death rates. Among the five routes of peritoneal contamination, intraluminal and periluminal contamination account for most of the infections. Due to the two prevention methods implemented in the care of the PD population, the incidence of peritonitis has decreased over the last two decades. The recommendations for empiric treatment of peritonitis have changed over the years, as more was learnt about antibiotic resistance and drug toxicity. Future research to address enteric peritonitis, as well as biocompatible dialysis solution or biocompatible catheter materials is needed to further reduce the incidence of PD peritonitis.

Infections in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis

Considering experience acquired in the past years, it seems as though physicians have reached a plateau in the frequency of peritonitis. A peritonitis rate of 1 every 2 patient years may be acceptable. Further reduction of this peritonitis rate will require inordinately large efforts on all fronts. One will have to consider what are the acceptable costs and risks of peritonitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis. New developments in catheter technology, improved connections, better understanding of patient selection and training programs, improved diagnostic and therapeutic methods in the management of peritonitis, and understanding of the infectious and immune processes are eagerly awaited developments.

Peritoneal infections

Peritoneal dialysis related infections include infection of the catheter exit site, subcutaneous pathway, or effluent. Exit-site infections, predominately owing to Staphylococcus aureus, are defined as purulent drainage at the exit site, although erythema may be a less serious type of exit-site infection. Tunnel infections are underdiagnosed clinically, and sonography of the tunnel is useful to delineate the extent of the infection and to evaluate response to antibiotic therapy. S aureus infections occur more frequently in S aureus carriers and immunosuppressed patients and can be reduced by mupirocin prophylaxis either intranasally or at the exit site. Patients with peritonitis present with cloudy effluent and usually pain, although 6% of patients may initially have pain without cloudy effluent. A white blood cell count of 100 or greater per microL, 50% of which are polymorphonuclear cells, has long been the hallmark of peritonitis. Empiric therapy is controversial, with some recommending cefazolin and others vancomycin (with cefatazidime for Gram-negative coverage). The choice should depend on the center's antibiotic sensitivity profile; those centers with a high rate of Enterococcus- or methicillin resistant organisms should use vancomcycin. Peritonitis episodes occurring in association with a tunnel infection with the same organism seldom resolve with antibiotics and require catheter removal. Other indications for catheter removal are refractory peritonitis, relapsing peritonitis, tunnel infection with inner-cuff involvement that does not respond to antibiotic therapy (based on ultrasound criteria), fungal peritonitis, and enteric peritonitis owing to intra abdominal pathology. Centers can reduce dialysis related infections to very low levels by proper catheter selection and insertion, careful selection and training of patients, avoidance of spiking techniques, and use of antibiotic prophylaxis against S. aureus. Further research is required to identify methods to reduce the risk of enteric peritonitis.