Associations Between Antithrombosis and Ventilator-Associated Events, ICU Stays, and Mortality Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Registry-Based Cohort Study

Background: The effect of thromboembolism prophylaxis on clinical outcomes, such as ventilator-associated events (VAEs), ICU stays, and mortality, remains controversial. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis on VAEs, ICU stays, and ICU mortality among patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV).

Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on a well-established registry of healthcare-associated infections at ICUs in the West China Hospital system. Patients who consistently received MV for at least 4 days from 1 April 2015 to 31 December 2018 were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) were compared for three tiers of VAEs, ICU stays, and ICU mortality among patients receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis versus those without using the time-dependent Cox model. For the analyses of ICU stays and ICU mortality, we also used Fine-Gray models to disentangle the competing risks and outcomes of interest.

Results: Overall, 6,140 patients were included. Of these, 3,805 received at least one prescription of antithrombosis agents. Treatments with antithrombosis agents were associated with lower risk of VAEs (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.98) and ICU mortality (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.86) than those without. Anticoagulants but not antiplatelet agents were associated with decreased risk of VAEs (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.98), ICU mortality (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.76), and less time to ICU discharge (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.28). Antithrombosis may be associated with decreased risk of VAEs in patients with D-dimer >5 mg/LFEU (HR: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.72, 0.98).

Conclusions: Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was associated with lower risk of VAEs and ICU mortality. Similar effects were observed between unfractionated heparins versus low-molecular-weight heparins.

The Association Between Early Versus Late Physical Therapy Initiation and Outcomes of Trauma Patients With and Without Traumatic Brain Injuries

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of literature regarding the most effective timing to initiate physical therapy (PT) among traumatically injured patients. We aim to evaluate the association between early PT/mobilization versus delayed or late PT/mobilization and clinical outcomes of trauma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of an urban level-I trauma center from 2014 to 2019 was performed. Univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed with significance defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 11,937 patients were analyzed. Among patients without a traumatic brain injury (TBI), late PT initiation times were associated with 60% lower odds of being discharged home without services (P < 0.05), significantly increased hospital and ICU length of stay (H-LOS, ICU-LOS) (P < 0.05), and significantly higher odds of complications (VTE, pneumonia, pressure ulcers, ARDS) (P < 0.001). Among patients with a TBI, late PT initiation time had 76% lower odds of being discharged home without services (P < 0.05) and significantly longer H-LOS and ICU-LOS (P < 0.05) however did not experience significantly higher odds of complications (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among traumatically injured patients, early PT is associated with decreased odds of complications, shorter H-LOS and ICU-LOS, and a favorable discharge disposition to home without services. Adoption of early PT initiation/mobilization protocols and establishment of prophylactic measures against complications associated with delayed PT is critical to maximize quality of care and trauma patient outcomes. Multi-center prospective studies are needed to ascertain the impact of PT initiation times in greater detail and to minimize trauma patient morbidity.

Ventilation bundle compliance in two Australian intensive care units: An observational study

Background

The ventilation bundle has been used in adult intensive care units to decrease harm and improve quality of care for mechanically ventilated patients. The ventilation bundle focuses on prevention of specific complications of mechanical ventilation; ventilator-associated pneumonia, sepsis, barotrauma, pulmonary oedema, pulmonary embolism, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement ventilation bundle consists of five structured evidence-based interventions: head of the bed elevation at 30–45°; daily sedation interruptions and assessment of readiness to extubate; peptic ulcer prophylaxis; deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis; and daily oral care with chlorhexidine.

Objectives

The objective of the study was to evaluate the use of the ventilation bundle in two intensive care units in Victoria, Australia.

Methods

This is a 3-month prospective observational study in two intensive care units. Patient medical records were reviewed on days 3, 4, and 5 of mechanical ventilation using a prevalidated ventilation bundle checklist.

Results

A total of 96 critically ill patients required mechanical ventilation for more than 2 d. Patients had a mean age of 64.50 y (standard deviation = 14.89), with an Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III mean score of 79.27 (standard deviation = 27.11). The mean ventilation bundle compliance rate was 88.3% on the three consecutive mechanical ventilation days (day 3 = 79.4%, day 4 = 91.1%, and day 5 = 96.7%). There was a statistically significant difference in the mean APACHE III score between patients who had head of bed elevation and those without head of bed elevation, on days 3 (p = <0.001) and 4 (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

The ventilation bundle elements were used in Australian intensive care units. The likelihood of having all ventilation bundle elements on day 3 was low if the patient's APACHE III score was high. However, the ventilation bundle compliance rate increased with mechanical ventilation days.