Interprofessional Perceptions and Attitudes Among Pharmacy and Family Nurse Practitioner Students

Impact of Just-in-Time TeamSTEPPS Training on Team Performance in a Pediatric Escape Room Interprofessional Experience

OBJECTIVE

To compare differences in observed and self-reported team dynamics between those who received versus those who did not receive TeamSTEPPS training prior to an interprofessional escape room scenario.

METHODS

Final-year pharmacy (N = 27) and physician assistant (N = 88) students participated in an escape room featuring pediatric dosing, asthma, otitis media, type 1 diabetes, and vaccine fundamentals. In total, 29 teams were randomized to control (14) or intervention arm (15). The control group went to the escape room and then returned to the classroom for a team-building module including TeamSTEPPS training. The intervention group started with the team-building module then went to the escape room. One faculty observer was assigned to each team and utilized the Performance Assessment Communication and Teamwork (PACT) expert-observer form to assess team performance. Post-event, students completed an abbreviated PACT post-assessment and a self-reflection on the prompt "What were the most important takeaways from today's interprofessional education experience?"

RESULTS

On the PACT expert-observer form, significantly higher global scores were noted for the intervention arm on all items except situation monitoring. On the aggregate observer data from all stations, leadership emerged as statistically different between the 2 groups. On the PACT post-assessment, the intervention arm reported significantly more leadership during the simulation. On the self-reflections, 70.9% versus 64% in the control arm recognized the importance of teamwork in managing patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Just-in-time TeamSTEPPS training improved observed and to a lesser extent, self-reported teamwork and communication skills. Incorporating TeamSTEPPS training immediately prior to an interprofessional education experience may enhance team performance.

The Application of Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in the Assessment of Interprofessional Simulation Activities Involving Pharmacy Students: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To our knowledge, this systematic review is the first to assess pharmacy-involved interprofessional education (IPE) simulation activities in establishing current methodological effectiveness using Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model. This is a training evaluative model that assesses educational training activities according to 4 levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results.

FINDINGS

From the 3108 studies retrieved, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies achieved levels 1 and 2 of Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model, and 1 achieved level 3. One study only achieved level 1. Single-group, pre- and posttest studies were the most common study designs (n = 9), and 1 study followed a longitudinal approach. IPE duration ranged from 45 min to 5 days, and most of the studies were conducted in the United States (n = 10). Most studies alluded to an underpinning theory behind IPE simulation design and chose surveys as their mode of data collection.

SUMMARY

The most common limitation reported was the uneven representation of professions and a lack of data on the studies' effect in practice. To demonstrate the achievement of outcomes in relation to levels 3 and 4, there is a need for longitudinal studies of IPE simulation activities. Although evaluative studies showed a positive response to IPE simulation at a basic level, there is a lack of effective integration of theory behind IPE design. Future studies need to consider this when setting the infrastructure of IPE design, as well as making efforts to mobilize stakeholders in the workplace to help facilitate transfer of learning.