Psychiatrist and Psychiatric Pharmacists Beliefs and Preferences for Atypical Antipsychotic Treatments in Patients With Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorders

Impact of formulary-related pharmacy claim rejections of cariprazine on health care utilization and treatment patterns among patients with bipolar I disorder

BACKGROUND

Formulary restrictions, intended to limit inappropriate medication use and decrease pharmacy costs, may prevent or delay patients with bipolar I disorder from initiating cariprazine, a dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 and serotonin 5HT1A receptor partial agonist that is approved to treat manic/mixed or depressive episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. Little is known about the downstream consequences of formulary-related cariprazine prescription rejections.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of formulary-related cariprazine claim rejections on health care resource utilization (HCRU) and treatment patterns among patients newly prescribed cariprazine for bipolar I disorder.

METHODS

Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse was used to identify commercially insured adults (aged ≥18 years) with bipolar I disorder and at least 1 pharmacy claim for cariprazine (rejected because of formulary restrictions or approved; date of the first claim is the index date) from March 2015 through October 2020. Formulary-related rejection reasons included noncoverage, prior authorization requirement, and step therapy requirement. Baseline characteristics were evaluated during the 12 months pre-index and balanced between rejected and approved cohorts using 1:2 propensity score matching. HCRU outcomes included all-cause and mental health (MH)-related hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits. Treatment patterns were analyzed descriptively and included treatment delay and atypical antipsychotic use. HCRU was reported per patient-year and compared between cohorts using rate ratios; 95% CIs and P values were calculated using nonparametric bootstrap procedures.

RESULTS

The matched rejected and approved cohorts comprised 1,554 and 3,108 patients, respectively. The rejected cohort had 22% more all-cause and 24% more MH-related hospitalizations per patient-year vs the approved cohort (rate ratio [95% CI], all-cause: 1.22 [1.01-1.48], P = 0.024; MH-related: 1.24 [1.01-1.55], P = 0.044). ED and outpatient visits were numerically, but not significantly, greater in the rejected cohort. Of patients in the rejected cohort, 34.7% never received an atypical antipsychotic and 76.8% never received cariprazine. For those who later received cariprazine or another atypical antipsychotic, the average treatment delay was approximately 6 months (188 days) and approximately 4 months (123 days) after the initial rejection, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with bipolar I disorder and formulary-related cariprazine claim rejections experienced significantly more hospitalizations than patients whose initial claim was approved; ED and outpatient visits were similar between cohorts. Less than a quarter of patients whose initial claim was rejected later received cariprazine, and more than one-third never received any atypical antipsychotic. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the impact of formulary-related rejections of cariprazine on HCRU and treatment patterns in patients with bipolar I disorder.

Efficacy and Safety Profiles of Antipsychotic Drugs as Viewed by Psychiatrists: A Comparative Analysis of Cariprazine and Risperidone

BACKGROUND

Physicians hold the belief that the treatment outcomes and the treatment strategy they eventually adopt is largely determined by the differences in medications. Despite numerous studies focusing on the decision-making processes of psychiatrists, including the choice of antipsychotics when prescribing pharmacotherapy, the impact of therapeutic drug profiling on physicians' decision-making remains poorly comprehended.

AIM

The aim of this study is to assess the quantitative differences in perceptions of antipsychotics by psychiatrists using cariprazine and risperidone as examples.

METHODS

A total of 79 psychiatrists were interviewed anonymously in St. Petersburg, Russia. The physicians documented the clinical advantages they perceived drugs to possess relative to one another, following a predetermined principle: A B, A=B, A B (2-AC protocol). The comparison is based on eleven parameters that assess the effectiveness and safety of cariprazine or risperidone. It has been hypothesized that the pattern of responses (qualitative difference) and the degree of preference for each drug (quantitative difference) may not align with the data in the original meta-analyses.

RESULTS

The perception parameter exhibited a greater difference than anticipated (δ - 0.889), while the threshold for differentiating between the drugs was lower (τ - 1.001). The response pattern only aligned with theory by 44.37%. The dispersion of responses was associated with the length of work experience.

CONCLUSION

The perceived difference between the drugs significantly deviates from the theoretical data, both in terms of strength of perception and pattern (quantitative and qualitative differences).