The Effect of Holistic Nursing Competence on Work Engagement, Self-Reflection and Insight in Nurses

Variations in the Five Facets of Mindfulness in Italian Oncology Nurses according to Sex, Work Experience in Oncology, and Shift Work

BACKGROUND

Oncology nurses support cancer patients in meeting their self-care needs, often neglecting their own emotions and self-care needs. This study aims to investigate the variations in the five facets of holistic mindfulness among Italian oncology nurses based on gender, work experience in oncology, and shift work.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was carried out in 2023 amongst all registered nurses who were employed in an oncology setting and working in Italy.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in all five facets of holistic mindfulness (p ≥ 0.05) according to gender, work experience in the oncology field, and shift work.

CONCLUSION

Could holistic mindfulness be defined as an intrinsic individual characteristic? Surely, more insights will be necessary to better define the holistic trend in oncology nursing.

Effects of burnout and work engagement in the relationship between self-efficacy and safety behaviours-A chained mediation modelling analysis

AIMS

To explore the current situation, influencing factors and pathways of safety behaviour of nurses in tumour specialized hospitals, in order to provide a theoretical basis for managers to manage and train nurses, improve their safety behaviour level and ensure medical safety.

DESIGN

An anonymous cross-sectional survey.

METHOD

A total of 2147 nurses from Grade A cancer hospitals in 15 provinces of China were selected by a convenient sampling method. Questionnaires were collected through the Questionnaire Star platform. Nurses' safety behaviour was measured using the nurse Safety Behaviour Scale, Self-efficacy by the General Self-efficacy Scale, and nurses' occupational burnout was measured by the occupational Burnout Scale, and work engagement through the the Work Engagement Scale. Structural equation modelling was used to test the relationship among nurses' safety behaviour, general self-efficacy, occupational burnout and work engagement. SPSS25.0 software was used to test the relationship among the safety behaviour of nurses, general self-efficacy, occupational burnout and work engagement.

RESULTS

The total score of safety behaviour of nurses was 55.45 ± 6.879, the total score of general self-efficacy was 31.39 ± 5.729, the total score of occupational burnout was 44.99 ± 26.587, and the total score of work engagement was 38.48 ± 13.433; the scores of the Nurse Safety Behaviour Scale, Self-Efficacy Scale, and Work Engagement Scale were positively correlated (all p < .001); the occupational burnout scale was negatively correlated with the scores of self-efficacy scale, work engagement scale and nurse safety behaviour scale (all p < .001); Structural equation model analysis shows that self-efficacy and work engagement have a direct positive impact on nurse safety behaviour(β = .103, β = .096, all p < .001); Occupational burnout has a direct negative impact on self-efficacy, work engagement and nurse safety behaviour(β = -.371, β = -.413, β = -.328 all p < .001). Bootstrap analysis showed that occupational burnout and job involvement had a significant chain mediating effect between self-efficacy and the safety behaviour of nurses (95% CI: 0.148-0.21). The total effect of self-efficacy on the safety behaviour of nurses was 0.283 (p < .001, 95% CI: 0.225-0.301), the direct effect was 0.096 (p < .001, 95% CI: 0.042-0.15), and the indirect effect was 0.179 (p < .001, 95% CI: 0.085-0.215), The mediating effect accounted for 63.3% of the total effect size.

CONCLUSION

Occupational burnout and work engagement play a partial mediating role between self-efficacy and nurse safety behaviour. It is necessary to strengthen training on nurse safety culture awareness, improve the nurse self-efficacy and work engagement, reduce nurse occupational burnout, and thereby improve the level of nurses' safety behaviour.

The Effect of Nurses' Holistic Competence in Chronic Disease Management on Their Attitudes Toward Caregiver Roles

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of nurses' holistic nursing competence in chronic disease management on their attitudes toward caregiving roles. The sample of the study, which was carried out in descriptive design, consists of 114 nurses (52.6% female and 47.4% male). The research data were gathered with sociodemographic characteristics form, the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale (HNCS), and the Attitude Scale for Nurses in Caregiving Roles (ASNCR). The influence of HNCS, gender, years of job, working style, professional status, weekly working time, and difficulty caring for chronic patients on ASNCR explained 38.1% of the variance. The impact of the ASNCR, gender, years of work in the job, working type, weekly working hours, and having difficulties caring for chronic patients on HNCS explained 54.5% of the variance. Our findings demonstrated the impact of holistic competence on nurses' positive attitudes toward the role of caregiver.

Reliability and validity of the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale for psychologists and the development and validation of the revised short version

Self-reflection is broadly considered a core competency for psychologists; however, there is an absence of measures of self-reflection, limiting the extent to which self-reflection can be assessed in both research and practice contexts. Whilst the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (Grant et al., 2002) has been validated in a range of formats with different populations, it has not yet been validated with psychologists. Further, the psychometric properties of a short version of the scale (Silvia, 2021) have not been examined for use with psychologists. This study tested the factor structure, internal consistency and convergent and divergent validity of the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale with registered psychologists (N = 123), finding both the full scale and short version to have sound psychometrics. However, as there were low loading items across both versions of the measure, and the short version also excluded high-loading items, the SRIS-Revised (SRIS-R) was formed through model improvement, retaining a total of 14 items. This revised version of the scale captures high loading items without redundancy of low-loading items, resulting in a measure that parsimoniously captures the construct of self-reflection as relevant to psychologists. The SRIS-R demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .882), convergent, divergent and construct validity. Scores on the SRIS-R were used to test whether there was a correlation between self-reflection and years of professional registration, with this not being significant.