Computation of bone remodelling after Duracon knee arthroplasty using a thermodynamic-based model

Computational prediction of the long-term behavior of the femoral density after THR using the Silent Hip stem

Aseptic loosening due to the progressive periprosthetic bone resorption following total hip replacement is a crucial concern, that causes complications and failure of the arthroplasty surgery. The mismatch in stiffness between the hip implant and the surrounding femoral bone is one of the key factors leading to bone density resorption. This paper aimed to investigate the long-term response of the femoral bone after THR using the Silent Hip stem. For this purpose, a validated thermodynamic-based computational model was used to compute the change in bone density before and after THR. This model incorporated essential factors involved in bone remodeling process, such as mechanical loading, and biochemical affinities. The results of the numerical simulations using 3D finite element analysis were analyzed in five zones of interest qualitatively and quantitatively. Bone density predictions showed notable bone resorption in cervical areas, specifically in zone 1 and zone 5 of -18.7% and -14%, respectively. Conversely, bone formation was observed in the greater trochanter area (zone 2) of +25%. Stress shielding seemed to occur at cervical area due to the reduction in the mechanical loading in this region. Based on the quantitative analysis of the bone density distribution throughout the femoral bone, it appears that the Silent Hip stem achieved less bone resorption compared to conventional hip stem designs reported in the literature, which could be used for active patients.

An efficient method to capture the impact of total knee replacement on a variety of simulated patient types: A finite element study

Osteoporosis resulting in a reduction in bone stiffness and thinning of the cortex is almost universal in older patients. In this study a novel method to generate computational models of the distal femur which incorporate the effects of ageing and endosteal trabecularisation are presented. Application of this method to pre- and post-knee arthroplasty scenarios is then considered. These computational methods are found to provide a simple yet effective tool for assessing the post-arthroplasty mechanical environment in the knee for different patient types and can help evaluate vulnerability to supracondylar periprosthetic fracture following implantation. Our results show that the stresses in the periprosthetic region increase dramatically with ageing; this is particularly true for higher flexion angles. Stresses in the anterior region of the femoral cortex were also found to increase significantly post-implantation. The most dramatic increases in stresses and strains at these locations were observed in old osteoporotic patients, explaining why this patient group in particular is at greater risk of periprosthetic fractures.

Functional outcomes comparing Triathlon versus Duracon total knee arthroplasty: does the Triathlon outperform its predecessor?

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthesis designs are constantly evolving to obtain greater functional performance. The aim of this study is to compare the functional outcomes between the newer single radius (SR) Triathlon prosthesis with its multiradius (MR) predecessor the Duracon.

METHOD

We analysed 1,012 primary TKA procedures which used either the Triathlon SR prosthesis or the Duracon MR prosthesis (338 Triathlon, 674 Duracon). Patients were assessed using the Knee Society score (KSS), range of movement measurements, pain and walking assessments at time points pre-operatively, one year and two years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar pre-operatively in terms of age, gender and body mass index (BMI). At one year postoperatively the Triathlon group had a significantly better flexion (P = 0.005) and KSS (function score P = 0.037, knee score P = 0.000). At two years postoperatively the Triathlons had maintained a significantly better KSS (function score P = 0.046, knee score P = 0.000) and also knee flexion (P = 0.02). Pain assessments at two years were significantly better in the Triathlon group (P = 0.002) with 66.3 % of patients experiencing no pain at that point compared to 54.4 % with Duracon knees.

CONCLUSION

This data supports the proposition that the use of Triathlon TKA results in improved outcomes for patients when compared to the Duracon TKA.