Accuracy of an adjustable patient-specific guide for acetabular alignment in hip replacement surgery (Optihip)

Value of Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Pre-operative Planning in Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty With Dysplastic Acetabulum

Objects: To investigate the value of CT-based 3D templating software for pre-operative planning in patients with acetabular dysplasia undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's cohort of patients with Crowe I to III developmental dysplastic hip (49 hips in 41 patients) who underwent cementless primary THA and were available for follow-up at a mean of 2.7 years after THA. We analyzed the accuracy of cup size prediction, the reliability of pre- and post-operative cup orientation and position of reconstructed rotation center using CT-based 3D templating software. Post-operative Harris Hip Score and lower limb discrepancy was obtained at the last follow-up. Results: The sizes of 71% of the cup components (35/49) were estimated exactly, and 100% of the cup size estimates were accurate to within one-cup size. There was good reproducibility of pre- and post-operative position of reconstructed rotation center (correlation coefficient r = 0.396 for vertical position, p = 0.005; r = 0.326 for horizontal position, p = 0.024). There was no substantial agreement between the planned acetabular orientation and that measured post-operatively (correlation coefficient -0.174 for inclination and 0.045 for anteversion). There were 44 (90%) excellent or good results according to HHS. Seven patients (14%) reported lower limb discrepancy. Conclusions: Pre-operative CT-based 3D templating made it possible to predict accurate cup size and achieve reproducible cup position in patients with dysplastic acetabulum. The reproducibility of cup orientation could not be demonstrated in this study.

3D-printed Patient-specific Guides for Hip Arthroplasty

Surgeons and engineers constantly search for methods to improve the surgical positioning of implants used for joint arthroplasty. Rapid prototyping is being used to develop patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and has already been successfully translated into large-scale clinical use for knee arthroplasty. PSI has been used in shoulder arthroplasty; however, it is not yet known whether PSI provides improved accuracy and outcomes compared with conventional methods in either shoulder arthroplasty or knee arthroplasty. In the hip, PSI has been limited to the positioning of custom-manufactured implants and a small number of surgeons testing the emerging solutions from different manufacturers. Early results indicate consistent accurate positioning of implants with the use of PSI in hip arthroplasty but with added costs and uncertain effect on clinical outcomes.

Good vs Poor Results After Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis Method Using Implant and Anatomic Parameters With the EOS Imaging System

BACKGROUND

Existing imaging techniques and single-parameter analyses, in nonfunctional positions, fail to detect the differences between patients with good vs poor results after total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

The present study developed an analysis method using the EOS full-body, low-dose, biplanar, weightbearing imaging system to compare good vs poor patients after total hip arthroplasty and to report on our preliminary experiences (17 good, 18 poor).

RESULTS

All revision cases were found to have at least 4 high or low implant or anatomic parameters relative to the good group. These included acetabular cup orientation, sagittal pelvic tilt, sacral slope, femoral offset, and neck-shaft angle. Acetabular cup orientation differed significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

With the EOS system, a large cohort can be studied relatively quickly and at low dose, which could lead to patient-specific guidelines.

Validating a Modified Circle Theorem Method for the Measurement of Acetabular Cup Anteversion on Plain Radiography with Intra-Operative Data from Robotic Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty

This study aims to validate a modified circle theorem method for the calculation of true version of the acetabular component on anteroposterior x-rays with intra-operative version data derived from robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA). Planar anteversion measurements recorded intraoperatively in 80 THAs were correlated to measurements on anteroposterior radiographs. The mean anteversion of the cohort measured by the robotic system and on plain radiography was 21.2° ± 2.0° and 19.9° ± 3.4° respectively and 97.5% of cases were in a 30% relative error. The correlation between the true and planar measurements of anteversion on plain radiographs was strong (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9422). We conclude that the circle theorem method can be validated with data from robotic guided THA.

Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery: Current State and Future Perspective

Introduced about two decades ago, computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) has emerged as a new and independent area, due to the importance of treatment of musculoskeletal diseases in orthopedics and traumatology, increasing availability of different imaging modalities, and advances in analytics and navigation tools. The aim of this paper is to present the basic elements of CAOS devices and to review state-of-the-art examples of different imaging modalities used to create the virtual representations, of different position tracking devices for navigation systems, of different surgical robots, of different methods for registration and referencing, and of CAOS modules that have been realized for different surgical procedures. Future perspectives will also be outlined.