Evaluation of the concurrent use of dolutegravir and metformin in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

Bictegravir and Metformin Drug-Drug Interaction in People with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

A drug-drug interaction (DDI) exists between bictegravir and metformin. Bictegravir inhibits renal organic cation transporter-2, leading to increased metformin plasma concentrations. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the clinical implications of concomitant bictegravir and metformin administration. This was a retrospective, single-center, descriptive analysis evaluating people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) concurrently prescribed bictegravir and metformin between February 2018-June 2020. PWH lost to follow-up or non-adherent were excluded. Data collection included: hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1C), HIV RNA viral load, CD4 cell count, serum creatinine, and lactate. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were assessed by provider-documented, patient-reported symptoms of gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance and hypoglycemia. Metformin dose adjustments and discontinuations were recorded. Fifty-three PWH were included (116 screened; 63 excluded). GI intolerance was reported in three PWH (5.7%). There were no documented episodes of hypoglycemia or lactic acidosis. Five PWH had metformin dose reductions (N = 3 for unspecified reasons; N = 1 for GI intolerance) or discontinuation (N = 1 unrelated to ADRs). Both diabetes and HIV control improved (HgbA1C decreased by 0.7% with virologic control in 95% of PWH). Minimal ADRs were reported in PWH receiving concurrent metformin and bictegravir. Prescribers should be aware of this potential interaction; however, no empiric metformin total daily dose adjustment appears necessary.

Drug-drug interactions of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors among older people living with HIV: Interazioni farmacologiche degli inibitori delle integrase tra le persone anziane che vivono con HIV

The advancement of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) treatment improves the life expectancy of HIV-positive individuals. People living with HIV have more polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions than those without HIV. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are the newest class commonly used for HIV treatment. There are five INSTIs currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration, including raltegravir, elvitegravir, dolutegravir, bictegravir, and cabotegravir. INSTIs class contributes to better safety and efficacy profile, making them the preferred or recommended antiretroviral regimens in HIV treatment guidelines worldwide. Despite the shared mechanism of action, INSTIs differ in pharmacokinetics, contributing to different drug-drug interactions. This review summarized the potential drug interactions of INSTIs and the management of the drug interactions in clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of integrase strand transfer inhibitors

The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens are currently considered as the first-line treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Although possessing a common mechanism of action to inhibit HIV integrase irreversibly to stop HIV replication cycle, the INSTIs, including raltegravir, elvitegravir, dolutegravir, and bictegravir, differ in pharmacokinetic characteristics. While raltegravir undergoes biotransformation by the UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), elvitegravir is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and co-formulated with cobicistat to increase its plasma exposure. The metabolism pathways of dolutegravir and bictegravir are similar, both including CYP3A and UGT1A1, and both agents are substrates to different drug transporters. Because of their differences in metabolism, INSTIs interact with other medications differently through CYP enzymes and transporters as inducers or inhibitors. These drug interactions may become an important consideration in the long-term clinical use because the life expectancy of people with HIV (PWH) approaches to that of the general population. Also, common geriatric challenges such as multimorbidity and polypharmacy have been increasingly recognized in PWH. This review provides a summary of pharmacokinetic interactions with INSTIs and future perspectives in implications of INSTI drug interactions.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of modern antiretroviral therapy

Drug--drug interactions (DDIs) have been a clinical challenge in HIV medicine for over two decades. The newer antiretroviral drugs (ARTs) have significantly fewer DDIs than protease inhibitors and boosted integrase inhibitors (INSTIs). The lower propensity of such newer antiretrovirals (e.g. unboosted integrase inhibitors; doravirine) to cause DDIs, has been largely offset by the ageing cohort of patients with multiple comorbidities, who are taking multiple chronic medicines. Furthermore, the introduction of newly marketed drugs into clinical practice needs to be closely monitored, as the new drugs may be perpetrators of DDIs, leading to a potential change in the efficacy or toxicity of the coadministered antiretrovirals.

Dolutegravir Population Pharmacokinetics in a Real-Life Cohort of People Living With HIV Infection: A Covariate Analysis

BACKGROUND

There are growing concerns about dolutegravir (DTG)-related neuropsychiatric adverse events and about differences in the characteristics of people living with HIV infection (PLWH) potentially associated with higher risks of said side effects. Several studies have shown that DTG was stopped more frequently among women, older PLWH, and PLWH who initiated abacavir (ABC) at the same time. This study aimed to clarify the factors affecting the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of DTG in a real-life cohort of PLWH using a population PK approach.

METHODS

The model-building strategy was based on a previously published model developed from premarketing trials (1-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time). Sparse therapeutic drug monitoring data were obtained from a real-life cohort of 279 PLWH, and population PK analysis was performed using Monolix software. A stepwise covariate model-building strategy was used to evaluate any relevant effects of age, body weight, gender, total bilirubin, smoking status, formulations of DTG, morning versus evening dosing, backbone therapy, and other comedications including CYP/UGT inducers/inhibitors.

RESULTS

For a typical 70-kg PLWH, the apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V/F) were 0.748 L/h and 14.6 L, respectively. Of the demographic factors evaluated, body weight was a significant covariate for CL/F and for V/F. Smokers had a 17% higher CL/F relative to nonsmokers. Both strong enzyme inhibitors (eg, atazanavir) and inducers (eg, rifampicin) had marked effects on DTG exposure, with potential clinical implications. Ritonavir-boosted darunavir was found to moderately increase clearance of DTG by 23%. No significant effect of ABC-based backbone therapy was observed on the PK parameters of DTG.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results did not support the hypothesis that ABC, by competing with the DTG metabolic pathway, may significantly increase DTG exposure leading to potential drug toxicity.

Update on Adverse Effects of HIV Integrase Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this paper is to provide an up-to-date review of adverse events related to the class of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), which became the class of choice in few years. We sought answers specifically to issues pertaining to neuropsychiatric adverse events, as well as weight gain, which were the two most important categories of adverse events raised in recent studies based on real-life experience. The primary focus of this paper is on adults with a brief summary on pregnant women and children/adolescents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dolutegravir (DTG) bears the heaviest burden of neuropsychiatric side effects. Weight gain was reported with all INSTIs, although there are methodological caveats in the analyses and the findings need to be interpreted with caution.Moreover, due to recent findings on neural tube defects in infants exposed to dolutegravir during their peri-conception period, its use is not recommended for women of childbearing age without proper birth control method, while raltegravir remains the only drug which may be prescribed without caution. Given the importance of cognitive and metabolic co-morbidities in people living with HIV in regard to their quality of life, future research needs to focus on long-term effects of INSTIs in relation to these adverse events. Pharmacogenetics seems to be a promising tool. Safety during pregnancy is also another important issue to further clarify.

SUMMARY

INSTIs are a generally well-tolerated class of antiretrovirals (ARV), and has a higher antiviral potency compared to other classes of ARV.Clinicians and patients need however to be aware of some red flags when starting with and monitoring patients on INSTIs.All INSTIs can lead to mild increases in creatinine levels, usually without clinical significance, but caution is needed in patients with low eGFR (<30ml/min), when using other nephrotoxic drugs, such as as tenofovir disoproxil.Neuro-psychiatric (NP) effects are to be monitored with INSTIs, especially with DTG (though reports are at times contradictory); clinicians might want to avoid DTG for patients with history of severe NP symptoms, until clarity is provided.Weight gain was reported with all INSTIs, especially with DTG, with possible differential effects according to sex and ethnicity (female and non-white patients being at increased risk). This is worrying since patients from African descent are at higher risk of cardio-vascular events and increased body mass index (BMI) can cause further increase metabolic risk. There is possibly an additional effect of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) on weight increase.Discrepancies between clinical trials - with low rates of adverse events - and reports from real-life settings might be due partly to under-representation of some groups of patients in clinical trials, and/or the short duration of follow-up, since some adverse effects may only occur after prolonged exposure.Preliminary data on safety of bictegravir (BIC), from clinical trials and non-trial settings, are very reassuring and seem to show lower rates of adverse events compared to DTG.Elvitegravir/cobicistat (EVG/cobi) need to be used with caution in patients with other co-morbidities given potential for polypharmacy, as it is the case for aging patients, because of the high potential of drug-drug interactions due to effects of the cobicistat booster.We are awaiting the release of cabotegravir (CAB), which could represent a good option for patients struggling with adherence, despite injection site reactions.Pharmacogenetics is a promising way to explore adverse effects occurrence in the INSTI class.

Factors Associated With Insulin Resistance in Adults With HIV Receiving Contemporary Antiretroviral Therapy: a Brief Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This narrative review summarizes recent data on factors associated with insulin resistance (IR) in adults with HIV, including contemporary antiretroviral therapy (ART).

RECENT FINDINGS

IR remains common in persons with HIV, even those receiving contemporary ART. Generalized and abdominal obesity and ectopic fat are correlates of IR, and emerging data have identified associations with biomarkers of inflammation and immune activation. Small studies suggest associations between mitochondria and IR. In ART-naïve individuals, IR increased within 4 weeks of starting ART in persons receiving contemporary boosted protease inhibitors or an integrase inhibitor. The importance of IR in non-diabetic persons with HIV will continue to grow as the population ages and obesity increases. Non-invasive estimates of IR appear to perform well in persons with HIV, but clinically relevant cutoffs are uncertain. Unexpected metabolic effects of newer HIV integrase inhibitors have been reported; thus, careful observation for and studies of IR are still warranted.