Effect of purgatives on antidotal efficacy of oral activated charcoal

Systematic review on the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination following acute oral overdose

INTRODUCTION

The use of activated charcoal in poisoning remains both a pillar of modern toxicology and a source of debate. Following the publication of the joint position statements on the use of single-dose and multiple-dose activated charcoal by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the routine use of activated charcoal declined. Over subsequent years, many new pharmaceuticals became available in modified or alternative-release formulations and additional data on gastric emptying time in poisoning was published, challenging previous assumptions about absorption kinetics. The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology founded the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative to create a framework for evidence-based recommendations for the management of poisoned patients. The activated charcoal workgroup of the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative was tasked with reviewing systematically the evidence pertaining to the use of activated charcoal in poisoning in order to update the previous recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was: Does oral activated charcoal given to adults or children prevent toxicity or improve clinical outcome and survival of poisoned patients compared to those who do not receive charcoal?  Secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetic outcomes, the role of cathartics, and adverse events to charcoal administration. This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on the efficacy of activated charcoal.

METHODS

A medical librarian created a systematic search strategy for Medline (Ovid), subsequently translated for Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), BIOSIS Previews (via Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library/DARE. All databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2019. There were no language limitations.  One author screened all citations identified in the search based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Excluded citations were confirmed by an additional author and remaining articles were obtained in full text and evaluated by at least two authors for inclusion. All authors cross-referenced full-text articles to identify articles missed in the searches. Data from included articles were extracted by the authors on a standardized spreadsheet and two authors used the GRADE methodology to independently assess the quality and risk of bias of each included study.

RESULTS

From 22,950 titles originally identified, the final data set consisted of 296 human studies, 118 animal studies, and 145 in vitro studies. Also included were 71 human and two animal studies that reported adverse events. The quality was judged to have a Low or Very Low GRADE in 469 (83%) of the studies. Ninety studies were judged to be of Moderate or High GRADE. The higher GRADE studies reported on the following drugs: paracetamol (acetaminophen), phenobarbital, carbamazepine, cardiac glycosides (digoxin and oleander), ethanol, iron, salicylates, theophylline, tricyclic antidepressants, and valproate. Data on newer pharmaceuticals not reviewed in the previous American Academy of Clinical Toxicology/European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists statements such as quetiapine, olanzapine, citalopram, and Factor Xa inhibitors were included. No studies on the optimal dosing for either single-dose or multiple-dose activated charcoal were found. In the reviewed clinical data, the time of administration of the first dose of charcoal was beyond one hour in 97% (n = 1006 individuals), beyond two hours in 36% (n = 491 individuals), and beyond 12 h in 4% (n = 43 individuals) whereas the timing of the first dose in controlled studies was within one hour of ingestion in 48% (n = 2359 individuals) and beyond two hours in 36% (n = 484) of individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found heterogenous data. The higher GRADE data was focused on a few select poisonings, while studies that addressed patients with unknown and or mixed ingestions were hampered by low rates of clinically meaningful toxicity or death.  Despite these limitations, they reported a benefit of activated charcoal beyond one hour in many clinical scenarios.

Massive Atenolol, Lisinopril, and Chlorthalidone Overdose Treated with Endoscopic Decontamination, Hemodialysis, Impella Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device, and ECMO

BACKGROUND

Overdose of cardiovascular medications is increasingly associated with morbidity and mortality. We present a case of substantial atenolol, chlorthalidone, and lisinopril overdose treated by multiple modalities with an excellent outcome.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive medical intervention did not provide sufficient hemodynamic stability in this patient with refractory cardiogenic and distributive shock. Impella® percutaneous left ventricular assist device and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provided support while the effects of the overdose subsided. We present concentrations demonstrating removal of atenolol with continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. This is the first report of esophagogastroduo denoscopy decontamination of this overdose with a large pill fragment burden.

Position Paper: Cathartics

The administration of a cathartic alone has no role in the management of the poisoned patient and is not recommended as a method of gut decontamination. Experimental data are conflicting regarding the use of cathartics in combination with activated charcoal. No clinical studies have been published to investigate the ability of a cathartic, with or without activated charcoal, to reduce the bioavailability of drugs or to improve the outcome of poisoned patients. Based on available data, the routine use of a cathartic in combination with activated charcoal is not endorsed. If a cathartic is used, it should be limited to a single dose in order to minimize adverse effects of the cathartic. A review of the literature since the preparation of the 1997 Cathartics Position Statement revealed no new evidence that would require a revision of the conclusions of the Statement.

Position statement: single-dose activated charcoal. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists

In preparing this Position Statement, all relevant scientific literature was identified and reviewed critically by acknowledged experts using agreed criteria. Well-conducted clinical and experimental studies were given precedence over anecdotal case reports and abstracts were not usually considered. A draft Position Statement was then produced and subjected to detailed peer review by an international group of clinical toxicologists chosen by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. The Position Statement went through multiple drafts before being approved by the boards of the two societies and being endorsed by other societies. The Position Statement includes a summary statement for ease of use and is supported by detailed documentation which describes the scientific evidence on which the Statement is based. Single-dose activated charcoal should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients. Based on volunteer studies, the effectiveness of activated charcoal decreases with time; the greatest benefit is within 1 hour of ingestion. The administration of activated charcoal may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially toxic amount of a poison (which is known to be adsorbed to charcoal) up to 1 hour previously; there are insufficient data to support or exclude its use after 1 hour of ingestion. There is no evidence that the administration of activated charcoal improves clinical outcome. Unless a patient has an intact or protected airway, the administration of charcoal is contraindicated.

Position statement: cathartics. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists

In preparing this Position Statement, all relevant scientific literature was identified and reviewed critically by acknowledged experts using agreed criteria. Well-conducted clinical and experimental studies were given precedence over anecdotal case reports and abstracts were not usually considered. A draft Position Statement was then produced and subjected to detailed peer review by an international group of clinical toxicologists chosen by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. The Position Statement went through multiple drafts before being approved by the Boards of the two societies and being endorsed by other societies. The Position Statement includes a summary statement for ease of use and is supported by detailed documentation which describes the scientific evidence on which the Statement is based. The administration of a cathartic alone has no role in the management of the poisoned patient and is not recommended as a method of gut decontamination. Experimental data are conflicting regarding the use of cathartics in combination with activated charcoal. No clinical studies have been published to investigate the ability of a cathartic, with or without activated charcoal, to reduce the bioavailability of drugs or to improve the outcome of poisoned patients. Based on available data, the routine use of a cathartic in combination with activated charcoal is not endorsed. If a cathartic is used, it should be limited to a single dose in order to minimize adverse effects.

Prevention of drug absorption in simulated theophylline overdose

To assess the effectiveness of oral activated charcoal and catharsis in preventing theophylline absorption, 12 healthy subjects, aged 20-35 years, received 3 x 200 mg sustained-release theophylline tablets and 16 radio-opaque placebo tablets on six occasions. On each occasion, they received either no treatment (control) or one of five treatments. Treatments were a) oral activated charcoal (Carbomix): 50 g at 1 h, 25 g at 5 h and 9 h; b) sorbitol 70%: 150 mL at 1 h; c) activated charcoal: 50 g at 6 h, 25 g at 10 h and 14 h; d) sorbitol 70%: 150 mL at 6 h; e) charcoal commencing at 6 h plus sorbitol at 6 h (i.e. a combination of treatments c and d). Plasma theophylline concentrations were measured and all stools collected over 36 h to assess placebo tablet recovery by radiography. Charcoal administration at 1 h was 91.2% effective in preventing theophylline absorption and at 6 h was 57.3% effective, while combined charcoal and catharsis at 6 h was 63.3% effective. Sorbitol-induced catharsis at 1 h and 6 h did not reduce theophylline absorption despite greater tablet recovery. Oral activated charcoal may be the most effective treatment for sustained-release theophylline overdose, with maximum benefit when administered soon after an overdose, though later administration might still be of value. Sorbitol catharsis is of no benefit either alone or in combination with charcoal.

Efficacy of magnesium citrate cathartic in pediatric toxic ingestions

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of magnesium citrate in reducing gastrointestinal transit time of activated charcoal in children.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, clinical comparison of four magnesium doses.

SETTING

Urban children's hospital emergency department.

PARTICIPANTS

Children aged 1 month to 6 years who presented for management of an acute toxic ingestion.

INTERVENTION

Each child received 1 g/kg activated charcoal combined with a randomly assigned dose of a 6% solution of magnesium citrate: 0 mL/kg, 4 mL/kg (standard recommended dose), 6 mL/kg, or 8 mL/kg. The primary outcome measure was the interval to first activated charcoal-containing stool, which was determined by follow-up telephone call or review of the medical record.

RESULTS

Sixty-four children were enrolled. Median times to first charcoal stool were 19.5 hours (0 mL/kg), 13.0 hours (4 mL/kg), 14.0 hours (6 mL/kg), and 12.0 hours (8 mL/kg). Intergroup differences were significant by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance (P = .0035).

CONCLUSION

Magnesium citrate reduces gastrointestinal transit times of activated charcoal stools when administered to children who receive activated charcoal for a toxic ingestion. Further study is needed to determine the clinical value of this reduction.

Effect of saline cathartics on gastrointestinal transit time of activated charcoal

The effects of saline cathartics on the gastrointestinal transit time of activated charcoal were investigated in six healthy volunteers. The study shows that the mean gastrointestinal transit times of charcoal alone were 29.3 h and 24.4, 15.4, 17.3 and 17.5 h with sodium chloride, sodium sulphate, magnesium sulphate alone and Andrew's Liver Salt respectively. Some volunteers complained of slight abdominal discomfort in all the phases except the Andrew's Liver Salt phase.

Pediatric gastrointestinal decontamination in acute toxin ingestion

The appropriate implementation of the various modalities of gastrointestinal (GI) decontamination is critical in the management of the pediatric patient who is examined in the emergency department or private office after an acute ingestion. Gastrointestinal decontamination includes gastric lavage, syrup of ipecac, activated charcoal, and whole bowel irrigation. Clinical studies have delineated the role and efficacy of these procedures. Trends in GI decontamination place less emphasis on ipecac and gastric lavage and more emphasis on activated charcoal alone in the patient with a mild overdose. Gastric lavage is indicated in serious ingestion and is most effective if done soon after the exposure. Whole bowel irrigation is the newest addition and has important clinical use in the treatment of serious iron ingestions as well as in older adolescent cocaine body suffers and packers. Indications and contraindications of the various forms of GI decontamination are discussed and relevant clinical studies are reviewed.

Update in medical toxicology

This article examines some current issues in toxicologic care. First there is a review of the scope of pediatric poisonings and some aspects of initial management. Then there is a discussion of the decision-making process required to properly use gastric decontamination in the management of poisonings. Each of the common methods available--emesis, gastric lavage, activated charcoal, catharsis, and whole bowel irrigation--is discussed. Finally, several new and old antidotes are reviewed, namely naloxone, glucagon, bicarbonate, dimercaptosuccinic acid, digoxin-specific fab fragments, and flumazenil.

Role of repeated doses of oral activated charcoal in the treatment of acute intoxications

While single dose activated charcoal is effective in preventing drug absorption, repeated doses not only prevent absorption but also can increase systemic drug clearance. The mechanism for the latter effect may involve interruption of enterohepatic recycling and/or promotion of drug exsorption from the systemic circulation into the gut lumen. A comprehensive review of reported studies in volunteer subjects and overdose patients showed that repeated dose activated charcoal markedly decreased the half-life and/or increased the clearance of a wide range of drugs. Side-effects of the treatment were infrequent, but included aspiration pneumonia, diarrhoea and constipation. The addition of laxatives to repeated dose charcoal treatment did not offer any significant increase in drug clearance and is not recommended. It is suggested that the optimal regimen for the use of repeat dose activated charcoal in acute drug intoxications is an initial dose of 75-100 g, followed by 50 g every 4 hours until the risks of systemic drug toxicity are reduced to an acceptable level.

Effect of whole-bowel irrigation on the antidotal efficacy of oral activated charcoal

Whole-bowel irrigation was studied in three volunteer subjects and compared with oral activated charcoal as a gastrointestinal decontamination procedure for acute drug overdose. The volunteer subjects were given 650 mg aspirin and were assigned randomly to the following treatment groups: 24-hour urine collection only; immediate whole-bowel irrigation with a polyethylene glycol solution; 50 g oral activated charcoal followed by whole-bowel irrigation; and oral activated charcoal alone. The cumulative 24-hour urinary salicylate excretion was measured in each trial. Catharsis was achieved rapidly with whole-bowel irrigation. Oral activated charcoal without catharsis was most effective in decreasing aspirin absorption (P = .011). These results do not support the routine use of a cathartic in combination with oral activated charcoal.

Sorbitol catharsis does not enhance efficacy of charcoal in a simulated acetaminophen overdose

The use of a 70% sorbitol solution has recently been advocated as an adjunct to activated charcoal. This results in rapid and profuse catharsis that could possibly cause fluid and electrolyte imbalance. An investigation was undertaken to determine if sorbitol catharsis enhanced the antidotal efficacy of activated charcoal. Eight healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, crossover trial. Subjects ingested 3 g of acetaminophen followed by either no intervention, 50 g of plain activated charcoal at one hour, or 50 g activated charcoal-sorbitol solution at one hour. Serial acetaminophen levels were determined at intervals over eight hours and side effects noted. Both interventions significantly reduced the area under the curve versus control (P less than .05). The addition of sorbitol did not enhance the efficacy of activated charcoal but did increase the side effects noted. Sorbitol has not been proven effective in enhancing drug removal and has side effects that can be significant in a poisoned patient. Current data do not warrant its use, and further investigations should be carried out with other ingested drugs.

Oral activated charcoal in the treatment of intoxications. Role of single and repeated doses

Activated charcoal has an ability to adsorb a wide variety of substances. This property can be applied to prevent the gastrointestinal absorption of various drugs and toxins and to increase their elimination, even after systemic absorption. Single doses of oral activated charcoal effectively prevent the gastrointestinal absorption of most drugs and toxins present in the stomach at the time of charcoal administration. Known exceptions are alcohols, cyanide, and metals such as iron and lithium. In general, activated charcoal is more effective than gastric emptying. However, if the amount of drug or poison ingested is very large or if its affinity to charcoal is poor, the adsorption capacity of activated charcoal can be saturated. In such cases properly performed gastric emptying is likely to be more effective than charcoal alone. Repeated dosing with oral activated charcoal enhances the elimination of many toxicologically significant agents, e.g. aspirin, carbamazepine, dapsone, dextropropoxyphene, cardiac glycosides, meprobamate, phenobarbitone, phenytoin and theophylline. It also accelerates the elimination of many industrial and environmental intoxicants. In acute intoxications 50 to 100g activated charcoal should be administered to adult patients (to children, about 1 g/kg) as soon as possible. The exceptions are patients poisoned with caustic alkalis or acids which will immediately cause local tissue damages. To avoid delays in charcoal administration, activated charcoal should be a part of first-aid kits both at home and at work. The 'blind' administration of charcoal neither prevents later gastric emptying nor does it cause serious adverse effects provided that pulmonary aspiration in obtunded patients is prevented. In severe acute poisonings oral activated charcoal should be administered repeatedly, e.g. 20 to 50g at intervals of 4 to 6 hours, until recovery or until plasma drug concentrations have fallen to non-toxic levels. In addition to increasing the elimination of many drugs and toxins even after their systemic absorption, repeated doses of charcoal also reduce the risk of desorbing from the charcoal-toxin complex as the complex passes through the gastrointestinal tract. Charcoal will not increase the elimination of all substances taken. However, as the drug history in acute intoxications is often unreliable, repeated doses of oral activated charcoal in severe intoxications seem to be justified unless the toxicological laboratory has identified the causative agent as not being prone to adsorption by charcoal. The role of repeated doses of oral activated charcoal in chronic intoxication has not been clearly defined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Role of extracorporeal drug removal in acute theophylline poisoning. A review

Theophylline, with its narrow therapeutic margin, is a common cause of iatrogenic and deliberate overdose. Most cases of self-poisoning are with sustained release preparations, with peak concentrations occurring up to 12 or more hours after overdose. Toxic symptoms are often seen at concentrations above 15 mg/L. Theophylline is metabolised within the cytochrome P-450 system, with an average total body clearance of 50 to 60 ml/min. Clearance is, however, affected by many factors such as other drugs or disease, and in overdose zero order kinetics may result in prolonged half-lives. Toxicity is characterised by agitation, tremor, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pains, seizures, and tachyarrhythmias. Hypokalaemia and metabolic acidosis are more profound in acute toxicity, and hypercalcaemia is usually present. Seizures occur at lower concentrations after chronic over-medication than after acute overdose. Gastric lavage should be performed in all patients presenting early, and an oral multiple dose charcoal regimen started with 50 to 100g charcoal, repeating with 50g doses and checking theophylline concentrations at 2- to 4-hour intervals. Multiple dose charcoal can be expected to double the clearance of theophylline, being as effective as a haemodialysis. Of the invasive techniques available, charcoal haemoperfusion is the most effective, increasing clearance 4- to 6-fold. Supportive care is particularly important. The aggressive supplementation of potassium, treatment of emesis with droperidol and ranitidine, and treatment of tachyarrhythmias and hypotension (possibly with propranolol), together with oral multiple dose charcoal may obviate the need for haemoperfusion. Seizures suggest increased morbidity and mortality. Charcoal haemoperfusion should be considered if plasma concentrations are greater than 100 mg/L in an acute intoxication or greater than 60 mg/L in a chronic intoxication. The decision to haemoperfuse should not be based on plasma concentrations alone, but an overall evaluation of the patient's laboratory and clinical status.