Pharmacodynamic interactions between infused adenosine and oral theophylline

Investigation of esophageal sensation and biomechanical properties in functional chest pain

BACKGROUND

There is limited and conflicting data regarding the role of esophageal hypersensitivity in the pathogenesis of functional chest pain (FCP). We examined esophageal sensori-motor properties, mechanics, and symptoms in subjects with FCP.

METHODS

Esophageal balloon distension test was performed using impedance planimetry in 189 (m/f = 57/132) consecutive subjects with non-cardiac, non-reflux chest pain, and 36 (m/f = 16/20) healthy controls. The biomechanical and sensory properties of subjects with and without esophageal hypersensitivity were compared with controls. The frequency, intensity, and duration of chest pain were assessed.

KEY RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three (75%) subjects had esophageal hypersensitivity and 46 (25%) had normal sensitivity. Typical chest pain was reproduced in 105/143 (74%) subjects. Subjects with hypersensitivity demonstrated larger cross-sectional area (P < 0.001), decreased esophageal wall strain (P < 0.001) and distensibility (P < 0.001), and lower thresholds for perception (P < 0.01), discomfort (P < 0.01), and pain (P < 0.01) compared to those without hypersensitivity or healthy controls. Chest pain scores (mean +/- SD) for frequency, intensity and duration were 2.5 +/- 0.3, 2.2 +/- 0.2, and 2.2 +/- 0.2, respectively, and were similar between the two patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Seventy-five per cent of subjects with FCP demonstrate esophageal hypersensitivity. Visceral hyperalgesia and sensori-motor dysfunction of the esophagus play a key role in the pathogenesis of chest pain.

Theophylline improves esophageal chest pain--a randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND/AIM

The treatment of esophageal (noncardiac) chest pain is unsatisfactory and there is no approved therapy. A previous uncontrolled study suggested that theophylline may be useful. Our aims were to investigate the effects of theophylline on esophageal sensorimotor function and chest pain.

METHODS

In a double-blind study, sensory and biomechanical properties of the esophagus were assessed using impedance planimetry in 16 patients with esophageal hypersensitivity, after intravenous theophylline or placebo. In a second, randomized 4-wk crossover study, oral theophylline and placebo were administered to 24 patients with esophageal hypersensitivity. Frequency, intensity, and duration of chest pain episodes were evaluated.

RESULTS

After IV theophylline, chest pain thresholds (P=0.027) and esophageal cross-sectional area (P=0.03) increased and the esophageal wall became more distensible (P=0.04) compared with placebo. After oral theophylline, the number of painful days (P=0.03) and chest pain episodes (P=0.025), pain duration (P=0.002), and its severity (P=0.031) decreased. Overall symptoms improved in 58% on theophylline and 6% on placebo (P<0.02). There was no order effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Theophylline relaxed the esophageal wall, decreased hypersensitivity, and improved chest pain. Theophylline is effective in the treatment of functional chest pain.

Adenosine in acute theophylline intoxication

Although it appears that adenosine would be theoretically useful in the emergent therapy of theophylline toxicity, published clinical data supporting the efficacy and safety of using adenosine for such a situation are currently lacking. The use of adenosine also is not without some risk. In addition, the use of adenosine infusions can be relatively expensive. Until more clinical evidence can be obtained, the routine use of adenosine in the treatment of acute theophylline ingestion cannot be recommended.