Postmortem digoxin-like immunoreactive substances (DLIS) in patients not treated with digoxin

Post-mortem clinical pharmacology

Clinical pharmacology assumes that deductions can be made about the concentrations of drugs from a knowledge of the pharmacokinetic parameters in an individual; and that the effects are related to the measured concentration. Post-mortem changes render the assumptions of clinical pharmacology largely invalid, and make the interpretation of concentrations measured in post-mortem samples difficult or impossible. Qualitative tests can show the presence of substances that were not present in life, and can fail to detect substances that led to death. Quantitative analysis is subject to error in itself, and because post-mortem concentrations vary in largely unpredictable ways with the site and time of sampling, as a result of the phenomenon of post-mortem redistribution. Consequently, compilations of 'lethal concentrations' are misleading. There is a lack of adequate studies of the true relationship between fatal events and the concentrations that can be measured subsequently, but without such studies, clinical pharmacologists and others should be wary of interpreting post-mortem measurements.

New Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Digoxin Assay on the ADVIA?? IMS??? 800i System Is Virtually Free from Interference of Endogenous Digoxin-like Immunoreactive Factors

Endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive factors (DLIF) may crossreact with antidigoxin antibody and falsely elevate immunoassay results. Recently, a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent chemiluminescent assay for digoxin has been available for use on the ADVIA IMS (Integrated Modular System) 800i analyzer (Bayer Diagnostics). We studied potential interference of DLIF with this new digoxin assay. We analyzed 30 serum specimens from patients who have pathologic conditions that may increase serum DLIF concentrations. These patients were never exposed to digoxin or other agents that may lead to a measurable digoxin concentration. We also analyzed 10 specimens from neonates, 10 cord blood specimens, and 10 amniotic fluid specimens. Apparent digoxin concentrations were measured using the new enzyme-linked immunosorbent digoxin assay (IMS-Digoxin), a fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA), and also a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA, run on ACS:180(R) system from Bayer Diagnostics). We observed measurable apparent digoxin levels with the FPIA in 4 uremic patients (range 0.21-0.36 ng/mL, digoxin equivalent), 7 patients with liver disease (range 0.21-0.72 ng/mL), and 3 patients in the third trimester of pregnancy (0.22-0.66 ng/mL). We also observed measurable DLIF concentrations with the FPIA in 2 neonates (0.22 and 0.36 ng/mL), 5 cord blood specimens (range 0.21-1.18 ng/mL), and 5 amniotic fluid specimens (0.21-0.50 ng/mL). None of these DLIF-positive specimens showed any measurable digoxin concentration using the IMS-Digoxin or the CLIA assay. When serum specimens containing elevated concentrations of DLIF but no digoxin (as measured by FPIA) were supplemented with known concentrations of digoxin, we observed falsely elevated digoxin concentrations, as expected, only by the FPIA. In contrast, we observed a good agreement between the target and observed concentrations when the new IMS-Digoxin or the CLIA assay was used. We conclude that the IMS-Digoxin assay is free from interference of DLIF.

Endogenous and exogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substances: impact on therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin

Endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substance (DLIS) was first reported in volume-expanded dogs. Its presence has been confirmed in blood, urine, and other body fluids. Elevated DLIS concentrations are encountered in patients with volume-expanded conditions such as uremia, essential hypertension, liver disease, and preeclampsia. DLISs cross-react with antidigoxin antibodies and falsely elevate serum digoxin concentrations, interfering in interpretation of results for therapeutic digoxin monitoring. Falsely lower digoxin values due to the presence of DLISs have been reported. The association of DLISs with volume expansion led to speculation that they could be natriuretic hormones. Several structures have been proposed for DLISs, including nonesterified fatty acid, phospholipid, lysophospholipid, bile acid, bile salt, and steroid. Exogenous DLISs can be found in serum after ingestion of various Chinese medicines and therapy with spironolactone, canrenone, or potassium canrenoate. Like endogenous DLISs, exogenous DLISs interfere with serum digoxin assays, complicating therapeutic digoxin monitoring. However, most reported endogenous and exogenous DLISs are strongly protein-bound while digoxin is weakly protein-bound. Therefore, interference of both endogenous and exogenous DLISs in serum digoxin measurement can be eliminated by monitoring digoxin concentrations in the protein-free ultrafiltrates.