Prospective, systematically recorded mycophenolate safety data in Graves' orbitopathy

CONTEXT

The antiproliferative mechanism of mycophenolate acid (MPA) suggests a beneficial effect in patients with Graves' orbitopathy (GO).

OBJECTIVE

To systematically analyze for the first time adverse events (AEs) during MPA treatment in GO.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center with a joint thyroid-eye clinic.

PATIENTS

Fifty-three consecutive, unselected patients with clinically active and moderate-to-severe GO.

METHODS

MPA 0.720 g was given once daily for 24-weeks in GO patients. AEs were documented and coded according to the standardized medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). AE were followed up and seriousness as defined by ICH-guideline E6 was documented. All AEs were analyzed regarding a possible underlying cause and if not, graded as side effect (SE).

RESULTS

Fifty GO patients (93 %) had Graves' disease, 37 (70 %) and 29 (54.7 %) were female and smoker, respectively. Thirty-six patients (68 %) reported at least one AE. A total of 88 AEs were documented, most frequent AEs were insomnia (N = 6), fatigue (N = 5) and optic neuropathy (N = 5), while other AEs occurred in up to three patients (5.6 %), only. In 12 (23 %) patients, at least one SE occurred. All 17 reported SE, i.e. mild infections and gastrointestinal intolerance were within the known safety profile of MPA. No patient dropped MPA medication because of drug-induced SE. Most AEs showed a recovered (76 %) or recovering (16 %) outcome. Seven (13 %) patients were hospitalized, five (62 %) due to optic neuropathy, none of these events was graded as SE.

CONCLUSIONS

MedDRA-coded data documented the good tolerance of a moderate MPA dose in GO patients.

Pulmonary hemosiderosis in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia

We describe a possible association between pulmonary hemosiderosis (PH) and a history of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Both patients were born at 28-week gestation and presented with PH at ages 22 months and 6 years, respectively. Both initially presented with cough and tachypnea, and bronchoalveolar lavage showed evidence of hemosiderin-laden macrophages. Initial hemoglobin levels were < 4 g/dL and chest radiographs showed diffuse infiltrates that cleared dramatically within days after initiation of intravenous corticosteroids. In the first case, frank pulmonary blood was observed upon initial intubation, prompting the need for high frequency ventilation, immediate corticosteroids, and antibiotics. The mechanical ventilation wean was made possible by the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and hydroxychloroquine. Slow tapering off of medications was accomplished over 6 years. These cases represent a possible correlation between prematurity-associated BPD and PH. We present a review of the literature regarding this possible association. In addition, MMF proved to be life-saving in one of the PH cases, as it has been in pulmonary hemorrhage related to systemic lupus erythematosus. Further studies are warranted to investigate the possible association between PH and prematurity-related BPD, as well as the use of MMF in the treatment of PH.

Which dose of steroids and which cytotoxics for severe lupus?

There have been a number of major advances in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus and we are now in the era of biologic therapies for this multisystem autoimmune disorder. There has been a greater awareness of the toxicities of the traditional therapies including the recognition that the doses of corticosteroids used in the past have been excessive, resulting in unacceptable toxicities. Other advances have included the development of lower cumulative doses of cyclophosphamide and the widespread acceptance of mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of lupus nephritis. This review addresses the current management of severe lupus with corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus is a heterogeneous autoimmune condition that can significantly impact quality of life. Treatment is focused on reducing clinical inflammation and preventing scarring. The choice of treatment should be guided based on the severity of disease. Mild or localized disease can be treated with sun protection and topical agents. Antimalarials are the initial treatment of choice if systemic therapy is required. Patients with severe or unresponsive disease can also be treated with a number of other immunomodulating or immunosuppressive agents. Clinicians should be aware of their potential adverse effects and appropriate dosing.

Treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

In patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and mild skin involvement, local therapy consisting of topically applied pharmacological agents, e.g., topical/intralesional steroids, may be sufficient. Recent reports have also shown efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors in patients with CLE, particularly on the face. Special attention receives consistent sun protection through photoresistant clothing and application of light-shielding substances with highly potent chemical or physical UVA- and UVB-protective filters. These substances should be applied in sufficient amount (ca. 2 mg/cm(2)) at least 20-30 minutes before sun exposure in order to avoid induction and exacerbation of cutaneous lesions. The mainstay of treatment for disfiguring and widespread skin manifestations in patients with CLE, irrespective of the subtype of the disease, is antimalarial agents. Our understanding of the use of combinations of antimalarials and proper dosing according to the ideal bodyweight limits problems with toxicity. Further therapies, such as methotrexate, or retinoids, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil, and thalidomide in selected cases, can be helpful for patients with resistant disease; however, side effects need to be taken into consideration. Recent advances in biotechnology resulted in the development of novel systemic agents, but randomized controlled trials are necessary for the approval of new therapeutic strategies in CLE.

Mycophenolate mofetil is as efficacious as, but safer than, cyclophosphamide in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

OBJECTIVE

Since mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an immunosuppressant for treating proliferative lupus nephritis, the role of cyclophosphamide (CYC)-containing regimens is being challenged. Efficacy data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and previous meta-analyses comparing these two agents for treating lupus nephritis have been inconsistent as they were heterogeneous in design and of small sample size. An updated meta-analysis is therefore required.

METHODS

Publications in the English literature were searched with the keywords 'mycophenoate', 'mycophenolic', 'lupus nephritis', 'nephritis' and 'glomerulonephritis' for RCTs in electronic databases. Primary outcome was relative risk (RR) of renal remission at 6 months. Secondary outcome included RRs of mortality, development of end-stage renal failure (ESRF) and side effects. Meta-regression was performed to identify factors explaining the heterogeneity of the effect sizes.

RESULTS

Ten eligible RCTs involving 847 patients were included. MMF offers similar efficacy in inducing renal remission as CYC (RR 1.052; 95% CI 0.950, 1.166) and the risks of death (RR 0.709; 95% CI 0.373, 1.347) and ESRF (RR 0.453; 95% CI 0.183, 1.121) were comparable. Significantly fewer patients receiving MMF developed amenorrhoea (RR 0.212; 95% CI 0.094, 0.479) and leucopenia (RR 0.473; 95% CI 0.269, 0.832) while the risks of herpes infection and pneumonia tended to be lower and that of diarrhoea appeared higher in the MMF groups. Meta-regression revealed that the non-white and non-Asian ethnicities contributed significantly to the heterogeneity of the effect sizes of renal remission.

CONCLUSION

MMF offers similar efficacy in renal remission and survival as CYC. MMF appears safer than CYC in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Therapeutic Update

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with variable clinical manifestations that is characterized by flares and periods of relative quiescence. The disease occurs approximately 10 times more frequently in women and is more prevalent among certain ethnic groups. The etiology is complex and dependent upon an interaction of genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents have transformed the outlook for patients with lupus. Unfortunately, the increased lifespan unmasked an accelerated process of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Early mortality is usually attributable to active lupus, but deaths late in the disease process are often secondary to thrombotic events. Advancements in the understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis have resulted in development of novel therapies. Immunomodulatory drugs developed for other diseases are being investigated for use in specific manifestations of lupus. Individualization of treatment and lifelong monitoring are required in most patients.

Treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone for steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

The management of patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) refractory to treatment with long-term steroids, levamisole and cyclophosphamide is difficult. We report our experience on long-term treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and alternate-day prednisolone in 42 patients with SDNS previously treated with levamisole (n = 35) and/or cyclophosphamide (n = 37). The mean age (range) at onset of nephrotic syndrome was 37 (13-92) months and at treatment with MMF 104.7 (32-187) months. MMF was administered at a mean daily dose of 26.5 (16.6-31.3) mg/kg for 14.3 (6-45) months. The mean 6-monthly relapse rates decreased from 3.0 episodes before therapy to 0.9 episodes in the first 6 months, 0.7 in next 6 months, and 0.3 in those treated longer than 12 months (P < 0.0001). While on therapy, 32 (76.2%) patients showed 50% or more reduction in relapse rates, and nine (21.4%) had sustained remission. The cumulative dose of prednisolone declined significantly from 0.6 mg/kg per day before to 0.3 mg/kg per day while receiving MMF. Prednisolone requirement was reduced by 50% or more in 16 patients and between 40% and 50% in eight patients. Treatment continuation beyond 12 months resulted in sustained steroid sparing and reduced need for alternative treatments while maintaining low relapse rates. No patients had diarrhea, hematological abnormalities, or impaired renal function. This data confirms the efficacy and safety of treatment with MMF and tapering doses of alternate-day prednisolone in patients with SDNS and supports its use for longer than 12 months.

Human Clinical Trials in Lupus Nephritis

Improved patient survival after treatment of lupus nephritis with corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and renal replacement therapy allows greater emphasis on long-term management issues. In particular, the recent focus has been on therapies to treat nephritis with fewer adverse effects compared with cyclophosphamide and immunosuppressive regimens. Issues complicating clinical trial design in lupus nephritis have severely limited comparisons across trials. These issues, including recognition and stratification of high-risk populations, comparable remission and response criteria, and appropriate use and interpretation of activity and damage indices have been the subject of much discussion and emerging consensus. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used in the field of transplantation for more than 10 years. After initial anecdotal reports describing the benefits of MMF in the treatment of lupus nephritis, randomized controlled trials have established a role for MMF in the treatment of lupus nephritis. A host of newer agents including rituximab, abatacept, and monoclonal antibodies blocking costimulatory targets are in current clinical trials for lupus nephritis. As long-term outcomes in lupus nephritis improve, the toxicity of therapy and risk of relapse become increasingly important determinants of the choice of therapeutic agents.

Unexpectedly high exposure to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium upon once-daily dosing

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) has a mean half-life of 11.7 hours, which encouraged hope of using this drug once daily in a nonadherent adolescent SLE patient. This is a case report on a 17-year-old adolescent with a history of noncompliance who was switched from twice-daily mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to once-daily EC-MPS. The EC-MPS dose was equimolar to the daily MMF dose (1 g MMF BID and 1.44 g of EC-MPS OD). The active compound of both drugs, mycophenolic acid, was measured using a commercially available EMIT assay. Both drugs were well-tolerated and maintained remission of the SLE. The average of three 12-hour areas under the time-concentration curves (AUC) on 1 g of MMF BID was 59.0 mgxh/L. In contrast, the 24-hour AUC after 1.44 g EC-MPS OD was 283.2 mgxh/L, more than double the expected 118.0 mgxh/L of two MMF dosing intervals. A repeat 24-hour AUC after 1.08 g of EC-MPS was 218.2 mgxh/L. EC-MPS once daily may be a well-tolerated therapeutic option for nonadherent adolescent lupus patients, but may be associated with a significantly higher exposure than the equivalent MMF BID dose.

Intensified, intermittent, low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide together with oral alternate-day steroid therapy in lupus nephritis (long-term outcome)

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and long-term outcome of low-dose IV cyclophosphamid therapy with repeated frequent intervals in combination with oral and IV methylprednisolone in patients with SLE nephritis. In this study, 113 patients diagnosed as having SLE and glomerulonephritis were assessed in between 1993 and 2002, with a median follow-up of 44.1+/-41.2 months. The patients were treated with 500 mg IV cyclophosphamide and 1 g IV methylprednisolone together with 60 mg/alternate-day oral methylprednisolone in a given schedule. The clinical and laboratory data were evaluated. There were significant improvements in the clinical and the laboratory parameters. Six patients died shortly after being hospitalized due to the disease activity itself. Eight patients were excluded from the study because of low compliance. The renal functions of the patients remained stable throughout the therapy; only 16/99 patients needed one or two additional pulses. Temporary leukopenia developed in 18/99 patients and diminished with the suspension or prolongation of the IV cyclophosphamide administration. Gastrointestinal side effects, which needed extra medication, developed in 20 patients. Hematuria was observed in 6/99 patients. Menstrual abnormalities were seen in 7/99 patients. No serious infections due to immunosuppression were observed with the given regimen. Hypertension was observed in 13 patients (minimum of 140/90 mmHg, maximum of 190/110 mmHg) and controlled with angiotensine-converting enzyme inhibitors. Mild central obesity was observed in 15 of the patients. Leimyosarcoma was observed in one patient who died during the follow-up period. Therapy starting with the weekly low-dose IV cyclophosphamide to induce remission together with IV and oral steroids, followed by prolonged intervals with the same doses for 2 years, appears to be useful in preserving renal function without major side effects in patients with lupus nephritis, in comparison to other studies.