Successful treatment of refractory immune thrombocytopenia with anti-CD20 antibody in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus

Thrombocytopenia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Prognosis in 230 Patients

The aim of the study was to examine the clinical characteristics and prognosis according to severity of thrombocytopenia and response to treatment for thrombocytopenia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).We retrospectively evaluated 230 SLE patients with thrombocytopenia, and reviewed their clinical data and laboratory findings. Thrombocytopenia was defined as platelet counts under 100,000/mm, and patients were divided into 3 thrombocytopenia groups according to severity: mild (platelet counts >50,000/mm), moderate (>20,000/mm, ≤50,000/mm), and severe (≤20,000/mm). Clinical characteristics, treatments, and prognoses were compared among the groups. Furthermore, complete remission of thrombocytopenia was defined as platelet counts >100,000/mm after treatment.There was no significant difference in clinical or laboratory findings among the groups according to severity of thrombocytopenia. However, hemorrhagic complications were more frequent in severe thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001) and mortality was also higher (P = 0.001). Complete remission was achieved in 85.2% of patients. The clinical characteristics and modality of treatment did not differ between the patients with and without complete remission. Mortality in patients with complete remission (1.5%) was significantly lower than in those without complete remission (29.4%, P < 0.001). Survival was significantly higher in patients with complete remission from thrombocytopenia (odds ratio = 0.049, 95% confidence interval: 0.013-0.191, P < 0.001).The severity of thrombocytopenia in SLE patients can be a useful independent prognostic factor to predict survival. Moreover, complete remission of thrombocytopenia after treatment is an important prognostic factor. The severity of thrombocytopenia and response to treatment should be closely monitored to predict prognosis in SLE patients.

Rituximab therapy has a rapid and durable response for refractory cytopenia in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

Objectives

Autoimmune thrombocytopenia (AITP) and hemolytic anemia (AIHA) are common in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) and may be refractory to conventional therapies. Our objectives were to: (a) examine our experience; (b) determine the rate and durability of response to rituximab; and (c) evaluate its safety in our cSLE population with refractory cytopenias.

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of cSLE patients with refractory AITP or AIHA treated with rituximab between 2003 and 2012. Outcomes included the time to complete clinical response, time to B-cell depletion, duration of response and time to flare. Adverse events were also analyzed.

Results

Twenty-four (6%) of 394 cSLE patients received rituximab for refractory cytopenia. The indication was AITP in 16 (67%), AIHA in five (21%) and both in three (13%) patients. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) time from cytopenia onset to rituximab therapy was 16 (7–27) months for AITP and 10 (2–29) months for AIHA. Complete response following the first course of rituximab occurred at a median (IQR) of 48 (14–103) days, only one patient failed to respond. Five (21%) patients had one or more flare episodes at 22 (15–27) months. Infusion reactions were rare and one infection with herpes zoster required hospitalization in the first 12 months. Three of four patients with low IgG levels prior to the first rituximab course developed persistent hypogammaglobulinemia, and three patients have required intravenous immunoglobulin replacement.

Conclusion

Rituximab appears to be a well-tolerated, safe and long-lasting therapy for cSLE patients with refractory AITP and/or AIHA. Caution should be exercised when considering rituximab for patients with preexisting hypogammaglobulinemia.

Successful rituximab treatment of refractory hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and autoimmune hemolytic anemia associated with systemic lupus erythematosus

High-dose steroids, immunosuppressants such as cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine, and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin have all been used to control hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) or autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, some patients are refractory to treatment. Rituximab has successfully resolved many of the refractory manifestations of SLE. Here, we report a case of HLH and AIHA associated with SLE that was refractory or intolerable to conventional therapy, but was successfully treated with rituximab.

Low-dose rituximab therapy for refractory thrombocytopenia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus--a prospective pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose rituximab therapy for refractory thrombocytopenia in patients with SLE.

METHODS

Ten adult SLE patients with severe refractory thrombocytopenia (mean platelet count 10.4 × 10(9)/l) were enrolled in this prospective pilot study. All patients had failed traditional high-dose CSs and immunosuppressants including methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Patients were scheduled to receive i.v. rituximab at a dose of 100 mg once weekly for 4 weeks. Previous dose of CSs were gradually tapered, and immunosuppressants were withdrawn. Patients were followed at Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 36.

RESULTS

All patients completed four courses of low-dose rituximab infusion. At Week 4, two (20%) patients achieved complete responses (CRs, platelet count >100 × 10(9)/l). The CR rate increased to 60% (six patients) at Week 12, was maintained at Week 24 and began to drop at Week 36 (four patients, 40%). Overall response (OR, platelet count >50 × 10(9)/l) was achieved in 5/10, 6/10, 7/10 and 5/10 patients at Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 36, respectively. Peripheral CD19(+) B cells were depleted (<5 × 10(6)/l) in all patients at Week 4, and gradually increased at Weeks 24 and 36. Serum C3, IgG, IgA and IgM levels did not change significantly (P < 0.05). Infusion reaction was observed in two patients. One patient developed pulmonary thrombosis at Week 14 and active tuberculosis at Week 25.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rituximab therapy is effective in treating severe thrombocytopenia in SLE patients who do not respond to vigorous glucocorticoid plus immunosuppressants, and in most cases is safe.

Successful rituximab therapy in a lupus patient with diffuse alveolar haemorrhage

Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH) is a rare but life-threatening complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Specific therapy is based on a heavy immunosuppressive treatment that usually associates corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide boluses and plasma exchange. Despite this treatment, an early mortality rate of 20-50% is reported in the literature. Immunosuppression-related complications are responsible for further mortality and morbidity. Rituximab, a specific anti-CD20 antigen B-cell antibody, has been used with success for the treatment of several refractory autoimmune disorders, but rarely for SLE-induced DAH. We report here the first case of SLE-induced DAH treated successfully with rituximab without cyclophosphamide administration in a patient intolerant to cyclophosphamide. We review the two other cases of SLE-induced DAH managed with rituximab as a part of the immunosuppressive regimen.