Comparative efficacy and safety of intravenous or subcutaneous belimumab in combination with standard therapy in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Therapeutic Avenues to Modulate B-Cell Function in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

The adaptive immune system plays an important role in the development and progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. B cells can have both proatherogenic and atheroprotective roles, making treatments aimed at modulating B cells important therapeutic targets. The innate-like B-cell response is generally considered atheroprotective, while the adaptive response is associated with mixed consequences for atherosclerosis. Additionally, interactions of B cells with components of the adaptive and innate immune system, including T cells and complement, also represent key points for therapeutic regulation. In this review, we discuss therapeutic approaches based on B-cell depletion, modulation of B-cell survival, manipulation of both the antibody-dependent and antibody-independent B-cell response, and emerging immunization techniques.

Disease-modifying effect and long-term safety of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Disease modification in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is important for minimizing disease activity while limiting treatment-associated toxicities. Belimumab can be used as a remission-induction/maintenance systemic lupus erythematosus therapy; however, its disease-modifying effects are unclear. We aimed to determine these effects in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included 92 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with belimumab. We analyzed the changes in flare free rate/lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) attainment rate/glucocorticoid dosage/Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics and American College of Rheumatology damage index (SDI) score/drug retention rate after treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Fifty-two weeks after initiating belimumab, the flare rate decreased from 82.6% to 14.1% (p < .01). Until week 52 and 1000 days after initiating belimumab treatment, > 70% and ∼90% of the patients attained lupus low disease activity state, respectively. Belimumab treatment significantly reduced glucocorticoid demand (initiation day, 8.88 (6.00-15.00) mg/d; week 52, 5.00 (2.00-7.00) mg/d; final day of the study period, 3.00 (0.46-6.06) mg/d, initiation day vs. week 52: p < .01, initiation day vs. final day: p < .01); at the end of the study period, 68.5% of patients required ≤5 mg/d prednisolone, and 22.8% discontinued glucocorticoids. Most patients were SDI progression-free (week 52, ∼95%; day 1000, ∼90%), and belimumab showed a high drug retention rate (week 52, 90%; day 1000 > 80%).

CONCLUSION

Most patients experienced lupus low disease activity state, reduced flare rate and glucocorticoid demand, and a stable SDI trend after belimumab treatment initiation. Given its efficacy and retention rate, belimumab treatment may serve as a fundamental strategy in disease modification.

Efficacy and safety of belimumab for the treatment of refractory childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: A single-center, real-world, retrospective study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of belimumab for treating children with refractory childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE).

Methods

Twenty-six cSLE patients who received belimumab treatment in our hospital from January 2020 to September 2021 (23 of them for more than 52 weeks) were enrolled in this study. Their clinical and laboratory data, assessment of disease activity, glucocorticoid dosage, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were retrieved for analysis. The paired samples t-test and the nonparametric test were used to compare the baseline and post-treatment data.

Results

The mean age of onset was 10.3 ± 2.4 years old; the mean disease duration was 41.6 ± 37.4 months; the median Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score was 10 (P ₂₅, P ₇₅: 3, 17); and the mean Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score at baseline was 1.9 ± 1.0. Compared with the baseline values, there was a significant decrease in the 24-h urine protein quantifications at 24 and 52 weeks of treatment (P<0.05) as well as an elevated complement (C) 3 and C4 levels at 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks of treatment. In addition, the SLEDAI-2K and PGA scores as well as the percentage of CD19⁺ B cells were significantly decreased at 12, 24, and 52 weeks of treatment compared with the baseline values (P<0.05). The dosage of glucocorticoid at 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks of treatment was significantly less than that at baseline or the previous follow-up (P<0.05). At 52 weeks, 14 subjects (53.8%) achieved Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), and 4 subjects (15.4%) reached clinical remission (CR). At the last follow-up, 16 subjects (61.5%) achieved LLDAS, and 10 subjects (38.5%) reached CR.

Conclusions

Belimumab treatment can significantly improve laboratory indicators, reduce disease activity, and decrease the dosage of glucocorticoid required in children with cSLE. Moreover, it has a good safety profile.

Effect and safety profile of belimumab and tacrolimus combination therapy in thirty-three patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Belimumab combined with mycophenolate mofetil has been proven to be effective for treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in several randomized controlled trials. Calcineurin inhibitors are also useful in controlling the activity of SLE. However, the safety and effectiveness of belimumab-calcineurin inhibitor combination therapy have not been addressed. Therefore, the current single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the safety/efficacy profile of belimumab-tacrolimus (B-T) combination therapy in patients with SLE.

METHOD

Patients with SLE administered tacrolimus and belimumab during treatment were included in the study. Samples were analyzed for the drug retention rate, SLE flare rate, infection incidence rate, and glucocorticoid-sparing effect of the B-T combination therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with SLE were treated with B-T combination therapy at our institution. Four patients discontinued treatment due to insufficient response or adverse events. The drug retention rate was over 90% at week 52 and approximately 80% at day 1000. Only one patient developed serious infection. The lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) achievement ratio was 9.1% on the day of initiation and improved to 64.0% at 52 weeks after initiation. SLE flares were observed in three patients (9.1%) in the first 52 weeks after initiation, and in five patients (15.2%) throughout the study period. A glucocorticoid-reducing effect was also observed in patients treated with B-T combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In most patients with SLE, B-T combination therapy is well tolerated with a good efficacy profile and glucocorticoid-reducing effect. Thus, B-T combination therapy represents a feasible option for patients with refractory lupus. Key Points • The safety and effectiveness of belimumab-calcineurin inhibitor combination therapy have not been addressed. • The drug retention rate of belimumab-tacrolimus combination therapy was over 90% at week 52 and around 80% on day 1000 • Almost none of the patients suffered from severe infection after the initiation of belimumab-tacrolimus combination therapy. • Belimumab-tacrolimus combination therapy is efficacious in suppressing lupus activity and achieving LLDAS.

Belimumab combined with standard therapy does not increase adverse effects compared with a control treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The increasing administration of belimumab has demonstrated its biological benefits. Prior meta-analyses have examined the overall adverse events (AEs) associated with belimumab, but such knowledge needs to be updated with a high volume of new trials. However, little is known about the occurrence of AEs associated with different underlying diseases. This study aimed to address the safety of the intravenous (IV) administration of belimumab combined with standard of care (SoC) therapy in Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

METHODS

We used PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to systematically search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting AEs and specific AEs in SLE patients receiving belimumab and SoC therapy before 30 November 2021. We extracted the data of the eligible studies and calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in SLE patients receiving belimumab and SoC therapy and experiencing various AEs. The main outcomes were as follows: (1) any AEs, any serious AEs (SAEs), and any severe AEs; (2) serious organ specific adverse events; (3) adverse events of special interest (AESIs).

RESULTS

Of the 1,621 studies identified, nine RCTs involving 7,974 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between the experimental and control groups in terms of the incident of AEs: AEs (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-1.02, P = 0.68), SAEs (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81-1.02, P = 0.09), and severe AEs (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.75-1.14, P = 0.46). The pooled data also showed that there was no significant correlation between five types of SAEs grouped by organ class and the IV belimumab (10 mg/kg) intervention, except for 'infections and infestations' (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.97, P = 0.02) and 'musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders' (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.32-0.67, P < 0.0001). In addition, we found no significant association between AESIs and the IV administration of belimumab (10 mg/kg) (all malignancies: RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.69-3.36, P = 0.3; all post-infusion systemic reactions: RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85-1.30, P = 0.63; depression: RR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.92-2.20, P = 0.11; serious depression: RR = 2.60, 95% CI: 0.85-7.93, P = 0.09; suicide or self-injury: RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.48-1.96, P = 0.92; serious suicide or self-injury: RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.59-2.70, P = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of the meta-analysis, SLE patients did not have significantly increased risk of experiencing any type of AEs when receiving SoC therapy. Special caution should be exercised during close follow-ups and individual clinical management before drug prescription.

The Microbiota in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Update on the Potential Function of Probiotics

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a kind of chronic diffuse connective tissue illness characterized by multisystem and multiorgan involvement, repeated recurrence and remission, and the presence of a large pool of autoantibodies in the body. Although the exact cause of SLE is not thoroughly revealed, accumulating evidence has manifested that intake of probiotics alters the composition of the gut microbiome, regulating the immunomodulatory and inflammatory response, which may be linked to the disease pathogenesis. Particularly, documented experiments demonstrated that SLE patients have remarkable changes in gut microbiota compared to healthy controls, indicating that the alteration of microbiota may be implicated in different phases of SLE. In this review, the alteration of microbiota in the development of SLE is summarized, and the mechanism of intestinal microbiota on the progression of immune and inflammatory responses in SLE is also discussed. Due to limited reports on the effects of probiotics supplementation in SLE patients, we emphasize advancements made in the last few years on the function and mechanisms of probiotics in the development of SLE animal models. Besides, we follow through literature to survey whether probiotics supplements can be an adjuvant therapy for comprehensive treatment of SLE. Research has indicated that intake of probiotics alters the composition of the gut microbiome, contributing to prevent the progression of SLE. Adjustment of the gut microbiome through probiotics supplementation seems to alleviate SLE symptoms and their cardiovascular and renal complications in animal models, marking this treatment as a potentially novel approach.

B Cells in Atherosclerosis: Mechanisms and Potential Clinical Applications

•

B cells regulate atherosclerotic plaque formation through production of antibodies and cytokines, and effects are subset specific (B1 and B2).

•

Putative human atheroprotective B1 cells function similarly to murine B1 in their spontaneous IgM antibody production. However, marker strategies in identifying human and murine B1 are different.

•

IgM antibody to oxidation specific epitopes produced by B1 cells associate with human coronary artery disease.

•

Neoantigen immunization may be a promising strategy for atherosclerosis vaccine development, but further study to determine relevant antigens still need to be done.

•

B-cell–targeted therapies, used in treating autoimmune diseases as well as lymphoid cancers, might have potential applications in treating cardiovascular diseases. Short- and long-term cardiovascular effects of these agents need to be assessed.

Because atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death worldwide, understanding inflammatory processes underpinning its pathology is critical. B cells have been implicated as a key immune cell type in regulating atherosclerosis. B-cell effects, mediated by antibodies and cytokines, are subset specific. In this review, we focus on elaborating mechanisms underlying subtype-specific roles of B cells in atherosclerosis and discuss available human data implicating B cells in atherosclerosis. We further discuss potential B cell–linked therapeutic approaches, including immunization and B cell–targeted biologics. Given recent evidence strongly supporting a role for B cells in human atherosclerosis and the expansion of immunomodulatory agents that affect B-cell biology in clinical use and clinical trials for other disorders, it is important that the cardiovascular field be cognizant of potential beneficial or untoward effects of modulating B-cell activity on atherosclerosis.

Belimumab for systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Belimumab, the first biologic approved for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), has been shown to reduce autoantibody levels in people with SLE and help control disease activity.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of belimumab (alone or in combination) in systematic lupus erythematosus.

SEARCH METHODS

An Information Specialist carried out the searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to 25 September 2019. There were no language or date restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of belimumab (alone or in combination) compared to placebo/control treatment (immunosuppressive drugs, such as azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil or another biologic), in adults with SLE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodologic procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs (2917 participants) qualified for quantitative analyses. All included studies were multicenter, international or US-based. The age range of the included participants was 22 to 80 years; most were women; and study duration ranged from 84 days to 76 weeks. The risk of bias was generally low except for attrition bias, which was high in 67% of studies. Compared to placebo, more participants on belimumab 10 mg/kg (Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dose) showed at least a 4-point improvement (reduction) in Safety of Estrogen in Lupus National Assessment (SELENA) - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score, a validated SLE disease activity index: (risk ratio (RR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.45; 829/1589 in belimumab group and 424/1077 in placebo; I²= 0%; 4 RCTs; high-certainty evidence). Change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), assessed by Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score improvement (range 0 to 100), showed there was probably little or no difference between groups (mean difference 1.6 points, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.90; 401 in belimumab group and 400 in placebo; I²= 0%; 2 RCTs; moderate-certainty evidence). The belimumab 10 mg/kg group showed greater improvement in glucocorticoid dose, with a higher proportion of participants reducing their dose by at least 50% compared to placebo (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.15; 81/269 in belimumab group and 52/268 in placebo; I²= 0%; 2 RCTs; high-certainty evidence). The proportion of participants experiencing harm may not differ meaningfully between the belimumab 10 mg/kg and placebo groups: one or more serious adverse event (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.11; 238/1700 in belimumab group and 199/1190 in placebo; I²= 48%; 5 RCTs; low-certainty evidence; ); one or more serious infection (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.54; 44/1230 in belimumab group and 40/955 in placebo; I²= 0%; 4 RCTs; moderate-certainty evidence); and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.07; 113/1700 in belimumab group and 94/1190 in placebo; I²= 0%; 5 RCTs; moderate-certainty evidence). Mortality was rare, and may not differ between belimumab 10 mg/kg and placebo (Peto odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.25; 9/1714 in belimumab group and 6/1203 in placebo; I²= 4%; 6 RCTs; low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The six studies that provided evidence for benefits and harms of belimumab were well-designed, high-quality RCTs. At the FDA-approved dose of 10 mg/kg, based on moderate to high-certainty data, belimumab was probably associated with a clinically meaningful efficacy benefit compared to placebo in participants with SLE at 52 weeks. Evidence related to harms is inconclusive and mostly of moderate to low-certainty evidence. More data are needed for the longer-term efficacy of belimumab.

2020 Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease that represents a prodigious challenge of diagnosis and treatment. In 2019, under the leadership of the Chinese Rheumatology Association, a multidisciplinary guideline development group was established to develop an evidence-based diagnosis and treatment guideline for patients with SLE in PR China. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. The guideline was reported following the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist. In this guideline, we provided recommendations for SLE classification criteria, disease activity monitoring and assessment, medication administration and considerations for SLE patients with organs and systems involved, and management of special populations such as SLE patients in the setting of pregnancy. This guideline serves as an evidence-based tool for Chinese clinicians to diagnose and treat patients with SLE.

Potential and prognostic factor for belimumab-free remission in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-center retrospective analysis

Belimumab is an effective and safe treatment option for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, data on treatment cessation are lacking. Thus, we investigated belimumab-free remission in SLE patients. SLE patients receiving belimumab in our institute (May 1, 2013-May 31, 2019) were retrospectively identified using electronic health records. Eligibility criteria included receiving belimumab for > 180 days and discontinuation for any reason. BILAG category A or B in at least one organ system indicated a disease flare. Follow-up monitoring during post-treatment at week 52 identified relapse-free and relapse patients. Thirty-one patients received belimumab, and 8 patients were included. Of the 8 patients, 4 relapsed within 52 weeks. At belimumab discontinuation, relapse-free patients achieved lower SELENA-SLEDAI (1 [IQR, 0-2] vs. 7 [IQR, 5.5-8] (p = 0.03)), received significantly less steroid (prednisolone equivalent, 3.0 mg/day [IQR, 2.8-3.2] vs. 9.5 mg/day [IQR, 7.3-13.3], p = 0.02) than relapse patients, and significantly more relapse-free patients achieved SELENA-SLEDAI less than 4 and received prednisolone less than 5 mg/day than relapse patients. Furthermore, on discontinuation day, relapse-free patients tended to have higher C3 (91.0 mg/dL [IQR, 78.8-102.3] vs. 56.0 mg/dL [IQR, 39.8-73.0], p = 0.15) and C4 levels (22.0 mg/dL [IQR, 19.00-26.00] vs. 11.0 mg/dL [IQR, 6.00-16.00], p = 0.08) and less anti-dsDNA antibody (5.2 IU/mL [IQR, 3.8-7.8] vs. 48.0 IU/mL [IQR, 11.5-137.3], p = 0.08) than relapse patients. Belimumab discontinuation can be considered for patients who achieved good responses. Normalization of complement, anti-dsDNA antibody, SELENA-SLEDAI less than 4, and steroid dosage less than 5 mg/day might be prognostic markers for belimumab-free remission.

Impact of B-Cell–Targeted Therapies on Cardiovascular Disease

Atherosclerosis is a lipid-driven chronic inflammatory disease that is modulated by many immune cell subsets, including B cells. Therefore, targeting the inflammatory component of cardiovascular disease represents a promising therapeutic strategy. In the past years, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of autoimmunity and cancer. Many of these clinically used strategies target B cells. Given the multifaceted role of B cells in atherogenesis, it is conceivable that B-cell–directed therapies can modulate disease development. Here, we review clinically available B-cell–targeted therapies and the possible benefits or detrimental effects on cardiovascular disease.

Biologics in the Treatment of Lupus Erythematosus: A Critical Literature Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease affecting multiple organ systems that runs an unpredictable course and may present with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Advances in treatment over the last decades, such as use of corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, have improved life expectancy of SLE sufferers. Unfortunately, in many cases effective management of SLE is still related to severe drug-induced toxicity and contributes to organ function deterioration and infective complications, particularly among patients with refractory disease and/or lupus nephritis. Consequently, there is an unmet need for drugs with a better efficacy and safety profile. A range of different biologic agents have been proposed and subjected to clinical trials, particularly dedicated to this subset of patients whose disease is inadequately controlled by conventional treatment regimes. Unfortunately, most of these trials have given unsatisfactory results, with belimumab being the only targeted therapy approved for the treatment of SLE so far. Despite these pitfalls, several novel biologic agents targeting B cells, T cells, or cytokines are constantly being evaluated in clinical trials. It seems that they may enhance the therapeutic efficacy when combined with standard therapies. These efforts raise the hope that novel drugs for patients with refractory SLE may be available in the near future. This article reviews the current biological therapies being tested in the treatment of SLE.

Belimumab: A Review in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Belimumab (Benlysta^®) is a human immunoglobulin G1λ monoclonal antibody that inhibits the binding of soluble B lymphocyte stimulator to B cells. It is the only biological agent currently approved for the treatment of non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Belimumab is approved in the EU, the USA and other countries as add-on therapy in adult patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE despite standard therapy. In phase III trials, treatment with IV or SC belimumab plus standard therapy was effective in terms of reducing overall disease activity and reducing the incidence and severity of flares, without worsening of patients' overall condition or the development of significant disease activity in new organ systems. Sustained disease control was maintained during longer-term (up to 10 years) treatment with IV belimumab. Belimumab also demonstrated steroid-sparing effects and was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life and fatigue. Belimumab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with low rates of immunogenicity. In view of the flexibility regarding the route of administration and the convenience of the once-weekly, self-administered, SC regimen, add-on therapy with belimumab is a useful treatment option for patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE despite standard therapy.

Subcutaneous belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic autoimmune disease with various clinical manifestations, organ involvement and laboratory findings. The disease can involve any organ including skin, joints, kidneys, central and peripheral nervous system, cardiovascular system and more. Currently, the cornerstone of treatment includes antimalarial and immunosuppressive medications and glucocorticosteroids. Recently, great effort has been invested in finding more targeted drugs for achieving better control of the disease with less adverse events. Intravenous belimumab was the first and only biologic drug to be approved by the US FDA and Health Canada for lupus over the last 50 years, and recently was studied in subcutaneous form. This paper will review the major belimumab trials with a focus on the subcutaneous form.

An indirect comparison of intravenous and subcutaneous belimumab efficacy in patients with SLE and high disease activity

AIM

To compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus and high disease activity (HDA).

PATIENTS & METHODS

An indirect treatment comparison using patient-level data of patients with HDA from three belimumab IV Phase III randomized controlled trials (BLISS-52 [BEL110751]; BLISS-76 [BEL110752]; Northeast Asia study [BEL113750]) and one belimumab SC randomized controlled trial (BLISS-SC [BEL112341]).

RESULTS

Similar efficacy results were identified between the belimumab formulations and greater improvements in efficacy endpoints were observed for both formulations compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

This indirect treatment comparison provides further evidence of the efficacy of belimumab IV and SC in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and HDA, compared with standard therapy.