Chylous ascites and podocytopathy as the presentation of childhood lupus-an unusual occurrence

Immune-related generalised oedema - A new category of adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Generalised oedema was occasionally reported associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs). The purpose of this study is to investigate immune-related generalised oedema (ir-GE) drug related to ICPI, through frequency, clinical and pathological characteristics, and patient's outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Objectives of the study were to report on ir-GE associated with ICPI to define frequency, associated signs and symptoms, pathological characteristics, severity, and response to corticosteroids. To be included in the study, adult patients had to have ir-GE related to ICPI with certain or likely link, without any other known causes of generalised oedema. The study design was observational, over the period 2014-2020, from pharmacovigilance databases in France, including the prospective Registre des Effets Indésirables Sévères des Anticorps Monoclonaux Immunomodulateurs en Cancérologie (REISAMIC) registry. Calculation of the frequency of ir-GE was restricted to the prospective REISAMIC registry.

RESULTS

Over 6633 screened patients, 20 had ir-GE confirmed drug related to ICPI. Based on the prospective REISAMIC registry, the frequency of ir-GE was 0.19% of ICPI-treated patients (3 cases out of 1598 screened patients). The 20 patients with ir-GE had a median (range) age of 62 (26-81) years, most frequent tumour types were melanoma (n = 9; 45%) and lung cancer (n = 6; 30%). The most frequent localisations of oedema were peripheral (n = 17; 85%), pleural (n = 13; 65%), and peritoneal (n = 10; 50%). Polyserositis was observed in 11 (55%) patients. The median (range) weight gain per patient was 9 (2-30) kg. Associated signs and symptoms met criteria for capillary leak syndrome (n = 4; 20%), sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) (n = 3; 15%), or subcutaneous autoimmune syndrome (n = 2; 10%). Corticosteroids were administered to 15 patients; of them, 10 (67%) improved clinically after corticosteroids. Based on CTCAEV5.0, the highest severity of ir-GE was grade ≥4 in 11 (55%) patients and four (20%) patients died due to ir-GE.

CONCLUSIONS

Generalised immune system-related oedema is a new category of adverse event with immune checkpoint inhibitors and is often associated with a life-threatening condition. The pathophysiology may in some cases be related to endothelial dysfunctions, such as SOS/VOD or capillary leak syndrome.

Lupus podocytopathy and antiphospholipid syndrome in a child with SLE: A case report and literature review

Lupus podocytopathy is a glomerular lesion in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) characterized by diffuse podocyte foot process effacement (FPE) without immune complex (IC) deposition or with only mesangial IC deposition. It is rarely seen in children with SLE. A 13-year-old girl met the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Classification Criteria for SLE based on positive ANA; facial rash; thrombocytopenia; proteinuria; and positive antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, including lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibody (anti-β2GPI), and anti-cardiolipin antibody (aCL). The renal lesion was characterized by 3+ proteinuria, a 4.2 mg/mg spot (random) urine protein to creatinine ratio, and hypoalbuminemia (26.2 g/l) at the beginning of the disease. Kidney biopsy findings displayed negative immunofluorescence (IF) for immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgM, fibrinogen (Fb), C3, and C1q, except faint IgG; a normal glomerular appearance under a light microscope; and diffuse podocyte foot process effacement (FPE) in the absence of subepithelial or subendothelial deposition by electron microscopy (EM). Histopathology of the epidermis and dermis of the pinna revealed a hyaline thrombus in small vessels. The patient met the APS classification criteria based on microvascular thrombogenesis and persistently positive aPL antibodies. She responded to a combination of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents. Our study reinforces the need to consider the potential cooccurrence of LP and APS. Clinicians should be aware of the potential presence of APS in patients with a diagnosis of LP presenting with NS and positivity for aPL antibodies, especially triple aPL antibodies (LCA, anti-β2GPI, and aCL).

Lupus podocytopathy superimposed on diabetic glomerulosclerosis: A case report

RATIONALE

Lupus podocytopathy (LP) is an entity that is increasingly being reported in the literature on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). LP is characterized by nephrotic syndrome in SLE patients with diffuse glomerular podocyte foot process effacement and no immune complex deposits along the capillary loops. Histologically, LP typically mimics minimal change disease or primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) on a background of ISN/RPS class I or II lupus nephritis. In situations where there are coexistent glomerular diseases, however, LP may be easily masked by background lesions and overlapping clinical symptoms.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report the case of a 24-year-old woman with type I diabetes, hypertension, psoriasis/rash, and intermittent arthritis who presented with abrupt onset of severe nephrotic proteinuria and renal insufficiency. Renal biopsy revealed nodular glomerulosclerosis and FSGS. Immune deposits were not identified by immunofluorescence or electron microscopy. Ultrastructurally, there was diffuse glomerular basement membrane thickening and over 90% podocyte foot process effacement. With no prior established diagnosis of SLE, the patient was initially diagnosed with diabetic nephropathy with coexistent FSGS, and the patient was started on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and diuretics. However, nephrotic proteinuria persisted and renal function deteriorated. The patient concurrently developed hemolytic anemia with pancytopenia.

DIAGNOSES

Subsequent to the biopsy, serologic results showed positive autoantibodies against double strand DNA (dsDNA), Smith antigen, ribonucleoprotein (RNP), and Histone. A renal biopsy was repeated, revealing essentially similar findings to those of the previous biopsy. Integrating serology and clinical presentation, SLE was favored. The pathology findings were re-evaluated and considered to be most consistent with LP and coexistent diabetic nephropathy, with superimposed FSGS either as a component of LP or as a lesion secondary to diabetes or hypertension.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was started on high-dose prednisone at 60 mg/day, with subsequent addition of mycophenolate mofetil and ACEI, while prednisone was gradually tapered.

OUTCOMES

The patient's proteinuria, serum creatinine, complete blood counts, skin rash, and arthritis were all significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of LP when confounded by other glomerular diseases that may cause nephrotic syndrome can be challenging. Sufficient awareness of this condition is necessary for the appropriate diagnosis and treatment.