Evidence based treatment for lupus nephritis: present perspectives and challenges

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease known for its high heterogeneity among individuals, which affects various organs including the kidneys. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent and life-threatening manifestation of the disease, with up to 50% of patients developing kidney involvement. Classification of renal involvement in lupus is based on specific histopathological findings, guiding therapeutical decisions. Immunosuppressive therapy, particularly glucocorticoids combined with cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil, has been the mainstay of treatment for many years, while rates of complete remission have not changed dramatically. Despite advancements in therapy, in an important proportion of patients LN leads to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Emerging therapies including belimumab, voclosporin, and obinutuzumab offer promising results in improving renal outcomes, especially in refractory or relapsing disease. Maintenance therapy is crucial to prevent disease flares and preserve renal function. Supportive measures including lifestyle modifications and non-immunosuppressive pharmacological interventions are nowadays also essential in managing LN. This review emphasizes recent advances of therapy and challenges regarding treatment optimization with strategies to improve long-term outcomes.

Rituximab as add-on therapy in patients with resistant lupus nephritis who have failed induction or maintenance therapy with other agents: A real-world experience from a single center in Mumbai

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis (LN) is associated with poor outcomes and a significant risk of progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Some patients with resistant LN do not respond adequately to current treatment options and need alternative strategies or therapies.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab as a re-induction therapy (Re-RTX) followed by maintenance therapy for patients with resistant LN.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with resistant LN (failed initial induction therapy or severe relapse after remission) were analyzed. Re-RTX was co-administered with other immunosuppressants. The primary KDIGO criteria outcomes included renal response (complete and partial), disease progression, relapses, and infections.

RESULTS

The median age was 28 years (IQR 24.5-42), and the female-to-male ratio was 11:1. All patients had active LN, and 91.3% had proliferative LN. Baseline creatinine was 1.075 mg% (IQR 0.7-1.38), and mean urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) was 4.9 (IQR 2.8-6.65). Of the patients receiving RTX as re-induction therapy, 66.6% (16/24) had failed initial induction therapy with other immunosuppressants, whereas 33.3% (8/24) had severe relapse during maintenance therapy.Re-RTX had a favorable renal response at 6 months, with 91.7% of the patients responding (20.8% complete response and 70.8% partial response). At 12 months, 58.3% of the patients maintained a renal response (25% complete response and 33.3% partial response). Approximately one-third of patients relapsed within a year.Fourteen patients (58.3%) continued RTX maintenance therapy with two different treatment regimens. At 6 months, Regimen-1 (500 mg every 6 months) resulted in a partial response in 43% (3/7) and relapse in 57% (4/7) of patients. Regimen 2 (1 g dose per year) achieved a complete response in 28.5% (2/7) and a partial response in 71.5% (5/7) with no relapses at 6 months.At a median follow-up of 29 months, adverse renal outcomes were observed in 29.16% of the patients with progression to advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The overall use of Re-RTX was considered safe, with a reported infection prevalence of 16%, which is comparable to the existing data.

CONCLUSION

Re-RTX demonstrated efficacy and safety as an induction therapy for resistant LN. However, the response waned after 1 year, underscoring the need for optimized maintenance therapy.

When should targeted therapies be used in the treatment of lupus nephritis: Early in the disease course or in refractory patients?

Although the prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) has improved over the last few decades, 5-20% of patients still progress to kidney failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to improve the management of LN. Two novel drugs, belimumab and voclosporin, have been recently approved for LN and obinutuzumab is in the late stage of development. In randomised controlled trials (RCTs), all these drugs, added to the standard-of-care, were more effective than standard-of-care alone in achieving renal response. Now the question is: should these new drugs be used early in the disease course or just in refractory patients? The main reasons supporting the early use are based on the RCTs that demonstrated benefits when combinatory regimen was initiated early in incident and relapsing patients leading to a higher proportion of patients to achieve renal response, hence reducing nephron loss and the risk of kidney failure. The main reasons supporting the use of the combinatory regimens primarily in relapsing/refractory patients acknowledge that many patients responded well even without add-on medications, allowing a more economic use of innovative and costly drugs. However, good predictors of renal response to standard-of-care are lacking and, thus, the decision of adding new treatments early or just in refractory or relapsing patients has to consider drug access, risks of over or undertreatment, and preservation of kidney function in high-risk individuals.

Diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis: a summary of the Consensus Document of the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN)

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most frequent serious manifestation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Up to 60% of SLE patients develop LN, which has a significant impact on their quality of life and prognosis. Recent advances have improved the diagnostic approach to LN, and new drugs that block specific pathways and kidney damage progression have been developed. Several randomized and well-powered clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy of these agents in terms of proteinuria remission and preservation of kidney function in the medium and long term, with an acceptable safety profile and good tolerance. The combination of different therapies allows for reduction of the dose and duration of corticosteroids and other potentially toxic therapies and leads to an increase in the number of patients achieving complete remission of the disease. This consensus document carried out by the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN) provides practical and updated recommendations, based on the best available evidence and clinical expertise of participating nephrologists.

Treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide: A prospective study

Introduction

The condition of refractory lupus nephritis (LN) negatively affects the prognosis and life expectancy of the patients, posing a challenge to manage in clinical. This interventional study evaluated the efficacy as well as safety of leflunomide in patients with refractory LN.

Methods

Twenty patients with refractory LN were enrolled in this study. A daily dose of 20–40 mg of leflunomide was given to the patients orally. Meanwhile, immunosuppressives were withdrawn, and corticosteroids were gradually tapered. There was an average follow-up period of 3, 6, and 12 months for most patients while some were observed for as long as 24 months. We recorded biochemical parameters and side effects. We calculated the response rate using intention-to-treat analysis.

Results

Eighteen patients (90%) completed the study. At 3 months, 80% (16/20) of the patients achieved more than a 25% decrease in 24-hour urine protein quantity. At 6 months, three patients (15%) achieved a partial response, and five patients (25%) achieved a complete response. However, by 12 months and 24 months, the complete response rate dropped to 15% and 20%, respectively. The objective responses were 30% (6/20), 40% (8/20), 40% (8/20), and 30% (6/20) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Two patients withdrew from the study due to developing cytopenia and leucopenia.

Conclusion

In patients diagnosed with refractory LN, our study shows that leflunomide could be a promising treatment option owing to its response rate and safety profile.

Consensus document of the Spanish Group for the Study of the Glomerular Diseases (GLOSEN) for the diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis

A significant number of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (between 20% and 60% according to different reported series) develop lupus nephritis in the course of its evolution, which directly influences their quality of life and vital prognosis. In recent years, the greater knowledge about the pathogenesis of systemic lupus and lupus nephritis has allowed relevant advances in the diagnostic approach and treatment of these patients, achieving the development of drugs specifically aimed at blocking key pathogenic pathways of the disease. Encouragingly, these immunomodulatory agents have shown in well-powered, randomized clinical trials good clinical efficacy in the medium-term, defined as proteinuria remission and preservation of kidney function, with an acceptable safety profile and good patient tolerability. All this has made it possible to reduce the use of corticosteroids and other potentially more toxic therapies, as well as to increase the use of combined therapies. The present consensus document carried out by the Glomerular Diseases Working Group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (GLOSEN), collects in a practical and summarized, but rigorous way, the best currently available evidence about the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of lupus nephritis patients, including cases of special situations, with the main objective of providing updated information and well-founded clinical recommendations to treating physicians, to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to our patients.

Treatment outcomes in refractory lupus nephritis: Data from an observational study

OBJECTIVES

Despite current advances in treatment, refractory lupus nephritis (RLN) continues to pose a challenge. The present paper studies the clinical profile and treatment outcomes in patients with RLN.

METHODS

This observational, bidirectional study enrolled consecutive lupus nephritis (LN) patients from August 2018 to January 2019, who either failed to improve within three months, did not achieve partial renal response (PR) at six months, or did not achieve complete renal response (CR) after two years of treatment. Patients were followed every three months; treatment details and outcomes [CR, PR, no renal response (NR)], doubling serum creatinine, and death were recorded. Group comparisons were made using ANOVA and chi-square test. Factors affecting renal response were studied using linear regression.

RESULTS

Forty-five of forty-eight enrolled patients completed at least nine months of follow-up and were included in outcome analysis. The median (IQR) SLE duration was three years (2-6 years). The majority of patients (n = 25) had proliferative LN (ISN/RPS class III/IV), with nine patients having pure membranous LN (class V). The mean activity and chronicity indices were 8 and 0. Over a median (IQR) follow-up period of 15 (12-27) months, 28 had CR, 9 had PR, and 8 showed no response to a switch in an immunosuppressive (IS) agent. Repeat renal biopsy (n = 8) with a mean (±SD) biopsy interval of 2 (±1) years showed histological class transformation in more than half of the patients. There was no significant difference in treatment outcome and time to attain response based on individual IS agent or sequence of IS agents used. None of the variables (duration of SLE or nephritis, baseline SLEDAI, leukopenia, hypertension, elevated anti-dsDNA, low complements, serum albumin, 24-hour urinary protein, biopsy class) predicted renal response on univariate analysis. No patient had a doubling of serum creatinine or progression to end-stage renal disease. There were three deaths, all related to infection.

CONCLUSION

A change in immunosuppression produces response in most RLN patients while a fifth of them showed no response to therapy. No predictor of renal response was identified. Histologic class switch was frequent. Renal function did not decline over a year of follow-up.