Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis prevents major infective episodes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus on immunosuppressants: A non-concurrent cohort study

Clinical and angiographic outcomes of mycophenolate versus methotrexate in South Asian patients of Takayasu arteritis: Results from an open-label, outcome-assessor blinded randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical and angiographic responses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus methotrexate (MTX) in Takayasu arteritis (TAK).

METHODS

This was an open-label, outcome assessor-blinded trial. Adult patients with active TAK were randomized 1:1 to MMF 1 g twice daily or MTX 20 mg once weekly by a computer-generated program. All patients were started on 0.5 mg/kg of steroids with a predetermined tapering protocol. The primary outcome was the treatment response as defined by Indian Takayasu arteritis score at 9 months. The secondary end points included the time to first failure and angiographic progression.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients (26 in each arm) were recruited. The rate of responders was 71.43% (15/21) in the MMF arm and 63.64% (14/22) in the MTX arm (P = .58). The median time to the first failure was 9 months (range: 3-9) and 4.5 months (range: 3-9) in the MMF and MTX arms, respectively (P = .052). In both groups, 15% of patients (n = 3) had a progressive disease in angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed numerically better outcomes favouring MMF, with a longer time to the first failure than MTX (9 months versus 4.5 months, P = .052). No significant difference was seen in the angiographic outcomes.

Rates of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and prophylaxis prescribing patterns in a large electronic health record cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective No guidelines exist for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Limited data are available on incidence of PJP infection and use of PJP prophylaxis. Using a real-world, electronic health record (EHR) cohort, we investigated the frequency of PJP infections as well as patient and provider factors that impacted use and type of PJP prophylaxis. Methods  In a large, de-identified EHR, we identified possible SLE patients using a previously validated algorithm. PJP ICD-9 or ICD-10-CM billing codes and PJP keywords were used to identify possible PJP cases within this SLE cohort. We assessed for PJP prophylaxis prescribing in all SLE patients using keywords and reviewing medication lists for prophylactic agents. Chart review was used to confirm cases of SLE, PJP, and PJP prophylaxis and to obtain data on demographics, comorbidities, and immunosuppressants. Results Of 977 SLE patients, there were only four with confirmed PJP infection. Two of these patients had concurrent Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, and none were on prophylaxis. Of 977 SLE patients, 132 (14%) were prescribed PJP prophylaxis. Of 617 SLE patients ever prescribed immunosuppressants, 128 (21%) were prescribed PJP prophylaxis. Sulfonamides were the most common prophylaxis prescribed (69%), and possible adverse events were documented in 22 out of 117 instances of being placed on a sulfonamide. Patients of younger age, Black race, nephritis, and renal transplant, and on chronic glucocorticoids were all more likely to have PJP prophylaxis prescribed. Patients who were on transplant induction medications, calcineurin/mTOR inhibitors, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate mofetil all were more likely to be prescribed PJP prophylaxis compared to other immunosuppressants. Conclusion PJP is a rare diagnosis among SLE patients, and prior studies may even overestimate its prevalence. PJP prophylaxis was less common in our cohort than previously described. Adverse events related to sulfonamides used for PJP prophylaxis were relatively rare with lower rates than previously reported. Our study demonstrates real-world PJP prophylaxis prescribing patterns in a large cohort of SLE patients.

An Overview of the Safety, Efficiency, and Signal Pathways of Stem Cell Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that affects multiple organs and tissues. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered a good source for autoimmune disease and hematological disease therapy. This review will summarize the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of MSC therapy for SLE. MSC therapy can reduce anti-dsDNA, antinuclear antigen (ANA), proteinuria, and serum creatinine in SLE patients. In animal models of SLE, MSC therapy also indicates that it could reduce anti-dsDNA, ANA, proteinuria, and serum creatinine and ameliorate renal pathology. There are no serious adverse events, treatment-related mortality, or tumor-related events in SLE patients after stem cell treatment. MSCs can inhibit inflammatory factors, such as MCP-1 and HMGB-1, and inhibit inflammation-related signaling pathways, such as the NF-κB, JAK/STAT, and Akt/GSK3β signaling pathways, to alleviate the lesions in SLE.