Development of an instrument to predict proliferative histological class in lupus nephritis based on clinical and laboratory data

An updated approach to the evaluation of the urinary sediment

Examination of the urinary sediment (U-sed) is an important non-invasive, rapid, and inexpensive tool for the diagnosis and surveillance over time of renal diseases. In this Educational Review, we describe first how to collect, prepare, and examine urine samples in order to obtain reliable results. Then, we describe the U-sed findings in isolated microscopic hematuria, glomerular diseases, acute interstitial nephritis, acute kidney injury, reactivation of the BK virus in kidney transplant recipients, and crystalluric genetic diseases.

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of early-onset and delayed-onset lupus nephritis patients: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis (LN) manifests systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is characterized by various clinical and laboratory features. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the characteristics of LN patients according to the time of LN diagnosis: early-onset (LN diagnosed within one year from SLE diagnosis) vs. delayed-onset (LN diagnosed more than one year after SLE diagnosis).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from all SLE patients treated at the University Hospital in Kraków, Poland, from 2012 to 2022. We collected data on demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics, including histological findings, treatment modalities, and disease outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed to identify factors impacting LN development and prognosis.

RESULTS

Among 331 LN patients, early-onset was diagnosed in 207 (62.54%) and delayed-onset was documented in 122 cases (36.86%). In 2 (0.6%) LN cases, the time of first kidney manifestation in the SLE course was unknown. Delayed-onset LN had a higher female-to-male ratio and younger age at SLE diagnosis. This group was associated with more severe clinical manifestations. In turn, studied subgroups did not differ in internist comorbidities, kidney histopathology, and family history regarding autoimmune diseases. Delayed-onset LN exhibited a higher frequency of anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith, anti-Ro, anti-RNP, and anti-cardiolipin IgG autoantibodies. During a 14-year follow-up period, 16 patients died. Mortality rate and causes of death were comparable in both analyzed subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

More severe clinical manifestations in delayed-onset LN prompt strict monitoring of non-LN SLE patients to diagnose and treat kidney involvement early. Also, recognizing the higher frequency of autoantibodies such as anti-dsDNA or anti-Smith in delayed-onset LN underscores the potential value of autoantibody profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic tool.

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.

RESULTS

All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.

CONCLUSION

This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

Kidney Biopsy in Management of Lupus Nephritis: A Case-Based Narrative Review

Kidney involvement in patients with lupus highly increases morbidity and mortality. In recent years, several reports have emphasized the dissociation between clinical and histological findings and highlighted the role of kidney biopsy as an instrument for diagnosis and follow-up of lupus nephritis. The kidney biopsy at initial diagnosis allows an early diagnosis, assessment of activity and chronicity, and detection of nonimmune complex nephritis. A kidney biopsy repeated months after treatment aids in the detection of persistent histological inflammation, which has been linked to the occurrence of future kidney relapses. A kidney biopsy at a relapse detects histological changes including chronic scarring. Finally, a kidney biopsy in patients with a clinical response undergoing maintenance immunosuppression may aid therapy tapering and/or suspension. The evidence supporting the use of a kidney biopsy in different scenarios across the course of lupus nephritis is heterogeneous, with most reports assessing the value for the diagnosis of a first or relapsing flare. In contrast, less evidence suggests additional therapeutic-modifying information derived from repeat posttreatment biopsies and biopsies to evaluate treatment tapering or suspension. In this clinical case-based review, we examine the role of kidney biopsy as a tool to improve clinical outcomes of patients with lupus nephritis.