Propofol Inhibits the Proliferation, Migration, and Stem-like Properties of Bladder Cancer Mainly by Suppressing the Hedgehog Pathway

Long-term Survival after Volatile or Propofol General Anesthesia for Bladder Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective National Registry Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Prospective interventional trials and retrospective observational analyses provide conflicting evidence regarding the relationship between propofol versus inhaled volatile general anesthesia and long-term survival after cancer surgery. Specifically, bladder cancer surgery lacks prospective clinical trial evidence.

METHODS

Data on bladder cancer surgery performed under general anesthesia between 2014 and 2021 from the National Quality Registry for Urinary Tract and Bladder Cancer and the Swedish Perioperative Registry were record-linked. Overall survival was compared between patients receiving propofol or inhaled volatile for anesthesia maintenance. The minimum clinically important difference was defined as a 5-percentage point difference in 5-yr survival.

RESULTS

Of 7,571 subjects, 4,519 (59.7%) received an inhaled volatile anesthetic, and 3,052 (40.3%) received propofol for general anesthesia maintenance. The two groups were quite similar in most respects but differed in American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status and tumor stage. Propensity score matching was used to address treatment bias. Survival did not differ during follow-up (median, 45 months [interquartile range, 33 to 62 months]) in the full unmatched cohort nor after 1:1 propensity score matching (3,052 matched pairs). The Kaplan-Meier adjusted 5-yr survival rates in the matched cohort were 898 of 3,052, 67.5% (65.6 to 69.3%) for propofol and 852 of 3,052, 68.5% (66.7 to 70.4%) for inhaled volatile general anesthesia, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.15]; P = 0.332). A sensitivity analysis restricted to 1,766 propensity score-matched pairs of patients who received only one general anesthetic during the study period did not demonstrate a difference in survival; Kaplan-Meier adjusted 5-yr survival rates were 521 of 1,766, 67.1% (64.7 to 69.7%) and 482 of 1,766, 68.9% (66.5 to 71.4%) for propofol and inhaled volatile general anesthesia, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.23]; P = 0.139).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing bladder cancer surgery under general anesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference in long-term overall survival associated with the choice of propofol or an inhaled volatile maintenance.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

In Vitro Effect of Propofol on the Expression of Genes Involved in Inflammation and Apoptosis in Corneal Activated Keratocytes

PURPOSE

We investigated the effect of propofol (0.5, 5, and 50 μM) on the gene expression of inflammatory cytokines [ IL-1β , IL-6 , transforming growth factor β ( TGF-β ), and LIF ] and apoptosis process ( BCL-2 and Bax ) in corneal activated keratocytes (CAKs).

METHODS

CAKs (10 6 cells/10 cm 2 ) were exposed to propofol at a concentration of 0.5, 5, and 50 μM for 24 hours at 37°C. The control group did not receive propofol at the same time or under the same condition. Ribonucleic acid (RNA) extraction, complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed to quantify the relative expression of IL-1β , IL-6 , TGF-β , LIF , BCL-2 , and Bax expression in the treated versus control cells.

RESULT

The results of this study showed that propofol treatment (0.5 and 5 μM) led to the downregulation of IL-1β and IL-6 gene expression in CAKs. TGF-β (with a role in fibrogenesis) was not changed in 0.5 and 5 μM propofol-treated CAKs, whereas CAKs treated with 50 μM propofol showed upregulation of the TGF-β gene. LIF (with a role in regeneration) was upregulated in 0.5 and 5 μM propofol-treated CAKs. The BCL-2/Bax ratio (as the antiapoptosis index) was increased in CAKs treated with 0.5 μM propofol and indicated the induction of an antiapoptotic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that CAKs treatment with propofol, at concentrations of 0.5 and 5 μM, could decrease the expression of genes related to inflammation and enhance the genes associated with cell regeneration. While 50 μM propofol treatment might induce CAK fibrogenesis. This proof-of-concept study could preserve a groundwork for future drug design for the treatment of corneal stromal diseases and ocular regenerative medicine.

Influence of the Anesthetic Technique on Circulating Extracellular Vesicles in Bladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

Anesthetics have been shown to alter tumor progression and seem to influence surgical cancer outcome. Circulating extracellular vesicles as mediators of intercellular communication are involved in cancer progression and may be influenced by anesthetics. In this prospective, randomized study, effects of anesthetics on extracellular vesicles and associated micro-RNAs in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy were tested. Extracellular vesicles from 51 patients at four perioperative time points receiving Propofol or Sevoflurane were extracted with polymer-based methods and quantified with a nanoparticle-tracking analysis. Vesicle-associated micro-RNAs were analyzed with a real-time polymerase chain reaction using array cards and single assays for tumor-associated miR-21-5p, miR-15a-5p, miR-17-5p and miR-451a. Plasma extracellular vesicle concentration (suture: fold change (fc) in Propofol at 4.1 ± 3.9 vs. Sevoflurane at 0.8 ± 0.5; p = 0.003) and associated miRNAs increased significantly (+30% post induction, +9% 30 Min surgery) in the Propofol group. Tumor-associated miRNAs increased during surgery in both groups (fc in miR-21-5p: 24.3 ± 10.2, p = 0.029; fc in miR-15a-5p: 9.7 ± 3.8, p = 0.027; fc in miR-17-5p: 5.4 ± 1.7, p = 0.014), whereas antitumor miR-451a increased in the Propofol group only (fc: 2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.2; p = 0.022). Anesthetics influence extracellular vesicles and associated micro-RNAs of bladder cancer patients during surgery. Increased expression of antitumor micro-RNA may be an explanatory approach for decreased tumor cell viability after Propofol.

The Bladder Tumor Microenvironment Components That Modulate the Tumor and Impact Therapy

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is complex and involves many different cell types that seemingly work together in helping cancer cells evade immune monitoring and survive therapy. The advent of single-cell sequencing has greatly increased our knowledge of the cell types present in the tumor microenvironment and their role in the developing cancer. This, coupled with clinical data showing that cancer development and the response to therapy may be influenced by drugs that indirectly influence the tumor environment, highlights the need to better understand how the cells present in the TME work together. This review looks at the different cell types (cancer cells, cancer stem cells, endothelial cells, pericytes, adipose cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and neuronal cells) in the bladder tumor microenvironment. Their impact on immune activation and on shaping the microenvironment are discussed as well as the effects of hypertensive drugs and anesthetics on bladder cancer.

Propofol inhibits colon cancer cell stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by regulating SIRT1, Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways

BACKGROUND

Propofol is a common sedative-hypnotic drug used for general anesthesia. Recent studies have drawn attention to the antitumor effects of propofol, but the potential mechanism by which propofol suppresses colon cancer stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

For the in vitro experiments, we used propofol to treat LOVO and SW480 cells and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) to detect proliferation. Self-renewal capacity, cell invasion and migration, flow cytometry analysis, qPCR and Western blotting were performed to detect the suppression of propofol to colon cancer cells and the underlying mechanism. Tumorigenicity and immunohistochemistry experiments were performed to confirm the role of propofol in vivo.

RESULT

We observed that propofol could suppressed stem cell-like characteristics and EMT-related behaviors, including self-renewal capacity, cell invasion and migration in colon cancer cells, and even suppressed tumorigenicity in vivo. Furthermore, investigations of the underlying mechanism revealed that propofol treatment downregulated SIRT1. SIRT1 overexpression or knockdown affected the stemness and EMT of colon cancer cells. Additionally, propofol reversed stemness and EMT in cells with overexpressing SIRT1 and subsequently inhibited the Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways. Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitor and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitor blocked the propofol-induced reduction of sphere-formation and cell invasion-migration.

CONCLUSION

Propofol inhibits LOVO and SW480 cell stemness and EMT by regulating SIRT1 and the Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways. Our findings indicate that propofol inhibits SIRT1 in cancer and is advantageous in colon cancer surgical treatment of patients with high SIRT1 expression.

An intravenous anesthetic drug-propofol, influences the biological characteristics of malignant tumors and reshapes the tumor microenvironment: A narrative literature review

Malignant tumors are the second leading cause of death worldwide. This is a public health concern that negatively impacts human health and poses a threat to the safety of life. Although there are several treatment approaches for malignant tumors, surgical resection remains the primary and direct treatment for malignant solid tumors. Anesthesia is an integral part of the operation process. Different anesthesia techniques and drugs have different effects on the operation and the postoperative prognosis. Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic that is commonly used in surgery. A substantial number of studies have shown that propofol participates in the pathophysiological process related to malignant tumors and affects the occurrence and development of malignant tumors, including anti-tumor effect, pro-tumor effect, and regulation of drug resistance. Propofol can also reshape the tumor microenvironment, including anti-angiogenesis, regulation of immunity, reduction of inflammation and remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Furthermore, most clinical studies have also indicated that propofol may contribute to a better postoperative outcome in some malignant tumor surgeries. Therefore, the author reviewed the chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, clinical application and limitations, mechanism of influencing the biological characteristics of malignant tumors and reshaping the tumor microenvironment, studies of propofol in animal tumor models and its relationship with postoperative prognosis of propofol in combination with the relevant literature in recent years, to lay a foundation for further study on the correlation between propofol and malignant tumor and provide theoretical guidance for the selection of anesthetics in malignant tumor surgery.

The immune response to major gastrointestinal cancer surgery and potential implications for adjuvant immunotherapy

The perioperative period theoretically is a critical time of opportunity for the progression of pre-existing tumour micrometastasis. Therefore,the timing of introducing cancer therapies including chemotherapy, radiation therapy and immunotherapies in the postoperative period is important. A thorough exploration of the perioperative immune events at a cellular level in combination with an intricate review of available clinical rials was conducted to extrapolate the effects of oncological surgery on the perioperative immune milieu.This is timely in view of the recently published Checkmate-577 trial which demonstrated significant disease-free survival in carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction with the use of adjuvant anti-programmed cell deathprotein 1(PD-1) immunotherapy.This review focusing in particular on perioperative immunosuppression, identifies potential modifiable factors, the effects of perioperative conditioning and optimisation, the most recent trials in the curative setting for Gastrointestinal malignancies and the new treatment avenues possible in the context of the combination of immunotherapy and major oncological gastrointestinal surgery.

Application of Anesthetics in Cancer Patients: Reviewing Current Existing Link With Tumor Recurrence

Surgery remains the most effective cancer treatment, but residual disease in the form of scattered micro-metastases and tumor cells is usually unavoidable. Whether minimal residual disease results in clinical metastases is a function of host defense and tumor survival and growth. The much interesting intersection of anesthesiology and immunology has drawn increasing clinical interest, particularly, the existing concern of the possibility that the perioperative and intraoperative anesthetic care of the surgical oncology patient could meaningfully influence tumor recurrence. This paper examines current data, including recent large clinical trials to determine whether the current level of evidence warrants a change in practice. Available pieces of evidence from clinical studies are particularly limited, largely retrospective, smaller sample size, and often contradictory, causing several questions and providing few answers. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials, including the largest study (NCT00418457), report no difference in cancer recurrence between regional and general anesthesia after potentially curative surgery. Until further evidence strongly implicates anesthesia in future clinical trials, clinicians may continue to choose the optimum anesthetic-analgesic agents and techniques in consultation with their cancer patients, based on their expertise and current best practice.