1
|
Fazekas T, Shim SR, Basile G, Baboudjian M, Kói T, Przydacz M, Abufaraj M, Ploussard G, Kasivisvanathan V, Rivas JG, Gandaglia G, Szarvas T, Schoots IG, van den Bergh RCN, Leapman MS, Nyirády P, Shariat SF, Rajwa P. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:745-754. [PMID: 38576242 PMCID: PMC10998247 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Importance Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly integrated within the prostate cancer (PCa) early detection pathway. Objective To systematically evaluate the existing evidence regarding screening pathways incorporating MRI with targeted biopsy and assess their diagnostic value compared with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening with systematic biopsy strategies. Data Sources PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane/Central, Scopus, and Web of Science (through May 2023). Study Selection Randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies were eligible if they reported data on the diagnostic utility of prostate MRI in the setting of PCa screening. Data Extraction Number of screened individuals, biopsy indications, biopsies performed, clinically significant PCa (csPCa) defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2 or higher, and insignificant (ISUP1) PCas detected were extracted. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was csPCa detection rate. Secondary outcomes included clinical insignificant PCa detection rate, biopsy indication rates, and the positive predictive value for the detection of csPCa. Data Synthesis The generalized mixed-effect approach with pooled odds ratios (ORs) and random-effect models was used to compare the MRI-based and PSA-only screening strategies. Separate analyses were performed based on the timing of MRI (primary/sequential after a PSA test) and cutoff (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] score ≥3 or ≥4) for biopsy indication. Results Data were synthesized from 80 114 men from 12 studies. Compared with standard PSA-based screening, the MRI pathway (sequential screening, PI-RADS score ≥3 cutoff for biopsy) was associated with higher odds of csPCa when tests results were positive (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 2.93-5.88; P ≤ .001), decreased odds of biopsies (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22-0.36; P ≤ .001), and insignificant cancers detected (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23-0.49; P = .002) without significant differences in the detection of csPCa (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.75-1.37; P = .86). Implementing a PI-RADS score of 4 or greater threshold for biopsy selection was associated with a further reduction in the odds of detecting insignificant PCa (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.05-0.97; P = .048) and biopsies performed (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.38; P = .01) without differences in csPCa detection (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.49-1.45; P = .22). Conclusion and relevance The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that integrating MRI in PCa screening pathways is associated with a reduced number of unnecessary biopsies and overdiagnosis of insignificant PCa while maintaining csPCa detection as compared with PSA-only screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Fazekas
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Division of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, North Academic Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Tamás Kói
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Institute of Mathematics, Department of Stochastics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Mikolaj Przydacz
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- The National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Division of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Tibor Szarvas
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium–University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ivo G. Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roderick C. N. van den Bergh
- Department of Urology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Péter Nyirády
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Daher D, Dahan KSE, Yekkaluri S, Gopal P, Rich NE, Parikh ND, Murphy CC, Singal AG. Proportion of Time Covered by Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:875-882. [PMID: 37975606 PMCID: PMC11068493 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is associated with improved early tumor detection, but effectiveness is limited by underuse. We characterized adherence to HCC surveillance using proportion of time covered (PTC) and estimated its association with clinical outcomes among patients with cirrhosis. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with HCC between January 2008 and December 2022 at 2 large US health systems. We characterized PTC by imaging in the 12 and 24 months before HCC diagnosis. We used multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses to assess the association between PTC and early HCC detection, receipt of curative treatment, and overall survival. RESULTS Among 2,027 patients with HCC, 331 (51.4% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 0/A) had been followed up for at least 12 months before diagnosis. The median PTC was 24.9% (interquartile range 1.1%-50.7%), with only 16.0% having semiannual imaging and 42.0% having annual surveillance. Semiannual and annual surveillance decreased to 6.3% and 29.6% when assessed over 24 months, although the median PTC remained unchanged at 24.9%. Receipt of gastroenterology/hepatology care had the strongest association with PTC, with median PTC of 36.7% and 3.8% for those with and without gastroenterology/hepatology care, respectively. PTC was independently associated with improved early HCC detection, curative treatment receipt, and overall survival. The median survival was 15.7, 26.8, and 32.7 months among those with PTC of <25% (n = 168 patients), PTC 25%-50% (n = 69 patients), and PTC >50% (n = 94 patients), respectively. DISCUSSION The proportion of time covered by HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis remains low, highlighting a need for multilevel interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darine Daher
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Karim Seif El Dahan
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Sruthi Yekkaluri
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Purva Gopal
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Nicole E. Rich
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Neehar D. Parikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI
| | | | - Amit G. Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dagne GA. Spatial mapping of colorectal cancer screening uptake and associated factors. Eur J Cancer Prev 2024; 33:161-167. [PMID: 37702612 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Over the past decades, it has been understood that the availability of screening tests has contributed to a steady decline in incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it is also seen that there is a geographic disparity in the use of such tests across small areas. The aim of this study is to examine small-area level barrier factors that may impact CRC screening uptake and to delineate coldspot (low uptake of screening) counties in Florida. METHODS Data on the percentages of county-level CRC screening uptakes in 2016 and county-level barrier factors for screening were obtained from the Florida Department of Health, Division of Public Health Statistics & Performance Management. Bayesian spatial beta models were used to produce posterior probability of deceedance to identify coldspots for CRC screening rates. RESULTS Unadjusted screening rates using sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy test ranged from 56.8 to 85%. Bayesian spatial beta models were fitted to the proportion data. At an ecological level, we found that an increasing rate of CRC screening uptake for either of the test types (colon/rectum exam, stool-based test) was strongly associated with a higher health insurance coverage, and lower percentage of population that speak English less than very well (immigration) at county level. Eleven coldspot counties out of 67 total were also identified. CONCLUSION This study suggests that health insurance disparities in the use of CRC screening tests are an important factor that may need more attention for resource allocation and health policy targeting small areas with low uptake of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Getachew A Dagne
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Castañeda KM, Sidorenkov G, Mourits MJE, van der Vegt B, Siebers AG, Vermeulen KM, Schuuring E, Wisman GBA, de Bock GH. Impact of health-related behavioral factors on participation in a cervical cancer screening program: the lifelines population-based cohort. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:2376. [PMID: 38037016 PMCID: PMC10688458 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17293-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regular participation in cervical cancer screening is critical to reducing mortality. Although certain sociodemographic factors are known to be associated with one-time participation in screening, little is known about other factors that could be related to regular participation. Therefore, this study evaluated the association between health-related behavioral factors and regular participation in cervical cancer screening. METHODS The Lifelines population-based cohort was linked to data for cervical cancer screening from the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank. We included women eligible for all four screening rounds between 2000 and 2019, classifying them as regular (4 attendances), irregular (1-3 attendances), and never participants. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between behavioral factors and participation regularity, with adjustment made for sociodemographic factors. RESULTS Of the 48,325 included women, 55.9%, 35.1%, and 9% were regular, irregular, and never screening participants. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, the likelihood of irregular or never screening participation was increased by smoking, obesity, marginal or inadequate sleep duration, alcohol consumption and low physical activity, while it was decreased by hormonal contraception use. CONCLUSION An association exists between unhealthy behavioral factors and never or irregular participation in cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly M Castañeda
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Grigory Sidorenkov
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Bert van der Vegt
- Department of Pathology & Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Albert G Siebers
- Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank, PALGA, 3991 SZ, Houten, the Netherlands
| | - Karin M Vermeulen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology & Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G Bea A Wisman
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lau-Min KS, Bleznuck J, Wollack C, McKenna DB, Long JM, Hubert AP, Johnson M, Rochester SE, Constantino G, Dudzik C, Doucette A, Wangensteen K, Domchek SM, Landgraf J, Chen J, Nathanson KL, Katona BW. Development of an Electronic Health Record-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool for Patients With Lynch Syndrome. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2300024. [PMID: 37639653 PMCID: PMC10857752 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support (CDS) tool to promote guideline-recommended cancer risk management among patients with Lynch syndrome (LS), an inherited cancer syndrome that confers an increased risk of colorectal and other cancer types. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the baseline prevalence and predictors of guideline-recommended colonic surveillance and annual genetics program visits among patients with LS. Multivariable log-binomial regressions estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) of cancer risk management adherence by baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. These analyses provided rationale for the development of an EHR-based CDS tool to support patients and clinicians with LS-related endoscopic surveillance and annual genetics program visits. The CDS leverages an EHR platform linking discrete genetic data to LS Genomic Indicators, in turn driving downstream clinician- and patient-facing CDS. RESULTS Among 323 patients with LS, cross-sectional adherence to colonic surveillance and annual genetics program visits was 69.3% and 55.4%, respectively. Patients with recent electronic patient portal use were more likely to be adherent to colonic surveillance (PR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.52). Patients more recently diagnosed with LS were more likely to be adherent to annual genetics program visits (PR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.76 for 2-4 years; PR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.75 for ≥4 compared with <2 years). Our EHR-based CDS tool is now active for 421 patients with LS throughout our health system. CONCLUSION We have successfully developed an EHR-based CDS tool to promote guideline-recommended cancer risk management among patients with LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey S. Lau-Min
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joseph Bleznuck
- Information Services Applications, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Colin Wollack
- Information Services Applications, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Danielle B. McKenna
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jessica M. Long
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anna P. Hubert
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mariah Johnson
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Shavon E. Rochester
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Gillain Constantino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christina Dudzik
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kirk Wangensteen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Susan M. Domchek
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey Landgraf
- Information Services Applications, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jessica Chen
- Information Services Applications, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Katherine L. Nathanson
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bryson W. Katona
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sinopoli A, Baccolini V, Di Rosa E. Killing Two Birds with One Stone: Is the COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign an Opportunity to Improve Adherence to Cancer Screening Programmes? The Challenge of a Pilot Project in a Large Local Health Authority in Rome. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030523. [PMID: 36992105 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected health services worldwide. The suspension of cancer screening programs during the lockdown period, coupled with the other measures taken to limit the SARS-CoV-2 spread, contributed to the idea that cancer preventive interventions are deferrable. In this opinion paper, we present some data on cancer screening coverage in one of the largest Local Health Authorities in Italy in recent years. Within this context, we introduce the benefits of a pilot project in which we took advantage of the great attention on the COVID-19 vaccination campaign to improve screening uptake. In this project, we offered men and women eligible for cancer screening the opportunity to book appointments while waiting to be vaccinated. In addition, trained healthcare personnel were available on-site to discuss any barriers to participation with the attendees. Despite the project having only just started, preliminary results are encouraging, with positive feedback from the attendees. In conclusion, we advocate for the need to adopt a comprehensive approach when it comes to population health, and we use this project as an example to discuss how it is possible to contribute to minimizing the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with resources already in place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Sinopoli
- Department of Prevention, Local Health Authority Roma 1, 00193 Rome, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Baccolini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Di Rosa
- Department of Prevention, Local Health Authority Roma 1, 00193 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elmore CE, Mitchell EM, Debnam K, Keim-Malpass J, Laughon K, Tanabe KO, Hauck FR. Predictors of cervical cancer screening for refugee women attending an international family medicine clinic in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:1295-1304. [PMID: 35978212 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01612-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cervical cancer screening (CCS) rates are lower for foreign-born women in the United States (U.S.) compared with the overall population. This study aimed to determine the CCS rate and predictors among refugees who were identified as female attending a family medicine clinic. METHODS A retrospective chart review included refugee individuals aged 21+, seen in the previous 3 years (3/23/2015-3/20/2018), without hysterectomy (n = 525). Lab results determined CCS rate. Chi-square and logistic regression models explored predictors of CCS. RESULTS Overall, 60.0% were up-to-date (UTD) on CCS. Individuals aged 30-49, married, and with [Formula: see text] 1 child had higher odds of being UTD. Ten or more years living in the U.S. was a significant bivariate predictor of CCS, and approached significance in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION This study begins to fill gaps in knowledge about cervical cancer control among individuals who resettled in the U.S. as refugees and, given that CCS rates are suboptimal, informs clinical practice improvements and directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine E Elmore
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S. 2000 E., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. .,School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| | - Emma McKim Mitchell
- Department of Family, Community & Mental Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Katrina Debnam
- School of Nursing & School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jessica Keim-Malpass
- Department of Acute and Specialty Care, School of Nursing, and Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kathryn Laughon
- Department of Family, Community & Mental Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kawai O Tanabe
- Division of Student Affairs, Department of Student Health & Wellness, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Fern R Hauck
- Department of Family Medicine and Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Green BB, Anderson ML, Cook AJ, Chubak J, Fuller S, Meenan RT, Vernon SW. A Centralized Program with Stepped Support Increases Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening Over 9 Years: a Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:1073-1080. [PMID: 34047921 PMCID: PMC8162159 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06922-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening over many years is required to optimize colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a CRC screening intervention on adherence to CRC screening over 9 years. DESIGN Randomized trial. SETTING Integrated health care system in Washington state. PARTICIPANTS Between August 2008 and November 2009, 4653 adults in a Washington state integrated health care system aged 50-74 due for CRC screening were randomized to usual care (UC; N =1163) or UC plus study interventions (interventions: N = 3490). INTERVENTIONS Years 1 and 2: (arm 1) UC or this plus study interventions; (arm 2) mailed fecal tests or information on scheduling colonoscopy; (arm 3) mailings plus brief telephone assistance; or (arm 4) mailings and assistance plus nurse navigation. In year 3, stepped-intensity participants (arms 2, 3, and 4 combined) still eligible for screening were randomized to either stopped or continued interventions in years 3 and 5-9. MAIN MEASURES Time in adherence to CRC testing over 9 years (covered time, primary outcome), and percent with no CRC testing in participants assigned to any intervention compared to UC only. Poisson regression models estimated incidence rate ratios for covered time, adjusting for patient characteristics and accounting for variable follow-up time. KEY RESULTS Compared to UC, intervention participants had 21% more covered time over 9 years (57.5% vs. 69.1%; adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.25, P<0.001). Fecal testing accounted for almost all additional covered time among intervention patients. Compared to UC, intervention participants were also more likely to have completed at least one CRC screening test over 9 years or until censorship (88.6% vs. 80.6%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS An outreach program that included mailed fecal tests and phone follow-up led to increased adherence to CRC testing and fewer age-eligible individuals without any CRC testing over 9 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION Systems of Support (SOS) to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-up (SOS), NCT00697047, clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00697047.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Melissa L Anderson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrea J Cook
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sharon Fuller
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Richard T Meenan
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sally W Vernon
- University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baccolini V, Isonne C, Salerno C, Giffi M, Migliara G, Mazzalai E, Turatto F, Sinopoli A, Rosso A, De Vito C, Marzuillo C, Villari P. The association between adherence to cancer screening programs and health literacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2022; 155:106927. [PMID: 34954244 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The effectiveness of a cancer screening program relies on its adherence rate. Health literacy (HL) has been investigated among the factors that could influence such participation, but the findings are not always consistent. The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence between having an adequate level of HL (AHL) and adherence to cancer screening programs. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Cross-sectional studies, conducted in any country, that provided raw data, unadjusted or adjusted odds ratio (OR) on the associations of interest were included. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Inverse-variance random effects methods were used to produce pooled ORs and their associated confidence interval (CI) stratified by time interval (e.g., undergoing screening in the last period, or at least once during lifetime) for each cancer type, considering unadjusted and adjusted estimates separately. A sensitivity analysis was performed for those studies providing more estimates. Overall, 15 articles of average-to-good quality were pooled. We found a significant association between AHL and higher screening participation for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer, independently of other factors, both overall (N = 7, aOR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.27-2.36; N = 3, aOR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.30-2.09; and N = 5, aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.12-1.39, respectively) and in most time-stratified analyses. The sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. Health literacy seems to be critical for an effective cancer prevention. Given the high prevalence of illiterate people across the world, a long-term action plan is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Baccolini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Isonne
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Carla Salerno
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Monica Giffi
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Migliara
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Mazzalai
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Turatto
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Sinopoli
- Department of Prevention, Local Health Unit Roma 1, Rome, Italy; Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Annalisa Rosso
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Local Health Unit Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado De Vito
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Marzuillo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Adhikari K, Yang H, Teare GF. Patterns of up-to-date status for colorectal cancer screening in Alberta: a cross-sectional study using survey data. CMAJ Open 2022; 10:E203-E212. [PMID: 35292478 PMCID: PMC8929423 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regular screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces its mortality. We explored patterns of use of different CRC screening modalities and quantified the association between having a regular primary care provider and being up to date for CRC screening in a community-based population in Alberta, Canada. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults between 50 and 74 years of age in Alberta, using Canadian Community Health Survey data (2015-2016). We defined being up to date for CRC screening as having completed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within the previous 2 years, or having a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy in the previous 5 years before the survey. We analyzed data using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS Of 4600 surveyed adults, 62.6% were up to date for CRC screening, with 45.1% having completed a FIT or FOBT (45.1%), and 34.1% having undergone a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. The adjusted odds ratio of being up to date for CRC screening was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.17-0.38) and the absolute probability of being up to date for CRC screening was 34.4% lower for adults who had no regular primary care provider, compared with those who had. This pattern was observed in both male and female subgroups. INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest a suboptimal uptake of CRC screening overall in Alberta, with high disparity between adults with and without a regular primary care provider. The use of customized, multicomponent intervention strategies that are shown to be effective in increasing participation in CRC screening may address this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamala Adhikari
- Alberta Health Services (Adhikari, Yang, Teare), Provincial Population and Public Health; Department of Community Health Sciences (Adhikari, Teare), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
| | - Huiming Yang
- Alberta Health Services (Adhikari, Yang, Teare), Provincial Population and Public Health; Department of Community Health Sciences (Adhikari, Teare), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| | - Gary F Teare
- Alberta Health Services (Adhikari, Yang, Teare), Provincial Population and Public Health; Department of Community Health Sciences (Adhikari, Teare), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bastani M, Patel D, Silvestri G, Raoof S, Chusid J, Cohen SL. Factors Associated With Lung Cancer Screening Adherence Among Patients With Negative Baseline CT Results in a Community Health Care Setting. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 19:232-239. [PMID: 34861204 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Lung cancer screening (LCS) decreases lung cancer mortality; however, that reduction depends upon screening adherence. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with adherence rate for LCS among patients with negative baseline CT results in a multi-integrated health care network. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted among patients with negative baseline CT results in a multi-integrated health care network LCS program between January 2015 and January 2020. The two outcomes were adherence for the first and second subsequent LCS studies. Negative baseline result was defined as a Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System score 0, 1, or 2. Adherence was defined as undergoing a follow-up study within 11 to 15 months of a prior scan. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors of adherence, adjusting for patient demographics, median household income (on the basis of geocoding ZIP codes from the US Census Bureau), smoking history, screening sites, and provider specialty. RESULTS A total of 30.7% (512 of 1,668) and 16.3% (270 of 1,660) of patients were adherent for the first two annual subsequent screens, respectively. First-year adherence was higher among former smokers and varied by site and provider specialty. Second-year adherence was higher among former smokers and varied by site, provider specialty, and pack-years smoked. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to LCS in a multihospital integrated health care network was poor and even lower at year 2. The identified factors associated with adherence may serve as targets to increase LCS adherence and decrease lung cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrad Bastani
- Department of Radiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York; Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York.
| | - Dhara Patel
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
| | - Gerard Silvestri
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Suhail Raoof
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
| | - Jesse Chusid
- Department of Radiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York; Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York
| | - Stuart L Cohen
- Department of Radiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York; Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bhatia D, Sutradhar R, Austin PC, Giannakeas V, Jaakkimainen L, Paszat LF, Lipscombe LL. Periodic screening for breast and cervical cancer in women with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 33:249-259. [PMID: 34800194 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01517-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Diabetes is associated with poorer cancer outcomes. Screening for breast and cervical cancer is recommended by clinical guidelines; however, utilization of these tests in people with diabetes has been unclear due to methodological limitations in the evidence base. We used administrative data to determine the association between diabetes and the rates of becoming up-to-date with periodic breast and cervical cancer screening over a 20-year period. METHODS Healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada, were linked to assemble two population-based cohorts of 50-70 and 21-70 year-olds between 1994 and 2011, eligible for breast and cervical cancer screening, respectively. Using age as the time scale, multivariable recurrent events models were implemented to examine the association between the presence of diabetes and the rates of becoming up-to-date with the recommended cancer screenings. RESULTS In each of the breast and cervical cancer screening cohorts, there were, respectively, 1,516,302 (16% had diabetes at baseline) and 4,751,220 (9.5% had diabetes at baseline) screen-eligible women. In multivariable models, prevalent diabetes (duration ≥ 2 years) was associated with lower rates of becoming up-to-date with cervical (hazard ratio, HR 0.85, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.84-0.85) and breast (HR 0.94, CI 0.93-0.94) cancer screening, compared to no diabetes. CONCLUSIONS Having diabetes is associated with decreased rates of becoming up-to-date with two recommended periodic cancer screenings, with a bigger reduction in the rates of becoming up-to-date with cervical cancer screening. Greater attention to cervical cancer preventive services is needed in women with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominika Bhatia
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Peter C Austin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Vasily Giannakeas
- ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Women's College Hospital, Women's College Research Institute, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Liisa Jaakkimainen
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada
| | - Lawrence F Paszat
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Lorraine L Lipscombe
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,ICES, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Women's College Hospital, Women's College Research Institute, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ONs, M5S 1A8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Roubidoux MA, Richards B, Honey NE, Begay JA. Adherence to Screening Among American Indian Women Accessing a Mobile Mammography Unit. Acad Radiol 2021; 28:944-949. [PMID: 33896716 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Although screening mammography is essential to reducing breast cancer morbidity and mortality, barriers exist especially among underrepresented minority groups. There are few studies of mammogram screening among American Indian women, many of whom reside in rural areas where screening access is challenging. A mobile mammography unit served 24 Indian Health Service clinics during 2013-17. Screening mammography adherence was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Among mobile unit women, 'adherence to screening' was determined by the date of the most recent prior mammogram. Those having a prior mammogram 9-27 months ago were classified as 'adherent to screening'. Comparison screening data were obtained from the American College of Radiology National Mammography Database, consisting of screening cases occurring in year 2015. Additionally, among mobile unit women 'continued adherence to screening' was determined, defined as at least one repeat screening at the mobile unit within the subsequent 9-27 months after a screening there. RESULTS Among 1,615 mobile unit women, 624 (38.6%) were adherent to screening. Among 2,509,826 National Mammography Database women, 1,481,021 (59.0%) were adherent to screening. (p<0.0001) The prevalence of a >27-month interval between mammograms was 3.13 (95% CI 2.91-3.36) times greater among mobile unit women than National Mammography Database women. 'Continued adherence to screening' of mobile unit women was 428/1194 (35.9%). CONCLUSION Adherence to screening and continued adherence to screening were low among mobile unit women and time interval between screenings was longer than National Mammography Database women. Factors to improve screening adherence among these underserved women should be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn A Roubidoux
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, TC 2910 Box 5326; 1500 E. Ann Arbor Michigan.
| | | | | | - Joel A Begay
- Senior Research Assistant and Data Analyst Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Doria-Rose VP, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, McCarthy S, Puricelli-Perin DM, Butera V, Segnan N, Taplin SH, Senore C. Measures of longitudinal adherence to fecal-based colorectal cancer screening: Literature review and recommended approaches. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:316-326. [PMID: 33811643 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The success of fecal occult blood-based colorectal cancer screening programs is dependent on repeating screening at short intervals (ie, every 1-2 years). We conducted a literature review to assess measures that have been used to assess longitudinal adherence to fecal-based screening. Among 46 citations identified and included in this review, six broad classifications of longitudinal adherence were identified: (a) stratified single-round attendance, (b) all possible adherence permutations, (c) consistent/inconsistent/never attendance, (d) number of times attended, (e) program adherence and (f) proportion of time covered. Advantages and disadvantages of these measures are described, and recommendations on which measures to use based on data availability and scientific question are also given. Stratified single round attendance is particularly useful for describing the yield of screening, while programmatic adherence measures are best suited to evaluating screening efficacy. We recommend that screening programs collect detailed longitudinal, individual-level data, not only for the screening tests themselves but additionally for diagnostic follow-up and surveillance exams, to allow for maximum flexibility in reporting adherence patterns using the measure of choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Paul Doria-Rose
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Sharon McCarthy
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Douglas M Puricelli-Perin
- Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Vicent Butera
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Nereo Segnan
- AOU Cittadella Salute e della Scienza, Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Stephen H Taplin
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Carlo Senore
- AOU Cittadella Salute e della Scienza, Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Barlow WE, Beaber EF, Geller BM, Kamineni A, Zheng Y, Haas JS, Chao CR, Rutter CM, Zauber AG, Sprague BL, Halm EA, Weaver DL, Chubak J, Doria-Rose VP, Kobrin S, Onega T, Quinn VP, Schapira MM, Tosteson ANA, Corley DA, Skinner CS, Schnall MD, Armstrong K, Wheeler CM, Silverberg MJ, Balasubramanian BA, Doubeni CA, McLerran D, Tiro JA. Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112:238-246. [PMID: 31292633 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer screening is a complex process encompassing risk assessment, the initial screening examination, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of cancer precursors or early cancers. Metrics that enable comparisons across different screening targets are needed. We present population-based screening metrics for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers for nine sites participating in the Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens consortium. METHODS We describe how selected metrics map to a trans-organ conceptual model of the screening process. For each cancer type, we calculated calendar year 2013 metrics for the screen-eligible target population (breast: ages 40-74 years; cervical: ages 21-64 years; colorectal: ages 50-75 years). Metrics for screening participation, timely diagnostic evaluation, and diagnosed cancers in the screened and total populations are presented for the total eligible population and stratified by age group and cancer type. RESULTS The overall screening-eligible populations in 2013 were 305 568 participants for breast, 3 160 128 for cervical, and 2 363 922 for colorectal cancer screening. Being up-to-date for testing was common for all three cancer types: breast (63.5%), cervical (84.6%), and colorectal (77.5%). The percentage of abnormal screens ranged from 10.7% for breast, 4.4% for cervical, and 4.5% for colorectal cancer screening. Abnormal breast screens were followed up diagnostically in almost all (96.8%) cases, and cervical and colorectal were similar (76.2% and 76.3%, respectively). Cancer rates per 1000 screens were 5.66, 0.17, and 1.46 for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive assessment of metrics by the Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens consortium enabled systematic identification of screening process steps in need of improvement. We encourage widespread use of common metrics to allow interventions to be tested across cancer types and health-care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisabeth F Beaber
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Berta M Geller
- Departments of Family Medicine, and the University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Yingye Zheng
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jennifer S Haas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber, Harvard Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Chun R Chao
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | | | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brian L Sprague
- Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.,Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Donald L Weaver
- Department of Pathology and the UVM Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - V Paul Doria-Rose
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.,Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sarah Kobrin
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Tracy Onega
- Departments of Biomedical Data Science, Epidemiology, and the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH
| | | | - Marilyn M Schapira
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, and CMC VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH
| | - Douglas A Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Mitchell D Schnall
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Katrina Armstrong
- General Medicine Division, MA General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cosette M Wheeler
- Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque, NM.,University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | | | - Bijal A Balasubramanian
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.,UTHealth School of Public Health, Dallas, TX
| | - Chyke A Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dale McLerran
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lam AC, Aggarwal R, Cheung S, Stewart EL, Darling G, Lam S, Xu W, Liu G, Kavanagh J. Predictors of participant nonadherence in lung cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2020; 146:134-144. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
17
|
Zheng Y, Corley DA, Doubeni C, Halm E, Shortreed SM, Barlow WE, Zauber A, Tosteson TD, Chubak J. ANALYSES OF PREVENTIVE CARE MEASURES WITH INCOMPLETE HISTORICAL DATA IN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS: AN EXAMPLE FROM COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING. Ann Appl Stat 2020; 14:1030-1044. [PMID: 34531936 PMCID: PMC8442666 DOI: 10.1214/20-aoas1342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The calculation of quality of care measures based on electronic medical records (EMRs) may be inaccurate because of incomplete capture of past services. We evaluate the influence of different statistical approaches for calculating the proportion of patients who are up-to-date for a preventive service, using the example of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We propose an extension of traditional mixture models to account for the uncertainty in compliance, which is further complicated by the choice of various screening modalities with different recommended screening intervals. We conducted simulation studies to compare various statistical approaches and demonstrated that the proposed method can alleviate bias when individuals with complete prior medical history information were not representative of the targeted population. The method is motivated by and applied to data from the National Cancer Institute-funded consortium Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regiments (PROSPR). Findings from the application are important for the evaluation of appropriate use of preventive care and provide a novel tool for dealing with similar analytical challenges with EMR data in broad settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingye Zheng
- Department of Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle WA
| | - Douglas A. Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Chyke Doubeni
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ethan Halm
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas TX
| | | | | | - Ann Zauber
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Jessica Chubak
- Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle WA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chubak J, Anderson ML, Cook AJ, Murphy CC, Jackson ML, Green BB. Methodologic Considerations in Calculating and Analyzing Proportion of Time Covered as a Measure of Longitudinal Cancer Screening Adherence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:1549-1556. [PMID: 32467346 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proportion of time covered (PTC, or "covered time") is a longitudinal measure of adherence to preventive health services, the use of which has increased in recent years. This measure is helpful for evaluating the success of delivering screening interventions over time. However, there are challenges and nuances in computing and interpreting PTC. METHODS In this manuscript, we describe some desired properties of PTC measures, challenges in achieving those, and potential solutions using hypothetical examples. RESULTS We propose a modified PTC measure (mPTC) to complement the standard, existing PTC measure. The mPTC measure focuses on screening completion rather than initiation when a screening modality requires more than one step; is affected less by loss to follow-up, death, or cancer during covered time than the standard PTC measure; and is not sensitive to screening episode results. We propose weighting strategies to ensure that the average PTC and mPTC are more heavily influenced by individuals who were observed for longer and are thus more informative. We further describe how PTC and mPTC measures can incorporate test indication to focus specifically on screening. CONCLUSIONS We recommend that studies of covered time present ample descriptive information, calculate both PTC and mPTC, describe how symptoms and indication are handled, and present multiple complementary measures, such as the proportion never screened and the proportion in need of screening. IMPACT Common approaches, terminology, and reporting practices for covered time measures have the potential to improve the study of longitudinal cancer screening adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington. .,Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Melissa L Anderson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Andrea J Cook
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michael L Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Kaiser Permanente Washington Medical Group, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Murphy CC, Halm EA, Skinner CS, Balasubramanian BA, Singal AG. Challenges and Approaches to Measuring Repeat Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:1557-1563. [PMID: 32457184 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can reduce colorectal cancer-related mortality. Effectiveness of FIT may be compromised when patients do not adhere to a regular schedule. However, having no standard measure of repeat FIT presents challenges for assessing effectiveness across populations and settings. We compared three measures of repeat FIT in a large, integrated health care system in Dallas, Texas. METHODS We identified 18,257 patients age-eligible (50-60 years) for FIT in January 1-December 31, 2010 and followed over four rounds of screening. Measures included: (i) repeat FIT in prior screeners, or completion of FIT within 9-15 months of the previous; (ii) yes-no patterns, whereby patients were assigned yes or no in 9-15 month windows; and 3) proportion of time covered (PTC), or the amount of time patients were up-to-date with screening relative to time eligible. RESULTS Repeat FIT varied by measure. Using a prior screeners measure, 15.8% of patients with a normal FIT in round 1 completed repeat FIT in round 2. Repeat FIT was notably higher (52.3%) using PTC. The most common yes-no pattern was YNNN or "one-and-done," and only 9.4% of patients completed two consecutive FITs across all rounds (YYNN). CONCLUSIONS Different measures of repeat FIT yielded a range of estimates, making comparison across studies difficult. Researchers should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each measure and select the most appropriate to their research question. IMPACT Our study highlights the need for future research of repeat FIT measures that best approximate screening effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin C Murphy
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Bijal A Balasubramanian
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Science, UTHealth School of Public Health in Dallas, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tanner NT, Brasher PB, Wojciechowski B, Ward R, Slatore C, Gebregziabher M, Silvestri GA. Screening Adherence in the Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project. Chest 2020; 158:1742-1752. [PMID: 32439505 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to annual low-dose CT was 95% in the National Lung Screening Trial and must be replicated to achieve mortality benefit from screening. RESEARCH QUESTION How do we determine adherence rates within the Veterans Affairs Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project and identify factors predictive of adherence? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS A secondary data analysis of the Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project that was conducted at eight Veterans Affairs medical centers was performed to determine adherence to follow up imaging and to determine factors predictive of adherence. RESULTS A total of 2,103 patients were screened. The adherence to screening from baseline scan (T0) to first follow-up scan (T1) was 82.2% and 65.2% from T1 to second follow-up scan (T2). Logistic regression modeling showed that presence of a nodule and the site of lung cancer screening were predictive of adherence. After three rounds of screening, 1,343 patients (64%) who underwent baseline screening underwent both subsequent annual low-dose CT scans; 225 patients (11%) had only one subsequent low-dose CT; 0.4% did not have a T1 scan but did have a T2 scan; 70 patients (3%) died, and 36 patients (1.7%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. There was significant variation in screening adherence across the eight sites, which ranged from 63% to 94% at T1 and 52% to 82% at T2 (P < .05). INTERPRETATION Despite a centralized program design with dedicated navigator and registry to assist with adherence to annual lung cancer screening, variations between sites suggest that active follow-up strategies are needed to optimize adherence. For the mortality benefit from lung cancer screening to be recognized, adherence to annual screening must achieve higher rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nichole T Tanner
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
| | | | - Barbara Wojciechowski
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC
| | - Ralph Ward
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Public Health, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Christopher Slatore
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Mulugeta Gebregziabher
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Public Health, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Gerard A Silvestri
- Department of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rivadeneira NA, Hoskote M, Le GM, Nguyen TT, Nápoles AM, Pasick RJ, Sarkar U, Hiatt RA. Advancing Cancer Control in San Francisco: Cancer Screening in Under-Represented Populations. Am J Prev Med 2020; 58:e1-e9. [PMID: 31862104 PMCID: PMC7173710 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 08/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer risk and screening data are limited in their ability to inform local interventions to reduce the burden of cancer in vulnerable populations. The San Francisco Health Information National Trends Survey was developed and administered to assess the use of cancer-related information among under-represented populations in San Francisco to provide baseline data for the San Francisco Cancer Initiative. METHODS The survey instrument was developed through consultation with research and community partners and translated into 4 languages. Participants were recruited between May and September 2017 through community-based snowball sampling with quotas to ensure adequate numbers of under-represented populations. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression were used between 2018 and 2019 to assess differences in screening rates across groups and factors associated with cancer screening. RESULTS One thousand twenty-seven participants were recruited. Asians had lower rates of lifetime mammogram (p=0.02), Pap test (p<0.01), and prostate-specific antigen test (p=0.04) compared with non-Asians. Hispanics had higher rates of lifetime mammogram (p=0.02), lifetime Pap test (p=0.01), recent Pap test (p=0.03), and lifetime prostate-specific antigen test (p=0.04) compared with non-Hispanics. Being a female at birth was the only factor that was independently associated with cancer screening participation (AOR=3.17, 95% CI=1.40, 7.19). CONCLUSIONS Screening adherence varied by race, ethnicity, and screening type. A collaborative, community-based approach led to a large, diverse sample and may serve as a model for recruiting diverse populations to add knowledge about cancer prevention preferences and behaviors. Results suggest targeted outreach efforts are needed to address disparate cancer screening behaviors within this diverse population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie A Rivadeneira
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| | - Mekhala Hoskote
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Gem M Le
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Tung T Nguyen
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Anna María Nápoles
- Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rena J Pasick
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Urmimala Sarkar
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Robert A Hiatt
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Benito L, Travier N, Binefa G, Vidal C, Espinosa J, Milà N, Garcia M. Longitudinal Adherence to Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing vs Guaiac-based FOBT in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2019; 12:327-334. [PMID: 30890542 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-18-0091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Longitudinal adherence is a critical component of the efficacy of stool-based screening programs because they should be repeated every 1-2 years. Few data have been published on the uptake in multiple rounds of fecal occult blood test-based (FOBT) colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We calculated two measures of longitudinal adherence to biennial FOBT (guaiac fecal occult blood test:gFOBT or fecal immunochemical test:FIT) to better understand its impact on the programmatic effectiveness of a population-based CRC screening program (2000-2017). Ongoing population-based CRC program of men and women aged 50-69 years. Variables: Age at first CRC screening invitation, sex, number of screening invitations, number of screens, deprivation score, and uptake rate. Logistic regression models were used to assess the independent effect of sex, age at first invitation, deprivation, and the type of screening test offered on adherence. The uptake rate for guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) was 23.9%, and for the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), it was 37.4%. The overall rate of consistently screened invitees after seven rounds of screening was 14.2%, being 20.6% for those individuals who used FIT and 14.3% for those who used gFOBT. Factors associated with continued participation (consistent vs. inconsistent screenees) showed that the longitudinal adherence was associated with age, screening test used, and number of invitations. Continued participation was lower in individuals who were screened using FIT than among those screened using gFOBT [OR, 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-0.81]. The overall rate of consistently screened invitees for colorectal cancer screening was higher with FIT than gFOBT. Studying the rate of individuals being current for screening may help to anticipate potential benefits before the long-term outcome data are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Llucia Benito
- School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Fundamental Care and Medical-Surgical Nursing Department, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Noemie Travier
- IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Binefa
- IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Vidal
- IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose Espinosa
- IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Milà
- IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Montse Garcia
- IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Beaber EF, Sprague BL, Tosteson ANA, Haas JS, Onega T, Schapira MM, McCarthy AM, Li CI, Herschorn SD, Lehman CD, Wernli KJ, Barlow WE. Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018; 28:1051-1059. [PMID: 30481098 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: U.S. women of ages 50-74 years are recommended to receive screening mammography at least biennially. Our objective was to evaluate multilevel predictors of nonadherence among screened women, as these are not well known. Materials and Methods: A cohort study was conducted among women of ages 50-74 years with a screening mammogram in 2011 with a negative finding (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 1 or 2) within Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) consortium research centers. We evaluated the association between woman-level factors, radiology facility, and PROSPR research center, and nonadherence to breast cancer screening guidelines, defined as not receiving breast imaging within 27 months of an index screening mammogram. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Nonadherence to guideline-recommended screening interval was 15.5% among 51,241 women with a screening mammogram. Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander women, women of other races, heavier women, and women of ages 50-59 years had a greater odds of nonadherence. There was no association with ZIP code median income. Nonadherence varied by research center and radiology facility (variance = 0.10, standard error = 0.03). Adjusted radiology facility nonadherence rates ranged from 10.0% to 26.5%. One research center evaluated radiology facility communication practices for screening reminders and scheduling, but these were not associated with nonadherence. Conclusions: Breast cancer screening interval nonadherence rates in screened women varied across radiology facilities even after adjustment for woman-level characteristics and research center. Future studies should investigate other characteristics of facilities, practices, and health systems to determine factors integral to increasing continued adherence to breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth F Beaber
- 1Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brian L Sprague
- 2Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.,3Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- 4The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Department of Medicine, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Jennifer S Haas
- 5Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tracy Onega
- 6Department of Biomedical Data Science, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,7Department of Epidemiology, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Marilyn M Schapira
- 8Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anne Marie McCarthy
- 9Department of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher I Li
- 1Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sally D Herschorn
- 10Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Constance D Lehman
- 11Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen J Wernli
- 12Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening measured as the proportion of time covered. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88:323-331.e2. [PMID: 29477302 PMCID: PMC6050149 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can reduce CRC incidence and mortality, but measuring screening adherence over time is challenging. We examined adherence using a novel measure characterizing the proportion of time covered (PTC) by screening tests. METHODS Eligible patients were age 50 to 60 years and followed at a large, safety-net health care system between January 2010 and September 2014. We estimated PTC as the number of days up to date with screening divided by the number of days from cohort entry until study end, CRC diagnosis, or death. We estimated mean and median PTC and used least-significant difference tests to assess differences in adherence by patient characteristics. RESULTS Of 18,257 patients, most were non-Hispanic black (40.5%) or Hispanic (34.9%) and/or female (62.4%). Approximately 40% (n = 7559) were never screened during the study period; the remaining 10,698 patients completed 19,105 screening examinations (14,481 fecal immunochemical tests [FITs], 4393 colonoscopies, 94 sigmoidoscopies, and 137 barium enemas). Overall, the mean PTC was 29.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.6%-29.5%). Among those who completed at least one screening test (n = 10,698), the mean PTC was 49.0% (95% CI, 48.5%-49.5%). The most common reasons for non-adherence were lack of repeat FIT and no diagnostic colonoscopy after abnormal results for the FIT. The mean PTC increased with the number of primary care visits (0 visits, 21%; 1 visit, 29%; 2-3 visits, 35%; ≥4 visits, 37%; all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS PTC provides a reliable estimate of screening adherence, capturing breakdowns in the CRC screening process amenable to intervention. Repeat FIT and diagnostic colonoscopy are important intervention targets that may increase adherence in underserved populations.
Collapse
|
25
|
Green BB, Anderson ML, Cook AJ, Chubak J, Fuller S, Meenan RT, Vernon SW. A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial. Cancer 2017; 123:4472-4480. [PMID: 28753230 PMCID: PMC5673524 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening over many years is required to optimize reductions in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. However, no prior trials have compared strategies for obtaining long-term adherence. METHODS Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up was implemented in an integrated health care organization in Washington State. Between 2008 and 2009, 4675 individuals aged 50 to 74 years were randomized to receive the usual care (UC), which included clinic-based strategies to increase CRC screening (arm 1), or, in years 1 and 2, mailings with a call-in number for colonoscopy and mailed fecal tests (arm 2), mailings plus brief telephone assistance (arm 3), or mailings and assistance plus nurse navigation (arm 4). Active-intervention subjects (those in arms 2, 3, and 4 combined) who were still eligible for CRC screening were randomized to mailings being stopped or continued in years 3 and 5. The time in compliance with CRC screening over 5 years was compared for persons assigned to any intervention and persons assigned to UC. Screening tests contributed time on the basis of national guidelines for screening intervals (fecal tests annually, sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years). RESULTS All participants contributed data, but they were censored at disenrollment, death, the age of 76 years, or a diagnosis of CRC. Compared with UC participants, intervention participants had 31% more adjusted covered time over 5 years (incidence rate ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.37; covered time, 47.5% vs 62.1%). Fecal testing accounted for almost all additional covered time. CONCLUSIONS In a health care organization with clinic-based activities to increase CRC screening, a centralized program led to increased CRC screening adherence over 5 years. Longer term data on screening adherence and its impact on CRC outcomes are needed. Cancer 2017;123:4472-80. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Andrea J Cook
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sharon Fuller
- Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Richard T Meenan
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sally W Vernon
- University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pedersen K, Burger EA, Campbell S, Nygård M, Aas E, Lönnberg S. Advancing the evaluation of cervical cancer screening: development and application of a longitudinal adherence metric. Eur J Public Health 2017; 27:1089-1094. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
27
|
Dalton ARH. Incomplete diagnostic follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf) 2017; 40:e46-e58. [DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
28
|
Hubbard RA, O'Meara ES, Henderson LM, Hill D, Braithwaite D, Haas JS, Lee CI, Sprague BL, Alford-Teaster J, Tosteson ANA, Wernli KJ, Onega T. Multilevel factors associated with long-term adherence to screening mammography in older women in the U.S. Prev Med 2016; 89:169-177. [PMID: 27261409 PMCID: PMC4969188 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
In the U.S., guidelines recommend that women continue mammography screening until at least age 74, but recent evidence suggests declining screening rates in older women. We estimated adherence to screening mammography and multilevel factors associated with adherence in a longitudinal cohort of older women. Women aged 66-75years receiving screening mammography within the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium were linked to Medicare claims (2005-2010). Claims data identified baseline adherence, defined as receiving subsequent mammography within approximately 2years, and length of time adherent to guidelines. Characteristics associated with adherence were investigated using logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Analyses were stratified by age to investigate variation in relationships between patient factors and adherence. Among 49,775 women, 89% were adherent at baseline. Among women 66-70years, those with less than a high school education were more likely to be non-adherent at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-2.33) and remain adherent for less time (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41; 95% CI 1.11-1.80) compared to women with a college degree. Women with ≥1 versus no Charlson co-morbidities were more likely to be non-adherent at baseline (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.31-1.62) and remain adherent for less time (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.24-1.66). Women aged 71-75 had lower adherence overall, but factors associated with non-adherence were similar. In summary, adherence to guidelines is high among Medicare-enrolled women in the U.S. receiving screening mammography. Efforts are needed to ensure that vulnerable populations attain these same high levels of adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Hubbard
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| | | | - Louise M Henderson
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Deirdre Hill
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Dejana Braithwaite
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jennifer S Haas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Christoph I Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Brian L Sprague
- Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Jennifer Alford-Teaster
- Department of Biomedical Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States; Department of Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH, United States
| | - Karen J Wernli
- Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Tracy Onega
- Department of Biomedical Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States
| |
Collapse
|