1
|
Neo YL, Hassan N, Koh J, Alias R, Wang L, Hussein Y, Wong YP. "How Do I Practise Palliative Care When I Don't Know How?" Exploring the Impact of EPAN, An Online Educational Intervention on General Nurses in Singapore: An Evaluation Study. J Palliat Care 2024:8258597241264454. [PMID: 39056366 DOI: 10.1177/08258597241264454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Objective(s): The majority of deaths in Singapore (62.1%) occur in the hospital, but most nurses do not have palliative care (PC) education. An online e-learning course, "Essential Palliative Care Approach for Nurses" (EPAN), was developed to close the learning gap. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of EPAN on general nurses' knowledge, confidence, and attitude in delivering end-of-life care. Methods: Convergent parallel mixed methods design. Results: 1708 nurses (67%), mostly from inpatient and ambulatory settings, completed EPAN. Statistically significant increases in mean scores across knowledge, confidence, and attitude (p < 0.05) remained consistent immediately post-course and 3 months post-course. Respondents shared their intentions to change practice in the immediate post-course survey (n = 1155) and how they have practiced end-of-life care in the 3-month post-course survey (n = 777). Major categories from the content analysis included: (i) actualise confidence to deliver effective communication, (ii) making time and showing empathy in end-of-life care, (iii) advocating for end-of-life care, (iv) proactive collaboration with other healthcare professionals, (v) navigated and accepted end-of-life boundaries, and (vi) able to self-manage emotions. Conclusions: EPAN, developed within an Asian context, has demonstrated a significant impact on nurses' knowledge, confidence, and attitude in delivering end-of-life care. This has broader implications for general palliative care education in countries of similar cultural concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Ling Neo
- Division of Nursing, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Jemima Koh
- Department of Health Service Research, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rasidah Alias
- Division of Nursing, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Liyun Wang
- Division of Nursing, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yazid Hussein
- Division of Nursing, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yoke Ping Wong
- Division of Nursing, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sajber K, Khaleefah S. Culturally competent respect for the autonomy of Muslim patients: fostering patient agency by respecting justice. THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS 2024; 45:133-149. [PMID: 38324110 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-023-09655-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Although Western biomedical ethics emphasizes respect for autonomy, the medical decision-making of Muslim patients interacting with Western healthcare systems is more likely to be motivated by relational ethical and religious commitments that reflect the ideals of equity, reciprocity, and justice. Based on an in-depth cross-cultural comparison of Islamic and Western systems of biomedical ethics and an assessment of conceptual alignments and differences, we argue that, when working with Muslim patients, an ethics of respect extends to facilitating decision-making grounded in the patient's justice-related customs, beliefs, and obligations. We offer an overview of the philosophical contestations of autonomy-enhancing practices from the Islamic tradition of biomedical ethics, and examples that demonstrate a recommended shift of emphasis from an autonomy-centered to a justice-focused approach to culturally competent agency-promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kriszta Sajber
- University of Michigan-Dearborn College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters, 4901 Evergreen Rd, Dearborn, MI, 48128, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lim YX, Quah ELY, Chua KZY, Lin Ronggui CK, Govindasamy R, Ong SM, Ong EK, Phua GLG, Krishna LKR. A Systematic Scoping Review on Dignity Assessment Tools. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:e263-e284. [PMID: 38092260 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT The provision of person-centered dignity-conserving care is central to palliative care. It is important to reevaluate current methods of assessing dignity as the concept of dignity is multifaceted. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to understand the tools which are used to assess a patient's dignity and the elements of dignity evaluated in these tools. METHODS Two independent and concurrent Systematic Evidence-Based Approach guided systematic scoping reviews (SSR in SEBA) on existing dignity assessment tools and on accounts of assessments of dignity were carried out. The SSR in SEBA on dignity assessment tools involving PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and CINAHL databases saw 22 full-text articles included from the 645 articles reviewed. The SSR in SEBA on accounts of assessments of dignity featured in the PubMed database identified 102 full-text articles which saw 46 articles included. RESULTS The domains identified were factors affecting patients' definition of dignity; elements of dignity-conserving care; and components of effective tools. CONCLUSION Current accounts to assess dignity and assessment tools fail to capture shifting self-concepts of dignity holistically. A portfolio-like appraisal of dignity is proposed to achieve assessments that are timely, longitudinal, and patient-specific. Portfolio-based assessments by members of the multidisciplinary team will better direct timely evaluations of relevant aspects of changing concepts of dignity, without losing the patient's holistic perception of dignity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Xue Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Casper Keegan Lin Ronggui
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Biomedical Ethics (C.K.L.R., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Pharmacy (C.K.L.R.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore; Division of Cancer Education (C.K.L.R., R.G., E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ranitha Govindasamy
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Division of Cancer Education (C.K.L.R., R.G., E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Department of Psychosocial Oncology (R.G.), National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore
| | - Simone Meiqi Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Division of Cancer Education (C.K.L.R., R.G., E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School (E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), Singapore; Assisi Hospice (E.K.O.), Singapore
| | - Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Lien Centre for Palliative Care (G.L.G.P.), Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Biomedical Ethics (C.K.L.R., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Cancer Education (C.K.L.R., R.G., E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School (E.K.O., L.K.R.R.), Singapore; Palliative Care Institute Liverpool (L.K.R.R.), Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; PalC (L.K.R.R.), The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chan GWH, Chua MT, Lee SK, Krishna LKR. Willingness of physicians to teach ethics at the bedside: a qualitative study from an Asian perspective. Singapore Med J 2024:00077293-990000000-00075. [PMID: 38189481 DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2022-025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Gene Wai Han Chan
- Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mui Teng Chua
- Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sock Koon Lee
- Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ho CY, Lim NA, Rahman NDA, Chiam M, Zhou JX, Phua GLG, Ong EK, Lim C, Chowdhury AR, Krishna LKR. Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:41. [PMID: 37055737 PMCID: PMC10099695 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01161-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nurturing effective physician-patient relationships is essential to the provision of patient-centred care. Palliative care physicians may apply boundary-crossings or breaches in professional standards to nurture effective physician-patient relationships. Being highly individualized and shaped by the physician's narratives, clinical experience, and contextual considerations, boundary-crossings are susceptible to ethical and professional violations. To better appreciate this concept, we employ the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) to map the effects of boundary-crossings on the physician's belief systems. METHODS As part of the Tool Design SEBA methodology, a Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) guided systematic scoping review was employed to guide the design of a semi-structured interview questionnaire with palliative care physicians. The transcripts were simultaneously content and thematically analysed. The themes and categories identified were combined using the Jigsaw Perspective and the resulting domains formed the basis for the discussion. RESULTS The domains identified from the 12 semi-structured interviews were catalysts and boundary-crossings. Boundary-crossings attempt to address threats to a physician's belief systems (catalysts) and are highly individualized. Employ of boundary-crossings depend on the physician's sensitivity to these 'catalysts', their judgement and willingness to act, and their ability to balance various considerations and reflect on their actions and their ramifications. These experiences reshape belief systems, understandings of boundary-crossings and may influence decision-making and practice, underscoring the potential for greater professional breaches when unchecked. CONCLUSION Underlining its longitudinal effects, the Krishna Model underscores the importance of longitudinal support, assessment and oversight of palliative care physicians, and lays the foundation for a RToP-based tool to be employed within portfolios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chong Yao Ho
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Nicole-Ann Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Nur Diana Abdul Rahman
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Jamie Xuelian Zhou
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, 16 College Road, Block 3 Level 1, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Anupama Roy Chowdhury
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, 16 College Road, Block 3 Level 1, 169854, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, 308436, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koh EYH, Koh KK, Renganathan Y, Krishna L. Role modelling in professional identity formation: a systematic scoping review. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:194. [PMID: 36991373 PMCID: PMC10052869 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04144-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Role modelling's pivotal part in the nurturing of a physician's professional identity remains poorly understood. To overcome these gaps, this review posits that as part of the mentoring spectrum, role modelling should be considered in tandem with mentoring, supervision, coaching, tutoring and advising. This provides a clinically relevant notion of role modelling whilst its effects upon a physician's thinking, practice and conduct may be visualised using the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP). METHODS A Systematic Evidence Based Approach guided systematic scoping review was conducted on articles published between 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021 in the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and ERIC databases. This review focused on the experiences of medical students and physicians in training (learners) given their similar exposure to training environments and practices. RESULTS 12,201 articles were identified, 271 articles were evaluated, and 145 articles were included. Concurrent independent thematic and content analysis revealed five domains: existing theories, definitions, indications, characteristics, and the impact of role modelling upon the four rings of the RToP. This highlights dissonance between the introduced and regnant beliefs and spotlights the influence of the learner's narratives, cognitive base, clinical insight, contextual considerations and belief system on their ability to detect, address and adapt to role modelling experiences. CONCLUSION Role modelling's ability to introduce and integrate beliefs, values and principles into a physician's belief system underscores its effects upon professional identity formation. Yet, these effects depend on contextual, structural, cultural and organisational influences as well as tutor and learner characteristics and the nature of their learner-tutor relationship. The RToP allows appreciation of these variations on the efficacy of role modelling and may help direct personalised and longitudinal support for learners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Yong Hian Koh
- Singapore Armed Forces, 303 Gombak Drive, Singapore, 669645, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Kai Kee Koh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yaazhini Renganathan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Lalit Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119077, Singapore.
- The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ting JJQ, Phua GLG, Hong DZ, Lam BKY, Lim AJS, Chong EJX, Pisupati A, Tan R, Yeo JYH, Koh YZ, Quek CWN, Lim JY, Tay KT, Ong YT, Chiam M, Zhou JX, Mason S, Wijaya L, Krishna LKR. Evidence-guided approach to portfolio-guided teaching and assessing communications, ethics and professionalism for medical students and physicians: a systematic scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067048. [PMID: 36977542 PMCID: PMC10069516 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Guiding the development of longitudinal competencies in communication, ethics and professionalism underlines the role of portfolios to capture and evaluate the multiple multisource appraisals and direct personalised support to clinicians. However, a common approach to these combined portfolios continues to elude medical practice. A systematic scoping review is proposed to map portfolio use in training and assessments of ethics, communication and professionalism competencies particularly in its inculcation of new values, beliefs and principles changes attitudes, thinking and practice while nurturing professional identity formation. It is posited that effective structuring of portfolios can promote self-directed learning, personalised assessment and appropriate support of professional identity formation. DESIGN Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) is employed to guide this systematic scoping review of portfolio use in communication, ethics and professionalism training and assessment. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Articles published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2020 were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS The included articles are concurrently content and thematically analysed using the split approach. Overlapping categories and themes identified are combined using the jigsaw perspective. The themes/categories are compared with the summaries of the included articles in the funnelling process to ensure their accuracy. The domains identified form the framework for the discussion. RESULTS 12 300 abstracts were reviewed, 946 full-text articles were evaluated and 82 articles were analysed, and the four domains identified were indications, content, design, and strengths and limitations. CONCLUSIONS This review reveals that when using a consistent framework, accepted endpoints and outcome measures, longitudinal multisource, multimodal assessment data fashions professional and personal development and enhances identity construction. Future studies into effective assessment tools and support mechanisms are required if portfolio use is to be maximised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Daniel Zhihao Hong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bertrand Kai Yang Lam
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Annabelle Jia Sing Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eleanor Jia Xin Chong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Anushka Pisupati
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rei Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jocelyn Yi Huang Yeo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yi Zhe Koh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chrystie Wan Ning Quek
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jia Yin Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kuang Teck Tay
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jamie Xuelian Zhou
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Limin Wijaya
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Concept of older person autonomy: phenomenological study of the opinion of specialist nurses. Porto Biomed J 2022; 7:e178. [PMID: 37152078 PMCID: PMC10158865 DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The concept of autonomy is composed of several components, making it a multidimensional concept. This includes cognitive ability, intellectual ability, emotional intelligence, social situation, and physical ability skills. This study aimed to describe the experiences attributed to the meaning of the concept of autonomy, by specialist nurses. Methods: A descriptive phenomenological study was carried out, according to the Giorgi method. Eighteen nurses were recruited at a hospital in Portugal. Data were collected through individual interviews. Results: The 18 specialist nurses work on average as nurses for 16years and are specialist nurses; for an average of 5.9years, most are specialist nurses in rehabilitation nursing. From the data analysis, six themes emerged: ability to do, ability to resolve, decision ability, cognitive ability, social integration, and emotional intelligence. Conclusions: Most professionals perceive the concept as the ability to perform activities of daily living and the ability to make decisions, especially concerning informed consent. It is necessary to raise awareness of the breadth of this concept since the quality of life and dignity of the elderly person depends on autonomy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Quek CWN, Ong RRS, Wong RSM, Chan SWK, Chok AKL, Shen GS, Teo AYT, Panda A, Burla N, Wong YA, Chee RCH, Loh CYL, Lee KW, Tan GHN, Leong REJ, Koh NSY, Ong YT, Chin AMC, Chiam M, Lim C, Zhou XJ, Ong SYK, Ong EK, Krishna LKR. Systematic scoping review on moral distress among physicians. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064029. [PMID: 36691160 PMCID: PMC9442489 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concepts of moral distress (MD) among physicians have evolved and extend beyond the notion of psychological distress caused by being in a situation in which one is constrained from acting on what one knows to be right. With many accounts involving complex personal, professional, legal, ethical and moral issues, we propose a review of current understanding of MD among physicians. METHODS A systematic evidence-based approach guided systematic scoping review is proposed to map the current concepts of MD among physicians published in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, SCOPUS, ERIC and Google Scholar databases. Concurrent and independent thematic and direct content analysis (split approach) was conducted on included articles to enhance the reliability and transparency of the process. The themes and categories identified were combined using the jigsaw perspective to create domains that form the framework of the discussion that follows. RESULTS A total of 30 156 abstracts were identified, 2473 full-text articles were reviewed and 128 articles were included. The five domains identified were as follows: (1) current concepts, (2) risk factors, (3) impact, (4) tools and (5) interventions. CONCLUSIONS Initial reviews suggest that MD involves conflicts within a physician's personal beliefs, values and principles (personal constructs) caused by personal, ethical, moral, contextual, professional and sociocultural factors. How these experiences are processed and reflected on and then integrated into the physician's personal constructs impacts their self-concepts of personhood and identity and can result in MD. The ring theory of personhood facilitates an appreciation of how new experiences create dissonance and resonance within personal constructs. These insights allow the forwarding of a new broader concept of MD and a personalised approach to assessing and treating MD. While further studies are required to test these findings, they offer a personalised means of supporting a physician's MD and preventing burn-out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrystie Wan Ning Quek
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Rui Song Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ruth Si Man Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sarah Wye Kit Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Amanda Kay-Lyn Chok
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Shen Shen
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrea York Tiang Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Aiswarya Panda
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Neha Burla
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu An Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Choon Hoe Chee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kun Woo Lee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gabrielle Hui Ning Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Emmanuel Jian Leong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Natalie Song Yi Koh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Xuelian Jamie Zhou
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chua KZY, Quah ELY, Lim YX, Goh CK, Lim J, Wan DWJ, Ong SM, Chong CS, Yeo KZG, Goh LSH, See RM, Lee ASI, Ong YT, Chiam M, Ong EK, Zhou JX, Lim C, Ong SYK, Krishna L. A systematic scoping review on patients' perceptions of dignity. Palliat Care 2022; 21:118. [PMID: 35787278 PMCID: PMC9251939 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-01004-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A socioculturally appropriate appreciation of dignity is pivotal to the effective provision of care for dying patients. Yet concepts of dignity remain poorly defined. To address this gap in understanding and enhance dignity conserving end-of-life care, a review of current concepts of dignity is proposed. Methods To address its primary research question “How do patients conceive the concept of dignity at the end of life?”, this review appraises regnant concepts and influences of dignity, and evaluates current dignity conserving practices. To enhance accountability, transparency and reproducibility, this review employs the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) as its theoretical lens to guide a Systematic Evidence Based Approach guided Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) of patient perspectives of dignity. Three independent teams of reviewers independently analysed included articles from a structured search of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane Databases using thematic and content analyses. The themes and categories identified were compared and combined using the Funnelling Process to create domains that guide the discussion that follows. Results Seventy-eight thousand five hundred seventy-five abstracts were identified, 645 articles were reviewed, and 127 articles were included. The three domains identified were definitions of dignity, influences upon perceptions of dignity, and dignity conserving care. Conclusions This SSR in SEBA affirms the notion that dignity is intimately entwined with self-concepts of personhood and that effective dignity conserving measures at the end of life must be guided by the patient’s concept of dignity. This SSR in SEBA posits that such personalised culturally sensitive, and timely support of patients, their family and loved ones may be possible through the early and longitudinal application of a RToP based tool. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-01004-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yun Xue Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Chloe Keyi Goh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Jieyu Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Darius Wei Jun Wan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Simone Meiqi Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Chi Sum Chong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Kennan Zhi Guang Yeo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Laura Shih Hui Goh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Ray Meng See
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Alexia Sze Inn Lee
- Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.,Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Jamie Xuelian Zhou
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.,Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Lalit Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. .,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore. .,Division of Cancer Education, 11 Hospital Crescent, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, 169610, Singapore. .,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore. .,Academic Palliative Care Unit, United Kingdom Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK. .,Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119077, Singapore. .,The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ong RSR, Wong RSM, Chee RCH, Quek CWN, Burla N, Loh CYL, Wong YA, Chok AKL, Teo AYT, Panda A, Chan SWK, Shen GS, Teoh N, Chin AMC, Krishna LKR. A systematic scoping review moral distress amongst medical students. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:466. [PMID: 35710490 PMCID: PMC9203147 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03515-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Characterised by feelings of helplessness in the face of clinical, organization and societal demands, medical students are especially prone to moral distress (MD). Despite risks of disillusionment and burnout, efforts to support them have been limited by a dearth of data and understanding of MD in medical students. Yet, new data on how healthcare professionals confront difficult care situations suggest that MD could be better understood through the lens of the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP). A systematic scoping review (SSR) guided by the RToP is proposed to evaluate the present understanding of MD amongst medical students. METHODS The Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) is adopted to map prevailing accounts of MD in medical students. To enhance the transparency and reproducibility, the SEBA methodology employs a structured search approach, concurrent and independent thematic analysis and directed content analysis (Split Approach), the Jigsaw Perspective that combines complementary themes and categories, and the Funnelling Process that compares the results of the Jigsaw Perspective with tabulated summaries to ensure the accountability of these findings. The domains created guide the discussion. RESULTS Two thousand six hundred seventy-one abstracts were identified from eight databases, 316 articles were reviewed, and 20 articles were included. The four domains identified include definitions, sources, recognition and, interventions for MD. CONCLUSIONS MD in medical students may be explained as conflicts between the values, duties, and principles contained within the different aspects of their identity. These conflicts which are characterised as disharmony (within) and dyssynchrony (between) the rings of RToP underline the need for personalised and longitudinal evaluations and support of medical students throughout their training. This longitudinal oversight and support should be supported by the host organization that must also ensure access to trained faculty, a nurturing and safe environment for medical students to facilitate speak-up culture, anonymous reporting, feedback opportunities and supplementing positive role modelling and mentoring within the training program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Song Ryan Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ruth Si Man Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Choon Hoe Chee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chrystie Wan Ning Quek
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Neha Burla
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu An Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Amanda Kay-Lyn Chok
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrea York Tiang Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Aiswarya Panda
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sarah Wye Kit Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Shen Shen
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ning Teoh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Annelissa Mien Chew Chin
- Medical Library, National University of Singapore libraries, Singapore Blk MD6, Centre, 14 Medical Dr, #05-01 for Translational Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 8 College Rd,, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative and End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119077, Singapore.
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ho CY, Lim NA, Ong YT, Lee ASI, Chiam M, Gek GPL, Sarraf-Yazdi S, Mason S, Krishna L. The impact of death and dying on the personhood of senior nurses at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS): a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care 2022; 21:83. [PMID: 35590293 PMCID: PMC9121572 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00974-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A nurse’s role in caring for the dying is fraught with ethical, professional, and psychosocial challenges that impact how they perceive their roles as professionals. When unsupported, nurses caring for the dying experience burnout, career dissatisfaction and leave the profession. Better understanding of how caring for the dying affects the professional identity formation (PIF) of nurses will guide efforts to better support nurses. Methods Guided by new data on the subject, we adopt the theoretical lens of the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) to evaluate how caring for the dying impacts the values, beliefs, principles, professional identities and personhood of nurses. We employ Krishna’s Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) to guide the design and piloting of the semi-structured interview tool. Results Analysis of interviews with eight senior nurses in Supportive, Palliative and Oncology care revealed three domains: Identity 1) Formation; 2) Conflict and 3) Refinement. Identity Formation occurs early in a nurse’s career, upon entering a new specialist field, and at the start of Supportive, Palliative and Oncology care. Identity Formation reveals significant changes to how self-concepts of professional identities are tied to individual concepts of personhood. Caring for the dying, however, resulted in Conflicts between values, beliefs, and principles within regnant concepts of personhood and their professional duties. These conflicts are captured as conflicts within (‘disharmony’) and/or between (‘dyssynchrony’) the rings of the RToP. These conflicts can result in changes to self-concepts of personhood and professional identities. Identity Refinement sees experience and timely support helping nurses attenuate the impact of difficult experiences. This reduces the risk of burnout and mitigates changes to their professional identities. Identity Refinement helps them develop a ‘rooted identity’ which remains relatively consistent in the face of adversity. Conclusions Ongoing Identity Construction amongst nurses, particularly in caring for the dying, underscore the host organisation’s role in ensuring structured, longitudinal, accessible, and personalised assessments and support of nurses, especially when they are prone to dyssynchrony and disharmony whilst caring for the terminally ill. Further study into assessment methods and the role of the environment is critical. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00974-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chong Yao Ho
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore City, 119228, Singapore
| | - Nicole-Ann Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore City, 119228, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore City, 119228, Singapore
| | - Alexia Sze Inn Lee
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore City, 169610, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore City, 169610, Singapore.
| | - Gillian Phua Li Gek
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore City, 169610, Singapore.,Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 8 College Road, Singapore City, 169857, Singapore
| | - Shiva Sarraf-Yazdi
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore City, 169857, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Lalit Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore City, 119228, Singapore.,Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore City, 169610, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore City, 169610, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore City, 169857, Singapore.,Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.,Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore City, 119077, Singapore.,PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore City, 308436, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Perceptions of healthcare professionals towards palliative care in internal medicine wards: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:101. [PMID: 34193142 PMCID: PMC8247075 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00787-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The extension of palliative care services to meet the needs of patients with chronic non-malignant life-limiting conditions faces misconceptions amongst healthcare professionals. A study of prevailing perceptions of healthcare professionals on this wider palliative care service was thus conducted to identify current obstacles, guide the education of local healthcare professionals and improve service accessibility. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out at the Singapore General Hospital. An anonymised and close-ended online questionnaire was disseminated to 120 physicians and 500 nurses in the Department of Internal Medicine. The online survey tool focused on participant demographics; perceptions of palliative care and its perceived benefits; roles and indications; and attitudes and behaviours towards palliative care referrals. Results Forty four physicians and 156 nurses suggested that care of terminally ill patients with chronic non-malignant life-limiting conditions are compromised by concerns over the role of palliative care in non-cancer care and lapses in their prognostication and communication skills. Respondents also raised concerns about their ability to confront sociocultural issues and introduce palliative care services to patients and their families. Conclusions Gaps in understanding and the ability of nurses and physicians to communicate end of life issues, introduce palliative care services to patients and their families and confront sociocultural issues suggest the need for a longitudinal training program. With similar concerns likely prevalent in other clinical settings within this island nation, a concerted national education program targeting obstacles surrounding effective palliative care should be considered.
Collapse
|
14
|
Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20:76. [PMID: 31655573 PMCID: PMC6815421 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0417-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respect for autonomy is a key concept in contemporary bioethics and end-of-life ethics in particular. Despite this status, an individualistic interpretation of autonomy is being challenged from the perspective of different theoretical traditions. Many authors claim that the principle of respect for autonomy needs to be reconceptualised starting from a relational viewpoint. Along these lines, the notion of relational autonomy is attracting increasing attention in medical ethics. Yet, others argue that relational autonomy needs further clarification in order to be adequately operationalised for medical practice. To this end, we examined the meaning, foundations, and uses of relational autonomy in the specific literature of end-of-life care ethics. METHODS Using PRESS and PRISMA procedures, we conducted a systematic review of argument-based ethics publications in 8 major databases of biomedical, philosophy, and theology literature that focused on relational autonomy in end-of-life care. Full articles were screened. All included articles were critically appraised, and a synthesis was produced. RESULTS Fifty publications met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight articles were published in the last 5 years; publications were originating from 18 different countries. Results are organized according to: (a) an individualistic interpretation of autonomy; (b) critiques of this individualistic interpretation of autonomy; (c) relational autonomy as theoretically conceptualised; (d) relational autonomy as applied to clinical practice and moral judgment in end-of-life situations. CONCLUSIONS Three main conclusions were reached. First, literature on relational autonomy tends to be more a 'reaction against' an individualistic interpretation of autonomy rather than be a positive concept itself. Dichotomic thinking can be overcome by a deeper development of the philosophical foundations of autonomy. Second, relational autonomy is a rich and complex concept, formulated in complementary ways from different philosophical sources. New dialogue among traditionally divergent standpoints will clarify the meaning. Third, our analysis stresses the need for dialogical developments in decision making in end-of-life situations. Integration of these three elements will likely lead to a clearer conceptualisation of relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics. This should in turn lead to better decision-making in real-life situations.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
End-of-life decision making frequently involves a complex balancing of clinical, cultural, social, ethical, religious and economic considerations. Achieving a happy balance of these sometimes-competing interests, however, can be particularly fraught in a family-centric society like Singapore where the family unit often retains significant involvement in care determinations necessitating careful consideration of the family's position during the decision-making process. While various decision-making tools such as relational autonomy, best interests principle and welfare-based models have been proposed to help navigate such difficult decision-making processes, their application in practical terms, however, is dubious at best. This case report is presented to highlight these issues and explore the utility of these frameworks within the Singapore end-of-life care context when the interests of the family may be dissonant from those of the patient.
Collapse
|
16
|
Chan HY. Regulating advance decision-making: potential and challenges for Malaysia. Asian Bioeth Rev 2019; 11:111-122. [PMID: 33717304 PMCID: PMC7747237 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-019-00078-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The right to refuse treatment is generally accepted in the legal and bioethics discourses; however, the use of advance directives remains contentious. Some jurisdictions have introduced statutory frameworks to govern the creation and implementation of advance directives, underpinned primarily by the recognition of respect for personal autonomy. Although there are no legislation and judicial decisions on advance decision-making in Malaysia, the considered view is that healthcare practitioners perceived its utility in managing patient care. This paper examines the potential and challenges of applying a statutory framework in Malaysia, drawing from relevant regulatory examples. It argues for greater public awareness within the healthcare discourse and knowledge dissemination regarding the availability, usage and clinical guidance on advance decision-making. The main conclusion drawn from this exploratory analysis is that further understanding of and education about advance decision-making within the population and healthcare practitioners should precede the implementation of a statutory regime in Malaysia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Yun Chan
- The Law School, Huddersfield Business School, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Saad TC. The history of autonomy in medicine from antiquity to principlism. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2018; 21:125-137. [PMID: 28601921 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-017-9781-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Respect for Autonomy (RFA) has been a mainstay of medical ethics since its enshrinement as one of the four principles of biomedical ethics by Beauchamp and Childress' in the late 1970s. This paper traces the development of this modern concept from Antiquity to the present day, paying attention to its Enlightenment origins in Kant and Rousseau. The rapid C20th developments of bioethics and RFA are then considered in the context of the post-war period and American socio-political thought. The validity and utility of the RFA are discussed in light of this philosophical-historical account. It is concluded that it is not necessary to embrace an ethic of autonomy in order to guard patients from coercion or paternalism, and that, on the contrary, the dominance of autonomy threatens to undermine those very things which have helped doctors come to view and respect their patients as persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni C Saad
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, UHW Main Building, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, Wales, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yap SY. Use of the welfare-based model in the application of palliative sedation. Asian Bioeth Rev 2018; 10:93-101. [PMID: 33717279 PMCID: PMC7747338 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-018-0050-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Su Yan Yap
- Palliative Care Services, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chang MK, Lim MX, Tay K, Lee RJ, Sim DSW, Menon S, Kanesvaran R, Puvanendran R, Radha Krishna LK. The Influence of Evolving Confucian Beliefs in the Selection of Proxy Decision-Makers at the End of Life in Singapore. Asian Bioeth Rev 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s41649-017-0003-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
20
|
Wang X, Huang Y, Radha Krishna L, Puvanendran R. Role of the Nasogastric Tube and Lingzhi (Ganoderma lucidum) in Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2016; 51:794-799. [PMID: 26891608 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2015] [Revised: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Decision-making on behalf of an incapacitated patient at the end of life is a complex process, particularly in family-centric societies. The situation is more complex when attempts are made to accommodate Eastern concepts of end-of-life care with more conventional Western approaches. In this case report of an incapacitated 74-year-old Singaporean man of Malay descent with relapsed Stage 4 diffuse large B cell lymphoma who was without an established lasting power of attorney, we highlight the difficult deliberations that ensue when the patient's family, acting as his proxy, elected to administer lingzhi through his nasogastric tube (NGT). Focusing on the questions pertaining to end-of-life decision-making in Asia, we consider the issues surrounding the use of NGT and lingzhi in palliative care (PC) and the implementation of NGT for administering lingzhi in a PC setting, particularly in light of a dearth of data on such treatment measures among PC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohui Wang
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Youyi Huang
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lalit Radha Krishna
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rukshini Puvanendran
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
"At-own-risk discharges" or "self-discharges" evidences an irretrievable breakdown in the patient-clinician relationship when patients leave care facilities before completion of medical treatment and against medical advice. Dissolution of the therapeutic relationship terminates the physician's duty of care and professional liability with respect to care of the patient. Acquiescence of an at-own-risk discharge by the clinician is seen as respecting patient autonomy. The validity of such requests pivot on the assumptions that the patient is fully informed and competent to invoke an at-own-risk discharge and that care up to the point of the at-own-risk discharge meets prevailing clinical standards. Palliative care's use of a multidisciplinary team approach challenges both these assumptions. First by establishing multiple independent therapeutic relations between professionals in the multidisciplinary team and the patient who persists despite an at-own-risk discharge. These enduring therapeutic relationships negate the suggestion that no duty of care is owed the patient. Second, the continued employ of collusion, familial determinations, and the circumnavigation of direct patient involvement in family-centric societies compromises the patient's decision-making capacity and raises questions as to the patient's decision-making capacity and their ability to assume responsibility for the repercussions of invoking an at-own-risk discharge. With the validity of at-own-risk discharge request in question and the welfare and patient interest at stake, an alternative approach to assessing at-own-risk discharge requests are called for. The welfare model circumnavigates these concerns and preserves the patient's welfare through the employ of a multidisciplinary team guided holistic appraisal of the patient's specific situation that is informed by clinical and institutional standards and evidenced-based practice. The welfare model provides a robust decision-making framework for assessing the validity of at-own-risk discharge requests on a case-by-case basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- National University of Singapore, Singapore; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|