Dynamic tracing for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in urinary circulating DNA in gastric cancer patients

Diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer: from conventional to novel biomarkers

Gastric cancer is a major health concern worldwide. The survival rate of Gastric cancer greatly depends on the stage at which it is diagnosed. Early diagnosis is critical for improving survival outcomes. To improve the chances of early diagnosis, regular screening tests, such as an upper endoscopy or barium swallow, are recommended for individuals at a higher risk due to factors like family history or a previous diagnosis of gastric conditions. Biomarkers can be detected and measured using non-invasive methods such as blood tests, urine tests, breath analysis, or imaging techniques. These non-invasive approaches offer many advantages, including convenience, safety, and cost-effectiveness, making them valuable tools for disease diagnosis, monitoring, and research. Biomarker-based tests have emerged as a useful tool for identifying gastric cancer early, monitoring treatment response, assessing the recurrence risk, and personalizing treatment plans. In this current review, we have explored both classical and novel biomarkers for gastric cancer. We have centralized their potential clinical application and discussed the challenges in Gastric cancer research.

Trans-Renal Cell-Free Tumor DNA for Urine-Based Liquid Biopsy of Cancer

Cancer biomarkers are a promising tool for cancer detection, personalization of therapy, and monitoring of treatment response or recurrence. “Liquid biopsy” commonly refers to minimally invasive or non-invasive sampling of a bodily fluid (i.e., blood, urine, saliva) for detection of cancer biomarkers such as circulating tumor cells or cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA). These methods offer a means to collect frequent tumor assessments without needing surgical biopsies. Despite much progress with blood-based liquid biopsy approaches, there are limitations—including the limited amount of blood that can be drawn from a person and challenges with collecting blood samples at frequent intervals to capture ctDNA biomarker kinetics. These limitations are important because ctDNA is present at extremely low levels in plasma and there is evidence that measuring ctDNA biomarker kinetics over time can be useful for clinical prediction. Additionally, blood-based assays require access to trained phlebotomists and often a trip to a healthcare facility. In contrast, urine is a body fluid that can be self-collected from a patient’s home, at frequent intervals, and mailed to a laboratory for analysis. Multiple reports indicate that fragments of ctDNA pass from the bloodstream through the kidney’s glomerular filtration system into the urine, where they are known as trans-renal ctDNA (TR-ctDNA). Accumulating studies indicate that the limitations of blood based ctDNA approaches for cancer can be overcome by measuring TR-ctDNA. Here, we review current knowledge about TR-ctDNA in urine as a cancer biomarker approach, and discuss its clinical potential and open questions in this research field.

Monitoring and adapting cancer treatment using circulating tumor DNA kinetics: Current research, opportunities, and challenges

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a biomarker with wide-ranging applications in cancer management. While its role in guiding precision medicine in certain tumors via noninvasive detection of susceptibility and resistance alterations is now well established, recent evidence has pointed to more generalizable use in treatment monitoring. Quantitative changes in ctDNA levels over time (i.e., ctDNA kinetics) have shown potential as an early indicator of therapeutic efficacy and could enable treatment adaptation. However, ctDNA kinetics are complex and heterogeneous, affected by tumor biology, host physiology, and treatment factors. This review outlines the current preclinical and clinical knowledge of ctDNA kinetics in cancer and how early on-treatment changes in ctDNA levels could be applied in clinical research to collect evidence to support implementation in daily practice.

Size distribution of cell-free DNA in oncology

Tumor-specific, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in liquid biopsy test is a novel promising biomarker in the advancement of cancer management, including early diagnosis, screening, prognosis, identification of actionable targets, and serial tumor monitoring. The specific size pattern of DNA fragments derived from cancer cells is observed to differ from that of cfDNA fragments shed by non-cancer cells. Research into the physiological and biological properties of cfDNA reveals the molecular signature carried by each cfDNA fragments, which can reflect their tissue origins, as well as the mutational profiles with significant genetic alterations. Understanding the fragmentation and size distribution of cfDNA might be a valuable hotspot in liquid biopsy research, with the potential to drive innovation in oncology.

Utility of liquid biopsy using urine in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

In recent years, liquid biopsy for blood and body fluid in cancer patients has attracted attention. However, there have been few reports of liquid biopsy focusing on urine of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In 56 patients with PDAC, DNA was extracted from urine and plasma prior to treatment, and KRAS mutations were analyzed with droplet digital PCR to examine the mutation detection rate. Our study showed that KRAS mutations were found in 27 cases (48%) in urine and 27 cases (48%) in plasma. The detection rate of urine KRAS mutations varied by renal functions. The rates were 70% (14/20) and 36% (13/36) in the creatinine clearance rate (CCr) < 70 mL/min group and in the CCr ≥ 70 mL/min group, respectively (P = .024). Whereas, no influence of the CCr was observed in the detection rates of plasma KRAS mutations. The rates were 50% (10/20) and 47% (17/36) in cases with the CCr < 70 mL/min group and the CCr ≥ 70 mL/min group, respectively. Although the sample size was small, this study clearly indicated a new possibility of less invasive urine liquid biopsy in PDAC patients.

Urine-Based Liquid Biopsy for Nonurological Cancers

AIMS

The use of circulating cell-free DNA for detection of cancer genetics has been studied extensively. Liquid biopsy often refers to the use of blood as a minimally invasive source of body fluid for detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). However, urine collection, which is completely noninvasive, has been shown to also have great promise to serve as an alternate body fluid source for ctDNA. In this review article, we focus on the clinical utility of urine for genetic liquid biopsy of nonurological cancers.

CONCLUSION

Although still in early stages as compared with blood-based liquid biopsy, recent studies have demonstrated the value of urine-based liquid biopsies for: nonurological cancer screening; early detection; monitoring for recurrence and metastasis; and therapeutic efficacy. Overall, the completely noninvasive and patient-friendly nature of the urine-based biopsy warrants further development and offers a promising alternative to blood-based biopsies.

Molecular Diagnostics in the Neoplasms of the Pancreas, Liver, Gallbladder, and Extrahepatic Biliary Tract: 2018 Update

Pancreatic neoplasms, including ductal adenocarcinoma, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, pancreatic endocrine neoplasms, acinar cell carcinoma, and pancreatoblastoma, are associated with different genetic abnormalities. Hepatic adenomas with beta-catenin exon 3 mutation are associated with a high risk of malignancy. Hepatic adenoma with arginosuccinate synthetase 1 expression or sonic hedgehog mutations are associated with a risk of bleeding. Hepatocellular carcinoma and choangiocarcinoma display heterogeneity at both morphologic and molecular levels Cholangiocellular carcinoma is most commonly associated with IDH 1/2 mutations.

Tumor-specific genetic aberrations in cell-free DNA of gastroesophageal cancer patients

The applicability of liquid biopsies is studied intensively in all types of cancer and analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has recently been implemented clinically for mutation detection in lung cancer. ctDNA may provide information about tumor quantity and mutations present in the tumor, and as such have many potential applications in diagnosis and treatment of cancer. It has been suggested that ctDNA analysis may overcome the issue of intra-tumor heterogeneity faced by tissue biopsies and serve as an additional diagnostic tool. Furthermore, liquid biopsies are potentially helpful for monitoring of treatment response as well as detection of minimal residual disease and relapse. Gastroesophageal cancers (GEC) have high mortality rates and the majority of patients present with advanced stage at diagnosis or succumb due to disease recurrence even after radical resection of the primary tumor. Biomarkers that can help optimize treatment strategy are thus highly desirable. The present study is a review of published data on ctDNA in GEC patients. We identified 25 studies in which tumor-specific genetic aberrations were investigated in plasma or serum and discuss these in relation to the methods applied for ctDNA analysis. The methods used for ctDNA detection greatly influence the sensitivity of the analysis and, therefore, the potential clinical applications. We found that studies of ctDNA in GEC, although limited in number, are promising for several applications such as genetic profiling of tumors and monitoring of disease progression. However, more studies are needed to establish if and how this analysis can be clinically implemented.

Urinary Cell-Free DNA: Potential and Applications

Urine could be a convenient source of biomarkers for different diseases and clinical applications, mostly for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, treatment monitoring, and prenatal diagnosis. The ultra-noninvasive sampling and the possibility to analyze large volume are the main undisputed advantages of urine-based protocols. Recent and comprehensive studies showed that urinary cell-free DNA (ucfDNA) is informative to identify the genomic signature of patients, resulting in a huge tool to track the tumor evolution and for personalized medicine in urological and non-urological cancer.In this chapter, we reported the main published evidences on ucfDNA, with the aim at discussing its promising and translatable role in clinical practices.

Cell-free DNA: the role in pathophysiology and as a biomarker in kidney diseases

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is present in various body fluids and originates mostly from blood cells. In specific conditions, circulating cfDNA might be derived from tumours, donor organs after transplantation or from the foetus during pregnancy. The analysis of cfDNA is mainly used for genetic analyses of the source tissue -tumour, foetus or for the early detection of graft rejection. It might serve also as a nonspecific biomarker of tissue damage in critical care medicine. In kidney diseases, cfDNA increases during haemodialysis and indicates cell damage. In patients with renal cell carcinoma, cfDNA in plasma and its integrity is studied for monitoring of tumour growth, the effects of chemotherapy and for prognosis. Urinary cfDNA is highly fragmented, but the technical hurdles can now be overcome and urinary cfDNA is being evaluated as a potential biomarker of renal injury and urinary tract tumours. Beyond its diagnostic application, cfDNA might also be involved in the pathogenesis of diseases affecting the kidneys as shown for systemic lupus, sepsis and some pregnancy-related pathologies. Recent data suggest that increased cfDNA is associated with acute kidney injury. In this review, we discuss the biological characteristics, sources of cfDNA, its potential use as a biomarker as well as its role in the pathogenesis of renal and urinary diseases.