Risk of severe pulmonary embolism in cancer patients receiving bevacizumab: Results from a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data

Emergency department imaging utilization of cancer patients treated with bevacizumab: single-institution 8-year experience

PURPOSE

This study aims to highlight the presentations, imaging, and clinical outcomes of cancer patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) while receiving bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy.

METHODS

Our retrospective study was based on data from a single institution to identify cancer patients who presented acutely to the ED between 2014 and 2021 within 3 months of beginning bevacizumab who subsequently received diagnostic imaging with CT, MRI, ultrasound, and/or nuclear medicine ventilation/perfusion (VQ) scans. Data gathered included presenting symptoms grouped by body system, imaging impressions, and clinical outcomes, including hospitalization and discontinuation of bevacizumab after each ED visit. Imaging examinations and patient charts were reviewed by a team of fellowship-trained radiologists, radiology residents, and medical students.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients who presented to the ED were included for analysis. This included 32 (38.1%) males and 52 (61.9%) females, with a mean age of 61.2 years and an age range of 29-91 years. Neurological symptoms were the most common presenting symptoms, followed by abdominal symptoms and respiratory symptoms. Head imaging with CT and MRI was the most common imaging ordered with 55 total examinations, followed by abdominal imaging with 37 CT abdomen/pelvis (A/P) examinations, and then CT chest imaging with 22 examinations. Imaging revealed a serious adverse drug reaction in 21 (25.0%) patients, disease progression in 19 (22.6%), and no acute imaging findings in 44 (52.4%) patients. Imaging diagnoses were significantly associated with treatment planning, with a positive determination of bevacizumab-related serious adverse reaction on imaging leading to discontinuation of bevacizumab (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Multimodality imaging was a commonly used assessment tool for cancer patients receiving bevacizumab who presented to the ED. Imaging played a crucial role in diagnosis in these patients, especially of treatment-related serious adverse reactions and disease progression. Positive imaging findings of serious adverse reactions affected patient management including discontinuation of bevacizumab.

Cardiovascular Toxicity of Targeted Therapies for Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Background

Several targeted therapies for cancer have been associated with cardiovascular toxicity. The evidence for this association has not been synthesized systematically nor has the quality of evidence been considered. We synthesized systematic review evidence of cardiovascular toxicity of individual targeted agents.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for systematic reviews with meta-analyses of cardiovascular outcomes for individual agents published to May 2020. We selected reviews according to prespecified eligibility criteria (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42017080014). We classified evidence of cardiovascular toxicity as sufficient, probable, possible, or indeterminate for specific cardiovascular outcomes based on statistical significance, study quality, and size.

Results

From 113 systematic reviews, we found at least probable systematic review evidence of cardiovascular toxicity for 18 agents, including high- and all-grade hypertension for bevacizumab, ramucirumab, axitinib, cediranib, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, vandetanib, aflibercept, abiraterone, and enzalutamide, and all-grade hypertension for nintedanib; high- and all-grade arterial thromboembolism (includes cardiac and/or cerebral events) for bevacizumab and abiraterone, high-grade arterial thromboembolism for trastuzumab, and all-grade arterial thromboembolism for sorafenib and tamoxifen; high- and all-grade venous thromboembolism (VTE) for lenalidomide and thalidomide, high-grade VTE for cetuximab and panitumumab, and all-grade VTE for bevacizumab; high- and all-grade left ventricular ejection fraction decline or congestive heart failure for bevacizumab and trastuzumab, and all-grade left ventricular ejection fraction decline/congestive heart failure for pazopanib and sunitinib; and all-grade corrected QT interval prolongation for vandetanib.

Conclusions

Our review provides an accessible summary of the cardiovascular toxicity of targeted therapy to assist clinicians and patients when managing cardiovascular health.