The equilibrium of tumor suppression: DUBs as active regulators of PTEN

PTEN is among the most commonly lost or mutated tumor suppressor genes in human cancer. PTEN, a bona fide lipid phosphatase that antagonizes the highly oncogenic PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, is considered a major dose-dependent tumor suppressor. Although PTEN function can be compromised by genetic mutations in inherited syndromes and cancers, posttranslational modifications of PTEN may also play key roles in the dynamic regulation of its function. Notably, deregulated ubiquitination and deubiquitination lead to detrimental impacts on PTEN levels and subcellular partitioning, promoting tumorigenesis. While PTEN can be targeted by HECT-type E3 ubiquitin ligases for nuclear import and proteasomal degradation, studies have shown that several deubiquitinating enzymes, including HAUSP/USP7, USP10, USP11, USP13, OTUD3 and Ataxin-3, can remove ubiquitin from ubiquitinated PTEN in cancer-specific contexts and thus reverse ubiquitination-mediated PTEN regulation. Researchers continue to reveal the precise molecular mechanisms by which cancer-specific deubiquitinases of PTEN regulate its roles in the pathobiology of cancer, and new methods of pharmacologically for modulating PTEN deubiquitinases are critical areas of investigation for cancer treatment and prevention. Here, we assess the mechanisms and functions of deubiquitination as a recently appreciated mode of PTEN regulation and review the link between deubiquitinases and PTEN reactivation and its implications for therapeutic strategies.

Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 10, a deubiquitinating enzyme: Assessing its role in tumor prognosis and immune response

Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 10 (USP10) is a member of the ubiquitin-specific protease family that removes the ubiquitin chain from ubiquitin-conjugated protein substrates. We performed a literature search to evaluate the structure and biological activity of USP10, summarize its role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression, and discuss how USP10 may act as a tumor suppressor or a tumor-promoting gene depending on its mechanism of action. Subsequently, we elaborated further on these results through bioinformatics analysis. We demonstrated that abnormal expression of USP10 is related to tumorigenesis in various types of cancer, including liver, lung, ovarian, breast, prostate, and gastric cancers and acute myeloid leukemia. Meanwhile, in certain cancers, increased USP10 expression is associated with tumor suppression. USP10 was downregulated in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) and associated with reduced overall survival in patients with KIRC. In contrast, USP10 upregulation was associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC). In addition, we elucidated the novel role of USP10 in the regulation of tumor immunity in KIRC and HNSC through bioinformatics analysis. We identified several signaling pathways to be significantly associated with USP10 expression, such as ferroptosis, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, TGF-β, and G2/M checkpoint. In summary, this review outlines the role of USP10 in various forms of cancer, discusses the relevance of USP10 inhibitors in anti-tumor therapies, and highlights the potential function of USP10 in regulating the immune responses of tumors.

USP10 as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Human Cancers

Deubiquitination is a major form of post-translational protein modification involved in the regulation of protein homeostasis and various cellular processes. Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), comprising about five subfamily members, are key players in deubiquitination. USP10 is a USP-family DUB featuring the classic USP domain, which performs deubiquitination. Emerging evidence has demonstrated that USP10 is a double-edged sword in human cancers. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying its different effects in tumorigenesis remain elusive. A possible reason is dependence on the cell context. In this review, we summarize the downstream substrates and upstream regulators of USP10 as well as its dual role as an oncogene and tumor suppressor in various human cancers. Furthermore, we summarize multiple pharmacological USP10 inhibitors, including small-molecule inhibitors, such as spautin-1, and traditional Chinese medicines. Taken together, the development of specific and efficient USP10 inhibitors based on USP10’s oncogenic role and for different cancer types could be a promising therapeutic strategy.

When the chains do not break: the role of USP10 in physiology and pathology

Deubiquitination is now understood to be as important as its partner ubiquitination for the maintenance of protein half-life, activity, and localization under both normal and pathological conditions. The enzymes that remove ubiquitin from target proteins are called deubiquitinases (DUBs) and they regulate a plethora of cellular processes. DUBs are essential enzymes that maintain intracellular protein homeostasis by recycling ubiquitin. Ubiquitination is a post-translational modification where ubiquitin molecules are added to proteins thus influencing activation, localization, and complex formation. Ubiquitin also acts as a tag for protein degradation, especially by proteasomal or lysosomal degradation systems. With ~100 members, DUBs are a large enzyme family; the ubiquitin-specific peptidases (USPs) being the largest group. USP10, an important member of this family, has enormous significance in diverse cellular processes and many human diseases. In this review, we discuss recent studies that define the roles of USP10 in maintaining cellular function, its involvement in human pathologies, and the molecular mechanisms underlying its association with cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. We also discuss efforts to modulate USPs as therapy in these diseases.

Revisiting the Concept of Stress in the Prognosis of Solid Tumors: A Role for Stress Granules Proteins?

Simple Summary

Stress Granules (SGs) were discovered in 1999 and while the first decade of research has focused on some fundamental questions, the field is now investigating their role in human pathogenesis. Since then, evidences of a link between SGs and cancerology are accumulating in vitro and in vivo. In this work we summarized the role of SGs proteins in cancer development and their prognostic values. We find that level of expression of protein involved in SGs formation (and not mRNA level) could serve a prognostic marker in cancer. With this review we strongly suggest that SGs (proteins) could be targets of choice to block cancer development and counteract resistance to improve patients care.

Abstract

Cancer treatments are constantly evolving with new approaches to improve patient outcomes. Despite progresses, too many patients remain refractory to treatment due to either the development of resistance to therapeutic drugs and/or metastasis occurrence. Growing evidence suggests that these two barriers are due to transient survival mechanisms that are similar to those observed during stress response. We review the literature and current available open databases to study the potential role of stress response and, most particularly, the involvement of Stress Granules (proteins) in cancer. We propose that Stress Granule proteins may have prognostic value for patients.

Post-Translational Regulation of ARF: Perspective in Cancer

Tumorigenesis can be induced by various stresses that cause aberrant DNA mutations and unhindered cell proliferation. Under such conditions, normal cells autonomously induce defense mechanisms, thereby stimulating tumor suppressor activation. ARF, encoded by the CDKN2a locus, is one of the most frequently mutated or deleted tumor suppressors in human cancer. The safeguard roles of ARF in tumorigenesis are mainly mediated via the MDM2-p53 axis, which plays a prominent role in tumor suppression. Under normal conditions, low p53 expression is stringently regulated by its target gene, MDM2 E3 ligase, which induces p53 degradation in a ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent manner. Oncogenic signals induced by MYC, RAS, and E2Fs trap MDM2 in the inhibited state by inducing ARF expression as a safeguard measure, thereby activating the tumor-suppressive function of p53. In addition to the MDM2-p53 axis, ARF can also interact with diverse proteins and regulate various cellular functions, such as cellular senescence, apoptosis, and anoikis, in a p53-independent manner. As the evidence indicating ARF as a key tumor suppressor has been accumulated, there is growing evidence that ARF is sophisticatedly fine-tuned by the diverse factors through transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms. In this review, we mainly focused on how cancer cells employ transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms to manipulate ARF activities to circumvent the tumor-suppressive function of ARF. We further discussed the clinical implications of ARF in human cancer.

Prognostic significance of USP10 and p14ARF expression in patients with colorectal cancer

Ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) play an important role in fundamental cellular processes. Among these, USP10 is known for its association with tumor development and progression of multiple cancers. We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of USP10 expression in colorectal cancer and examined the potential link between USP10 and p14ARF in patients with colorectal cancer. USP10 and p14ARF protein expression was assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC) on a tissue microarray from 280 colorectal cancer cases. IHC scores were evaluated by digital image analysis and compared with patients' outcomes. In addition, we examined DNA hypermethylation in colorectal cancer cell lines and tissues, which were matched with adjacent normal colon samples. USP10 expression was lost (USP10^loss) in 18.6% of samples (52/280 cases), which was linked to lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.019) and distant metastases (p < 0.001). Similarly, loss of p14ARF expression (p14ARF^loss) was associated with more advanced tumors. USP10 expression correlated positively with p14ARF expression (r = 0.617, p < 0.001). USP10^loss, p14ARF^loss, and dual loss of USP10 and p14ARF were significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival and overall survival in comparison to USP10^intact, p14ARF^intact, and dual loss of USP10 and p14ARF, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that USP10^loss (p = 0.030) and dual loss of USP10 and p14ARF (p = 0.014) are independent prognostic factors for poor disease-free survival in colorectal cancer patients. Furthermore, aberrant hypermethylation of the USP10 promoter region was found in colorectal cancer cell lines and tissues. The present results suggest that USP10^loss is a potential prognostic marker for colorectal cancer.

Loss of Both USP10 and p14ARF Protein Expression Is an Independent Prognostic Biomarker for Poor Prognosis in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The prognostic role of USP10 in epithelial ovarian cancer has been studied in various human cancers. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical and pathological significance of USP10 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical analyses of the expression of USP10 and p14ARF by using tissue microarrays were performed in 336 ovarian tumours and the data were compared with clinicopathological variables. We examined their level of DNA methylation around the putative transcriptional start site in 5' CpG islands in fresh frozen tissues and ovarian cancer cells.

RESULTS

Expression of USP10 and p14ARF was significantly lower in cancer tissues than in normal epithelium. Low USP10 expression and a combined USP10/p14ARF low expression were revealed to be independent prognostic factors. A high degree of methylation in USP10 and p14ARF CpG islands was found by methylation specific PCR analysis in cancer than in normal tissues and cells.

CONCLUSION

Decreased expression of USP10 or combined USP10/p14ARF decreased expression is a strong indicator of poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer.

Ubiquitin, SUMO, and Nedd8 as Therapeutic Targets in Cancer

Ubiquitin defines a family of approximately 20 peptidic posttranslational modifiers collectively called the Ubiquitin-like (UbLs). They are conjugated to thousands of proteins, modifying their function and fate in many ways. Dysregulation of these modifications has been implicated in a variety of pathologies, in particular cancer. Ubiquitin, SUMO (-1 to -3), and Nedd8 are the best-characterized UbLs. They have been involved in the regulation of the activity and/or the stability of diverse components of various oncogenic or tumor suppressor pathways. Moreover, the dysregulation of enzymes responsible for their conjugation/deconjugation has also been associated with tumorigenesis and cancer resistance to therapies. The UbL system therefore constitutes an attractive target for developing novel anticancer therapeutic strategies. Here, we review the roles and dysregulations of Ubiquitin, SUMO, and Nedd8 pathways in tumorigenesis, as well as recent advances in the identification of small molecules targeting their conjugating machineries for potential application in the fight against cancer.