Epidemiology, risk factors, and strategies to prevent and manage poisonings due to pharmaceuticals in children in low income and low-middle income countries: A systematic review

Background

There are significant disparities in the burden of disease due to poisoning between children in low- and high-income countries (HICs). However, there is limited data on the impact of increasing pharmaceutical access in low income countries (LICs) and low-middle income countries (LMICs) on the epidemiology of and risk factors associated with poisoning in children in these settings. Furthermore, while strategies in HICs have effectively reduced the burden of disease due to poisonings in children, there is limited information regarding the efficacy of these interventions in LICs/LMICs.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review in eight databases for literature published between January 2000 to April 2022 to evaluate the epidemiology and risk factors associated with poisonings due to pharmaceuticals and effective strategies to prevent and manage them in children in LICs/LMICs. From 16 061 retrieved articles, 41 were included in the final analysis.

Results

Pharmaceuticals were a common cause of poisoning in children in LICs/LMICs, occurring in between 12.4% and 72.36% of cases. Major risk factors were unsafe medication storage and inadequate caregiver knowledge. Delayed access to care and younger age were associated with increased mortality. Prevention strategies that included education demonstrated improvements in knowledge; however, their impact on incidence and mortality was unclear. Management strategies detailed individual patient care interventions, most commonly gastric lavage and activated charcoal. Meanwhile, delayed presentation, limited provider knowledge, and inadequate laboratory resources to support therapeutic monitoring hindered optimal management.

Conclusions

The combination of educational interventions for prevention, along with regulatory processes to maximise medication storage and formulation safety, could be effective in reducing the burden of poisoning in LICs/LMICs. The development of national or regional protocols for the management of common medication poisonings, augmented by the development of poison control centers and expansion of laboratory access in facilities may help reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with pharmaceutical poisonings in children in LICs/LMICs. Further evidence regarding contextual factors, risk and benefit profiles, the pattern of poisoning, and the impact of preventive and treatment interventions specific to LICs/LMICs is needed to better refine recommendations in these settings.

Registration

PROSPERO: CRD42022315686.

The cost-effectiveness of a real-time seizure detection application for people with epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Automated seizure detection modalities can increase safety among people with epilepsy (PWE) and reduce seizure-related anxiety. We evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of a seizure detection mobile application for PWE in Singapore.

METHODS

We used a Markov cohort model to estimate the expected changes to total costs and health outcomes from a decision to adopt the seizure detection application versus the current standard of care from the health provider perspective. The time horizon is ten years and cycle duration is one month. Parameter values were updated from national databases and published literature. As we do not know the application efficacy in reducing seizure-related injuries, a conservative estimate of 1% reduction was used. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis, scenario analyses, and value of information analysis were performed.

RESULTS

At a willingness-to-pay of $45,000/ quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $1,096/QALY, and the incremental net monetary benefit was $13,656. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses reported that the application had a 99.5% chance of being cost-effective. In a scenario analysis in which the reduction in risk of seizure-related injury was 20%, there was a 99.8% chance that the application was cost-effective. Value of information analysis revealed that health utilities was the most important parameter group contributing to model uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

This early-stage modeling study reveals that the seizure detection application is likely to be cost-effective compared to current standard of care. Future prospective trials will be needed to demonstrate the real-world impact of the application. Changes in health-related quality of life should also be measured in future trials.

Advice for lay callers with low-risk poison exposures by a regional poison control center: the impact on health care expenditures

BACKGROUND

Since establishing the first poison control centers (PCCs), there is a still ongoing debate regarding their relevance and financing. The present study aims to analyze whether a regional PCC can reduce the economic burden associated with utilization of health care structures due to low-risk poison exposures on the German health care system.

METHODS

A decision-tree based cost-benefit analysis comparing a situation utilizing PCC consultation versus a hypothetical situation without PCC consultation for low-risk poison exposures from the German health care system's perspective was conducted. The model inputs were obtained by a representative telephone survey of lay callers supplemented by empirical PCC and literature data. A probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis with varying input variables was performed to prove the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

In the underlying telephone survey, data of 378 lay callers could be considered and included in the decision tree model. As a result, the mean costs for handling one low-risk poison exposure case were €41.99 utilizing PCC consultation compared to €145.92 without PCC consultation, indicating a cost-benefit ratio of 3.48 for the existence of the PCC. The sensitivity analysis proved that the outcome of the decision analysis does not change significantly with varying inputs.

CONCLUSION

The existence of PCCs relieve the burden on other health care providers and reduce health care costs to a relevant extent. Therefore, PCCs should be considered as an important supporting structure of the German health care system.

Staying at home: the potential cost savings related to triage advice provided by the New Zealand National Poisons Centre

INTRODUCTION

Evidence from multiple countries suggests poisons centres create value in several ways including the provision of expert clinical advice, decreased hospital length of stay and triage of exposures enabling safe management without further medical utilisation. Data specific to the New Zealand context are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate one aspect of poison centre value, namely the potential savings to the health system related to triage advice provided by the New Zealand National Poisons Centre (NZNPC).

METHODS

A prospective survey was conducted over a 2-week period where eligible NZNPC callers - who were advised their exposure did not require further medical assessment - were asked what alternative action they would have taken in the hypothetical absence of the NZNPC. The potential cost savings associated with the alternative actions respondents would have taken were calculated using publicly available information and extrapolated to the population level using annual NZNPC call numbers for 2019.

RESULTS

Among 554 eligible callers, 399 were recruited to participate and 396 provided responses. The single most common alternative action was "search the Internet" (54/396, 14%). In-person medical assessment would have been sought by 25% (100/396), and 39% (154/396) would have called an alternative provider within the healthcare system. The estimated cost associated with alternative actions for the study period was NZ$25,637. When extrapolated to the 2019 year, the potential savings from avoided healthcare utilisation was NZ$1,061,551.

CONCLUSION

In 2019, in the absence of NZNPC triage advice, a conservatively estimated NZ$1,061,551 would have been spent on healthcare related to poisoning exposures that were appropriate for management without further medical utilisation. It is important to note that this estimate is only one aspect of the total value created by the NZNPC and is consistent with findings of value from other poisons centres internationally.

Mobile technology: Usage and perspective of patients and caregivers presenting to a tertiary care emergency department

BACKGROUND

Developments in information technology (IT) have driven a push in healthcare innovation in the emergency department (ED). Many of these applications rely on mobile technology (MT) such as smartphones but not everyone is comfortable with MT usage. Our study aims to characterize the technology usage behavior of users in the ED so as to guide the implementation of IT interventions in the ED.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. Patients and their caregivers aged 21 and above were recruited. The survey collected demographic information, technology usage patterns, and participant reported comfort level in the usage of MT. We performed descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors differentially associated with comfort in usage of MT.

RESULTS

A total of 498 participants were recruited, and 299 (60%) were patients. English was the most commonly written and read language (66.9%) and 64.2% reported a comfort level of 3/5 or more in using MT. Factors that were associated with being comfortable in using MT include having a tertiary education, being able to read and write English, as well as being a frequent user of IT. Caregivers were more likely to display these characteristics.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of ED patients are not comfortable in the usage of MT. Factors that predicted comfort level in the usage of MT were common amongst caregivers. Future interventions should take this into consideration in the design of MT interventions.

A 24/7 hospital toxicology service: Experience of a new start-up

Objectives:

A toxicology team providing round-the-clock consultations for poisoning was established in Changi General Hospital in November 2014. This study aims to describe the epidemiology of patients referred to this service in 2015.

Methods:

A retrospective electronic and paper records review of all patients referred to the toxicology service from January to December 2015 was performed for demographics, poisoning, clinical, and outcome data. The cases were graded for poisoning severity score (PSS), likelihood of poisoning exposure and relative contribution to fatality for death cases.

Results:

A total of 306 cases were referred to this service in 2015. The median age was 34 years with majority being females (54%). The most common cause of poisoning was deliberate self-harm (62%) and the most common route of poisoning was oral (85%). Analgesics (21%) and sedatives (19%) were the most common poisoning classes. Six per cent of patients received decontamination and 17% received antidotes. The likelihood of poisoning exposure was probable to definite certainty for 85% of the cases. Mild poisoning (PSS 0–1) constituted 76% of the cohort, while 22% had moderate to severe poisoning (PSS 2–3). Out of the five fatalities, three were exposure-related fatalities contributing to a fatality rate of 1%. Fifty-four per cent of patients were admitted to the emergency department observation unit, 17% to general inpatient wards and 9% to either intensive care unit or high dependency wards.

Conclusions:

Although most poisoning cases resulted in mild clinical effects, a small but significant number of severe acuity cases occurred in this cohort.

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF POISON CENTERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Objectives: The aim of this study was to summarize and assess economic evaluations of poison centers (PCs) from the perspectives of society, the payer, and the healthcare system.

Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify complete economic evaluations regardless of the language or publication status. Two reviewers evaluated the abstracts for eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed the study quality using a standardized tool.

Results: In total, 422 non-duplicated studies were retrieved, but only nine met the eligibility criteria. Five of the eligible studies were published in the 1990s, and four were published in the 2000s. Six studies met at least seven of ten quality criteria. In all studies, the presence of PCs was compared with a scenario of their absence. Eight studies used cost–benefit analyses and one used a cost-effectiveness approach. The cost–benefit ratios ranged from 0.76 to 7.67, which indicates that each United States dollar (USD) spent on poison centers can save almost 8 USD on medical spending. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed that each successful outcome achieved by a PC avoids a minimum of 12,000 USD to 56,000 USD in other healthcare spending.

Conclusions: The data in our review show that PCs are economically viable. PCs improve the efficiency of healthcare expenditure and contribute to the sustainability of the healthcare system. An investment in PCs is a rational public health policy approach that contrasts the current trend of reducing spending on PCs.