Early Detection and Rescue of an Unusual Case of Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Associated with Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphophagocytosis: Case Report from a Liver Transplant Center in India

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, multisystem, potentially fatal clinicopathologic syndrome. HLH presenting predominantly as pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) has been rarely reported. Early recognition is imperative to initiate life-saving treatment but is often hampered due to the rarity of this syndrome, variable clinical presentations, and nonspecific clinical and laboratory findings. In this article, we reported a case of secondary HLH (H1N1 and RSV positive) presenting as PALF from India. A previously healthy 22-month-old boy presented with fever, vomiting, and altered sensorium for 10 days. He had coagulopathy and deranged liver functions. He was evaluated for underlying etiology and managed on lines of PALF. Due to persistent bicytopenia and excessively high ferritin levels, HLH was strongly suspected though he did not fulfill all clinical criteria for the diagnosis of HLH. Presence of seizures and cerebrospinal fluid analysis was suggestive of central nervous system involvement. There was no evidence of primary HLH on genetic evaluation. Real-time polymerase chain reaction amplifications were positive for RSV and influenza A H1N1, confirming the causative triggers. After the administration of immunosuppressants and oseltamivir, the patient's symptoms improved dramatically and he recovered completely. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fourth case reported worldwide till date of successful rescue of ALF in a child associated with HLH completely without resorting to liver transplantation. Clinical vigilance is crucial for possible presence of HLH with varied initial presentations in PALF despite incomplete diagnostic criteria, with detailed etiological workup for commencing life-saving therapy in time.

Plasma exchange in patients with acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver (ACLF) carry high short-term mortality rate, and may result from a wide variety of causes. Plasma exchange has been shown in a randomized control trial to improve survival in ALF especially in patients who did not receive a liver transplant. Other cohort studies demonstrated potential improvement in survival in patients with ACLF.

AIM

To assess utility of plasma exchange in liver failure and its effect on mortality in patients who do not undergo liver transplantation.

METHODS

Databases MEDLINE via PubMed, and EMBASE were searched and relevant publications up to 30 March, 2019 were assessed. Studies were included if they involved human participants diagnosed with liver failure who underwent plasma exchange, with or without another alternative non-bioartificial liver assist device.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty four records were reviewed, of which 62 studies were found to be duplicates. Of the 262 records screened, 211 studies were excluded. Fifty-one articles were assessed for eligibility, for which 7 were excluded. Twenty-nine studies were included for ALF only, and 9 studies for ACLF only. Six studies included both ALF and ACLF patients. A total of 44 publications were included. Of the included publications, 2 were randomized controlled trials, 14 cohort studies, 12 case series, 16 case reports. All of three ALF studies which looked at survival rate or survival days reported improvement in outcome with plasma exchange. In two out of four studies where plasma exchange-based liver support systems were compared to standard medical treatment (SMT) for ACLF, a biochemical improvement was seen. Survival in the non-transplanted patients was improved in all four studies in patients with ACLF comparing plasma exchange vs SMT. Using the aforementioned studies, plasma exchange based therapy in ACLF compared to SMT improved survival in non-transplanted patients at 30 and 90-d with a pooled OR of 0.60 (95%CI 0.46-0.77, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The level of evidence for use of high volume plasma exchange in selected ALF cases is high. Plasma exchange in ACLF improves survival at 30-and 90-d in non-transplanted patients. Further well-designed randomized control trials will need to be carried out to ascertain the optimal duration and amount of plasma exchange required and assess if the use of high volume plasma exchange can be extrapolated to patients with ACLF.