Psychodynamic formulation in the era of the brain - towards integration

Instructions for Australian and New Zealand trainees in developing skills in formulation: a systematic review of local evidence

OBJECTIVE

To examine the peer-reviewed literature on psychiatric formulation.

METHODS

The term (formula*) was used to systematically search Australasian Psychiatry, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, British Journal of Psychiatry, BJPsych Bulletin, American Journal of Psychiatry and Academic Psychiatry. The resulting papers were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 42 papers located, 22 (52%) were published between 2002 and 2019; 90% papers were published in Australasian Psychiatry (15), Academic Psychiatry (12) or BJPsych Bulletin (10), journals that focus on training and clinical practice. The papers varied in their aims and recommendations and not all justified the need for formulation. Formulation was recommended as a necessity for training, a communication tool and a guide to treatment. No article provided evidence for the superiority of any type of formulation, and the role of consumers in formulation was conspicuously lacking.

CONCLUSION

There are many ways to structure formulation. However, the existing literature does not support any particular approach. More consideration needs to be given to the needs of consumers in conceptualising and practicing formulation.

[Traumatization and Schizophrenic Disorders - A Multidimensional View]

Prevalence of traumatizing of patients with schizophrenia is higher as in the normal community. Meta analyses show significant relationships between traumatic experiences in childhood and psychotic disorders. Patients with schizophrenia as well as those with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are characterized by brain morphological changes (mygdala und Hippocampus). In these two patient groups, neuroendocrinological disturbances (cortisol und α-amylase) as well as a worse clinical outcome could be additionally found. In the psychodynamic theoretical discussion, there are only few approaches concerning trauma and psychosis. Specifically here, the name of Frieda Fromm-Reichmann should be noted, who already pointed out the great meaning of child traumatization (especially physical and sexual abuse) for the later manifestation of schizophrenia. She also developed first principles of analytic psychosis therapy with the working on the deep life anxiety caused by the trauma in the here and now of the transference situation. It is assumed that schizophrenic disorders and PTSD have to be understood as trauma consequence diseases, which occur in comorbidty in a so far unknown extent.

Paradigm shift in psychiatry: what may it involve?

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine the potential nature of an ongoing paradigm shift in psychiatry that has been suggested to be occurring.

CONCLUSIONS

New findings in traumatology and neuroscience do form a potential platform for a paradigm shift. Prior conflicting paradigms are suggested to be due to biases arising from mental structures themselves. A new wholist perspective is proposed, which makes sense of and incorporates previous paradigms, and coheres recent understanding of right- and left-brain functioning and biopsychosocial traumatic processes and their ramifications. The perspective makes sense of the great variety of post-traumatic manifestations ranging from somatic to meaning-making dysfunctions. The wholist perspective may well be an important step in solidifying a fresh paradigmatic perspective in psychiatry.