2
|
Kayrouz R, Schofield C, Nielssen O, Karin E, Staples L, Titov N. A Review and Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Professionals Working With Indigenous and Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Populations During COVID-19. Front Public Health 2021; 9:584000. [PMID: 34249822 PMCID: PMC8267873 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.584000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: As the rates of infection and mortality from COVID-19 have been higher in minority groups, the communication of health information in a way that is understood and accepted is of particular importance. Aims: To provide health professionals with a clinical practice guideline for clear and culturally sensitive communication of health information about COVID-19 to people of Indigenous and culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. Assessment of Guideline Options: The authors conducted a review of the literature on health communication, and the guidelines were developed with particular reference to the SPIKES protocol of “breaking bad news” in oncology and the use of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI). Actionable Recommendations: The guideline combines two approaches, the Cultural Formulation Interview, developed for DSM-5, and the SPIKES protocol used for delivering “bad news” in oncology. The combined CFI-SPIKES protocol is a six-step clinical practice guideline that includes the following: (1) Set up (S) the interview; (2) Determine how the patient perceives the problem (P) using the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) to elicit the patient's cultural perception of the problem; (3) Obtain an invitation (I) from the patient to receive a diagnosis; (4) Provide the patient knowledge (K) of diagnosis in a non-technical way; (5) Address the patient's emotional reaction (E) to diagnosis; and (6) Provide the patient a summary (S) of healthcare and treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: This article presents guidelines for assessing the cultural dimensions of patients' understanding of COVID-19 and delivering diagnostic and treatment recommendations in ways that are culturally safe and responsive, such as: (a) suspending the clinician's own cultural biases to understand the explanatory models and cultural values of their CALD or Indigenous patients; (b) encouraging the use of interpreters or cultural brokers to ensure that that the message is delivered in a way that the patient can understand; and (c) encouraging CALD or Indigenous patient to take an active part in the solution and treatment adherence, to minimize transmission of COVID-19 in CALD and Indigenous communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rony Kayrouz
- MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Olav Nielssen
- MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Eyal Karin
- MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lauren Staples
- MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nickolai Titov
- MindSpot Clinic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aggarwal NK, Jarvis GE, Gómez-Carrillo A, Kirmayer LJ, Lewis-Fernández R. The Cultural Formulation Interview since DSM-5: Prospects for training, research, and clinical practice. Transcult Psychiatry 2020; 57:496-514. [PMID: 32838655 DOI: 10.1177/1363461520940481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
While social science research has demonstrated the importance of culture in shaping psychiatric illness, clinical methods for assessing the cultural dimensions of illness have not been adopted as part of routine care. Reasons for limited integration include the impression that attention to culture requires specialized skills, is only relevant to a subset of patients from unfamiliar backgrounds, and takes too much time to be useful. The DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), published in 2013, was developed to provide a simplified approach to collecting information needed for cultural assessment. It offers a 16-question interview protocol that has been field tested at sites around the world. However, little is known about how CFI implementation has affected training, health services, and clinical outcomes. This article offers a comprehensive narrative review that synthesizes peer-reviewed, published studies on CFI use. A total of 25 studies were identified, with sample sizes ranging from 1 to 460 participants. In all pilot CFI studies 960 unique subjects were enrolled, and in final CFI studies 739 were enrolled. Studies focused on how the CFI affects clinical practice; explored the CFI through research paradigms in medical communication, implementation science, and family psychiatry; and examined clinician training. In most studies, patients and clinicians reported that using the CFI improved clinical rapport. This evidence base offers an opportunity to consider implications for training, research, and clinical practice and to identify crucial areas for further research.
Collapse
|
5
|
Jarvis GE, Kirmayer LJ, Gómez-Carrillo A, Aggarwal NK, Lewis-Fernández R. Update on the Cultural Formulation Interview. FOCUS (AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING) 2020; 18:40-46. [PMID: 32047396 PMCID: PMC7011218 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the clinical and research literature on the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) since its publication in DSM-5. The CFI is an interview protocol designed to be used by clinicians in any setting to gather essential data to produce a cultural formulation. The CFI aims to improve culturally sensitive diagnosis and treatment by focusing clinical attention on the patient's perspective and social context. Preliminary evidence indicates that the CFI can improve clinical communication by enhancing clinician-patient rapport, allowing the clinician to obtain new, cultural data in a relatively short period, eliciting patients' perspectives on what caused their symptoms, and helping patients to become aware of their problems in more insightful ways. With practice, the CFI takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. The CFI has been evaluated internationally in the United States, Canada, Kenya, Peru, the Netherlands, India, and Mexico and generally has been found to be clinically acceptable and useful in these varied settings. Clinicians receiving as little as one hour of training on the CFI improved their ability to work with culturally diverse patients. The CFI may be more difficult to conduct with patients who have severe symptoms, including acute psychosis, suicidal behavior, aggression, and cognitive impairment. The CFI provides a simple way to begin the process of cultural assessment, and its systematic use can foster a reflective stance and promote systemic thinking in routine clinical practice about the patient's life and experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Eric Jarvis
- Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, and Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec (Jarvis, Kirmayer, Gómez-Carrillo); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); New York State Center of Excellence for Cultural Competence (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández), Anxiety Disorders Clinic (Lewis-Fernández), and Hispanic Treatment Program (Lewis-Fernández), New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Laurence J Kirmayer
- Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, and Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec (Jarvis, Kirmayer, Gómez-Carrillo); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); New York State Center of Excellence for Cultural Competence (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández), Anxiety Disorders Clinic (Lewis-Fernández), and Hispanic Treatment Program (Lewis-Fernández), New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Ana Gómez-Carrillo
- Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, and Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec (Jarvis, Kirmayer, Gómez-Carrillo); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); New York State Center of Excellence for Cultural Competence (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández), Anxiety Disorders Clinic (Lewis-Fernández), and Hispanic Treatment Program (Lewis-Fernández), New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Neil Krishan Aggarwal
- Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, and Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec (Jarvis, Kirmayer, Gómez-Carrillo); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); New York State Center of Excellence for Cultural Competence (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández), Anxiety Disorders Clinic (Lewis-Fernández), and Hispanic Treatment Program (Lewis-Fernández), New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Roberto Lewis-Fernández
- Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, and Culture and Mental Health Research Unit, Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec (Jarvis, Kirmayer, Gómez-Carrillo); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); New York State Center of Excellence for Cultural Competence (Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández), Anxiety Disorders Clinic (Lewis-Fernández), and Hispanic Treatment Program (Lewis-Fernández), New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| |
Collapse
|