Specific Pathogen Free - A review of strategies in agriculture, aquaculture, and laboratory mammals and how they inform new recommendations for laboratory zebrafish

Specific pathogen-free (SPF) animals are bred and managed to exclude pathogens associated with significant morbidity or mortality that may secondarily pose a risk to public health, food safety and food security, and research replicability. Generating and maintaining SPF animals requires detailed biosecurity planning for control of housing, environmental, and husbandry factors and a history of regimented pathogen testing. Successful programs involve comprehensive risk analysis and exclusion protocols that are rooted in a thorough understanding of pathogen lifecycle and modes of transmission. In this manuscript we review the current state of SPF in domestic agriculture (pigs and poultry), aquaculture (salmonids and shrimp), and small laboratory mammals. As the use of laboratory fish, especially zebrafish (Danio rerio), as models of human disease is expanding exponentially, it is prudent to define standards for SPF in this field. We use the guiding principles from other SPF industries and evaluate zebrafish pathogens against criteria to be on an SPF list, to propose recommendations for establishing and maintaining SPF laboratory zebrafish.

To pool or not to pool? Guidelines for pooling samples for use in surveillance testing of infectious diseases in aquatic animals

Samples from multiple animals may be pooled and tested to reduce costs of surveillance for infectious agents in aquatic animal populations. The primary advantage of pooling is increased population-level coverage when prevalence is low (<10%) and the number of tests is fixed, because of increased likelihood of including target analyte from at least one infected animal in a tested pool. Important questions and a priori design considerations need to be addressed. Unfortunately, pooling recommendations in disease-specific chapters of the 2018 OIE Aquatic Manual are incomplete and, except for amphibian chytrid fungus, are not supported by peer-reviewed research. A systematic review identified only 12 peer-reviewed aquatic diagnostic accuracy and surveillance studies using pooled samples. No clear patterns for pooling methods and characteristics were evident across reviewed studies, although most authors agreed there is a negative effect on detection. Therefore, our purpose was to review pooling procedures used in published aquatic infectious disease research, present evidence-based guidelines, and provide simulated data examples for white spot syndrome virus in shrimp. A decision tree of pooling guidelines was developed for use by peer-reviewed journals and research institutions for the design, statistical analysis and reporting of comparative accuracy studies of individual and pooled tests for surveillance purposes.

The impact of pooling samples on surveillance sensitivity for the megalocytivirus Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus

Movements of large volumes and species varieties make the ornamental fish industry a high-risk pathway for the transfer of aquatic pathogens to new geographical regions and naïve hosts, potentially resulting in emergency disease events. Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (genus Megalocytivirus) is considered exotic to Australia despite documented incursions since 2003. There are current import controls requiring freedom from infection for entry to Australia. The objective was to evaluate the effect of tissue pooling strategies for qPCR testing using a SYBR® assay for freedom from ISKNV at 2% expected prevalence with 95% confidence. Tissue homogenates from apparently healthy imported ornamental fish were tested as individuals and in pools of 5 and 10. Analytical sensitivity of the qPCR assay was reduced by two orders of magnitude when the nucleic acid extraction process was accounted for by spiking the plasmid in fish tissues and compared with molecular grade water. Diagnostic sensitivity of the assay was substantially reduced when testing tissues in pools compared with individual testing. For Population 1 (66% positive for ISKNV with moderate viral loads), surveillance sensitivity was only achieved using individual testing. For Population 2 (100% positive ISKNV with high viral loads), surveillance sensitivity was achieved using 260 fish in pools of 10 for a total of 26 tests or 200 fish in pools of 5 for 40 tests. Surveillance sensitivity could be maximized even when there was a reduction in pooled diagnostic sensitivity compared with diagnostic sensitivity for individual fish by increasing the sample size. Pooled sensitivity was influenced by the prevalence and variable virus load among fish with subclinical infections. Pooled testing is highly effective when the prevalence is >10% which should be informed by prior knowledge or pooling can be used for a screening test to rapidly identify populations with high prevalence.