Clinical Characteristics of Intravenous PEG-Asparaginase Hypersensitivity Reactions in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [Formula: see text]

Allergic Reactions to E. coli Asparaginase are Associated with Decreased Asparaginase Activity in an Indonesian Pediatric Population with ALL

PURPOSE

The asparaginase's (ASP) utility for ALL treatment is limited by neutralizing antibodies, which is problematic in countries whose access limited to alternative preparations. ASP antibody levels and activity was measured during remission induction and associated with allergy manifestations.

METHODS

E. coli ASP was dosed at 7500 IU/m2. ASP IgG antibody levels were quantified at the beginning and end of induction. ASP activity was measured 24 hours after 1st and 5th dose (standard-risk) or 7th dose (high-risk patients) administration, and within 24 hours in case of allergic reactions. Allergy was monitored by CTCAE version 3. Parametric and non-parametric was performed for data analysis.

RESULTS

ASP antibody and activity levels were available in 41/63 consecutive patients. Allergic manifestations occurred in 13/41, with urticaria being the most frequent. There were no significant differences in subject characteristics based on allergic reactions. The 5th dose was the most frequent time of onset. Antibody levels in allergy group at the end of induction did not differ from those at baseline (p<0.05). Using a 24-hour level of 100 mU/mL as a threshold for adequate ASP activity, 6/13 patients with allergy had adequate levels compared to 26/28 patients without (p<0.05). The ASP activity level at the end of induction phase in both groups did not show a significant decrement.

CONCLUSION

The E. coli ASP activity with adequate levels were significantly higher in non-allergy group. Its activity level was not accompanied by increment of IgG in allergic group indicates other factors might affect activity levels in allergy group.

Antibodies against Poly(ethylene glycol) Activate Innate Immune Cells and Induce Hypersensitivity Reactions to PEGylated Nanomedicines

Nanomedicines and macromolecular drugs can induce hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) with symptoms ranging from flushing and breathing difficulties to hypothermia, hypotension, and death in the most severe cases. Because many normal individuals have pre-existing antibodies that bind to poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), which is often present on the surface of nanomedicines and macromolecular drugs, we examined if and how anti-PEG antibodies induce HSRs to PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Anti-PEG IgG but not anti-PEG IgM induced symptoms of HSRs including hypothermia, altered lung function, and hypotension after PLD administration in C57BL/6 and nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice. Hypothermia was significantly reduced by blocking FcγRII/III, by depleting basophils, monocytes, neutrophils, or mast cells, and by inhibiting secretion of histamine and platelet-activating factor. Anti-PEG IgG also induced hypothermia in mice after administration of other PEGylated liposomes, nanoparticles, or proteins. Humanized anti-PEG IgG promoted binding of PEGylated nanoparticles to human immune cells and induced secretion of histamine from human basophils in the presence of PLD. Anti-PEG IgE could also induce hypersensitivity reactions in mice after administration of PLD. Our results demonstrate an important role for IgG antibodies in induction of HSRs to PEGylated nanomedicines through interaction with Fcγ receptors on innate immune cells and provide a deeper understanding of HSRs to PEGylated nanoparticles and macromolecular drugs that may facilitate development of safer nanomedicines.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG): The nature, immunogenicity, and role in the hypersensitivity of PEGylated products

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a versatile polymer that is widely used as an additive in foods and cosmetics, and as a carrier in PEGylated therapeutics. Even though PEG is thought to be less immunogenic, or perhaps even non-immunogenic, with a variety of physicochemical properties, there is mounting evidence that PEG causes immunogenic responses when conjugated with other materials such as proteins and nanocarriers. Under these conditions, PEG with other materials can result in the production of anti-PEG antibodies after administration. The antibodies that are induced seem to have a deleterious impact on the therapeutic efficacy of subsequently administered PEGylated formulations. In addition, hypersensitivity to PEGylated formulations could be a significant barrier to the utility of PEGylated products. Several reports have linked the presence of anti-PEG antibodies to incidences of complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA) following the administration of PEGylated formulations. The use of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, which are composed mainly of PEGylated lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), has recently gained wide acceptance, although many cases of post-vaccination hypersensitivity have been documented. Therefore, our review focuses not only on the importance of PEGs and its great role in improving the therapeutic efficacy of various medications, but also on the hypersensitivity reactions attributed to the use of PEGylated products that include PEG-based mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: an EAACI Position Paper

Chemotherapeutic drugs have been widely used in the treatment of cancer disease for about 70 years. The development of new treatments has not hindered their use, and oncologists still prescribe them routinely, alone or in combination with other antineoplastic agents. However, all chemotherapeutic agents can induce hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), with different incidences depending on the culprit drug. These reactions are the third leading cause of fatal drug-induced anaphylaxis in the United States. In Europe, deaths related to chemotherapy have also been reported. In particular, most reactions are caused by platinum compounds, taxanes, epipodophyllotoxins and asparaginase. Despite their prevalence and relevance, the ideal pathways for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of these reactions are still unclear, and practice remains considerably heterogeneous with vast differences from center to center. Thus, the European Network on Drug Allergy and Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology organized a task force to provide data and recommendations regarding the allergological work-up in this field of drug hypersensitivity reactions. This position paper aims to provide consensus on the investigation of HSRs to chemotherapeutic drugs and give practical recommendations for clinicians that treat these patients, such as oncologists, allergologists and internists. Key sections cover risk factors, pathogenesis, symptoms, the role of skin tests, in vitro tests, indications and contraindications of drug provocation tests and desensitization of neoplastic patients with allergic reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs. Statements, recommendations and unmet needs were discussed and proposed at the end of each section.

To PEGylate or not to PEGylate: Immunological properties of nanomedicine's most popular component, polyethylene glycol and its alternatives

Polyethylene glycol or PEG has a long history of use in medicine. Many conventional formulations utilize PEG as either an active ingredient or an excipient. PEG found its use in biotechnology therapeutics as a tool to slow down drug clearance and shield protein therapeutics from undesirable immunogenicity. Nanotechnology field applies PEG to create stealth drug carriers with prolonged circulation time and decreased recognition and clearance by the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS). Most nanomedicines approved for clinical use and experimental nanotherapeutics contain PEG. Among the most recent successful examples are two mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines that are delivered by PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. The breadth of PEG use in a wide variety of over the counter (OTC) medications as well as in drug products and vaccines stimulated research which uncovered that PEG is not as immunologically inert as it was initially expected. Herein, we review the current understanding of PEG's immunological properties and discuss them in the context of synthesis, biodistribution, safety, efficacy, and characterization of PEGylated nanomedicines. We also review the current knowledge about immunological compatibility of other polymers that are being actively investigated as PEG alternatives.

Pegaspargase: Two Pediatric Case Studies of Delayed Urticaria Preceding Anaphylactic Reactions Postadministration

Pegaspargase, a chemotherapy drug known to improve survival outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, is associated with a risk for hypersensitivity reactions. At a children's hospital in the midwestern United States, two patients developed unusual reactions consisting of disseminated urticaria about two weeks after their second dose of pegaspargase. Both patients then proceeded to have severe anaphylaxis with the third dose of pegaspargase. These cases highlight the importance of advanced practice nurses being alert for the occurrence of unusual and delayed reactions to chemotherapy administration.

Polyethylene Glycol Immunogenicity: Theoretical, Clinical, and Practical Aspects of Anti-Polyethylene Glycol Antibodies

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a flexible, hydrophilic simple polymer that is physically attached to peptides, proteins, nucleic acids, liposomes, and nanoparticles to reduce renal clearance, block antibody and protein binding sites, and enhance the half-life and efficacy of therapeutic molecules. Some naïve individuals have pre-existing antibodies that can bind to PEG, and some PEG-modified compounds induce additional antibodies against PEG, which can adversely impact drug efficacy and safety. Here we provide a framework to better understand PEG immunogenicity and how antibodies against PEG affect pegylated drug and nanoparticles. Analysis of published studies reveals rules for predicting accelerated blood clearance of pegylated medicine and therapeutic liposomes. Experimental studies of anti-PEG antibody binding to different forms, sizes, and immobilization states of PEG are also provided. The widespread use of SARS-CoV-2 RNA vaccines that incorporate PEG in lipid nanoparticles make understanding possible effects of anti-PEG antibodies on pegylated medicines even more critical.

Premedication prior to PEG-asparaginase is cost-effective in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

PEG-asparaginase is critical in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy but is highly immunogenic. Severe allergic reactions lead to substitution of further PEG-asparaginase with Erwinia. Erwinia is associated with more frequent dosing, increased expense, and limited availability. Premedication may reduce rates of allergic reactions.

PROCEDURES

This Markov model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of three strategies: premedication plus therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), TDM alone, and no premedication or TDM. We modeled two scenarios: a standard-risk (SR) B-ALL patient receiving two asparaginase doses and a high-risk (HR) patient receiving seven asparaginase doses. The model incorporated costs of asparaginase, premedication, TDM and clinic visits, and lost parental wages associated with each additional Erwinia dose. We incorporated a five-year time horizon with a societal perspective. Outcomes were Erwinia substitutions avoided and differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses evaluated model uncertainty.

RESULTS

In both scenarios, premedication was the least costly strategy. In SR and HR scenarios, premedication with monitoring resulted in 8% and 7% fewer changes to Erwinia compared with monitoring alone and 3% and 2% fewer changes compared with no premedication/monitoring, respectively. Premedication resulted in the most QALYs gained in the SR patients. Individual variation of model inputs did not change premedication/monitoring favorability for either scenario. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, premedication/monitoring was favored in >87% of iterations in both scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other strategies, premedication use and asparaginase level monitoring in children with B-ALL is potentially cost-saving.

Time Course and Management of Protracted Anaphylaxis Due to PEG-Asparaginase

Polyethylene glycosylated (PEG)-asparaginase is a cornerstone of treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and effective administration is associated with better outcomes. PEG-asparaginase is associated with a uniphasic hypersensitivity reaction in ∼10% to 20% of patients. We present a 17-year-old male individual diagnosed with very high-risk pre-B-ALL, who experienced protracted anaphylaxis 1 hour following administration of his second PEG-asparaginase dose. This type of allergic reaction has yet to be described in ALL patients treated with PEG-asparaginase. Here, we outline the time course and successful management of protracted anaphylaxis in an ALL patient.

Anti-PEG antibodies: Properties, formation, testing and role in adverse immune reactions to PEGylated nano-biopharmaceuticals

Conjugation of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) to proteins or drug delivery nanosystems is a widely accepted method to increase the therapeutic index of complex nano-biopharmaceuticals. Nevertheless, these drugs and agents are often immunogenic, triggering the rise of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Among these ADAs, anti-PEG IgG and IgM were shown to account for efficacy loss due to accelerated blood clearance of the drug (ABC phenomenon) and hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) entailing severe allergic symptoms with occasionally fatal anaphylaxis. In addition to recapitulating the basic information on PEG and its applications, this review expands on the physicochemical factors influencing its immunogenicity, the prevalence, features, mechanism of formation and detection of anti-PEG IgG and IgM and the mechanisms by which these antibodies (Abs) induce ABC and HSRs. In particular, we highlight the in vitro, animal and human data attesting to anti-PEG Ab-induced complement (C) activation as common underlying cause of both adverse effects. A main message is that correct measurement of anti-PEG Abs and individual proneness for C activation might predict the rise of adverse immune reactions to PEGylated drugs and thereby increase their efficacy and safety.

Antibodies Predict Pegaspargase Allergic Reactions and Failure of Rechallenge

PURPOSE

Pegaspargase (PEG-ASP) has largely replaced native Escherichia coli asparaginase (L-ASP) in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia because of its longer half-life and lower immunogenicity. Risk factors for allergic reactions to PEG-ASP remain unclear. Here, we identify risk factors for reactions in a front-line acute lymphoblastic leukemia trial and assess the usefulness of serum antibodies for diagnosing allergy and predicting rechallenge outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PEG-ASP was administered to 598 patients in St Jude's Total XVI study. Results were compared with Total XV study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00549848 and NCT00137111), which used native L-ASP. Serum samples (n = 5,369) were analyzed for anti-PEG-ASP immunoglobulin G by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Positive samples were tested for anti-polyethylene glycol (PEG) and anti-L-ASP. We analyzed potential risk factors for reactions and associations between antibodies and reactions, rechallenge outcomes, and PEG-ASP pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Grade 2 to 4 reactions were less common in the Total XVI study with PEG-ASP (81 [13.5%] of 598) than in the Total XV study with L-ASP (169 [41.2%] of 410; P = 1.4 × 10-23). For Total XVI, anti-PEG, not anti-L-ASP, was the predominant component of anti-PEG-ASP antibodies (96%). In a multivariable analysis, more intrathecal therapy (IT) predicted fewer reactions (P = 2.4 × 10-5), which is consistent with an immunosuppressant contribution of IT. Anti-PEG-ASP was associated with accelerated drug clearance (P = 5.0 × 10-6). Failure of rechallenge after initial reactions was associated with anti-PEG-ASP (P = .0078) and was predicted by the occurrence of angioedema with first reaction (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Less IT therapy was the only independent clinical risk factor for reactions to PEG-ASP. PEG, and not L-ASP, is the major antigen that causes allergic reactions. Anti-PEG-ASP has utility in predicting and confirming clinical reactions to PEG-ASP as well as in identifying patients who are most likely to experience failure with rechallenge.