And [They] Even Followed Her Into the Hospital: Primary Care Providers' Attitudes Toward Referral for Traditional Healing Practices and Integrating Care for Indigenous Patients

The use of experimental vignette studies to identify drivers of variations in the delivery of health care: a scoping review

Background

Identifying how unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery arise is challenging. Experimental vignette studies can help, by isolating and manipulating potential drivers of differences in care. There is a lack of methodological and practical guidance on how to design and conduct these studies robustly. The aim of this study was to locate, methodologically assess, and synthesise the contribution of experimental vignette studies to the identification of drivers of unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery.

Methods

We used a scoping review approach. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL databases (2007–2019) using terms relating to vignettes and variations in healthcare. We screened title/abstracts and full text to identify studies using experimental vignettes to examine drivers of variations in healthcare delivery. Included papers were assessed against a methodological framework synthesised from vignette study design recommendations within and beyond healthcare.

Results

We located 21 eligible studies. Study participants were almost exclusively clinicians (18/21). Vignettes were delivered via text (n = 6), pictures (n = 6), video (n = 6) or interactively, using face-to-face, telephone or online simulated consultations (n = 3). Few studies evaluated the credibility of vignettes, and many had flaws in their wider study design. Ten were of good methodological quality. Studies contributed to understanding variations in care, most commonly by testing hypotheses that could not be examined directly using real patients.

Conclusions

Experimental vignette studies can be an important methodological tool for identifying how unwarranted variations in care can arise. Flaws in study design or conduct can limit their credibility or produce biased results. Their full potential has yet to be realised.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01247-4.

Advancing Excellence in Community Health Nursing Through Evidence-Based National Standards of Practice

BACKGROUND

Current standards of practice are necessary to ensure safe nursing practice in Canada and across the world. This article aimed to describe and present findings from the rigorous review process undertaken to update the 2011 Canadian Community Health Nursing Standards of Practice.

METHOD

A revision process included a scoping review of the literature, focus groups, and a modified Delphi method.

RESULTS

Through the inclusive consultation process, 495 community health nurses enhanced the content of the standards with respect to cultural safety, cultural humility, Indigenous health and ways of knowing, health equity, and evidence-informed practice.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive revision process can guide other nursing specialty groups developing or revising specialized practice standards in Canada and across the world. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2021;52(4):168-175.].

The influence of undertreated chronic pain in a national survey: Prescription medication misuse among American indians, Asian Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics and whites

Objective

Disparities in the assessment and treatment of chronic pain among racial/ethnic may lead to self-treatment for undertreated pain. This study examines whether pain intensity among US racial/ethnic groups’ influences rates of psychotherapeutic prescription drug misuse.

Methods

Data included civilian, non-institutionalized adults (age 18–99 years) residing in the United States (n = 34,653) from Waves 1 and 2 of the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions (NESARC; 2004–2005). The primary outcome variable was prescription drug misuse/PDM (i.e., use without a prescription or other than as prescribed) including tranquilizers, sedatives, stimulants, or opioids. Predictor variables included self-reported race/ethnicity (American Indian, Black, Hispanic, or White) and pain intensity. Data were analyzed in 2019.

Results

Overall, White and Hispanic participants’ pain intensity had a significantly curvilinear relationship with frequency of prescription medication (p < 0.01). PDM rose with pain intensity until pain levels reached “severe,” then PDM rates fell, not significantly differing from the “no pain” levels (χ²(1) = 0.65, p = 0.42). PDM rates for Black participants remained lowest of all other racial/ethnic groups and plateaued with increasing pain intensity.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that undertreated chronic pain may drive rates of PDM among varying racial/ethnic groups. Providing equitable assessment and treatment of pain intensity remains critical. Additional research is needed to examine provider decision-making and unconscious bias, as well as patient health beliefs surrounding perceived need for prescription pain medications.

•

Prescription drug misuse (PDM) rates vary by racial/ethnic groups.

•

Pain intensity appears to affect PDM.

•

PDM is not more likely in Black patients than Whites.

•

PDM reduction in racial/ethnic populations must address provider implicit bias.

•

Provider education needs include differences in cultural pain expression.