1
|
Henle CA, Shore LM, Morton JW, Conroy SA. Putting a Spotlight on the Ostracizer: Intentional Workplace Ostracism Motives. GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/10596011221092863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Workplace ostracism is a prevalent and detrimental type of mistreatment. To curtail this harmful behavior, researchers need to identify who is more likely to intentionally ostracize others at work and the motives that drive them to do so. Past reviews of workplace ostracism focus primarily on the outcomes of ostracism, and the few that address the antecedents often examine a limited set of variables. We examined themes in the ostracism literature and determined that employees intentionally ostracize others due to either punitive or defensive motives. Punitive motives are focused on protecting the interests of the group, whereas defensive motives pertain to defending the interests of the self. We present a model of the ostracizer based on these motives and the associated perceptions of threat and negative emotions that precipitate ostracism. Our model provides an extension of the workplace ostracism literature by presenting a testable theoretical framework, rooted in appraisal theory, to explain why and when employees are likely to ostracize others at work. We also provided suggestions for an expansion of the ostracizer motives literature, with the goal of encouraging research that provides greater understanding of the perspective of the ostracizer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine A. Henle
- Department of Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Lynn M. Shore
- Department of Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
- Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organisation, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Tweekerkenstraat, Gent, Belgium
| | - John W. Morton
- Department of Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Samantha A. Conroy
- Department of Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levine JM. Factional conflict in groups: How majorities and minorities relate to one another. GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS 2017. [DOI: 10.1177/1368430217702726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Disagreement between numerically larger (majority) and smaller (minority) factions in groups is both common and consequential. For these reasons, there is a long tradition of social psychological interest in the causes and consequences of such disagreement. Early work focused on minority members’ movement toward the majority (majority influence) and majority members’ (negative) perceptions and evaluations of those who refused to move. Later work focused on similarities and differences between majority influence and its mirror opposite, minority influence, and on majority members’ (sometimes relatively positive) perceptions and evaluations of minority members. This paper summarizes current knowledge on these topics and suggests promising avenues for future research.
Collapse
|