Meaning and agency in discussing end-of-life care: a study of elderly veterans' values and interpretations

Factors Impacting Advance Decision Making and Health Care Agent Appointment among Taiwanese Urban Residents after the Passage of Patient Right to Autonomy Act

In recent years, advance care planning (ACP) promotion in Taiwan has expanded beyond clinical practice to the broader population. This study aims to investigate people's attitudes toward ACP and to identify factors influencing their signing of advance directives (ADs) and appointment of health care agents (HCAs).

METHODS

We identified 2337 ACP participants from consultation records between 2019 and 2020. The relationships among the participants' characteristics, AD completion, and HCA appointment were investigated.

RESULTS

Of 2337 cases, 94.1% completed ADs and 87.8% were appointed HCAs. Welfare entitlement (OR = 0.47, p < 0.001), the place ACP progressed (OR = 0.08, p < 0.001), the participation of second-degree relatives (OR = 2.50, p < 0.001), and the intention of not being a family burden (OR = 1.65, p = 0.010) were significantly correlated with AD completion. The probability of appointing HCAs was higher in participants with family caregiving experience (OR = 1.42, p < 0.05), who were single (OR = 1.49, p < 0.05), and who expected a good death with dignity (OR = 1.65, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our research shows that adopting ACP discussion in Taiwan is feasible, which encourages ACP conversation and facilitates AD completion.

IMPLICATIONS

Male and younger adults may need extra encouragement to discuss ACP matters with their families.

LIMITATIONS

due to sampling restrictions, our data were chosen from an urban district to ensure the integrity of the results. Furthermore, interview data could be collected in future research to supplement the quantitative results.

Experience as an Informal Caregiver and Discussions Regarding Advance Care Planning in Japan

CONTEXT

Advance care planning (ACP) is vital for end-of-life care management. Experiences as informal family caregivers might act as a catalyst to promote ACP.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the association between ACP discussions and caregiving experiences.

METHODS

A nationwide survey in Japan was conducted in December 2016 using a quota sampling method to select a sample representative of the general Japanese population. The responses of 3167 individuals aged 20-84 years (mean age: 50.9 ± 16.8) were analyzed. The outcome was measured by asking if respondents had ever engaged in ACP discussions. The exposure was measured by asking whether and for how long respondents had experience as informal caregivers for family members. We analyzed informal caregiving experience related to the occurrence of ACP discussions using multivariable logistic regression models that adjusted for possible covariates.

RESULTS

Respondents with informal caregiving experience had significantly higher odds of having ACP discussions than those without caregiving experience (adjusted odds ratio: 1.93, 95% CI = 1.63, 2.29). Stronger effects were identified in younger adults (aged 20-65 years) and those with a higher education level (education duration > 12 years) than in older adults (aged ≥65 years) and those with a lower education level, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Experiences as informal caregivers for family members may facilitate ACP discussions among Japanese adults, especially younger adults with higher educational attainment. Our findings may help health-care providers screen those at risk for inadequate ACP discussions, and informal caregiving experience should be considered when health-care providers initiate discussions of end-of-life care.

Experiences and perspectives of older people regarding advance care planning: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND

Studies have indicated that family members or health professionals may not know or predict their older relatives' or patients' health preferences. Although advance care planning is encouraged for older people to prepare end-of-life care, it is still challenging.

AIM

To understand the experiences and perspectives of older people regarding advance care planning.

DESIGN

A systematic review of qualitative studies and meta-synthesis was conducted.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched.

RESULTS

A total of 50 articles were critically appraised and a thematic synthesis was undertaken. Four themes were identified: life versus death, internal versus external, benefits versus burdens, and controlling versus being controlled. The view of life and death influenced older people's willingness to discuss their future. The characteristics, experiences, health status, family relationship, and available resources also affected their plans of advance care planning. Older people needed to balance the benefits and burdens of advance care planning, and then judge their own ability to make decisions about end-of-life care.

CONCLUSION

Older people's perspectives and experiences of advance care planning were varied and often conflicted; cultural differences amplified variances among older people. Truthful information, available resources, and family support are needed to enable older people to maintain dignity at the end of life. The views of life and death for older people from different cultures should be compared to assist health professionals to understand older people's attitudes toward advance care planning, and thus to develop appropriate strategies to promote advance care planning in different cultures.

Active and non-active agents: residents’ agency in assisted living

Culturally, institutional care has been seen to strip older people of their status as full adult members of society and turn them into ‘have-nots’ in terms of agency. The substantial emphasis in gerontology of measuring the activity and functional ability of the elderly has unintentionally fostered these stereotypes, as have traditional definitions of agency that emphasise individuals’ choices and capacities. The aim of this paper is to discover what kind of opportunities to feel agentic exist for people who have reduced functional abilities and therefore reside in assisted living. In this paper, agency is approached empirically from the viewpoint of Finnish sheltered housing residents. The data were gathered using participant observation and thematic interviews. This study suggests that even people with substantial declines in their functional abilities may feel more or less agentic depending on their functional and material surroundings and the support they receive from the staff, relatives and other residents. The perception that residents’ agency in assisted living cannot be reduced to measurable activity has methodological implications for gerontological research on agency. Care providers can utilise our findings in reasserting their residents’ quality of life.

"He's on his dying bed": Next-of-kin's experiences of the dying body

For family members of dying patients who have grown accustomed to providing daily body care, the transition from home to hospital is stressful. The authors used the experiences surrounding death for 78 U.S. veterans who died in a Veterans Affairs hospital. The research is based on interviews conducted with the decedent's next-of-kin. Secondary qualitative analysis of previously-coded transcribed interviews was used. Themes of social disorganization and a loss of control over the body emerged. Next-of-kin experienced the physical and functional breakdown of their loved one's body. Understanding the nature of the loss of control may help alleviate the loss of control may help alleviate the strain on families.

Nebraska veterans' preferences for end-of-life care

More than 1,800 veterans die in a variety of healthcare settings each day, illustrating a need to improve their end-of-life (EOL) care. In 2006, the Nebraska End-of-Life Survey was mailed to 2,713 urban and rural Nebraskan adults' homes; 44 of 324 first-time respondents (14%) were veterans. This article compares survey responses from veterans and nonveterans and discusses four issues: personal desires during the dying process, fear of dying, completion of advance directives, and communication preferences. Compared to nonveterans, veterans were significantly less likely to want friends or family visiting at EOL, less likely to place importance on being at peace spiritually, less afraid of dying alone, more likely to turn to a spouse to initiate EOL conversations, and less trusting of primary physicians on EOL issues. In addition, veterans had higher rates of completion of advance directives. Examining the survey responses can help guide clinical oncology nurses in delivering EOL care to veterans.

Advance Directive Decision Making Among Independent Community-Dwelling Older Adults

The purpose of this systematic review of health science literature was to examine the current state of science regarding advance directive decision making (ADDM) among independent community-dwelling older adults. Seventeen studies fitting study inclusion criteria established for the purpose of this systematic review were examined. Findings revealed that ADDM has predominantly been explored among widowed, divorced, or never married female Caucasian independent community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older possessing a high school level of education. Numerous older adult/health care provider barriers to advance directive discussion and completion were found to exist. There is a lack of research regarding ADDM among independent community-dwelling male older adults, older adults from various ethnic and cultural backgrounds, and older adults receiving lower levels of education. Study replication and the implementation of new studies are needed to strengthen the existing body of older adult, advance directive, evidence-based research.

Identifying and responding to ethical and methodological issues in after-death interviews with next-of-kin

After-death research with next-of-kin can enhance our understanding of end-of-life care and translate into better services for dying persons and their survivors. This article describes ethical and methodological issues that emerged in a pilot of a face-to-face interview guide designed to elicit next-of-kin's perceptions of end-of-life care. The pilot study was part of a larger Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research protocol to improve end-of-life care in VA Medical Centers. By deconstructing the research process from an ethical perspective and engaging in critical self-assessment, the authors aim to inform other researchers of potential problems involved in after-death research with next-of-kin.

End-of-life decisions: family views on advance directives

A cross-sectional survey was administered to family members of patients who died at 1 of the 5 Catholic institutions comprising Mercy Health Partners, a health care system in Ohio, to determine their opinions about patient and family participation in decisions about end-of-life care. Among 165 respondents, 118 (86%) of 138 agreed that the family was encouraged to join in decisions and 133 (91%) of 146 that their family member's health care choices were followed. Most agreed that nurses answered their questions (93%, 141/151) and that the doctor communicated well with family members (83%, 128/155). Seventy percent (107/152) indicated that their family member had at least 1 advance directive. There were no differences in whether health care choices were followed when patients with formal advance directives (92%, 92/100) were compared with patients without formal advance directives (88%, 35/40). A unique survey instrument can be used to measure family perceptions and opinions of participation in decisions about end-of-life care.

Feeling like a burden to others: a systematic review focusing on the end of life

Research into the burden of illness has focused predominantly on family caregivers, with little consideration of the other side of the caregiving relationship-care recipients' perspectives on having become a 'burden to others'. However, there is now a small but growing body of evidence to suggest that worry about creating burden to others is a common and troubling concern for people who are nearing the end of their lives. This concern is referred to as 'self-perceived burden'. The present study provides a systematic review of the literature, addressing self-perceived burden at the end of life. Using standard methods, literature was searched for relevant studies in palliative care and related fields. The review revealed that self-perceived burden is reported as a significant problem by 19- 65% of terminally ill patients. It is correlated with loss of dignity, suffering, and a 'bad death'. Self-perceived burden has also been identified as a relevant factor in death-hastening acts among patients with life-threatening illness, as well as in clinical decisions, such as the choice of place of care at the end of life, advance directives, and acceptance of treatment. Given the unique challenges faced by patients with advanced disease and their families, there is a need for further investigation into this under-researched area.

The Illness Experience of Older Adults near the End of Life: a Systematic Review

A systematic literature review identified qualitative studies of issues important to older people near the end of their lives, to develop a model of the illness experience near the end of life based on the views of older people. Six elements were identified from 40 studies that comprise a core domain of the experience of illness while dying: burden, suffering, hope, dignity, decision making, and control and autonomy. These elements were interwoven with three main themes: contextual factors, perceptions and concerns, and response to illness. Collectively, the core domain and the three themes comprise a model of the experience of illness near the end of life.

The role of narrative in discussing end-of-life care: eliciting values and goals from text, context, and subtext

This article reports a qualitative study of elderly veterans' perceptions of and preferences for end-of-life care. At a large urban Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital, we asked 30 veterans and 30 health care providers to define 4 terms in the VA form of the advance directive: life-sustaining treatment, terminal condition, state of permanent unconsciousness, and decision-making capacity. The veterans commonly used narratives to construct meaning, and analysis showed that the resulting texts had both a subtext (the values and goals driving the narrative) and a context (life experiences that filter and shape the current interpretation). We found that all 3 components--text, subtext, and context--are crucial to understanding the central theme of an individual's narrative and the decision-making processes associated with it. In this article we examine 1 lengthy narrative using Chafe's (1994) notion of intonation units. We then present a series of short narratives to demonstrate 3 subthemes that emerged from the data: quality of life versus quantity of life, benefit of treatment versus cost of treatment, and, most common, control versus lack of control. Our goal was to demonstrate the centrality and usefulness of storytelling in the patient-provider interaction when listeners are willing to consider the subtext and context of the story and its role in the decision-making process. As demonstrated in this study, deciphering people's stories gives us insight into their values, the mental constructs that drive their decision making, and the goals that they have for their own health care.

Developmental and contextual correlates of elders' anticipated end-of-life treatment decisions

The purpose of this study was to gain insight into developmental and contextual correlates of the aggressiveness in treatment that community-based elders anticipate they will desire at the end of life. Elders completed questionnaires to measure 4 developmental factors (integrated moral reasoning, self-transcendence, past experience with life-threatening illness, and age) and five contextual factors (education level, gender, ethnicity, current health status, and completion of a living will). The variance in desired aggressiveness in treatment was explained by both developmental and contextual correlates. Integrated moral reasoning emerged as a new variable to consider in gaining understanding of the process of end-of-life decisions.

Patients' and healthcare providers' understandings of life-sustaining treatment: are perceptions of goals shared or divergent?

In this cross-sectional qualitative study, researchers performed in-depth, semistructured interviews with 30 pairs of patients and their primary care providers in an outpatient clinic of a large, urban Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center in the United States. During audiotaped interviews to assess their understanding of advance directive concepts, participants were asked what "life-sustaining treatment" means to them and why they think of it in the way they do. The findings indicate that patients and providers in the United States tend to view and discuss life-sustaining treatment in terms of four goals for end-of-life care: (1) extending the length of life, (2) improving the quality of life, (3) maintaining or improving specific biological functions, and (4) assisting the body for a temporary period of time. Patients thought providers were more concerned with extending the length of life than with quality-based outcomes, and patients often discussed life-sustaining treatment as acceptable means for short-term but not long-term use. Many providers indicated that they struggle with conflicting quality-based and physiologic care goals. The findings highlight the importance of eliciting patient preferences not only for specific types of treatment, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but also for end-of-life care goals or desired health-related outcomes, such as maximizing the quantity of life. The findings also suggest that advance directives and patient-provider discussions that focus on acceptable health states and valued life activities may be better suited to patients' end-of-life care goals than those that focus on specific medical interventions.

Perspectives of Elderly Veterans Regarding Communication with Medical Providers about End-of-Life Care

OBJECTIVE

To explore patients' perspectives concerning communication with medical providers about end-of-life (EOL) care.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey involving semistructured interviews.

SETTING

Outpatient primary care clinic of a large, urban Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS

Male and female veterans who were 60 years or older, ambulatory, able to speak and read English, residing in the community, receiving outpatient care from the VA, not acutely ill (i.e., not hospitalized or in obvious distress), and not cognitively impaired.

METHODS

During audiotaped interviews to assess understanding of advance directive concepts, all 30 participants were asked what advice they would give medical students or trainees about how to discuss EOL care with patients. The audiotapes of their open-ended responses were transcribed, coded, and examined using qualitative content analysis, a systematic and replicable technique to uncover meaning by detecting commonalities and regularities of speech.

RESULTS

Seven essential elements of advice for medical providers emerged: engage in strategies to ensure patient understanding (mentioned by 30% of participants), communicate honestly and truthfully (27%), develop a compassionate bedside manner (27%), treat others as you would want to be treated (20%), provide empathic care (20%), take the time needed to communicate (20%), and determine patient information and decision-making preferences (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Effective EOL discussions with patients require attention to the content, process, and perception of patient-provider communication.