1
|
Dahlem CH, Dwan M, Dobbs B, Rich R, Jaffe K, Shuman CJ. Using RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate Recovery Opioid Overdose Team Plus: A Peer-Led Post-overdose Quick Response Team. Community Ment Health J 2024:10.1007/s10597-024-01319-x. [PMID: 39044057 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-024-01319-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
Peer recovery coaches utilize their lived experiences to support overdose survivors, a role gaining prominence across communities. A convergent mixed methods design, informed by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, was used to evaluate the Recovery Opioid Overdose Team Plus (ROOT +), through an iterative evaluation using web-based surveys and qualitative interviews. Reach: Over 27 months, ROOT + responded to 83% of suspected overdose referrals (n = 607) and engaged with 41% of survivors (n = 217) and 7% of survivors' family/friends (n = 38). Effectiveness: Among those initially engaged with ROOT +, 36% of survivors remained engaged, entered treatment, or were in recovery at 90 days post-overdose (n = 77). Adoption: First responders completed 77% of ROOT + referrals (n = 468). Implementation: Barriers included lack of awareness of ROOT + , working phones, and access to treatment from community partner interviews (n = 15). Maintenance: Adaptations to ROOT + were made to facilitate implementation. Peer-led teams are promising models to engage with overdose survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin Hwa Dahlem
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N. Ingalls Rm 3174, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking, and Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Mary Dwan
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N. Ingalls Rm 3174, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Kaitlyn Jaffe
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Clayton J Shuman
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N. Ingalls Rm 3174, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking, and Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plys E, Giraldo-Santiago N, Ehmann M, Brewer J, Presciutti AM, Rush C, McDermott K, Greenberg J, Ritchie C, Vranceanu AM. "They really trust us!": Medical Interpreter's Roles and Experiences in an Integrated Primary Care Clinic. SOCIAL WORK IN MENTAL HEALTH 2024; 22:715-733. [PMID: 39157005 PMCID: PMC11326538 DOI: 10.1080/15332985.2024.2379455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
This study describes medical interpreters' experiences with behavioral health (BH) services in a primary care clinic. Focus group data with medical interpreters representing multiple languages was analyzed using hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis. Themes related to interpreter roles were: (1) case management, (2) patient-interpreter relationship, and (3) patient-provider liaison. Themes related to barriers and facilitators to interpreter-mediated BH care were: (1) cultural factors, (2) patient-provider interactions, (3) BH-specific considerations, and (4) clinic factors. Results illustrate ways that interpreters directly (e.g., interpreter-mediated services) and indirectly (e.g., relationship building) support care. The interpreter-patient relationship reportedly helped improve patient attitudes and buy-in for BH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Plys
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Harvard Medical School
| | - Natalia Giraldo-Santiago
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Madison Ehmann
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Julie Brewer
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | | | - Christina Rush
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Harvard Medical School
| | - Katherine McDermott
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Harvard Medical School
| | - Jonathan Greenberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Harvard Medical School
| | - Christine Ritchie
- Harvard Medical School
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Harvard Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Latimer A, Pope ND, Lin CY, Kang J, Sasdi O, Wu JR, Moser DK, Lennie T. Adapting the serious illness conversation guide for unhoused older adults: a rapid qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:153. [PMID: 38886741 PMCID: PMC11181539 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01485-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults experiencing homelessness (OAEH) age quickly and die earlier than their housed counterparts. Illness-related decisions are best guided by patients' values, but healthcare and homelessness service providers need support in facilitating these discussions. The Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) is a communication tool to guide discussions but has not yet been adapted for OAEH. METHODS We aimed to adapt the SICG for use with OAEH by nurses, social workers, and other homelessness service providers. We conducted semi-structured interviews with homelessness service providers and cognitive interviews with OAEH using the SICG. Service providers included nurses, social workers, or others working in homeless settings. OAEH were at least 50 years old and diagnosed with a serious illness. Interviews were conducted and audio recorded in shelters, transitional housing, a hospital, public spaces, and over Zoom. The research team reviewed transcripts, identifying common themes across transcripts and applying analytic notetaking. We summarized transcripts from each participant group, applying rapid qualitative analysis. For OAEH, data that referenced proposed adaptations or feedback about the SICG tool were grouped into two domains: "SICG interpretation" and "SICG feedback". For providers, we used domains from the Toolkit of Adaptation Approaches: "collaborative working", "team", "endorsement", "materials", "messages", and "delivery". Summaries were grouped into matrices to help visualize themes to inform adaptations. The adapted guide was then reviewed by expert palliative care clinicians for further refinement. RESULTS The final sample included 11 OAEH (45% Black, 61 ± 7 years old) and 10 providers (80% White, 8.9 ± years practice). Adaptation themes included changing words and phrases to (1) increase transparency about the purpose of the conversation, (2) promote OAEH autonomy and empowerment, (3) align with nurses' and social workers' scope of practice regarding facilitating diagnostic and prognostic awareness, and (4) be sensitive to the realities of fragmented healthcare. Responses also revealed training and implementation considerations. CONCLUSIONS The adapted SICG is a promising clinical tool to aid in the delivery of serious illness conversations with OAEH. Future research should use this updated guide for implementation planning. Additional adaptations may be dependent on specific settings where the SICG will be delivered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Latimer
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
| | - Natalie D Pope
- College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Chin-Yen Lin
- College of Nursing, University of Auburn, Auburn, Alabama, USA
| | - JungHee Kang
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Olivia Sasdi
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jia-Rong Wu
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Debra K Moser
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Terry Lennie
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huberty J, Beatty CC. Integrating science into digital health workflows: A strategic approach for leaders. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076241296572. [PMID: 39502484 PMCID: PMC11536571 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241296572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 11/08/2024] Open
Abstract
As the digital health industry becomes increasingly competitive, companies must integrate science cross-functionally to drive innovation and differentiation. However, many companies face significant challenges in effectively leveraging science across their organization. This commentary explores the common obstacles digital health companies encounter when integrating science, including limited C-suite understanding, siloed structures, resource constraints, change resistance, and value demonstration challenges. We provide practical strategies for overcoming each challenge, such as educating leadership on science's strategic importance, fostering cross-functional collaboration, prioritizing high-impact initiatives, facilitating open dialogue, and quantifying science's measurable impact. By proactively addressing these hurdles through targeted solutions, companies can successfully integrate science across teams and functions. Effective cross-functional science integration will enable companies to leverage scientific insights, drive product innovation, build credibility through evidence-based outcomes, and ultimately gain a competitive advantage in the rapidly evolving digital health landscape. Strong scientific leadership that champions integration through clear communication, strategic prioritization, and cultural buy-in is essential for achieving long-term success.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rochon EA, Sy M, Phillips M, Anderson E, Plys E, Ritchie C, Vranceanu AM. Bio-Experiential Technology to Support Persons With Dementia and Care Partners at Home (TEND): Protocol for an Intervention Development Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e52799. [PMID: 38157239 PMCID: PMC10787328 DOI: 10.2196/52799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer disease and related dementias are debilitating and incurable diseases. Persons with dementia and their informal caregivers (ie, dyads) experience high rates of emotional distress and negative health outcomes. Several barriers prevent dyads from engaging in psychosocial care including cost, transportation, and a lack of treatments that target later stages of dementia and target the dyad together. Technologically informed treatment and serious gaming have been shown to be feasible and effective among persons living with dementia and their care partners. To increase access, there is a need for technologically informed psychosocial interventions which target the dyad, together in the home. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop the toolkit for experiential well-being in dementia, a dyadic, "bio-experiential" intervention for persons with dementia and their caregivers. Per our conceptual model, the toolkit for experiential well-being in dementia platform aims to target sustained attention, positive emotions, and active engagement among dyads. In this paper, we outline the protocol and conceptual model for intervention development and partnership with design and development experts. METHODS We followed the National Institutes of Health (NIH) stage model (stage 1A) and supplemented the model with principles of user-centered design. The first step includes understanding user needs, goals, and strengths. We met this step by engaging in methodology and definition synthesis and conducting focus groups with dementia care providers (N=10) and persons with dementia and caregivers (N=11). Step 2 includes developing and refining the prototype. We will meet this step by engaging dyads in up to 20 iterations of platform β testing workshops. Step 3 includes observing user interactions with the prototype. We will meet this step by releasing the platform for feasibility testing. RESULTS Key takeaways from the focus groups include balancing individualization and the dyadic relationship and avoiding confusing stimuli. As of September 2023, we have completed focus groups with providers, persons with dementia, and their caregivers. Additionally, we have conducted 4 iterations of β testing workshops with dyads. Feedback from focus groups informed the β testing workshops; data have not yet been formally analyzed and will be reported in future publications. CONCLUSIONS Technological interventions, particularly "bio-experiential" technology, can be used in dementia care to support emotional health among persons with a diagnosis and caregivers. Here, we outline a collaborative intervention development process of bio-experiential technology through a research, design, and development partnership. Next, we are planning to test the platform's feasibility as well as its impact on clinical outcomes and mechanisms of action. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/52799.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Rochon
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Maimouna Sy
- Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness and the Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Evan Plys
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Christine Ritchie
- Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness and the Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goldstein KM, Patel DB, Van Loon KA, Shapiro A, Rushton S, Lewinski AA, Lanford TJ, Cantrell S, Zullig LL, Wilson SM, Shepherd-Banigan M, Alton Dailey S, Sims C, Robinson C, Chawla N, Bosworth HB, Hamilton A, Naylor J, Gierisch JM. Optimizing the Equitable Deployment of Virtual Care for Women: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Examining Patient and Provider Perspectives Supplemented with Primary Qualitative Data. Health Equity 2023; 7:570-580. [PMID: 37731781 PMCID: PMC10507937 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2023.0089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Women experience numerous barriers to patient-centered health care (e.g., lack of continuity). Such barriers are amplified for women from marginalized communities. Virtual care may improve equitable access. We are conducting a partner-engaged, qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) of patients' and providers' experiences with virtual health care delivery for women. Methods We use a best-fit framework approach informed by the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability framework and Public Health Critical Race Praxis. We will supplement published literature with qualitative interviews with women from underrepresented communities and their health care providers. We will engage patients and other contributors through multiple participatory methods. Results Our search identified 5525 articles published from 2010 to 2022. Sixty were eligible, of which 42 focused on women and 24 on provider experiences. Data abstraction and analysis are ongoing. Discussion This work offers four key innovations to advance health equity: (1) conceptual foundation rooted in an antiracist action-oriented praxis; (2) worked example of centering QES on marginalized communities; (3) supplementing QES with primary qualitative information with populations historically marginalized in the health care system; and (4) participatory approaches that foster longitudinal partnered engagement. Health Equity Implications Our approach to exploring virtual health care for women demonstrates an antiracist praxis to inform knowledge generation. In doing so, we aim to generate findings that can guide health care systems in the equitable deployment of comprehensive virtual care for women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M. Goldstein
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dhara B. Patel
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine A. Van Loon
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Abigail Shapiro
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sharron Rushton
- School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison A. Lewinski
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tiera J. Lanford
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah Cantrell
- School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center Library, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leah L. Zullig
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah M. Wilson
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- VA VISN-6 Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research and Education Clinical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Susan Alton Dailey
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Catherine Sims
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cheryl Robinson
- Clinical Translational Sciences Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Veteran Research Engagement Panel, VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Neetu Chawla
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation Implementation and Policy, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hayden B. Bosworth
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alison Hamilton
- VA Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation Implementation and Policy, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jennifer Naylor
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- VA VISN-6 Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research and Education Clinical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer M. Gierisch
- VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|