Malignant irreversible intestinal obstruction: the powerful association of octreotide to corticosteroids, antiemetics, and analgesics

MASCC multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the management of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations on the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) for patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) MBO study group conducted a systematic review of databases (inception to March 2021) to identify studies about patients with advanced cancer and MBO that reported on the following outcomes: symptom management, bowel obstruction resolution, prognosis, overall survival, and quality of life. The review was restricted to studies published in English, but no restrictions were placed on publication year, country, and study type. As per the MASCC Guidelines Policy, the findings were synthesized to determine the levels of evidence to support each MBO intervention and, ultimately, the graded recommendations and suggestions.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 17,656 published studies and 397 selected for the guidelines. The MASCC study group developed a total of 25 evidence-based suggestions and recommendations about the management of MBO-related nausea and vomiting, bowel movements, pain, inflammation, bowel decompression, and nutrition. Expert consensus-based guidance about advanced care planning and psychosocial support is also provided.

CONCLUSION

This MASCC Guideline provides comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations about MBO management for patients with advanced cancer.

Somatostatin Analogues Compared With Placebo and Other Pharmacologic Agents in the Management of Symptoms of Inoperable Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Somatostatin analogues are commonly used to relieve symptoms in malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) but are more expensive than other antisecretory agents.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the evidence of effectiveness of somatostatin analogues compared with placebo and/or other pharmacologic agents in relieving vomiting in patients with inoperable MBO.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases were systematically searched; reference lists of relevant articles were hand searched. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used.

RESULTS

The search identified 420 unique studies. Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria (six octreotide studies and one lanreotide); 220 people administered somatostatin analogues and 207 placebo or hyoscine butylbromide. Three RCTs compared a somatostatin analogue with placebo and four with hyoscine butylbromide. Two adequately powered multicenter RCTs with a low Cochrane risk of bias reported no significant difference between somatostatin analogues and placebo in their primary end points. Four RCTs with a high/unclear Cochrane risk of bias reported that somatostatin analogues were more effective than hyoscine butylbromide in reducing vomiting.

CONCLUSION

There is low-level evidence of benefit with somatostatin analogues in the symptomatic treatment of MBO. However, high-level evidence from trials with low risk of bias found no benefit of somatostatin analogues for their primary outcome. There is debate regarding the clinically relevant study end point for symptom control in MBO and when it should be measured. The role of somatostatin analogues in this clinical situation requires further adequately powered, well-designed trials with agreed clinically important end points and measures.

Malignant bowel obstruction: A retrospective clinical analysis

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a disease with a poor prognosis, particularly in patients with advanced bowel or gynecological cancers. Multimodality teatments may be used to relieve the symptoms in patients with MBO; however, there is currently no consensus regarding the optimal treatment and no strong evidence supporting the efficacy of any treatment in improving the quality of life (QOL) and prolonging survival. We conducted a search through our medical center database of cancer registries for MBO cases between January, 1995 and December, 2008 and analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and association between treatments and prognosis or QOL. The primary type of cancer causing MBO was found to be adenocarcinoma of colon. The overall survival time was found to be significantly higher among patients presenting with MBO as the initial symptom and improved QOL was achieved in patients who received surgical treatment. The mean survival time and the functional status of colorectal cancer patients receiving targeted therapy and chemotherapy were more satisfactory compared with those receiving surgery alone or conservative treatment. Furthermore, for end-stage cancer patients with MBO, hospice care was effective in reducing pain scores and relieving the symptoms of the disease.

Octreotide prescribing patterns in the palliation of symptomatic inoperable malignant bowel obstruction patients at a single US academic hospital

BACKGROUND

Medical management is the cornerstone of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) therapy and may include antisecretory agents such as octreotide. Currently, no data exist regarding octreotide prescribing patterns in US academic hospitals in the palliation of inoperable MBO. The aim of this study is to collect octreotide prescribing data to shape future prospective studies.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review evaluated inpatient inoperable MBO admissions at a single academic US hospital between 2008 and 2011. The prescribing primary service (medical vs. surgical), inpatient day initiated, average octreotide daily dose, cumulative octreotide dose, days receiving octreotide, length of stay (LOS), subject age, cancer stage, lines of chemotherapy, cancer type, and overall survival were analyzed utilizing a Wilcoxon rank sum test, Spearman rank correlation test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank test, and multiple linear regression analysis when appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 767 patients received octreotide. A cancer diagnosis was documented in 134 patients and 37 of these (24 females and 13 males; mean age, 56.7 years) had a confirmed inoperable MBO. Statistical significance was not achieved for variables analyzed. However, octreotide prescribing trends were observed for several variables: the mean LOS was equivalent on both services (16.8 vs. 17 days), mean octreotide dose was higher on the medical service (201.2 μg vs. 119 μg surgical), cumulative octreotide dose was higher on the medical service (3,558 vs. 1,884 mcg), mean day of octreotide initiation was roughly equivalent (7.9 days medical vs. 8.8 days surgical), subjects on the medical service had a decreased overall survival, and earlier octreotide initiation (defined as <7 days) was associated with a decreased overall survival.

LIMITATION

The data were collected retrospectively, with a limited population distribution at a specific time.

CONCLUSIONS

These data possibly suggest that the MBO patients on the medical vs. surgical services are distinct patient populations. MBO patients on the medical service trended to receive higher cumulative doses and have a decreased overall survival compared with surgical patients. Consequently, future studies should possibly consider these distinct study groups.

Octreotide for malignant bowel obstruction: twenty years after

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a challenging complication of advanced cancer. Conservative treatment of inoperable MBO in terminal cancer patients has been found to be effective in controlling the distressing symptoms caused by this complication in inoperable cancer patients. Twenty years ago, octreotide was proposed to treat symptoms related to malignant bowel obstruction. Since then several reports have confirmed the efficacy of octreotide in the management of gastrointestinal symptoms of MBO. Fifteen randomized controlled trials or observational reports with a significant number of patients treated with octreotide have been reviewed; 281 patients were surveyed. Authors reported a therapeutic success ranging between 60% and 90%. Despite the limited number of controlled studies, the large experience acquired through 20 years suggests that octreotide is the first-choice antisecretory agent for MBO. As such, octreotide is the only drug approved by the health-care system in Italy for this treatment.

Efficacy of triple therapy with Sandostatin, Dahuang Fuzi Decoction and XiNeng in the treatment of postoperative acute adhesive intestinal obstruction: an analysis of 45 cases

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy with octreotide acetate (Sandostatin), Dahuang Fuzi Decoction and N(2)-L-alanyl-L-glutamine (XiNeng) in the treatment of postoperative acute adhesive intestinal obstruction.

METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Eighty-five patients with postoperative acute adhesive intestinal obstruction who were treated at the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from May 2009 to January 2011 were randomly divided into control group (n = 40) and treatment group (n = 45). The control group received conventional treatment, including fasting, gastrointestinal decompression, soapy water enema, rehydration and anti-infection, while the treatment group received triple therapy on the basis of conventional therapy. Both the two groups were treated until the obstruction relieved. Clinical manifestations, the clinical curative effect, the number of cases of conversion to surgery, and the length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the treatment group had a shorter time to first anal exhaust (70.7 ± 10.4 h vs 45.3 ± 9.8 h, P < 0.05), time to first defecation (112.4 ± 16.8 h vs 70.5 ± 12.7 h, P < 0.05), stomach tube retention time (135.8 ± 26.7 h vs 91.5 ± 14.1 h, P < 0.05), eating recovery time (158.8 ± 26.4 h vs 109.4 ± 15.7 h, P <0.05), and length of hospital stay (13.9 ± 3.4 d vs 8.2 ± 2.6 d, P < 0.05). In the control group, 19 cases were cured, 13 cases were improved, and 8 cases showed no improvement. In the treatment group, the corresponding figures were 31, 11 and 3, respectively. The total response rate was 93.3% for the treatment group and 80.0% for the control group. The number of cases of conversion to surgery was significantly fewer in the treatment group than in the control group (3 vs 8, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Triple therapy with Sandostatin, Dahuang Fuzi Decoction and XiNeng could significantly improve clinical symptoms, promote the recovery of bowel function, reduce the rate of conversion to surgery, and shorten hospital stay in patients with postoperative acute adhesive intestinal obstruction.

Pharmacological treatment of bowel obstruction in cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common complication of advanced cancer, occurring most frequently in gynaecological and colorectal cancer. Its management remains complex and variable. This is in part due to the lack of evidence-based guidelines for the clinicians involved. Although surgery should be considered the primary treatment, this may not be feasible in patients with a poor performance status or advanced disease. Advances have been made in the medical management of MBO which can lead to a considerable improvement in symptom management and overall quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

This review emphasizes the importance of a prompt diagnosis of MBO with early introduction of pharmacological agents to optimize symptom control. The authors summarize the treatment options available for bowel obstruction in those patients for whom surgical intervention is not a feasible option. The authors also explore the complexities involved in the introduction of parenteral hydration and total parenteral nutrition in this group of patients.

EXPERT OPINION

It is not always easy to distinguish reversible from irreversible bowel obstruction. Early and aggressive management with the introduction of pharmacological agents including corticosteroids, octreotide and anti-cholinergic agents have the potential to maintain bowel patency, and allow for more rapid recovery of bowel transit. A combination of analgesics, anti-emetics and anti-cholinergics with or without anti-secretory agents can successfully improve symptom control in patients with irreversible bowel obstruction.