Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Respiratory Failure due to Hemorrhagic Alveolitis in a Patient with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

Introduction. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is nowadays widely used with notable results on the overall survival as reported in the ELSO registry near to 55% at 90 days. This is the reason why ECMO teams force the use of this extreme technique to several populations, even though there is still a lack of data about its use on hematological patients. Case Report. A 39-year-old woman without a history of previous diseases, but a new diagnosis of acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) was admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) for worsening hypoxia and respiratory acidosis, presenting an ARDS with PaO2/FiO2 < 100 in spontaneous breathing treated with noninvasive ventilation via full-face mask. Meanwhile, chemotherapy was started leading to a severe bone marrow aplasia that was managed with multiple blood and platelet transfusions. These conditions did not allow physicians to start any invasive approaches. After 14 days, ARDS worsened whereas bone marrow recovered, making possible the beginning of an invasive mechanical ventilation, with low positive end-expiratory pressure and a low tidal volume. Moreover, an immediate extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) therapy was added. Despite these efforts, no improvement was achieved, and that is why venovenous ECMO throughout femoral-jugular cannulation was applied. A full protective lung ventilation by ultralow tidal volumes was guaranteed. After 2 weeks of ECMO, a gradual weaning from ECMO support was started and completed after two days. No ECMO-related complications were registered. In the end, the patient started her weaning from the mechanical ventilation and reached 12 hours of spontaneous ventilation in oxygen therapy. Discussion. ECMO is used as a rescue therapy in patients affected by severe respiratory failure with life-threatening hypoxia and respiratory acidosis nonresponsive to other maneuvers. However, immunosuppression and coagulopathies of hematological malignancies are considered relative contraindications for ECMO, while long-lasting respiratory failure represents another relative contraindication to extracorporeal support. ECMO could be a valid option to improve the survival of hematological patients with severe ARDS and thrombocytopenia, and management could change case by case, even if high incidence of recurrency.

Noninvasive versus invasive mechanical ventilation for immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To determine the effects of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) compared with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) as the initial mechanical ventilation on clinical outcomes when used for treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) in immunocompromised patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and other databases. Subgroup analyses by disease severity and causes of immunodeficiency were also conducted.

Results

Thirteen observational studies with a total of 2552 patients were included. Compared to IMV, NIV was shown to significantly reduce in-hospital mortality (OR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.23 to 0.80, P value = 0.007) and 30-day mortality (OR 0.34, 95 % CI 0.20 to 0.61, P value < 0.0001) in overall analysis. Subgroup analysis showed NIV had great advantage over IMV for less severe, AIDS, BMT and hematological malignancies patients in reducing mortality and duration of ICU stay.

Conclusions

The overall evidence we obtained shows NIV does more benefits or at least no harm to ARF patients with certain causes of immunodeficiency or who are less severe.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0289-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Non-invasive mechanical ventilation in postoperative patients. A clinical review]

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a method of ventilatory support that is increasing in importance day by day in the management of postoperative respiratory failure. Its role in the prevention and treatment of atelectasis is particularly important in the in the period after thoracic and abdominal surgeries. Similarly, in the transplanted patient, NIV can shorten the time of invasive mechanical ventilation, reducing the risk of infectious complications in these high-risk patients. It has been performed A systematic review of the literature has been performed, including examining the technical, clinical experiences and recommendations concerning the application of NIV in the postoperative period.