Hematopoietic stem cell transplant candidate and designated proxy distress levels prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Screening for distress and quality of life in pediatric patients after allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using a self-reporting instrument, blood stress biomarkers and an expert rating scale (PO-Bado)

OBJECTIVE

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is highly distressing and potentially traumatizing for pediatric and young adult patients (PYAP). At present, there is little evidence on their individual burdens.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, the course of the psychological and somatic distress was investigated on eight observation days (day -8/-12, -5, 0 (day of HSCT), +10, +20, and + 30 before/after HSCT), using the PO-Bado external rating scale and the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL self-assessment questionnaire. Stress-associated blood parameters were determined and correlated with the results of the questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 64 PYAP with a median age of 9.1 years (range 0-26 years) who underwent autologous (n = 20; 31%; autoHSCT) or allogeneic (n = 44; 69%; alloHSCT) HSCT were analyzed. Both were associated with a significant reduction in QOL. The reduction in self-assessed QOL correlated with somatic and psychological distress as assessed by medical staff. While somatic distress was similar in both groups with a maximum around day+10 (alloHSCT 8.9 ± 2.4 vs. autoHSCT 9.1 ± 2.6; p = 0.69), a significantly higher level of psychological distress was seen during alloHSCT (e.g. day0 alloHSCT 5.3 ± 2.6 vs. day0 autoHSCT 3.2 ± 1.0; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum of psychological and somatic distress, as well as the lowest quality of life, ranges between day 0 and + 10 after both allogeneic and autologous pediatric HSCT. While somatic distress is similar during autologous and allogeneic HSCT, the allogeneic group seems to be affected by higher psychological distress. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate this observation.

Digital Life Coaching During Stem Cell Transplantation: Development and Usability Study

BACKGROUND

For patients with multiple myeloma receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), acute life disruptions and symptom burden may lead to worsened quality of life (QOL) and increased emotional distress. Digital life coaching (DLC), whereby trained coaches deliver personalized well-being-related support via phone calls and SMS text messaging, has been shown to improve QOL among SCT survivors. However, DLC has not been investigated during the acute peri-SCT period, which is generally characterized by symptomatic exacerbations and 2-week hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVE

We launched a single-arm pilot study to investigate the feasibility of patient engagement with DLC during this intensive period.

METHODS

We approached English-speaking adult patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous SCT at our center. Enrolled patients received 16 weeks of virtual access to a life coach beginning on day -5 before SCT. Coaches used structured frameworks to help patients identify and overcome personal barriers to well-being. Patients chose the coaching topics and preferred communication styles. Our primary endpoint was ongoing DLC engagement, defined as bidirectional conversations occurring at least once every 4 weeks during the study period. Secondary endpoints were electronic patient-reported outcome assessments of QOL, distress, and sleep disturbances.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients who were screened, 17 (85%) chose to enroll and 15 (75%) underwent SCT as planned. Of these 15 patients (median age 65 years, range 50-81 years), 11 (73%) demonstrated ongoing DLC engagement. The median frequency of bidirectional conversations during the 3-month study period was once every 6.2 days (range 3.9-28 days). During index hospitalizations with median lengths of stay of 16 days (range 14-31 days), the median frequency of conversations was once every 5.3 days (range 2.7-15 days). Electronic patient-reported outcome assessments (94% adherence) demonstrated an expected QOL nadir during the second week after SCT. The prevalence of elevated distress was highest immediately before and after SCT, with 69% of patients exhibiting elevated distress on day -5 and on day +2.

CONCLUSIONS

DLC may be feasible for older patients during intensive hospital-based cancer treatments such as autologous SCT for multiple myeloma. The limitations of our study include small sample size, selection bias among enrolled patients, and heterogeneity in DLC use. Based on the positive results of this pilot study, a larger phase 2 randomized study of DLC during SCT is underway to investigate the efficacy of DLC with regard to patient well-being.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04432818; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04432818.

Advance care planning among hematopoietic cell transplant patients and bereaved caregivers

Younger, healthier patients contemplating high-risk (but potentially curative) hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT) may not consider advance care planning (ACP). We investigated the effect of pre-transplant ACP in surviving HCT patients and bereaved caregivers using retrospective, audiotaped telephone surveys. Subjects were identified between 2001–2003 via databases at two high-volume HCT centers. Transcripts were coded by 2 investigators, with differences resolved by consensus. HCT survivors (n=18) were interviewed a median of 13 months after HCT for acute leukemia (7), lymphoma (5), or other (6); 50% had living wills, 72% had a formal proxy. Twelve (67%) had discussed mortality risk pre-HCT with the medical team. Of those, 92% felt their hope and perception of the medical team's truthfulness was increased or unchanged (I/U) by the conversation, while all felt clinician commitment to transplant was I/U. Bereaved caregivers (n=11) were interviewed a median of 10 months post-death (median 31 days post-HCT, range 13–152). Nine (82%) had discussed mortality risk pre-HCT with the medical team; 7 (78%) felt hope was I/U, all felt clinician commitment to transplant and truthfulness was I/U, and most felt ACP reduced burden (67%). ACP discussions with patients and caregivers pre-HCT did not affect hope and supported confidence in medical teams.