Pain Outcomes in Patients Undergoing CT-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis for Intractable Abdominal Visceral Pain

Computed tomography-guided single celiac plexus neurolysis analgesic efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided single celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) with the injection of a neurolytic agent into the celiac plexus in one session (CT-guided single CPN).

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web were searched for English or Japanese articles published up to February 2022, which reported findings about patients who underwent CT-guided single CPN. The outcome measures assessed in the systematic review and meta-analysis were the pain measurement scales from 0 to 10 before and after the intervention and the rate of minor and major complications.

RESULTS

The pooled pain measurement scales at pre-intervention and 1- or 2-, 7-, 30-, 60-, 90-, and 180-day post-intervention was 6.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.77-9.46, I² = 98%), 2.31 (95% CI 2.31-4.44, I² = 92%), 2.84 (95% CI 1.39-5.79, I² = 95%), 3.36 (95% CI 1.66-6.77, I² = 98%), 3.19 (95% CI 1.44-7.08, I² = 59%), 3.87 (95% CI 1.88-7.97, I² = 0%), and 3.40 (95% CI 3.02-3.83, I² = not applicable), respectively. The pooled minor complication rates of diarrhea, hypotension, nausea or vomiting, and pain associated with the procedure were 18% (95% CI 8-37%, I² = 45%), 16% (95% CI 2-58%, I² = 76%), 6% (95% CI 2-16%, I² = 1%), and 7% (95% CI 2-21%, I² = 17%), respectively. There was no major complication in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided single CPN can be performed safely and provides immediate analgesic efficacy although the amount of heterogeneity is characterized as large. Further investigation of its long-term analgesic efficacy is required.

Splanchnic nerve neurolysis via the transdiscal approach under fluoroscopic guidance: a retrospective study

Background

Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is a typical treatment for severe epigastric cancer pain, but the therapeutic effect is often affected by the variation of local anatomical structures induced by the tumor. Greater and lesser splanchnic nerve neurolysis (SNN) had similar effects to the NCPB, and was recently performed with a paravertebral approach under the image guidance, or with the transdiscal approach under the guidance of computed tomography. This study observed the feasibility and safety of SNN via a transdiscal approach under fluoroscopic guidance.

Methods

The follow-up records of 34 patients with epigastric cancer pain who underwent the splanchnic nerve block via the T11-12 transdiscal approach under fluoroscopic guidance were investigated retrospectively. The numerical rating scale (NRS), the patient satisfaction scale (PSS) and quality of life (QOL) of the patient, the dose of morphine consumed, and the occurrence and severity of adverse events were recorded preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months after surgery.

Results

Compared with the preoperative scores, the NRS scores and daily morphine consumption decreased and the QOL and PSS scores increased at each postoperative time point (P < 0.001). No patients experienced serious complications.

Conclusions

SNN via the transdiscal approach under flouroscopic guidance was an effective, safe, and easy operation for epigastric cancer pain, with fewer complications.

Direct intraoperative versus percutaneous computed tomographyguided celiac plexus neurolysis in non-resectable pancreatic cancer: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study

BACKGROUND

Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has been used to control pancreatic cancer (PC) pain, up to our knowledge, there is no study compared intraoperative CPN and computed tomography (CT)-guided techniques.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of intraoperative and CT-guided CPN in unresectable PC on pain intensity and analgesic requirements.

METHODS

A total of 90 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, open label, controlled, non-inferiority study, 20 patients were excluded or lost to follow up. The patients were randomly allocated to either intraoperative or CT-guided CPN group. A mixture of 20 mL ethanol 90%, 100 mg lignocaine and 5 mg dexamethasone was infused on each side of the aorta in both groups. Visual analogue score (VAS) and oral daily tramadol consumption were recorded at day 7, 14, 30, 60, 120 and 180 days after intervention. Occurrence of any intervention related complications were reported.

RESULTS

Median VAS was similar in both intraoperative and CT-guided CPN groups from day 7 up to 180 days after intervention. The median daily analgesic consumption of oral tramadol (mg) was comparable in both intraoperative and CT-guided CPN groups after intervention at day 7 (50 versus 50), day14 (50 versus 50), day 30 (50 versus 50), day 60 (50 versus 50), day 120 (100 versus 75) and day 180 (100 versus 100). The incidence of diarrhea, vomiting, hypotension and back pain was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative CPN is non-inferior to CT-guided CPN as both techniques were similarly associated with reduced pain severity and analgesics requirements.

CT-Guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis in Patients with Intra-Abdominal Malignancy: A Retrospective Evaluation of 52 Palliative In-Patients

INTRODUCTION

Prevalence rates of chronic abdominal pain (CAP) and breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) are high in patients with intra-abdominal malignancies. As part of a multimodal approach, CT-guided coeliac plexus blockade (CPB) and CT-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) are commonly used pain management strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate pain outcomes among patients with intra-abdominal malignancies who underwent CPB and/or CPN.

METHODS

Patients with intra-abdominal malignancies who underwent CPB and/or CPN for pain control at the general hospital Klagenfurt am Wörthersee from 2010 to 2019 were enrolled.

RESULTS

A total of 84 procedures (24 CPB and 60 CPN) were performed on 52 patients; 62% of these patients had pancreatic cancer. CPN led to significant pain reduction and decreased BTcP intensity. Patients receiving repeated CPN showed higher individual pain reduction. Higher pre-procedural pain intensity was correlated with higher pain reduction. No difference in pain reduction in patients receiving a diagnostic CPB prior to CPN compared to patients without a diagnostic CPB was found. Higher pain reduction after CPN led to longer-lasting pain relief. The time frame from diagnosis to CPN was 472 (± 416) days. Patients experienced a mean duration of pain prior to CPN of 330 (± 53) days. The time frame from diagnosis to CPN was shorter in patients with pancreatic cancer compared to other intra-abdominal malignancies. In 58% of patients pain medication was stable or was reduced after CPN; 16% of patients complained about pain during the procedure; no major complications occurred. There was no correlation between median survival after CPN and pain outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with intra-abdominal malignancy-related CAP, CPN is a safe and effective procedure which can provide long-lasting significant relief of background pain and BTcP. As part of a multimodal approach, CPN should be considered as an earlier option for pain management in these patients.

Factors associated with successful response to neurolytic celiac plexus block in patients with upper abdominal cancer-related pain: a retrospective study

Background

Prior studies have reported that 40%-90% of the patients with celiac plexus-mediated visceral pain benefit from the neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB), but the predictive factors of response to NCPB have not been evaluated extensively. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with the immediate analgesic effectiveness of NCPB in patients with intractable upper abdominal cancer-related pain.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 513 patients who underwent NCPB for upper abdominal cancer-related pain. Response to the procedure was defined as (1) a decrease of ≥ 50% or ≥ 4 points on the numerical rating scale (NRS) in pain intensity from the baseline without an increase in opioid requirement, or (2) a decrease of ≥ 30% or ≥ 2 points on the NRS from the baseline with simultaneously reduced opioid consumption after NCPB. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with successful responses to NCPB.

Results

Among the 513 patients included in the analysis, 255 (49.8%) and 258 (50.2%) patients were in the non-responder and responder group after NCPB, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.644, P = 0.035), history of upper abdominal surgery (OR = 0.691, P = 0.040), and celiac metastasis (OR = 1.496, P = 0.039) were the independent factors associated with response to NCPB.

Conclusions

Celiac plexus metastases, absence of diabetes, and absence of prior upper abdominal surgery may be independently associated with better response to NCPB for upper abdominal cancer-related pain.

Direct intraoperative versus percutaneous computed tomographyguided celiac plexus neurolysis in non-resectable pancreatic cancer: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study

BACKGROUND

Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has been used to control pancreatic cancer (PC) pain, up to our knowledge, there is no study compared intraoperative CPN and computed tomography (CT)-guided techniques.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of intraoperative and CT-guided CPN in unresectable PC on pain intensity and analgesic requirements.

METHODS

A total of 90 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, open label, controlled, non-inferiority study, 20 patients were excluded or lost to follow up. The patients were randomly allocated to either intraoperative or CT-guided CPN group. A mixture of 20ml ethanol 90%, 100mg lignocaine and 5mg dexamethasone was infused on each side of the aorta in both groups. Visual analogue score (VAS) and oral daily tramadol consumption were recorded at day 7, 14, 30, 60, 120 and 180 days after intervention. Occurrence of any intervention related complications were reported.

RESULTS

Median VAS was similar in both intraoperative and CT-guided CPN groups from day 7 up to 180 days after intervention. The median daily analgesic consumption of oral tramadol (mg) was comparable in both intraoperative and CT-guided CPN groups after intervention at day 7 (50 versus 50), day14 (50 versus 50), day 30 (50 versus 50), day 60 (50 versus 50), day 120 (100 versus 75) and day 180 (100 versus 100). The incidence of diarrhea, vomiting, hypotension and back pain was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative CPN is non-inferior to CT-guided CPN as both techniques were similarly associated with reduced pain severity and analgesics requirements.

[Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial]

BACKGROUND

Computerized tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis has become almost a safe technique to alleviate abdominal malignancy pain. We compared the single needle technique with changing patients' position and the double needle technique using posterior anterocrural approach.

METHODS

In Double Needles Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used two needles posterior anterocrural technique injecting 12.5 mL phenol 10% on each side in prone position. In Single Needle Celiac Neurolysis Group (n = 17), we used single needle posterior anterocrural approach. 25 mL of phenol 10% was injected from left side while patients were in left lateral position then turned to right side. The monitoring parameters were failure block rate and duration of patient positioning, technique time, Visual Analog Scale, complications (hypotension, diarrhea, vomiting, hemorrhage, neurological damage and infection) and rescue analgesia.

RESULTS

The failure block rate and duration of patient positioning significantly increased in double needles celiac neurolysis vs. single needle celiac neurolysis (30.8% vs. 0.13.8±1.2 vs. 8.9 ± 1; p = 0.046, p ≤ 0.001 respectively). Also, the technique time increased significantly in double needles celiac neurolysis than single needle celiac neurolysis (24.5 ± 5.1 vs. 15.4 ± 1.8; p ≤ 0.001). No significant differences existed as regards visual analogue scale: double needles celiac neurolysis = 2 (0-5), 2 (0-4), 3 (0-6), 3 (2-6) and single needle celiac neurolysis = 3 (0-5), 2 (0-5), 2 (0-4), 4 (2-6) after 1 day, 1 week, 1 and 3 months respectively. However, visual analogue scale in each group reduced significantly compared with basal values (p ≤ 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences as regards rescue analgesia and complications (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Single needle celiac neurolysis with changing patients' position has less failure block rate, less procedure time, shorter duration of patient positioning than double needles celiac neurolysis in abdominal malignancy.

Single needle versus double needle celiac trunk neurolysis in abdominal malignancy pain management: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Pain Outcomes After Celiac Plexus Block in Children and Young Adults with Cancer

Purpose: The use of celiac plexus block (CPB) for abdominal pain has been extensively reported in adults. However, pediatric literature is limited to three single case reports and a series of three cases. This study evaluated the effectiveness of CPB in children and young adults (aged 8-20 years) with abdominal malignancies. Methods: Pain outcomes after CPB were evaluated in four children and young adults with cancer. Mean daily pain score (PS, 0-10) and morphine consumption (intravenous morphine equivalent daily [MED], mg/kg/day) before and after CPB were used to assess effectiveness. Results: Mean daily PS reduced after CPB in all patients. In one patient, this reduction was sustained up to 6 months of follow-up, and analgesics were discontinued 1 week after CPB. The other three patients had limited survival (6, 16, and 37 days) after CPB. One patient had a PS of 0 over the last few days of life, but the MED was escalated from 0.74 before the block to 5.4 mg/kg/day at the end of life. In the other two patients, MED was lower during the first week after CPB than that before CPB (4.55 vs. 1.59 and 2.88 vs. 1.51 mg/kg/day, respectively). As these two patients had disease progression during their last days of life, the MED was increased to 4.75 and 263.9 mg/kg/day, respectively. Conclusions: Our results suggest that CPB may contribute to reducing PS and MED. We observed the use of CPB rather late in the disease trajectory.

Image Guidance Technologies for Interventional Pain Procedures: Ultrasound, Fluoroscopy, and CT

Chronic pain is a common medical condition. Patients who suffer uncontrolled chronic pain may require interventions including spinal injections and various nerve blocks. Interventional procedures have evolved and improved over time since epidural injection was first introduced for low back pain and sciatica in 1901. One of the major contributors in the improvement of these interventions is the advancement of imaging guidance technologies. The utilization of image guidance has dramatically improved the accuracy and safety of these interventions. The first image guidance technology adopted by pain specialists was fluoroscopy. This was followed by CT and ultrasound. Fluoroscopy can be used to visualize bony structures of the spine. It is still the most commonly used guidance technology in spinal injections. In the recent years, ultrasound guidance has been increasingly adopted by interventionists to perform various injections. Because its ability to visualize soft tissue, vessels, and nerves, this guidance technology appears to be a better option than fluoroscopy for interventions including SGB and celiac plexus blocks, when visualization of the vessels may prevent intravascular injection. The current evidence indicates the efficacies of these interventions are similar between ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopy guidance for SGB and celiac plexus blocks. For facet injections and interlaminar epidural steroid injections, it is important to visualize bony structures in order to perform these procedures accurately and safely. It is worth noting that facet joint injections can be done under ultrasound guidance with equivalent efficacy to fluoroscopic guidance. However, obese patients may present challenge for ultrasound guidance due to its poor visualization of deep anatomical structures. Regarding transforaminal epidural steroid injections, there are limited evidence to support that ultrasound guidance technology has equivalent efficacy and less complications comparing to fluoroscopy. However, further studies are required to prove the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transforaminal epidural injections. SI joint is unique due to its multiplanar orientation, irregular joint gap, partial ankylosis, and thick dorsal and interosseous ligament. Therefore, it can be difficult to access the joint space with fluoroscopic guidance and ultrasound guidance. CT scan, with its cross-sectional images, can identify posterior joint gap, is most likely the best guidance technology for this intervention. Intercostal nerves lie in the subcostal grove close to the plural space. Significant risk of pneumothorax is associated with intercostal blocks. Ultrasound can provide visualization of ribs and pleura. Therefore, it may improve the accuracy of the injection and reduce the risk of pneumothorax. At present time, most pain specialists are familiar with fluoroscopic guidance techniques, and fluoroscopic machines are readily available in the pain clinics. In the contrast, CT guidance can only be performed in specially equipped facilities. Ultrasound machine is generally portable and inexpensive in comparison to CT scanner and fluoroscopic machine. As pain specialists continue to improve their patient care, ultrasound and CT guidance will undoubtedly be incorporated more into the pain management practice. This review is based on a paucity of clinical evidence to compare these guidance technologies; clearly, more clinical studies is needed to further elucidate the pro and cons of each guidance method for various pain management interventions.