1
|
Vlckova K, Gonella S, Bavelaar L, Mitchell G, Sussman T. Methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life: A systematic review of qualitative and textual evidence. Int J Nurs Pract 2023:e13224. [PMID: 38113927 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
AIM This systematic review aims to identify methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life from the perspective of researchers and provide a set of recommendations. BACKGROUND Conducting research with patients and family carers facing end-of-life issues is ethically and methodologically complex. DESIGN A systematic review was conducted. DATA SOURCES Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo) were searched from inception until the end of 2021 in February 2022. REVIEW METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews was followed, and the JBI Approach to qualitative synthesis was used for analysis. RESULTS Seventeen of 1983 studies met inclusion criteria. Data were distilled to six main themes. These included (1) the need for flexibility at all stages of the research process; (2) careful attention to timing; (3) sensitivity in approach; (4) the importance of stakeholder collaboration; (5) the need for unique researcher skills; and (6) the need to deal with the issue of missing data. CONCLUSION The findings illuminate several considerations that can inform training programmes, ethical review processes and research designs when embarking on research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Vlckova
- Center for Palliative Care, Prague, The Czech Republic
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Prague, The Czech Republic
| | - Silvia Gonella
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Laura Bavelaar
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gary Mitchell
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Tamara Sussman
- School of Social Work, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slev VN, Molenkamp CM, Eeltink CM, Roeline W Pasman H, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Francke AL, van Uden-Kraan CF. A nurse-led self-management support intervention for patients and informal caregivers facing incurable cancer: A feasibility study from the perspective of nurses. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2020; 45:101716. [PMID: 32023503 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Investigation of the feasibility of recruitment through nurses of patients with incurable cancer, and the feasibility (adoption, usage) and nurses' evaluation of a nurse-led self-management support intervention, integrated in continuity home visits and based on the 5 A's Behavior Change Model. METHOD Questionnaire, registrations, evaluation forms, and interviews. RESULTS Recruitment was complicated; many patients were ineligible for participation, nurses appeared protective of their patients (gatekeeping), and recruitment during the first continuity home visit appeared to be a barrier as a lot of other issues had to be discussed. The adoption rate was 81%, meaning that 18 out of 22 nurses recruited were willing to use the intervention. The usage rate at the nurse level was 56%, meaning that 10 nurses applied the intervention in full (having applied all five A's) in at least one patient. Nurses used the intervention in full in 21 out of the 36 patients included, implying a usage rate at the patient level of 58%. Nurses' mean general satisfaction score for the intervention was 7.57 (range 0-10). Nurse were especially positive about the 5 A's model, and considered the continuity home visits to be an appropriate setting for the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Timing of recruitment and gatekeeping complicated recruitment of patients through nurses. Although nurses were positive about the intervention, nurses often did not fully apply the intervention. To improve its usage, it is suggested that nurses should first be trained in using the 5 A's model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vina N Slev
- Amsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical Center/ Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Public and Occupational Health, de Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Cornelia M Molenkamp
- Evean, Department of Specialised Home Care Nursing, Waterlandplein 5, Purmerend, the Netherlands
| | - Corien M Eeltink
- Amsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical Center Department of Hematology, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - H Roeline W Pasman
- Amsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical Center/ Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Public and Occupational Health, de Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Amsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical Center Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Public Health, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke L Francke
- Amsterdam UMC, location VU University Medical Center/ Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Public and Occupational Health, de Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands; NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118 - 124, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan
- Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Public Health, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|