Rural Palliative Care Telemedicine for Advanced Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

Innovative and best models of palliative and end-of-life care - with focus on rural and remote communities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review aims to synthesize the most recent innovative models of palliative care being delivered in rural and remote locations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Worldwide, as the ageing population grows, more people will require palliative care. However, equal availability of high-quality palliative care services remains a significant challenge, particularly in rural and remote communities. Innovative models of palliative care have been developed to address the projected need of people in rural and remote areas. Models that leverage the use of digital healthcare (such as telecare and Artificial Intelligence), the non-specialized palliative care workforce (such as GPs, pharmacists, and family carers), and community driven approaches have demonstrated success in achieving positive palliative care outcomes, such as reduced physical and emotional distress, and family carers feeling more supported.

SUMMARY

There is a need to support people to remain within their rural and remote communities towards the end-of-life (EOL). While some models of care have been identified to help with this, there continues to be significant difficulties in access to health and social care in rural and remote areas. It is important we build on this research to understand more broadly the models of support for those living in remote and rural communities at the EOL.

Transitional Palliative Care for Family Caregivers: Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT

Patients receiving inpatient palliative care often face physical and psychological uncertainties during transitions out of the hospital. Family caregivers often take on responsibilities to ensure patient safety, quality of care, and extend palliative care principles, but often without support or training, potentially compromising their health and well-being.

OBJECTIVES

This study tested an eight-week intervention using video visits between palliative care nurse interventionists and caregivers to assess changes in caregiver outcomes and patient quality of life.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial, conducted from 2018 to 2022, enrolled adult caregivers in rural or medically underserved areas in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa. Eligible caregivers included those caring for patients who received inpatient palliative care and transitioned out of the hospital. The intervention group received teaching, guidance, and counseling from a palliative care nurse before and for eight weeks after hospital discharge. The control group received monthly phone calls but no intervention. Caregiver outcomes included changes in depression, burden, and quality of life, and patient quality of life, as reported by the caregiver.

RESULTS

Of those consented, 183 completed the intervention, and 184 completed the control arm; 158 participants had complete baseline and eight-week data. In unadjusted analyses, the intervention group and their care recipients showed statistically significant improvements in quality of life compared to the control group. Improvements persisted in adjusted analyses, and depression significantly improved. No differences in caregiver burden were observed.

CONCLUSION

Addressing rural caregivers' needs during transitions in care can enhance caregiver outcomes and improve patient quality of life.

Palliative care national plan implementation through stakeholder analysis

BACKGROUND

National palliative care plans depend upon stakeholder engagement to succeed. Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step in the implementation of public health initiatives, as recommended by the World Health Organisation. However, utilising stakeholder analysis is a strategy underused in public palliative care.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a stakeholder analysis characterising a diverse group of stakeholders involved in implementing a national palliative care plan in three rural regions of an upper-middle-income country.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study design, complemented by a quantitative stakeholder analysis approach, was executed through a survey designed to gauge stakeholders' levels of interest and capability in relation to five fundamental dimensions of public palliative care: provision of services, accessibility of essential medicines, palliative care education, financial support, and palliative care vitality. Stakeholders were categorised as promoters (high-power, high-interest), latent (high-power, low-interest), advocates (low-power, high-interest), and indifferent (low-power and low-interest). Stakeholder self-perceived category and knowledge level were also assessed.

RESULTS

Among the 65 surveyed stakeholders, 19 were categorised as promoters, 34 as advocates, 9 as latent, and 3 as indifferent. Stakeholders' self-perception of their category did not align with the results of the quantitative analysis. When evaluated by region and palliative care dimensions the distribution of stakeholders was nonuniform. Palliative care funding was the dimension with the highest number of stakeholders categorised as indifferent, and the lowest percentage of promoters. Stakeholders categorised as promoters consistently reported a low level of knowledge, regardless of the dimension, region, or their level of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step when implementing public health initiatives in palliative care. It allows for a data-driven decision-making process on how to delegate responsibilities, administer financial resources, and establish governance boards that remain engaged and work efficiently.

Telemedical Consultations in Palliative Care: Benefits through Knowledge Exchange and Intercollegiate Collaboration-Findings from the German oVID Project

(1) Background: As the number of people receiving specialized palliative care (PC) continues to rise, there is a need to ensure the transfer of this expertise from university-based PC departments to primary care hospitals without such in-house access. The present study examines the potential of telemedicine to bridge these gaps. (2) Methods: This is a prospective multi-center feasibility trial. All physicians were appropriately pre-equipped and instructed to conduct telemedical consultations (TCs), which took place within fixed meetings or on-call appointments either related or unrelated to individual patients (allowing TCs also for educational and knowledge exchange purposes). (3) Results: An inquiry for participation was submitted to 11 hospitals, with 5 external hospitals actively cooperating. In the first study section, a total of 57 patient cases were included within 95 patient-related TCs during 80 meetings. Other university disciplines were involved in 21 meetings (26.2%). Therapy adjustments resulted following 25 of 71 affected TCs (35.2%). In 20 cases (21.1%), an on-site consultation at the university hospital was avoided, and in 12 cases (12.6%), a transfer was avoided. Overall, TCs were considered helpful in resolving issues for 97.9% of the cases (n = 93). Yet, technical problems arose in about one-third of all meetings for at least one physician (36.2%; n = 29). Besides, in the second study section, we also conducted 43 meetings between physicians for education and knowledge exchange only. (4) Conclusions: Telemedicine has the potential to transfer university expertise to external hospitals through simple means. It improves collaboration among physicians, may prevent unnecessary transfers or outpatient presentations, and is thus likely to lower costs.